Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 4月, 2013 4 次提交
  3. 22 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • C
      xfs: add support for large btree blocks · ee1a47ab
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Add support for larger btree blocks that contains a CRC32C checksum,
a filesystem uuid and block number for detecting filesystem
consistency and out of place writes.

[dchinner@redhat.com] Also include an owner field to allow reverse
mappings to be implemented for improved repairability and a LSN
field to so that log recovery can easily determine the last
modification that made it to disk for each buffer.

[dchinner@redhat.com] Add buffer log format flags to indicate the
type of buffer to recovery so that we don't have to do blind magic
number tests to determine what the buffer is.

[dchinner@redhat.com] Modified to fit into the verifier structure.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      ee1a47ab
  5. 15 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 17 11月, 2012 1 次提交
    • D
      xfs: fix attr tree double split corruption · 42e2976f
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      In certain circumstances, a double split of an attribute tree is
needed to insert or replace an attribute. In rare situations, this
can go wrong, leaving the attribute tree corrupted. In this case,
the attr being replaced is the last attr in a leaf node, and the
replacement is larger so doesn't fit in the same leaf node.
When we have the initial condition of a node format attribute
btree with two leaves at index 1 and 2. Call them L1 and L2.  The
leaf L1 is completely full, there is not a single byte of free space
in it. L2 is mostly empty.  The attribute being replaced - call it X
- is the last attribute in L1.

The way an attribute replace is executed is that the replacement
attribute - call it Y - is first inserted into the tree, but has an
INCOMPLETE flag set on it so that list traversals ignore it. Once
this transaction is committed, a second transaction it run to
atomically mark Y as COMPLETE and X as INCOMPLETE, so that a
traversal will now find Y and skip X. Once that transaction is
committed, attribute X is then removed.

So, the initial condition is:

     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |
     | fsp: 0 |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr B |     | attr 2 |
     |--------|     |--------|
     ..........     ..........
     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr X |     | attr n |
     +--------+     +--------+

So now we go to replace X, and see that L1:fsp = 0 - it is full so
we can't insert Y in the same leaf. So we record the the location of
attribute X so we can track it for later use, then we split L1 into
L1 and L3 and reblance across the two leafs. We end with:

     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L3   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 3 |---->| fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |<----| bwd: 3 |
     | fsp: M |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr X |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     +--------+     |--------|
     | attr B |                    | attr 2 |
     |--------|                    |--------|
     ..........                    ..........
     |--------|                    |--------|
     | attr W |                    | attr n |
     +--------+                    +--------+

And we track that the original attribute is now at L3:0.

We then try to insert Y into L1 again, and find that there isn't
enough room because the new attribute is larger than the old one.
Hence we have to split again to make room for Y. We end up with
this:

     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L4   |     |   L3   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 4 |---->| fwd: 3 |---->| fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |<----| bwd: 4 |<----| bwd: 3 |
     | fsp: M |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr Y |     | attr X |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     + INCOMP +     +--------+     |--------|
     | attr B |     +--------+                    | attr 2 |
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     ..........                                   ..........
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     | attr W |                                   | attr n |
     +--------+                                   +--------+

And now we have the new (incomplete) attribute @ L4:0, and the
original attribute at L3:0. At this point, the first transaction is
committed, and we move to the flipping of the flags.

This is where we are supposed to end up with this:

     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L4   |     |   L3   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 4 |---->| fwd: 3 |---->| fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |<----| bwd: 4 |<----| bwd: 3 |
     | fsp: M |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr Y |     | attr X |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     +--------+     + INCOMP +     |--------|
     | attr B |                    +--------+     | attr 2 |
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     ..........                                   ..........
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     | attr W |                                   | attr n |
     +--------+                                   +--------+

But that doesn't happen properly - the attribute tracking indexes
are not pointing to the right locations. What we end up with is both
the old attribute to be removed pointing at L4:0 and the new
attribute at L4:1.  On a debug kernel, this assert fails like so:

XFS: Assertion failed: args->index2 < be16_to_cpu(leaf2->hdr.count), file: fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c, line: 2725

because the new attribute location does not exist. On a production
kernel, this goes unnoticed and the code proceeds ahead merrily and
removes L4 because it thinks that is the block that is no longer
needed. This leaves the hash index node pointing to entries
L1, L4 and L2, but only blocks L1, L3 and L2 to exist. Further, the
leaf level sibling list is L1 <-> L4 <-> L2, but L4 is now free
space, and so everything is busted. This corruption is caused by the
removal of the old attribute triggering a join - it joins everything
correctly but then frees the wrong block.

