1. 25 10月, 2016 3 次提交
  2. 17 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: kill BUG_ON in do_relocation · 4547f4d8
      Liu Bo 提交于
      While updating btree, we try to push items between sibling
      nodes/leaves in order to keep height as low as possible.
      But we don't memset the original places with zero when
      pushing items so that we could end up leaving stale content
      in nodes/leaves.  One may read the above stale content by
      increasing btree blocks' @nritems.
      
      One case I've come across is that in fs tree, a leaf has two
      parent nodes, hence running balance ends up with processing
      this leaf with two parent nodes, but it can only reach the
      valid parent node through btrfs_search_slot, so it'd be like,
      
      do_relocation
          for P in all parent nodes of block A:
              if !P->eb:
                  btrfs_search_slot(key);   --> get path from P to A.
              if lowest:
                  BUG_ON(A->bytenr != bytenr of A recorded in P);
              btrfs_cow_block(P, A);   --> change A's bytenr in P.
      
      After btrfs_cow_block, P has the new bytenr of A, but with the
      same @key, we get the same path again, and get panic by BUG_ON.
      
      Note that this is only happening in a corrupted fs, for a
      regular fs in which we have correct @nritems so that we won't
      read stale content in any case.
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      4547f4d8
  3. 13 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 11 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 04 10月, 2016 7 次提交
  6. 27 9月, 2016 22 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: remove unnecessary btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty in split_leaf · 196e0249
      Liu Bo 提交于
      When we're not able to get enough space through splitting leaf,
      we'd create a new sibling leaf instead, and it's possible that we return
       a zero-nritem sibling leaf and mark it dirty before it's in a consistent
      state.  With CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY=y, the integrity check of
      check_leaf will report panic due to this zero-nritem non-root leaf.
      
      This removes the unnecessary btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty.
      Reported-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      196e0249
    • J
      Btrfs: don't BUG() during drop snapshot · 4867268c
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Really there's lots of things that can go wrong here, kill all the
      BUG_ON()'s and replace the logic ones with ASSERT()'s and return EIO
      instead.
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      [ switched to btrfs_err, errors go to common label ]
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      4867268c
    • A
      btrfs: fix btrfs_no_printk stub helper · 2fd57fcb
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      The addition of btrfs_no_printk() caused a build failure when
      CONFIG_PRINTK is disabled:
      
      fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'send_rename':
      fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3367:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'btrfs_no_printk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      
      This moves the helper outside of that #ifdef so it is always
      defined, and changes the existing #ifdef to refer to that
      helper as well for consistency.
      
      Fixes: 47c57058ff2c ("btrfs: btrfs_debug should consume fs_info when DEBUG is not defined")
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2fd57fcb
    • L
      Btrfs: memset to avoid stale content in btree leaf · 851cd173
      Liu Bo 提交于
      This is an additional patch to
      "Btrfs: memset to avoid stale content in btree node block".
      
      This uses memset to initialize the unused space in a leaf to avoid
      potential stale content, which may be incurred by pushing items
      between sibling leaves.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      851cd173
    • G
      btrfs: parent_start initialization cleanup · 0f5053eb
      Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于
      Code cleanup. parent_start is initialized multiple times when it is
      not necessary to do so.
      Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      0f5053eb
    • G
      btrfs: Remove already completed TODO comment · 6cea66e5
      Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于
      Fixes: 7cf5b976 ("btrfs: qgroup: Cleanup old inaccurate facilities")
      Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6cea66e5
    • G
      btrfs: Do not reassign count in btrfs_run_delayed_refs · dd12d5b8
      Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于
      Code cleanup. count is already (unsgined long)-1. That is the reason
      run_all was set. Do not reassign it (unsigned long)-1.
      Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      dd12d5b8
    • A
      btrfs: fix a possible umount deadlock · 0ccd0528
      Anand Jain 提交于
      btrfs_show_devname() is using the device_list_mutex, sometimes
      a call to blkdev_put() leads vfs calling into this func. So
      call blkdev_put() outside of device_list_mutex, as of now.
      
