1. 13 9月, 2012 2 次提交
    • T
      ARM: OMAP: Split plat/hardware.h, use local soc.h for omap2+ · dbc04161
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      As the plat and mach includes need to disappear for single zImage work,
      we need to remove plat/hardware.h.
      
      Do this by splitting plat/hardware.h into omap1 and omap2+ specific files.
      
      The old plat/hardware.h already has omap1 only defines, so it gets moved
      to mach/hardware.h for omap1. For omap2+, we use the local soc.h
      that for now just includes the related SoC headers to keep this patch more
      readable.
      
      Note that the local soc.h still includes plat/cpu.h that can be dealt
      with in later patches. Let's also include plat/serial.h from common.h for
      all the board-*.c files. This allows making the include files local later
      on without patching these files again.
      
      Note that only minimal changes are done in this patch for the
      drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c driver to keep things compiling. Further
      patches are needed to eventually remove cpu_is_omap usage in the drivers.
      
      Also only minimal changes are done to sound/soc/omap/* to remove the
      unneeded includes and to define OMAP44XX_MCPDM_L3_BASE locally so there's
      no need to include omap44xx.h.
      
      While at it, also sort some of the includes in the standard way.
      
      Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
      Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
      Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
      Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NWim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
      Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      dbc04161
    • T
      ARM: OMAP2+: Prepare for irqs.h removal · 7d7e1eba
      Tony Lindgren 提交于
      As the interrupts should only be defined in the platform_data, and
      eventually coming from device tree, there's no need to define them
      in header files.
      
      Let's remove the hardcoded references to irqs.h and fix up the includes
      so we don't rely on headers included in irqs.h. Note that we're
      defining OMAP_INTC_START as 0 to the interrupts. This will be needed
      when we enable SPARSE_IRQ. For some drivers we need to add
      #include <plat/cpu.h> for now until these drivers are fixed to
      remove cpu_is_omapxxxx() usage.
      
      While at it, sort som of the includes the standard way, and add
      the trailing commas where they are missing in the related data
      structures.
      
      Note that for drivers/staging/tidspbridge we just define things
      locally.
      
      Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      7d7e1eba
  2. 09 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 13 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • P
      ARM: OMAP2+: declare file-local functions as static · 8c3d4534
      Paul Walmsley 提交于
      Several function declarations used only in the files in which they're
      declared should include the static keyword, but don't:
      
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c:248:6: warning: symbol 'cmdline_find_option' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c:259:6: warning: symbol 'irq_sar_clear' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:878:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_vibra_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:882:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_audio_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:201:29: warning: symbol 'omap_panda_wlan_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:393:24: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:403:12: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:464:6: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c:434:6: warning: symbol 'omap_init_hsmmc' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:31:12: warning: symbol 'hwspinlocks_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:58:12: warning: symbol 'omap1_dm_timer_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/fpga.c:90:6: warning: symbol 'innovator_fpga_IRQ_demux' was not declared. Should it be static?
      
      Mark all of these as static.
      
      Thanks to Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> for pointing out a typo in the
      original patch description.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Cc: Govindraj R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
      Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Cc: David Anders <x0132446@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      8c3d4534
  4. 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 09 12月, 2011 3 次提交