1. 05 12月, 2008 1 次提交
    • S
      sparc: prepare kernel/ for unification · d670bd4f
      Sam Ravnborg 提交于
      o sparc32 files with identical names to sparc64 renamed to <name>_32.S
      o introduced a few Kconfig helpers to simplify Makefile logic
      o refactored Makefile to prepare for unification
        - use obj-$(CONFIG_SPARC32) for sparc32 specific files
        - use <name>_$(BITS) for files where sparc64 has a _64 variant
        - sparc64 directly include a few files where sparc32 builds them,
          refer to these files directly (no BITS)
        - sneaked in -Werror as used by sparc64
      o modified sparc/Makefile to use the new names for head/init_task
      Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d670bd4f
  2. 28 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  3. 11 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      sparc: Fix debugger syscall restart interactions. · 28e61036
      David S. Miller 提交于
      So, forever, we've had this ptrace_signal_deliver implementation
      which tries to handle all of the nasties that can occur when the
      debugger looks at a process about to take a signal.  It's meant
      to address all of these issues inside of the kernel so that the
      debugger need not be mindful of such things.
      
      Problem is, this doesn't work.
      
      The idea was that we should do the syscall restart business first, so
      that the debugger captures that state.  Otherwise, if the debugger for
      example saves the child's state, makes the child execute something
      else, then restores the saved state, we won't handle the syscall
      restart properly because we lose the "we're in a syscall" state.
      
      The code here worked for most cases, but if the debugger actually
      passes the signal through to the child unaltered, it's possible that
      we would do a syscall restart when we shouldn't have.
      
      In particular this breaks the case of debugging a process under a gdb
      which is being debugged by yet another gdb.  gdb uses sigsuspend
      to wait for SIGCHLD of the inferior, but if gdb itself is being
      debugged by a top-level gdb we get a ptrace_stop().  The top-level gdb
      does a PTRACE_CONT with SIGCHLD to let the inferior gdb see the
      signal.  But ptrace_signal_deliver() assumed the debugger would cancel
      out the signal and therefore did a syscall restart, because the return
      error was ERESTARTNOHAND.
      
      Fix this by simply making ptrace_signal_deliver() a nop, and providing
      a way for the debugger to control system call restarting properly:
      
      1) Report a "in syscall" software bit in regs->{tstate,psr}.
         It is set early on in trap entry to a system call and is fully
         visible to the debugger via ptrace() and regsets.
      
      2) Test this bit right before doing a syscall restart.  We have
         to do a final recheck right after get_signal_to_deliver() in
         case the debugger cleared the bit during ptrace_stop().
      
      3) Clear the bit in trap return so we don't accidently try to set
         that bit in the real register.
      
      As a result we also get a ptrace_{is,clear}_syscall() for sparc32 just
      like sparc64 has.
      
      M68K has this same exact bug, and is now the only other user of the
      ptrace_signal_deliver hook.  It needs to be fixed in the same exact
      way as sparc.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      28e61036
  4. 08 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      sparc: Fix SA_ONSTACK signal handling. · dc5dc7e6
      David S. Miller 提交于
      We need to be more liberal about the alignment of the buffer given to
      us by sigaltstack().  The user should not need to be mindful of all of
      the alignment constraints we have for the stack frame.
      
      This mirrors how we handle this situation in clone() as well.
      
      Also, we align the stack even in non-SA_ONSTACK cases so that signals
      due to bad stack alignment can be delivered properly.  This makes such
      errors easier to debug and recover from.
      
      Finally, add the sanity check x86 has to make sure we won't overflow
      the signal stack.
      
      This fixes glibc testcases nptl/tst-cancel20.c and
      nptl/tst-cancelx20.c
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      dc5dc7e6
  5. 27 4月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      sparc: Remove old style signal frame support. · 5526b7e4
      David S. Miller 提交于
      Back around the same time we were bootstrapping the first 32-bit sparc
      Linux kernel with a SunOS userland, we made the signal frame match
      that of SunOS.
      
      By the time we even started putting together a native Linux userland
      for 32-bit Sparc we realized this layout wasn't sufficient for Linux's
      needs.
      
      Therefore we changed the layout, yet kept support for the old style
      signal frame layout in there.  The detection mechanism is that we had
      sys_sigaction() start passing in a negative signal number to indicate
      "new style signal frames please".
      
      Anyways, no binaries exist in the world that use the old stuff.  In
      fact, I bet Jakub Jelinek and myself are the only two people who ever
      had such binaries to be honest.
      
      So let's get rid of this stuff.
      
      I added an assertion using WARN_ON_ONCE() that makes sure 32-bit
      applications are passing in that negative signal number still.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5526b7e4
  6. 24 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 22 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 09 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交
    • S
      [PATCH] convert signal handling of NODEFER to act like other Unix boxes. · 69be8f18
      Steven Rostedt 提交于
      It has been reported that the way Linux handles NODEFER for signals is
      not consistent with the way other Unix boxes handle it.  I've written a
      program to test the behavior of how this flag affects signals and had
      several reports from people who ran this on various Unix boxes,
      confirming that Linux seems to be unique on the way this is handled.
      
      The way NODEFER affects signals on other Unix boxes is as follows:
      
      1) If NODEFER is set, other signals in sa_mask are still blocked.
      
      2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal is
      still blocked. (Note: this is the behavior of all tested but Linux _and_
      NetBSD 2.0 *).
      
      The way NODEFER affects signals on Linux:
      
      1) If NODEFER is set, other signals are _not_ blocked regardless of
      sa_mask (Even NetBSD doesn't do this).
      
      2) If NODEFER is set and the signal is in sa_mask, then the signal being
      handled is not blocked.
      
      The patch converts signal handling in all current Linux architectures to
      the way most Unix boxes work.
      
      Unix boxes that were tested:  DU4, AIX 5.2, Irix 6.5, NetBSD 2.0, SFU
      3.5 on WinXP, AIX 5.3, Mac OSX, and of course Linux 2.6.13-rcX.
      
      * NetBSD was the only other Unix to behave like Linux on point #2. The
      main concern was brought up by point #1 which even NetBSD isn't like
      Linux.  So with this patch, we leave NetBSD as the lonely one that
      behaves differently here with #2.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      69be8f18
  12. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4