Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 28 10月, 2013 8 次提交
    • E
      veth: extend features to support tunneling · 82d81898
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      While investigating on a recent vxlan regression, I found veth
was using a zero features set for vxlan tunnels.

We have to segment GSO frames, copy the payload, and do the checksum.

This patch brings a ~200% performance increase

We probably have to add hw_enc_features support
on other virtual devices.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      82d81898
    • D
      Revert "Merge branch 'bonding_monitor_locking'" · 1f2cd845
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      This reverts commit 4d961a10, reversing
changes made to a00f6fcc.

Revert bond locking changes, they cause regressions and Veaceslav Falico
doesn't like how the commit messages were done at all.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1f2cd845
    • S
      be2net: add support for ndo_busy_poll · 6384a4d0
      由 Sathya Perla 提交于 
      Includes:
- ndo_busy_poll implementation
- Locking between napi and busy_poll
- Fix rx_post_starvation (replenish rx-queues in out-of-mememory scenario)
  logic to accomodate busy_poll.

v2 changes:
[Eric D.'s comment] call alloc_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC even in ndo_busy_poll
context as it is not allowed to sleep.
Signed-off-by: NSathya Perla <sathya.perla@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6384a4d0
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() · 5cc172c6
      由 dingtianhong 提交于 
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5cc172c6
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_activebackup_arp_mon() · 80b9d236
      由 dingtianhong 提交于 
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      80b9d236
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() · 7f1bb571
      由 dingtianhong 提交于 
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and add the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7f1bb571
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_alb_monitor() · 2d0dafb0
      由 dingtianhong 提交于 
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2d0dafb0
    • D
      bonding: remove bond read lock for bond_mii_monitor() · 6b6c5261
      由 dingtianhong 提交于 
      The bond slave list may change when the monitor is running, the slave list is no longer
protected by bond->lock, only protected by rtnl lock(), so we have 3 ways to modify it:
1.add bond_master_upper_dev_link() and bond_upper_dev_unlink() in bond->lock, but it is unsafe
to call call_netdevice_notifiers() in write lock.
2.remove unused bond->lock for monitor function, only use the existing rtnl lock().
3.use rcu_read_lock() to protect it, of course, it will transform bond_for_each_slave to
bond_for_each_slave_rcu() and performance is better, but in slow path, it is ignored.
so I remove the bond->lock and move the rtnl lock to protect the whole monitor function.
Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6b6c5261
  5. 26 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      net: fix rtnl notification in atomic context · 7f294054
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      commit 991fb3f7 "dev: always advertise rx_flags changes via netlink"
introduced rtnl notification from __dev_set_promiscuity(),
which can be called in atomic context.

Steps to reproduce:
ip tuntap add dev tap1 mode tap
ifconfig tap1 up
tcpdump -nei tap1 &
ip tuntap del dev tap1 mode tap

[  271.627994] device tap1 left promiscuous mode
[  271.639897] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:940
[  271.664491] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3394, name: ip
[  271.677525] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[  271.690503] CPU: 0 PID: 3394 Comm: ip Tainted: G        W    3.12.0-rc3+ #73
[  271.703996] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012
[  271.731254]  ffffffff81a58506 ffff8807f0d57a58 ffffffff817544e5 ffff88082fa0f428
[  271.760261]  ffff8808071f5f40 ffff8807f0d57a88 ffffffff8108bad1 ffffffff81110ff8
[  271.790683]  0000000000000010 00000000000000d0 00000000000000d0 ffff8807f0d57af8
[  271.822332] Call Trace:
[  271.838234]  [<ffffffff817544e5>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[  271.854446]  [<ffffffff8108bad1>] __might_sleep+0x181/0x240
[  271.870836]  [<ffffffff81110ff8>] ? rcu_irq_exit+0x68/0xb0
[  271.887076]  [<ffffffff811a80be>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x4e/0x2a0
[  271.903368]  [<ffffffff810b4ddc>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1dc/0x5a0
[  271.919716]  [<ffffffff81614d67>] ? __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0
[  271.936088]  [<ffffffff810b4de0>] ? vprintk_emit+0x1e0/0x5a0
[  271.952504]  [<ffffffff81614d67>] __alloc_skb+0x57/0x2a0
[  271.968902]  [<ffffffff8163a0b2>] rtmsg_ifinfo+0x52/0x100
[  271.985302]  [<ffffffff8162ac6d>] __dev_notify_flags+0xad/0xc0
[  272.001642]  [<ffffffff8162ad0c>] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x8c/0x1c0
[  272.017917]  [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380
[  272.033961]  [<ffffffff8162b109>] dev_set_promiscuity+0x29/0x50
[  272.049855]  [<ffffffff8172e937>] packet_dev_mc+0x87/0xc0
[  272.065494]  [<ffffffff81732052>] packet_notifier+0x1b2/0x380
[  272.080915]  [<ffffffff81731ea5>] ? packet_notifier+0x5/0x380
[  272.096009]  [<ffffffff81761c66>] notifier_call_chain+0x66/0x150
[  272.110803]  [<ffffffff8108503e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
[  272.125468]  [<ffffffff81085056>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
[  272.139984]  [<ffffffff81620190>] call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x40/0x70
[  272.154523]  [<ffffffff816201d6>] call_netdevice_notifiers+0x16/0x20
[  272.168552]  [<ffffffff816224c5>] rollback_registered_many+0x145/0x240
[  272.182263]  [<ffffffff81622641>] rollback_registered+0x31/0x40
[  272.195369]  [<ffffffff816229c8>] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x58/0x90
[  272.208230]  [<ffffffff81547ca0>] __tun_detach+0x140/0x340
[  272.220686]  [<ffffffff81547ed6>] tun_chr_close+0x36/0x60
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: NNicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7f294054
  7. 24 10月, 2013 19 次提交
  9. 23 10月, 2013 4 次提交
  11. 22 10月, 2013 7 次提交