      [  983.284212] ======================================================
      [  983.290401] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      [  983.296677] 4.8.0-rc5-ceph-00023-g1b39cec2 #1 Not tainted
      [  983.302081] -------------------------------------------------------
      [  983.308357] umount/21720 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  983.313243]  (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff9128ec51>] blkdev_put+0x31/0x150
      [  983.321264]
      [  983.321264] but task is already holding lock:
      [  983.327101]  (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffc033d6f6>] __btrfs_close_devices+0x46/0x200 [btrfs]
      [  983.337839]
      [  983.337839] which lock already depends on the new lock.
      [  983.337839]
      [  983.346024]
      [  983.346024] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      [  983.353512]
      -> #4 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+...}:
      [  983.359096]        [<ffffffff910dfd0c>] lock_acquire+0x1bc/0x1f0
      [  983.365143]        [<ffffffff91823125>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x350
      [  983.371521]        [<ffffffffc02d8116>] btrfs_show_devname+0x36/0x1f0 [btrfs]
      [  983.378710]        [<ffffffff9129523e>] show_vfsmnt+0x4e/0x150
      [  983.384593]        [<ffffffff9126ffc7>] m_show+0x17/0x20
      [  983.389957]        [<ffffffff91276405>] seq_read+0x2b5/0x3b0
      [  983.395669]        [<ffffffff9124c808>] __vfs_read+0x28/0x100
      [  983.401464]        [<ffffffff9124eb3b>] vfs_read+0xab/0x150
      [  983.407080]        [<ffffffff9124ec32>] SyS_read+0x52/0xb0
      [  983.412609]        [<ffffffff91825fc0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1
      [  983.419617]
      -> #3 (namespace_sem){++++++}:
      [  983.424024]        [<ffffffff910dfd0c>] lock_acquire+0x1bc/0x1f0
      [  983.430074]        [<ffffffff918239e9>] down_write+0x49/0x80
      [  983.435785]        [<ffffffff91272457>] lock_mount+0x67/0x1c0
      [  983.441582]        [<ffffffff91272ab2>] do_add_mount+0x32/0xf0
      [  983.447458]        [<ffffffff9127363a>] finish_automount+0x5a/0xc0
      [  983.453682]        [<ffffffff91259513>] follow_managed+0x1b3/0x2a0
      [  983.459912]        [<ffffffff9125b750>] lookup_fast+0x300/0x350
      [  983.465875]        [<ffffffff9125d6e7>] path_openat+0x3a7/0xaa0
      [  983.471846]        [<ffffffff9125ef75>] do_filp_open+0x85/0xe0
      [  983.477731]        [<ffffffff9124c41c>] do_sys_open+0x14c/0x1f0
      [  983.483702]        [<ffffffff9124c4de>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
      [  983.489240]        [<ffffffff91825fc0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1
      [  983.496254]
      -> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){+.+.+.}:
      [  983.501798]        [<ffffffff910dfd0c>] lock_acquire+0x1bc/0x1f0
      [  983.507855]        [<ffffffff918239e9>] down_write+0x49/0x80
      [  983.513558]        [<ffffffff91366237>] start_creating+0x87/0x100
      [  983.519703]        [<ffffffff91366647>] debugfs_create_dir+0x17/0x100
      [  983.526195]        [<ffffffff911df153>] bdi_register+0x93/0x210
      [  983.532165]        [<ffffffff911df313>] bdi_register_owner+0x43/0x70
      [  983.538570]        [<ffffffff914080fb>] device_add_disk+0x1fb/0x450
      [  983.544888]        [<ffffffff91580226>] loop_add+0x1e6/0x290
      [  983.550596]        [<ffffffff91fec358>] loop_init+0x10b/0x14f
