- 16 4月, 2015 23 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
these should be used on objects already in top layer Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
library helpers called by filesystem drivers on their own inodes Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
... except where that code acts as a filesystem driver, rather than working with dentries given to it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
most of the ->d_inode uses there refer to the same inode IO would go to, i.e. d_backing_inode() Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
socket inodes and sunrpc filesystems - inodes owned by that code Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
places where we are dealing with S_ISSOCK file creation/lookups. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
relayfs and tracefs are dealing with inodes of their own; those two act as filesystem drivers Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix up some ->d_inode accesses in the chelsio driver. (1) FILE_DATA() should just be replaced with file_inode(). (2) set_debugfs_file_size() should be removed and debugfs_create_file_size() should be used to create the file. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Cachefiles should perform fs modifications (eg. vfs_unlink()) on the top layer only and should not attempt to alter the lower layer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
AF_UNIX sockets should call mknod on the top layer only and should not attempt to modify the lower layer in a layered filesystem such as overlayfs. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix inconsistent use of file_inode() vs file->f_path.dentry->d_inode. Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make pathwalk use d_is_reg() rather than S_ISREG() to determine whether to honour O_TRUNC. Since this occurs after complete_walk(), the dentry type field cannot change and the inode pointer cannot change as we hold a ref on the dentry, so this should be safe. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix up debugfs to use d_is_dir(dentry) in place of S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Where we have: if (!dentry->d_inode || d_is_negative(dentry)) { type constructions in pathwalk we should be able to eliminate the check of d_inode and rely solely on the result of d_is_negative() or d_is_positive(). What we do have to take care to do is to read d_inode after calling a d_is_xxx() typecheck function to get the barriering right. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Don't use d_inode as a variable name as it now masks a function name. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Impose ordering on accesses of d_inode and d_flags to avoid the need to do this: if (!dentry->d_inode || d_is_negative(dentry)) { when this: if (d_is_negative(dentry)) { should suffice. This check is especially problematic if a dentry can have its type field set to something other than DENTRY_MISS_TYPE when d_inode is NULL (as in unionmount). What we really need to do is stick a write barrier between setting d_inode and setting d_flags and a read barrier between reading d_flags and reading d_inode. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Supply two functions to test whether a filesystem's own dentries are positive or negative (d_really_is_positive() and d_really_is_negative()). The problem is that the DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE field of dentry->d_flags may be overridden by the union part of a layered filesystem and isn't thus necessarily indicative of the type of dentry. Normally, this would involve a negative dentry (ie. ->d_inode == NULL) having ->d_layer.lower pointed to a lower layer dentry, DCACHE_PINNING_LOWER set and the DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE field set to something other than DCACHE_MISS_TYPE - but it could also involve, say, a DCACHE_SPECIAL_TYPE being overridden to DCACHE_WHITEOUT_TYPE if a 0,0 chardev is detected in the top layer. However, inside a filesystem, when that fs is looking at its own dentries, it probably wants to know if they are really negative or not - and doesn't care about the fallthrough bits used by the union. To this end, a filesystem should normally use d_really_is_positive/negative() when looking at its own dentries rather than d_is_positive/negative() and should use d_inode() to get at the inode. Anyone looking at someone else's dentries (this includes pathwalk) should use d_is_xxx() and d_backing_inode(). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 4月, 2015 17 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
we can do that now - all we need is to clear IOCB_DIRECT from ->ki_flags in "can't do dio" case. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... avoiding write_iter/fcntl races. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... returning -E... upon error and amount of data left in iter after (possible) truncation upon success. Note, that normal case gives a non-zero (positive) return value, so any tests for != 0 _must_ be updated. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Conflicts: fs/ext4/file.c
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Alignment checks for dio depend upon the range truncation done by generic_write_checks(). They can be done as soon as we got ocfs2_rw_lock() and that actually makes ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write() simpler. The only thing to watch out for is restoring the original count in "unlock and redo without dio" case. Position doesn't need to be restored, since we change it only in O_APPEND case and in that case it will be reassigned anyway. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's &iocb->ki_pos; no need to obfuscate. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's easier to do generic_write_checks() first Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
already done by caller. We used to call __fuse_direct_write(), which called generic_write_checks(); now the former got expanded, bringing the latter to the surface. It used to be called all along and calling it from there had been wrong all along... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
simpler that way... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all remaining callers are passing 0; some just obscure that fact. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
A side effect worth noting: in O_APPEND case we set ->ki_pos early, so if it turns out to be an error or a zero-length write, we'll end up with ->ki_pos modified. Safe, since all callers never look at the ->ki_pos after the call of __generic_file_write_iter() returning non-positive, all the way to caller of ->write_iter() and those discard ->ki_pos when getting that. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
That allows ->write_iter() instances much more convenient life wrt iocb->ki_pos (and fixes several filesystems with borderline POSIX violations when zero-length write succeeds and changes the current position). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-