- 19 7月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
As with IPv4, listen to NEIGH_UPDATE events from the ndisc table and program relevant neighbours to the device's neighbour table. Note that neighbours with a link-local IP address aren't programmed, as packets with a link-local destination IP are trapped after LPM lookup and never reach the neighbour table. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
When a netdev is configured with an IP address a router interface (RIF) should be configured for it in the device. Allow configuration of RIFs based on IPv6 address notifications as well as IPv4. Note that the RIF exists as long as an IP address is configured on the netdev, regardless of the address family. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Up until now we only flooded broadcast packets to the router when an L3 interface was configured on top of a bridge. However, IPv6 Neighbour Discovery packets are trapped to the CPU inside the router and these can be sent with a multicast address. Flood unregistered multicast packets to the router port, so that relevant packets could be trapped there. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Before we add IPv6 constructs like traps and router interfaces, we first need to enable IPv6 routing in the device. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 7月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
While working on IPv6 route replace I realized we can have a use-after-free in IPv4 in case the replaced route is offloaded and the only one using its FIB info. The problem is that fib_table_insert() drops the reference on the FIB info of the replaced routes which is eventually freed via call_rcu(). Since the driver doesn't hold a reference on this FIB info it can cause a use-after-free when it tries to clear the RTNH_F_OFFLOAD flag stored in fi->fib_flags. After running the following commands in a loop for enough time with a KASAN enabled kernel I finally got the below trace. $ ip route add 192.168.50.0/24 via 192.168.200.1 dev enp3s0np3 $ ip route replace 192.168.50.0/24 dev enp3s0np5 $ ip route del 192.168.50.0/24 dev enp3s0np5 BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8803717d9820 by task kworker/u4:2/55 [...] ? mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] ? mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] ? mlxsw_sp_router_neighs_update_work+0x1cd0/0x1ce0 [mlxsw_spectrum] ? mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] __asan_load4+0x61/0x80 mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_unset+0xa7/0x120 [mlxsw_spectrum] mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_refresh+0xb6/0x370 [mlxsw_spectrum] mlxsw_sp_router_fib_event_work+0xd1c/0x2780 [mlxsw_spectrum] [...] Freed by task 5131: save_stack_trace+0x16/0x20 save_stack+0x46/0xd0 kasan_slab_free+0x70/0xc0 kfree+0x144/0x570 free_fib_info_rcu+0x2e7/0x410 rcu_process_callbacks+0x4f8/0xe30 __do_softirq+0x1d3/0x9e2 Fix this by taking a reference on the FIB info when creating the nexthop group it represents and drop it when the group is destroyed. Fixes: 599cf8f9 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for route replace") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
With this patch the error path of mlxsw_sp_nexthop_init() is symmetric with mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fini(). Noticed during code review. Fixes: a8c97014 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Refactor nexthop init routine") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In case a VLAN device is enslaved to a bridge we shouldn't create a router interface (RIF) for it when it's configured with an IP address. This is already handled by the driver for other types of netdevs, such as physical ports and LAG devices. If this IP address is then removed and the interface is subsequently unlinked from the bridge, a NULL pointer dereference can happen, as the original 802.1d FID was replaced with an rFID which was then deleted. To reproduce: $ ip link set dev enp3s0np9 up $ ip link add name enp3s0np9.111 link enp3s0np9 type vlan id 111 $ ip link set dev enp3s0np9.111 up $ ip link add name br0 type bridge $ ip link set dev br0 up $ ip link set enp3s0np9.111 master br0 $ ip address add dev enp3s0np9.111 192.168.0.1/24 $ ip address del dev enp3s0np9.111 192.168.0.1/24 $ ip link set dev enp3s0np9.111 nomaster Fixes: 99724c18 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Introduce support for router interfaces") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In new firmware versions (that we can now enforce via request_firmware()), only the first LPM tree is reserved and not the first two as in older versions. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The way we usually allocate an index is by letting the allocation function return an error instead of an invalid index. Do the same for RIF index. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 5月, 2017 14 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The mlxsw driver currently implements three types of RIFs. VLAN and FID RIFs for L3 interfaces on top of VLAN-aware and VLAN-unaware bridges (respectively) and Subport RIFs for all other L3 interfaces. All the RIF types follow a common configuration procedure, which only differs in the type-specific bits. The patch exploits this fact and consolidates the common code paths, thereby simplifying the code and making it more extensible. This work also prepares the driver for use with future ASICs, where the range of the Subport RIFs will be extended and their configuration modified accordingly. By merely implementing a new RIF operations and selecting it during initialization, the same driver could be re-used. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The device supports three types of FIDs. 802.1Q and 802.1D FIDs for VLAN-aware and VLAN-unaware bridges (respectively) and rFIDs to transport packets to the router block. The different users (e.g., bridge, router, ACLs) of the FIDs infrastructure need not know about the internal FIDs implementation and can therefore interact with it using a restricted set of exported functions. By encapsulating the entire FID logic and hiding it from the rest of the driver we get a code base that it much simpler and easier to work with and extend. For example, in the current Spectrum ASIC only 802.1D FIDs can be assigned a VNI, but future ASICs will also support 802.1Q FIDs. With this patch in place, support for future ASICs can be easily added by implementing a new FID operations according to their capabilities. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