xfs_repair will report something like:

bad sibling back pointer for block 4 in attribute fork for inode 131
problem with attribute contents in inode 131
would clear attr fork
bad nblocks 8 for inode 131, would reset to 3
bad anextents 4 for inode 131, would reset to 0

The problem lies in the assignment of the old/new blocks for
tracking purposes when the double leaf split occurs. The first split
tries to place the new attribute inside the current leaf (i.e.
"inleaf == true") and moves the old attribute (X) to the new block.
This sets up the old block/index to L1:X, and newly allocated
block to L3:0. It then moves attr X to the new block and tries to
insert attr Y at the old index. That fails, so it splits again.

With the second split, the rebalance ends up placing the new attr in
the second new block - L4:0 - and this is where the code goes wrong.
What is does is it sets both the new and old block index to the
second new block. Hence it inserts attr Y at the right place (L4:0)
but overwrites the current location of the attr to replace that is
held in the new block index (currently L3:0). It over writes it with
L4:1 - the index we later assert fail on.

Hopefully this table will show this in a foramt that is a bit easier
to understand:

Split		old attr index		new attr index
		vanilla	patched		vanilla	patched
before 1st	L1:26	L1:26		N/A	N/A
after 1st	L3:0	L3:0		L1:26	L1:26
after 2nd	L4:0	L3:0		L4:1	L4:0
                ^^^^			^^^^
		wrong			wrong

The fix is surprisingly simple, for all this analysis - just stop
the rebalance on the out-of leaf case from overwriting the new attr
index - it's already correct for the double split case.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      42e2976f
  9. 16 11月, 2012 6 次提交
  11. 14 11月, 2012 2 次提交
    • D
      xfs: add more attribute tree trace points. · ee73259b
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      Added when debugging recent attribute tree problems to more finely
trace code execution through the maze of twisty passages that makes
up the attr code.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      ee73259b
    • D
      xfs: fix attr tree double split corruption · 07428d7f
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      In certain circumstances, a double split of an attribute tree is
needed to insert or replace an attribute. In rare situations, this
can go wrong, leaving the attribute tree corrupted. In this case,
the attr being replaced is the last attr in a leaf node, and the
replacement is larger so doesn't fit in the same leaf node.
When we have the initial condition of a node format attribute
btree with two leaves at index 1 and 2. Call them L1 and L2.  The
leaf L1 is completely full, there is not a single byte of free space
in it. L2 is mostly empty.  The attribute being replaced - call it X
- is the last attribute in L1.

The way an attribute replace is executed is that the replacement
attribute - call it Y - is first inserted into the tree, but has an
INCOMPLETE flag set on it so that list traversals ignore it. Once
this transaction is committed, a second transaction it run to
atomically mark Y as COMPLETE and X as INCOMPLETE, so that a
traversal will now find Y and skip X. Once that transaction is
committed, attribute X is then removed.

So, the initial condition is:

     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |
     | fsp: 0 |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr B |     | attr 2 |
     |--------|     |--------|
     ..........     ..........
     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr X |     | attr n |
     +--------+     +--------+


So now we go to replace X, and see that L1:fsp = 0 - it is full so
we can't insert Y in the same leaf. So we record the the location of
attribute X so we can track it for later use, then we split L1 into
L1 and L3 and reblance across the two leafs. We end with:


     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L3   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 3 |---->| fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |<----| bwd: 3 |
     | fsp: M |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr X |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     +--------+     |--------|
     | attr B |                    | attr 2 |
     |--------|                    |--------|
     ..........                    ..........
     |--------|                    |--------|
     | attr W |                    | attr n |
     +--------+                    +--------+


And we track that the original attribute is now at L3:0.

We then try to insert Y into L1 again, and find that there isn't
enough room because the new attribute is larger than the old one.
Hence we have to split again to make room for Y. We end up with
this:


     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L4   |     |   L3   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 4 |---->| fwd: 3 |---->| fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |<----| bwd: 4 |<----| bwd: 3 |
     | fsp: M |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr Y |     | attr X |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     + INCOMP +     +--------+     |--------|
     | attr B |     +--------+                    | attr 2 |
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     ..........                                   ..........
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     | attr W |                                   | attr n |
     +--------+                                   +--------+

And now we have the new (incomplete) attribute @ L4:0, and the
original attribute at L3:0. At this point, the first transaction is
committed, and we move to the flipping of the flags.

