- 20 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This ugly hack was long overdue to die. It was a way to print out Sparc interrupts in a more freindly format, since IRQ numbers were arbitrary opaque 32-bit integers which vectored into PIL levels. These 32-bit integers were not necessarily in the 0-->NR_IRQS range, but the PILs they vectored to were. The idea now is that we will increase NR_IRQS a little bit and use a virtual<-->real IRQ number mapping scheme similar to PowerPC. That makes this IRQ printing hack irrelevant, and furthermore only a handful of drivers actually used __irq_itoa() making it even less useful. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
Someone wanted access to this usually unused (and unused by Linux) value for the day of week. Existing kernels have the field in the struct but return 0 always. This updates the kernel to fill in the field. The usual case of 'not set' conveniently is 0. Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Takashi Iwai 提交于
rtc_control() may be called in the interrupt context in ALSA rtc-timer driver. The patch fixes the wrong irq enable in rtc.c, and also fixes the possible race of bit flags. Signed-off-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
-
- 06 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Based upon a report from Jason Wever. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 8月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Petr Vandrovec 提交于
Since the beginning of July my Opteron box was randomly crashing and being rebooted by hardware watchdog. Today it finally did it in front of me, and this patch will hopefully fix it. The problem is that at the end of June (the 28th, to be exact: commit 47f176fd, "[PATCH] Using msleep() instead of HZ") rtc_get_rtc_time was converted to use msleep() instead of busy waiting. But rtc_get_rtc_time is used by hpet_rtc_interrupt, and scheduling is not allowed during interrupt. So I'm reverting this part of original change, replacing msleep() back with busy loop. The original code was busy waiting for up to 20ms, but on my hardware in the worst case update-in-progress bit was asserted for at most 363 passes through loop (on 2GHz dual Opteron), much less than even one jiffie, not even talking about 20ms. So I changed code to just wait only as long as necessary. Otherwise when RTC was set to generate 8192Hz timer, it stopped doing anything for 20ms (160 pulses were skipped!) from time to time, and this is rather suboptimal as far as I can tell. Signed-off-by: NPetr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 29 6月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Falavigna 提交于
Use msleep() in a few places. Signed-off-by: NLuca Falavigna <dktrkranz@gmail.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-