All RIF types are associated with a virtual router (VR), so determine VR first when creating a RIF. That way, we can more easily integrate the common RIF core in the following patches. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
If a packet ingress the router but can't be assigned an ingress RIF, it's dropped. Therefore, in the case of RIF configured on top of a bridge, it makes sense to start flooding broadcast packets to the router only after the RIF was created. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that all the information to create a RIF is contained within the RIF struct itself, we can also simplify the destruction logic. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
All the information necessary for the configuration of RIFs can now be found in the RIF struct itself, so reduce the arguments list. This gets us one step closer to the common RIF core. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Currently, when a Subport RIF is configured, the LAG status and VLAN of the underlying port are read from the port itself. This is problematic, as we would like to have common code to configure all types of RIFs, which aren't necessarily bound to a port. Instead, embed the RIF in a struct specific to the Subport type, which contains all the necessary information. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In the following patches the RIF's configuration function is going to expect a RIF struct with all the necessary information. Therefore, allocate the RIF just before it's configured to the device. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The following patches are going to re-arrange the FID and RIF code, so that when the RIF is configured to the device based on the information present in the RIF struct (which points to a FID). For this reason, move the FID allocation to just before the RIF configuration. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
As explained in the cover letter, since the introduction of the bridge offload in the mlxsw driver, information related to the offloaded bridge and bridge ports was stored in the individual port struct, mlxsw_sp_port. This lead to a bloated struct storing both physical properties of the port (e.g., autoneg status) as well as logical properties of an upper bridge port (e.g., learning, mrouter indication). While this might work well for simple devices, it proved to be hard to extend when stacked devices were taken into account and more advanced use-cases (e.g., IGMP snooping) considered. This patch removes the excess information from the above struct and instead stores it in more appropriate structs that represent the bridge port, the bridge itself and a VLAN configured on the bridge port. The membership of a port in a bridge is denoted using the Port-VLAN struct, which points to the bridge port and also member in the bridge VLAN group of the VLAN it represents. This allows us to completely remove the vPort abstraction and consolidate many of the code paths relating to VLAN-aware and unaware bridges. Note that the FID / vFID code is currently duplicated, but this will soon go away when the common FID core will be introduced. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Up until now we used to create FIDs upon the creation of VLAN uppers on top of the VLAN-aware bridge. This was done so that in case a router interface (RIF) was configured on top of the bridge, the FID would already be there. Instead, simplify the code and only create the FID upon RIF creation. This is an intermediary step towards the introduction of the common FID core, in which this code would be completely removed. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We're going to get rid of vPorts completely later in the patchset, but the router code is self-contained, so it's a good candidate to start the transition with. Convert all the functions that expects to operate on a vPort to operate on a Port-VLAN instead. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When a vPort is destroyed, it leaves the FID it's currently mapped to (if any) and drops the reference. The FID's leave function expects to get the vPort as its argument, but this will have to change when the vPort model is retired. Change the function signature to expect a Port-VLAN struct instead and patch the call sites accordingly. The code introduced in this patch will be removed later in the patchset, but this intermediary step is required in order to ease the code review. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We currently transition the port to "Virtual mode" upon the creation of its first VLAN upper, as we need to classify incoming packets to a FID using {Port, VID} and not only the VID. However, it's more appropriate to transition the port to this mode when the {Port, VID} are actually mapped to a FID. Either during the enslavement of the VLAN upper to a VLAN-unaware bridge or the configuration of a router port. Do this change now in preparation for the introduction of the FID core, where this operation will be encapsulated. To prevent regressions, this patch also explicitly configures an OVS slave to "Virtual mode". Otherwise, a packet that didn't hit an ACL rule could be classified to an existing FID based on a global VID-to-FID mapping, thus not incurring a FID mis-classification, which would otherwise trap the packet to the CPU to be processed by the OVS daemon. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In new firmware versions, when configuring a {Port, VID} as a router interface, the driver is responsible for enabling the STP filter and disabling learning. Otherwise, packets are discarded. This change doesn't break existing firmware versions, but is required for newer firmware versions. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 5月, 2017 6 次提交
-
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
During rif counter freeing the counter index can be invalid. Add check of validity before freeing the counter. Fixes: e0c0afd8 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Support for counters on router interfaces") Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The router interfaces (RIFs) array is currently initialized together with the general router configuration. However, in a follow-up patchset we're going to introduce a common RIF core that will require us to initialize more RIF constructs, so move the RIF initialization to its own function. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The FIB notification block logically belongs inside the router specific struct, so move it there. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The router interfaces (RIFs) array is of no interest to code outside the routing realm, so declare it inside the router specific struct instead of the chip-wide one. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Some attributes in the global chip struct are only relevant for bridge operation, so encapsulate them in their own struct that isn't exposed to non-bridge code. This will also help us later, when we add more bridge-specific attributes. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In a similar fashion to previous patch, the router structure ('mlxsw_sp_router') doesn't need to be accessible to anyone, but the router code located at spectrum_router.c Make this apparent and reduce its scope by defining it there. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When a netdev is enslaved to a VRF master, its router interface (RIF) needs to be destroyed (if exists) and a new one created using the corresponding virtual router (VR). >From the driver's perspective, the above is equivalent to an inetaddr event sent for this netdev. Therefore, when a port netdev (or its uppers) are enslaved to a VRF master, call the same function that would've been called had a NETDEV_UP was sent for this netdev in the inetaddr notification chain. This patch also fixes a bug when a LAG netdev with an existing RIF is enslaved to a VRF. Before this patch, each LAG port would drop the reference on the RIF, but would re-join the same one (in the wrong VR) soon after. With this patch, the corresponding RIF is first destroyed and a new one is created using the correct VR. Fixes: 7179eb5a ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for VRFs") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
>From now on, a port can become a slave of OVS master. All vlans are enabled, STP state is set to "forwarding". It is up to the OVS userspace daemon to setup the flows either in kernel or in HW using TC flower offload. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add rif helper function to access the rif index and rif devices ifindex. This functions will be used by dpipe in order to dump the rif table. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Add support for counter allocation on router interfaces. The allocation depends on the counter state of relevant table. In case the counting is disabled or no counters left the counter index will be set as invalid. Also a counter pool for router allocation is added. Signed-off-by: NArakdi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Currently the return allocated index and err value are multiplexed. This patch changes the API to decouple the ret value from the allocated index. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We currently hard code the maximum number of ports in the driver, but this may change in future devices, so query it from the firmware instead. Fallback to a maximum of 64 ports in case this number can't be queried. This should only happen in SwitchX-2 for which this number is correct. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Instead of hard coding the number of LPM trees in the driver, query it from the firmware, as it may change in future devices. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Currently the struct representing router interface "mlxsw_sp_rif" is reffered as "r" in various places in the driver. Furthermore it contains a member which specify the index which is called "rif". This patch change "r" to "rif" and "rif" to "rif_index". Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that port netdevs can be enslaved to a VRF master we need to make sure the device's routing tables won't be flushed upon the insertion of a l3mdev rule. Note that we assume the notified l3mdev rule is a simple rule as used by the VRF master. We don't check for the presence of other selectors such as 'iif' and 'oif'. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In a similar fashion to the previous patch, allow bridges and VLAN devices on top of bridges to be enslaved to a VRF master device. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-