This is where we are supposed to end up with this:

     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+     +--------+
     |   L1   |     |   L4   |     |   L3   |     |   L2   |
     | fwd: 4 |---->| fwd: 3 |---->| fwd: 2 |---->| fwd: 0 |
     | bwd: 0 |<----| bwd: 1 |<----| bwd: 4 |<----| bwd: 3 |
     | fsp: M |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: J |     | fsp: N |
     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|     |--------|
     | attr A |     | attr Y |     | attr X |     | attr 1 |
     |--------|     +--------+     + INCOMP +     |--------|
     | attr B |                    +--------+     | attr 2 |
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     ..........                                   ..........
     |--------|                                   |--------|
     | attr W |                                   | attr n |
     +--------+                                   +--------+

But that doesn't happen properly - the attribute tracking indexes
are not pointing to the right locations. What we end up with is both
the old attribute to be removed pointing at L4:0 and the new
attribute at L4:1.  On a debug kernel, this assert fails like so:

XFS: Assertion failed: args->index2 < be16_to_cpu(leaf2->hdr.count), file: fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c, line: 2725

because the new attribute location does not exist. On a production
kernel, this goes unnoticed and the code proceeds ahead merrily and
removes L4 because it thinks that is the block that is no longer
needed. This leaves the hash index node pointing to entries
L1, L4 and L2, but only blocks L1, L3 and L2 to exist. Further, the
leaf level sibling list is L1 <-> L4 <-> L2, but L4 is now free
space, and so everything is busted. This corruption is caused by the
removal of the old attribute triggering a join - it joins everything
correctly but then frees the wrong block.

xfs_repair will report something like:

bad sibling back pointer for block 4 in attribute fork for inode 131
problem with attribute contents in inode 131
would clear attr fork
bad nblocks 8 for inode 131, would reset to 3
bad anextents 4 for inode 131, would reset to 0

The problem lies in the assignment of the old/new blocks for
tracking purposes when the double leaf split occurs. The first split
tries to place the new attribute inside the current leaf (i.e.
"inleaf == true") and moves the old attribute (X) to the new block.
This sets up the old block/index to L1:X, and newly allocated
block to L3:0. It then moves attr X to the new block and tries to
insert attr Y at the old index. That fails, so it splits again.

With the second split, the rebalance ends up placing the new attr in
the second new block - L4:0 - and this is where the code goes wrong.
What is does is it sets both the new and old block index to the
second new block. Hence it inserts attr Y at the right place (L4:0)
but overwrites the current location of the attr to replace that is
held in the new block index (currently L3:0). It over writes it with
L4:1 - the index we later assert fail on.

Hopefully this table will show this in a foramt that is a bit easier
to understand:

Split		old attr index		new attr index
		vanilla	patched		vanilla	patched
before 1st	L1:26	L1:26		N/A	N/A
after 1st	L3:0	L3:0		L1:26	L1:26
after 2nd	L4:0	L3:0		L4:1	L4:0
                ^^^^			^^^^
		wrong			wrong

The fix is surprisingly simple, for all this analysis - just stop
the rebalance on the out-of leaf case from overwriting the new attr
index - it's already correct for the double split case.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      07428d7f
  13. 02 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 15 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  17. 28 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 18 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 30 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • C
      xfs: fix attr2 vs large data fork assert · 4c393a60
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      With Dmitry fsstress updates I've seen very reproducible crashes in
xfs_attr_shortform_remove because xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit claims that
the attributes would not fit inline into the inode after removing an
attribute.  It turns out that we were operating on an inode with lots
of delalloc extents, and thus an if_bytes values for the data fork that
is larger than biggest possible on-disk storage for it which utterly
confuses the code near the end of xfs_attr_shortform_bytesfit.

Fix this by always allowing the current attribute fork, like we already
do for the attr1 format, given that delalloc conversion will take care
for moving either the data or attribute area out of line if it doesn't
fit at that point - or making the point moot by merging extents at this
point.

Also document the function better, and clean up some loose bits.
Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      4c393a60
  23. 12 10月, 2011 2 次提交
    • D
      xfs: introduce xfs_bmapi_read() · 5c8ed202
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      xfs_bmapi() currently handles both extent map reading and
allocation. As a result, the code is littered with "if (wr)"
branches to conditionally do allocation operations if required.
This makes the code much harder to follow and causes significant
indent issues with the code.

Given that read mapping is much simpler than allocation, we can
split out read mapping from xfs_bmapi() and reuse the logic that
we have already factored out do do all the hard work of handling the
extent map manipulations. The results in a much simpler function for
the common extent read operations, and will allow the allocation
code to be simplified in another commit.