      [  983.556394]        [<ffffffff91002207>] do_one_initcall+0xa7/0x180
      [  983.562618]        [<ffffffff91f932e0>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1cc/0x266
      [  983.569370]        [<ffffffff918174be>] kernel_init+0xe/0x100
      [  983.575166]        [<ffffffff9182620f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
      [  983.581131]
      -> #1 (loop_index_mutex){+.+.+.}:
      [  983.585801]        [<ffffffff910dfd0c>] lock_acquire+0x1bc/0x1f0
      [  983.591858]        [<ffffffff91823125>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x350
      [  983.598256]        [<ffffffff9157ed3f>] lo_open+0x1f/0x60
      [  983.603704]        [<ffffffff9128eec3>] __blkdev_get+0x123/0x400
      [  983.609757]        [<ffffffff9128f4ea>] blkdev_get+0x34a/0x350
      [  983.615639]        [<ffffffff9128f554>] blkdev_open+0x64/0x80
      [  983.621428]        [<ffffffff9124aff6>] do_dentry_open+0x1c6/0x2d0
      [  983.627651]        [<ffffffff9124c029>] vfs_open+0x69/0x80
      [  983.633181]        [<ffffffff9125db74>] path_openat+0x834/0xaa0
      [  983.639152]        [<ffffffff9125ef75>] do_filp_open+0x85/0xe0
      [  983.645035]        [<ffffffff9124c41c>] do_sys_open+0x14c/0x1f0
      [  983.650999]        [<ffffffff9124c4de>] SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
      [  983.656535]        [<ffffffff91825fc0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc1
      [  983.663541]
      -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}:
      [  983.668107]        [<ffffffff910def43>] __lock_acquire+0x1003/0x17b0
      [  983.674510]        [<ffffffff910dfd0c>] lock_acquire+0x1bc/0x1f0
      [  983.680561]        [<ffffffff91823125>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x350
      [  983.686967]        [<ffffffff9128ec51>] blkdev_put+0x31/0x150
      [  983.692761]        [<ffffffffc033481f>] btrfs_close_bdev+0x4f/0x60 [btrfs]
      [  983.699699]        [<ffffffffc033d77b>] __btrfs_close_devices+0xcb/0x200 [btrfs]
      [  983.707178]        [<ffffffffc033d8db>] btrfs_close_devices+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs]
      [  983.714380]        [<ffffffffc03081c5>] close_ctree+0x265/0x340 [btrfs]
      [  983.721061]        [<ffffffffc02d7959>] btrfs_put_super+0x19/0x20 [btrfs]
      [  983.727908]        [<ffffffff91250e2f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x6f/0x100
      [  983.734744]        [<ffffffff91250f56>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x30
      [  983.740888]        [<ffffffffc02da97e>] btrfs_kill_super+0x1e/0x130 [btrfs]
      [  983.747909]        [<ffffffff91250fe9>] deactivate_locked_super+0x49/0x80
      [  983.754745]        [<ffffffff912515fd>] deactivate_super+0x5d/0x70
      [  983.760977]        [<ffffffff91270a1c>] cleanup_mnt+0x5c/0x80
      [  983.766773]        [<ffffffff91270a92>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
      [  983.772738]        [<ffffffff910aa2fe>] task_work_run+0x7e/0xc0
      [  983.778708]        [<ffffffff91081b5a>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x7e/0xb4
      [  983.785373]        [<ffffffff910039eb>] syscall_return_slowpath+0xbb/0xd0
      [  983.792212]        [<ffffffff9182605c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xbf/0xc1
      [  983.799225]
      [  983.799225] other info that might help us debug this:
      [  983.799225]
      [  983.807291] Chain exists of:
        &bdev->bd_mutex --> namespace_sem --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex
      
