The flush_control parameter to iwlagn_txfifo_flush
is passed as an internal value (context flags) and
then sent to the device, that can't be right.

Fix the confusion by removing the parameter, always
use IWL_DROP_ALL that is redefined according to the
firmware API in the flush control.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The flush command really flushes queues, not
FIFOs, and the first 32 bits indicate the
queues to flush, not FIFOs. Change the command
accordingly.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Newer devices use 32 bit for boost register,
set the correct value for it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Now that the eeprom parsing code overrides the sku
field directly with 11n_disable parameters, there's
no longer a need to keep a copy of this field.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

CMD_SYNC is zero so the if (cmd->flags & CMD_SYNC) is never true and we
never check the assertion.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

The EEPROM reading/parsing code is all mixed in
the driver today, and the EEPROM is parsed only
when we access data from it. This is problematic
because the NVM needs to be parsed and that is
independent of reading it. Also, the NVM format
for new devices will be different and probably
require a new parser.

Therefore refactor the reading and parsing and
create two independent components. Reading the
EEPROM requires direct hardware accesses and
therefore access to the transport, but parsing
is independent and can be done on an NVM blob.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Since we're working on another mode/driver
inside iwlwifi, move the current one into a
subdirectory to more cleanly separate the
code. While at it, rename all the files.
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

It is possible that the BSS context is not active (for example
when the current mode is set to GO), or that the vif->type is
different than station. In such a case we cannot
call mac80211 to report the average rssi for the interface
(the function assumes that the vif is valid and that the type
is station).
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Once driver decide to change reduced tx power behavior,
make sure the reduce tx power valid bit is set

Change-Id: I3afae96319292d8cb347a812a948085c5db7ad91
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-mwg.jer.intel.com/gerrit/1948
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Change-Id: Ia6294d651dcffdcaf8b62e67bcef52bd8c158dea
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-mwg.jer.intel.com/gerrit/1947
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

In bt coex, consider the average rssi as part of decision making process

Change-Id: I8d11d7f177a6875e2a9d08f7539d42253226fd7a
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://git-mwg.jer.intel.com/gerrit/1945
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Add the Loose coex LUT and will use later for better bt coex tpt
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

In bt coex, consider reduce tx power as part of ack/cts kill mask
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Add the reduce tx power information in bt coex host command
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

When bluetooth coex is active and certain condition matched,
driver need to decide should the tx power been reduce or not.
Adding the logic to manage it.
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

For now at least, all module parameters should be
with the core functionality, so move them there,
while at it rename to iwlwifi_mod_params. Also
rename iwl-shared.h to iwl-modparams.h to reflect
the real contents.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Keeping statistics per frame type really isn't
very useful, and needs a huge amount of code
so remove it. Since that is the only thing in
iwl-core.{c,h} now, those files can be killed.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Instead of using the shared area that we be killed.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Instead of using the shared area that we be killed.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

The command strings are needed through the layers for
debug and error messages, but can differ with opmode.
As a result, we need to give the command names to the
transport layer as configuration.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

We've never released firmware using the alternatives
mechanism and our build process makes that difficult
anyway. This means that in every file we have ever
built (except maybe by hand for testing) the listed
alternative was 0. Make the alternative field in the
TLVs part of the TLV number (thus expanding that to
32 bits); this gives us more TLV numbers (not really
needed) and more importantly protects against rogue
firmware files that actually do use the alternatives
mechanism -- those will now be rejected since they
don't contain any valid TLVs.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

My original idea with this was to adjust the sleep
pattern of the uCode based on the maximum network
latency userspace asked for. Due to nobody wanting
to test it, this logic was disabled by default. It
seems the time has come to remove it, since it's
not only always disabled but there also don't seem
to be any applications that actually request a max
network latency.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

Instead of hardcode 6000 and 2000, use more generic name
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>

The whole code around eeprom is distributed
across whole bunch of different files, most
of which belong to the to-be-DVM code. As a
result, it is currently very hard to split
out the EEPROM code to be generic. However,
it is also quite unlikely that the current
EEPROM code will be needed by the MVM code
as that has different mechanisms to query
the EEPROM (it does so through the uCode.)

So, at least temporarily, move everything
into priv. If it becomes necessary to use
the code from MVM, we will have to split it
out, but then it's also easier since we'll
know what pieces we need.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The hw_params are mostly values that are
derived from the actual hardware config.
As such, while it is possible that MVM
will require similar ones, it makes more
sense -- at least for now -- to put them
into the DVM struct.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Move the POWER_PMI to the op_mode where it is changed.  The trans needs
to check it frequently, so shadow the status in the trans and update it
in trans when it infrequently changes.
Signed-off-by: NDon Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The op_mode should check for FW_ERROR before calling send_cmd.  This
removes the need to test for FW_ERROR in the trans layer.
Signed-off-by: NDon Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

No other component is accessing it any more,
so it can move to the correct place in priv.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

A whole bunch of messages, even some recent ones,
didn't include a trailing newline so add it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Printing the SRAM and similar testmode operations could
be triggered when no uCode is loaded; prevent those
invalid operations by tracking whether uCode is loaded.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Spinadel <david.spinadel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Continue splitting the status bits between transport and op_mode.
All but a few are separated.
Signed-off-by: NDon Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The shared status bits are a mixture of transport and op mode bits.
Some are used just by one or the other, some are shared.  Begin the
de-tangling of these bits.
Signed-off-by: NDon Fry <donald.h.fry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

There's not much point in passing priv and
hw pointers since they can be derived from
each other, and the function doesn't use
the hw pointer anyway. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The base packet structure will (hopefully) be
the same for all transports, but what is in it
differs. Remove the union of all the possible
contents and move the packet itself into the
transport header file. This requires changing
all users of the union to just use pkt->data.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The transport doesn't really need to know as
we can enforce it in the command wrapper.
Move the ucode_owner variable into priv and
do all enforcing there.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Now the mutex no longer needs to be
shared, so move it into iwl_priv.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The fact that the mutex must be held is an
implementation detail of DVM, but something
has to ensure that no two synchronous cmds
are submitted concurrently. Move the lockdep
assertion into the DVM-specific code, but
also make the transport abort if there are
two concurrently commands.

The assertion is much more useful though as
the transport check can only catch it when
it actually happens, while the assertion
makes sure it can't possibly happen.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Currently, we cannot send any commands when the
uCode is in RF or CT kill, but that will not be
true for all new uCode versions, so we need to
move the check into the uCode specific code.

Also remove the duplicate rfkill check.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>