Once xfs_bmapi_read() is implemented, convert all the callers of
xfs_bmapi() that are only reading extents to use the new function.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
      5c8ed202
    • C
      xfs: Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf() · 2a30f36d
      由 Chandra Seetharaman 提交于 
      Check the return value of xfs_trans_get_buf() and fail
appropriately.
Signed-off-by: NChandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
      2a30f36d
  25. 08 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 23 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  29. 27 7月, 2010 3 次提交
  31. 22 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  33. 20 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  35. 15 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • C
      xfs: event tracing support · 0b1b213f
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Convert the old xfs tracing support that could only be used with the
out of tree kdb and xfsidbg patches to use the generic event tracer.

To use it make sure CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING is enabled and then enable
all xfs trace channels by:

   echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs/enable

or alternatively enable single events by just doing the same in one
event subdirectory, e.g.

   echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs/xfs_ihold/enable

or set more complex filters, etc. In Documentation/trace/events.txt
all this is desctribed in more detail.  To reads the events do a

   cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace

Compared to the last posting this patch converts the tracing mostly to
the one tracepoint per callsite model that other users of the new
tracing facility also employ.  This allows a very fine-grained control
of the tracing, a cleaner output of the traces and also enables the
perf tool to use each tracepoint as a virtual performance counter,
     allowing us to e.g. count how often certain workloads git various
     spots in XFS.  Take a look at

    http://lwn.net/Articles/346470/

for some examples.

Also the btree tracing isn't included at all yet, as it will require
additional core tracing features not in mainline yet, I plan to
deliver it later.

And the really nice thing about this patch is that it actually removes
many lines of code while adding this nice functionality:

 fs/xfs/Makefile                |    8
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_acl.c     |    1
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c    |   52 -
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.h    |    2
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c     |  117 +--
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.h     |   33
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_fs_subr.c |    3
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl.c   |    1
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_ioctl32.c |    1
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c    |    1
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_linux.h   |    1
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c     |   87 --
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.h     |   45 -
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c   |  104 ---
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.h   |    7
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c    |    1
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.c   |   75 ++
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.h   | 1369 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_vnode.h   |    4
 fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot.c       |  110 ---
 fs/xfs/quota/xfs_dquot.h       |   21
 fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c          |   40 -
 fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm_syscalls.c |    4
 fs/xfs/support/ktrace.c        |  323 ---------
 fs/xfs/support/ktrace.h        |   85 --
 fs/xfs/xfs.h                   |   16
 fs/xfs/xfs_ag.h                |   14
 fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c             |  230 +-----
 fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.h             |   27
 fs/xfs/xfs_alloc_btree.c       |    1
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr.c              |  107 ---
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr.h              |   10
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c         |   14
 fs/xfs/xfs_attr_sf.h           |   40 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c              |  507 +++------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.h              |   49 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c        |    6
 fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c             |    5
 fs/xfs/xfs_btree_trace.h       |   17
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c          |   87 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h          |   20
 fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c          |    3
 fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.h          |    7
 fs/xfs/xfs_dfrag.c             |    2
 fs/xfs/xfs_dir2.c              |    8
 fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_block.c        |   20
 fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_leaf.c         |   21
 fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_node.c         |   27
 fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c           |   26
 fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_trace.c        |  216 ------
 fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_trace.h        |   72 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_filestream.c        |    8
 fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c             |    2
 fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c              |  111 ---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c             |   67 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h             |   76 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c        |    5
 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c             |   85 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h             |    8
 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c               |  181 +----
 fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h          |   20
 fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c       |    1
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c             |    2
 fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h             |    8
 fs/xfs/xfs_rename.c            |    1
 fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c           |    1
 fs/xfs/xfs_rw.c                |    3
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h             |   47 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c         |   62 -
 fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c          |    8
 70 files changed, 2151 insertions(+), 2592 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
      0b1b213f
  37. 12 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  39. 30 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • C
      xfs: remove m_attroffset · 1a5902c5
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      With the upcoming v3 inodes the default attroffset needs to be calculated
for each specific inode, so we can't cache it in the superblock anymore.

Also replace the assert for wrong inode sizes with a proper error check
also included in non-debug builds.  Note that the ENOSYS return for
that might seem odd, but that error is returned by xfs_mount_validate_sb
for all theoretically valid but not supported filesystem geometries.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NJosef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
      1a5902c5
  41. 04 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  43. 09 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  45. 13 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  47. 28 7月, 2008 3 次提交
  49. 18 4月, 2008 1 次提交