      [  983.816521]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [  983.816521]
      [  983.822489]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [  983.827043]        ----                    ----
      [  983.831599]   lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
      [  983.836289]                                lock(namespace_sem);
      [  983.842268]                                lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
      [  983.849478]   lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
      [  983.853127]
      [  983.853127]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [  983.853127]
      [  983.859113] 3 locks held by umount/21720:
      [  983.863145]  #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#35){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff912515f5>] deactivate_super+0x55/0x70
      [  983.872713]  #1:  (uuid_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc033d8d3>] btrfs_close_devices+0x23/0xa0 [btrfs]
      [  983.882206]  #2:  (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffc033d6f6>] __btrfs_close_devices+0x46/0x200 [btrfs]
      [  983.893422]
      [  983.893422] stack backtrace:
      [  983.897824] CPU: 6 PID: 21720 Comm: umount Not tainted 4.8.0-rc5-ceph-00023-g1b39cec2 #1
      [  983.905958] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5018R-WR/X10SRW-F, BIOS 1.0c 09/07/2015
      [  983.913492]  0000000000000000 ffff8c8a53c17a38 ffffffff91429521 ffffffff9260f4f0
      [  983.921018]  ffffffff92642760 ffff8c8a53c17a88 ffffffff911b2b04 0000000000000050
      [  983.928542]  ffffffff9237d620 ffff8c8a5294aee0 ffff8c8a5294aeb8 ffff8c8a5294aee0
      [  983.936072] Call Trace:
      [  983.938545]  [<ffffffff91429521>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc4
      [  983.943715]  [<ffffffff911b2b04>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c
      [  983.949748]  [<ffffffff910def43>] __lock_acquire+0x1003/0x17b0
      [  983.955613]  [<ffffffff910dfd0c>] lock_acquire+0x1bc/0x1f0
      [  983.961123]  [<ffffffff9128ec51>] ? blkdev_put+0x31/0x150
      [  983.966550]  [<ffffffff91823125>] mutex_lock_nested+0x65/0x350
      [  983.972407]  [<ffffffff9128ec51>] ? blkdev_put+0x31/0x150
      [  983.977832]  [<ffffffff9128ec51>] blkdev_put+0x31/0x150
      [  983.983101]  [<ffffffffc033481f>] btrfs_close_bdev+0x4f/0x60 [btrfs]
      [  983.989500]  [<ffffffffc033d77b>] __btrfs_close_devices+0xcb/0x200 [btrfs]
      [  983.996415]  [<ffffffffc033d8db>] btrfs_close_devices+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs]
      [  984.003068]  [<ffffffffc03081c5>] close_ctree+0x265/0x340 [btrfs]
      [  984.009189]  [<ffffffff9126cc5e>] ? evict_inodes+0x15e/0x170
      [  984.014881]  [<ffffffffc02d7959>] btrfs_put_super+0x19/0x20 [btrfs]
      [  984.021176]  [<ffffffff91250e2f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x6f/0x100
      [  984.027476]  [<ffffffff91250f56>] kill_anon_super+0x16/0x30
      [  984.033082]  [<ffffffffc02da97e>] btrfs_kill_super+0x1e/0x130 [btrfs]
      [  984.039548]  [<ffffffff91250fe9>] deactivate_locked_super+0x49/0x80
      [  984.045839]  [<ffffffff912515fd>] deactivate_super+0x5d/0x70
      [  984.051525]  [<ffffffff91270a1c>] cleanup_mnt+0x5c/0x80
      [  984.056774]  [<ffffffff91270a92>] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
      [  984.062201]  [<ffffffff910aa2fe>] task_work_run+0x7e/0xc0
      [  984.067625]  [<ffffffff91081b5a>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x7e/0xb4
      [  984.073747]  [<ffffffff910039eb>] syscall_return_slowpath+0xbb/0xd0
      [  984.080038]  [<ffffffff9182605c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xbf/0xc1
      Reported-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      0ccd0528
    • L
      Btrfs: fix memory leak in do_walk_down · a958eab0
      Liu Bo 提交于
      The extent buffer 'next' needs to be free'd conditionally.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a958eab0
    • J
      btrfs: btrfs_debug should consume fs_info when DEBUG is not defined · c01f5f96
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      We can hit unused variable warnings when btrfs_debug and friends are
      just aliases for no_printk.  This is due to the fs_info not getting
      consumed by the function call, which can happen if convenenience
      variables are used.  This patch adds a new btrfs_no_printk static inline
      that consumes the convenience variable and does nothing else.  It
      silences the unused variable warning and has no impact on the generated
      code:
      
