This slipped past the previous sweeps.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>

Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask (to be a pointer).

It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask.

It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask.

It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask
(to be a pointer).

It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).

Also change the actual arg name here to "mm" (which it is), not "task".
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask.

It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> (fixes)

Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm->cpu_vm_mask.

It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer
(the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Use the accessors rather than frobbing bits directly (the new versions
are const).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

Use the accessors rather than frobbing bits directly (the new versions
are const).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

Use the accessors rather than frobbing bits directly (the new versions
are const).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

Use the accessors rather than frobbing bits directly (the new versions
are const).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

Now everyone is converted to arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask, remove
the shim and the #defines.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

We're weaning the core code off handing cpumask's around on-stack.
This introduces arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask().
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

We're weaning the core code off handing cpumask's around on-stack.
This introduces arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(), and by defining
it, the old arch_send_call_function_ipi is defined by the core code.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

We're weaning the core code off handing cpumask's around on-stack.
This introduces arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(), and by defining
it, the old arch_send_call_function_ipi is defined by the core code.

We also take the chance to wean the implementations off the
obsolescent for_each_cpu_mask(): making send_ipi_mask take the pointer
seemed the most natural way to ensure all implementations used
for_each_cpu.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

We're weaning the core code off handing cpumask's around on-stack.
This introduces arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(), and by defining
it, the old arch_send_call_function_ipi is defined by the core code.

We also take the chance to wean the implementations off the
obsolescent for_each_cpu_mask(): making send_ipi_mask take the pointer
seemed the most natural way to ensure all implementations used
for_each_cpu.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

We're weaning the core code off handing cpumask's around on-stack.
This introduces arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask().

We also take the chance to wean the send_ipi_message off the
obsolescent for_each_cpu_mask(): making it take a pointer seemed the
most natural way to do this.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

There were replaced by topology_core_cpumask and topology_thread_cpumask.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

There were replaced by topology_core_cpumask and topology_thread_cpumask.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

There were replaced by topology_core_cpumask and topology_thread_cpumask.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

There were replaced by topology_core_cpumask and topology_thread_cpumask.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

There were replaced by topology_core_cpumask and topology_thread_cpumask.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Everyone is now using smp_call_function_many().
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

smp_call_function_many is the new version: it takes a pointer.  Also,
use mm accessor macro while we're changing this.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

You're not supposed to pass cpumasks on the stack in that case.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

set_cpus_allowed() is on the way out; replace it with
set_cpus_allowed_ptr().

Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/6/448Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

By 7be23e278f, mask field was deleted by irqaction. However, it was not
deleted from comment.
Signed-off-by: NNobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Up until 1.1.83, the primitive human tribes used struct sigaction for
interrupts.  The sa_mask field was overloaded to hold a pointer to the
name.

When someone created the new "struct irqaction" they carried across
the "mask" field as a kind of ancestor worship: the fact that it was
unused makes clear its spiritual significance.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

This snuck in after the patch which removed all the others.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

It's only defined for NR_CPUS > BITS_PER_LONG; cpu_all_mask is always
defined (and const).
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

(Thanks to Al Viro for reminding me of this, via Ingo)

CPU_MASK_ALL is the (deprecated) "all bits set" cpumask, defined as so:

	#define CPU_MASK_ALL (cpumask_t) { { ... } }

Taking the address of such a temporary is questionable at best,
unfortunately 321a8e9d (cpumask: add CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR macro) added
CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR:

	#define CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR (&CPU_MASK_ALL)

Which formalizes this practice.  One day gcc could bite us over this
usage (though we seem to have gotten away with it so far).

So replace everywhere which used &CPU_MASK_ALL or CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR
with the modern "cpu_all_mask" (a real struct cpumask *), and remove
CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR altogether.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

(Thanks to Al Viro for reminding me of this, via Ingo)

CPU_MASK_ALL is the (deprecated) "all bits set" cpumask, defined as so:

	#define CPU_MASK_ALL (cpumask_t) { { ... } }

Taking the address of such a temporary is questionable at best,
unfortunately 321a8e9d (cpumask: add CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR macro) added
CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR:

	#define CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR (&CPU_MASK_ALL)

Which formalizes this practice.  One day gcc could bite us over this
usage (though we seem to have gotten away with it so far).

Now all callers are removed, we kill it.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>

Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

cpumask_of_pcibus() is the new version.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

cpumask_of_pcibus() is the new version.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

cpumask_of_pcibus() is the new version.
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Remove open-coded zalloc_cpumask_var() and zalloc_cpumask_var_node().
Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

* 'ixp4xx' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chris/linux-2.6:
  Add MAINTAINERS entry for ARM/INTEL IXP4xx arch support.
  ixp4xx: arch_idle() documentation fixup
  ixp4xx: timer and clocks cleanups

Fix new kernel-doc warnings in serial_core.[hc] files.

  Warning(include/linux/serial_core.h:485): No description found for parameter 'uport'
  Warning(include/linux/serial_core.h:485): Excess function parameter 'port' description in 'uart_handle_dcd_change'
  Warning(include/linux/serial_core.h:511): No description found for parameter 'uport'
  Warning(include/linux/serial_core.h:511): Excess function parameter 'port' description in 'uart_handle_cts_change'
  Warning(drivers/serial/serial_core.c:2437): No description found for parameter 'uport'
  Warning(drivers/serial/serial_core.c:2437): Excess function parameter 'port' description in 'uart_add_one_port'
  Warning(drivers/serial/serial_core.c:2509): No description found for parameter 'uport'
  Warning(drivers/serial/serial_core.c:2509): Excess function parameter 'port' description in 'uart_remove_one_port'
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit ebd2c8f6 removed struct uart_info and
commit bdc04e31 further moved delta_msr_wait.
Fix up the MN10300 on-chip serial port drivers to comply with this.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>