      $ size fs/btrfs/extent_io.o*
         text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
        44072	    152	     32	  44256	   ace0	fs/btrfs/extent_io.o.btrfs_no_printk
        44072	    152	     32	  44256	   ace0	fs/btrfs/extent_io.o.no_printk
      
      Fixes: 27a0dd61 (Btrfs: make btrfs_debug match pr_debug handling related to DEBUG)
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c01f5f96
    • J
      btrfs: convert send's verbose_printk to btrfs_debug · 04ab956e
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      This was basically an open-coded, less flexible dynamic printk.  We can
      just use btrfs_debug instead.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      04ab956e
    • J
      btrfs: convert pr_* to btrfs_* where possible · ab8d0fc4
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      For many printks, we want to know which file system issued the message.
      
      This patch converts most pr_* calls to use the btrfs_* versions instead.
      In some cases, this means adding plumbing to allow call sites access to
      an fs_info pointer.
      
      fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c is left alone for another day.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ab8d0fc4
    • J
      btrfs: convert printk(KERN_* to use pr_* calls · 62e85577
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      This patch converts printk(KERN_* style messages to use the pr_* versions.
      
      One side effect is that anything that was KERN_DEBUG is now automatically
      a dynamic debug message.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      62e85577
    • J
      btrfs: unsplit printed strings · 5d163e0e
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      CodingStyle chapter 2:
      "[...] never break user-visible strings such as printk messages,
      because that breaks the ability to grep for them."
      
      This patch unsplits user-visible strings.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      5d163e0e
    • J
      btrfs: clean the old superblocks before freeing the device · cea67ab9
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      btrfs_rm_device frees the block device but then re-opens it using
      the saved device name.  A race exists between the close and the
      re-open that allows the block size to be changed.  The result
      is getting stuck forever in the reclaim loop in __getblk_slow.
      
      This patch moves the superblock cleanup before closing the block
      device, which is also consistent with other callers.  We also don't
      need a private copy of dev_name as the whole routine operates under
      the uuid_mutex.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      cea67ab9
    • L
      Btrfs: kill BUG_ON in run_delayed_tree_ref · 02794222
      Liu Bo 提交于
      In a corrupted btrfs image, we can come across this BUG_ON and
      get an unreponsive system, but if we return errors instead,
      its caller can handle everything gracefully by aborting the current
      transaction.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      02794222
    • J
      Btrfs: don't leak reloc root nodes on error · 6bdf131f
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We don't track the reloc roots in any sort of normal way, so the only way the
      root/commit_root nodes get free'd is if the relocation finishes successfully and
      the reloc root is deleted.  Fix this by free'ing them in free_reloc_roots.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6bdf131f
    • M
      btrfs: squash lines for simple wrapper functions · e2c89907
      Masahiro Yamada 提交于
      Remove unneeded variables and assignments.
      Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e2c89907
    • L
      Btrfs: improve check_node to avoid reading corrupted nodes · 6b722c17
      Liu Bo 提交于
      We need to check items in a node to make sure that we're reading
      a valid one, otherwise we could get various crashes while processing
      delayed_refs.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6b722c17
    • L
      Btrfs: add error handling for extent buffer in print tree · a42cbec9
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Somehow we missed btrfs_print_tree when last time we
      updated error handling for read_extent_block().
      
      This keeps us from getting a NULL pointer panic when
      btrfs_print_tree's read_extent_block() fails.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a42cbec9
    • L
      Btrfs: remove BUG_ON in start_transaction · a43f7f82
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Since we could get errors from the concurrent aborted transaction,
      the check of this BUG_ON in start_transaction is not true any more.
      
      Say, while flushing free space cache inode's dirty pages,
      btrfs_finish_ordered_io
       -> btrfs_join_transaction_nolock
            (the transaction has been aborted.)
            -> BUG_ON(type == TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK);
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a43f7f82
    • L
      Btrfs: memset to avoid stale content in btree node block · 3eb548ee
      Liu Bo 提交于
      During updating btree, we could push items between sibling
      nodes/leaves, for leaves data sections starts reversely from
      the end of the block while for nodes we only have key pairs
      which are stored one by one from the start of the block.
      
      So we could do try to push key pairs from one node to the next
      node right in the tree, and after that, we update the node's
      nritems to reflect the correct end while leaving the stale
      content in the node.  One may intentionally corrupt the fs
      image and access the stale content by bumping the nritems and
      causes various crashes.
      
      This takes the in-memory @nritems as the correct one and
      gets to memset the unused part of a btree node.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      3eb548ee
  7. 26 9月, 2016 5 次提交