Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Add mci controller nodes to atmel boards.
Signed-off-by: NLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Add mci controller nodes to atmel SOCs.
Signed-off-by: NLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Add clocks to clock lookup table for DT entries.
Signed-off-by: NLudovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Signed-off-by: NJoachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Signed-off-by: NJoachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Signed-off-by: NJoachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Signed-off-by: NJoachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Based on AT91 PIT DT patch from Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD.
Signed-off-by: NJoachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

We need CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9 to get the at91sam926x_timer
symbol used in board-dt.
Signed-off-by: NJoachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

CPU Module with ATMEL AT91SAM9G45
http://www.ronetix.at/pm9g45.htmlSigned-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

as we just use the rts and not the rts & cts for rs485
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

USART are the full pin uart
DBGU the debug Unit
UART the two pin uart
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

add :
 set_deglitch: enable/disable deglitch
 set_debounce: enable/disable debounce
 set_pulldown: enable/disable pulldown
 disable_schmitt_trig: disable schmitt trigger
Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

Signed-off-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

This patch adds plgpio nodes in SPEAr DT files.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Most of SPEAr SoCs, which support pinctrl, can configure & use pads as gpio.
This patch gpio enable support for SPEAr pinctrl drivers.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The <*/gpio.h> includes are updated again: now we need to account
for the problem introduced by commit:
595679a8038584df7b9398bf34f61db3c038bfea
"gpiolib: fix up function prototypes etc"

Actually we need static inlines in include/asm-generic/gpio.h
as well since we may have GPIOLIB but not PINCTRL.
Make sure to move all the CONFIG_PINCTRL business
to the end of the file so we are sure we have
declared struct gpio_chip.

And we need to keep the static inlines in <linux/gpio.h>
but here for the !CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO case, and then we
may as well throw in a few warnings like the other
prototypes there, if someone would have the bad taste
of compiling without GENERIC_GPIO even.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.

So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.

This is done by:

- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
  reliably check whether this succeeds.

- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
  pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
  pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
  function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
  purpose-specific.

- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
  pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
  gpiochip_add_pin_range().

Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This makes us call gpiochio_remove_pin_ranges() in the
gpiochip_remove() function, so we get rid of ranges when
freeing the chip.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"

Introduced both of_gpiochip_remove_pin_range() and
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(). But the contents are exactly
the same so remove the OF one and rely on the range deletion
in the core.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"

Declared the of_gpiochip_[add|remove]_pin_range() global
while they should be static as they are only ever used in
this file. Let's convert them to static.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Commit 69e1601bca88809dc118abd1becb02c15a02ec71
"gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges"

Got most of it's function prototypes wrong, so fix this up by:

- Moving the void declarations into static inlines in
  <linux/gpio.h> (previously the actual prototypes were declared
  here...)

- Declare the gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
  gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() functions in <asm-generic/gpio.h>
  together with the pin range struct declaration itself.

- Actually only implement these very functions in gpiolib.c
  if CONFIG_PINCTRL is set.

- Additionally export the symbols since modules will need to
  be able to do this.
Reviewed-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Staticize sirfsoc_gpio_irq_map() function.
Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Acked-by: NBarry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Staticize u300_pin_config_get() and u300_pin_config_set() functions.
Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This converts the U300 pin controller to use managed resources
(devm_*) for it's memory region.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This switches the COH 901 pin controller to use managed
resources (devm_*) for memory remaps, clocks, etc.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This switches the COH 901 pinctrl driver to allocate its GPIO
IRQs dynamically, and start to use a linear irqdomain to map
from the hardware IRQs.

This way we can cut away the complex allocation of IRQ numbers
from the <mach/irqs.h> file.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The U300 IRQs were bumped once to offset to 1 (in order to avoid
using IRQ 0 which is now NO_IRQ). This was OK as we were still
passing the number of irqs in the .nr_irqs field of the machine,
with descriptors allocated at boot time.

However .nr_irqs should be 0, leading the system to reserve the
first 16 IRQs. Then the VIC driver will complain that IRQs 1
thru 15 are pre-allocated, so to avoid this and use free
descriptors, move all IRQs up to offset 32.

This will all be done away with as we migrate to device tree,
so it is an interim solution.
Acked-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Most of SPEAr SoCs, which support pinctrl, can configure & use
pads as gpio. This patch adds plgpio driver for configuring
these pads as gpio.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

pinctrl subsystem needs gpio chip base to prepare set of gpio
pin ranges, which a given pinctrl driver can handle. This is
important to handle pinctrl gpio request calls in order to
program a given pin properly for gpio operation.

As gpio base is allocated dynamically during gpiochip
registration, presently there exists no clean way to pass this
information to the pinctrl subsystem.

After few discussions from [1], it was concluded that may be
gpio controller reporting the pin range it supports, is a
better way than pinctrl subsystem directly registering it.

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/184816

Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NShiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[Edited documentation a bit]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This reverts earlier commit which removed
pinctrl_remove_gpio_range(), because at that time there
weren't any more users of that routine. It was removed as the
removal of ranges was done in unregister of pinctrl.

But as we are now registering stuff from gpiolib, we may
remove and insert a gpio module multiple times. So, we
need this routine again.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The of_device_id table is supposed to be zero-terminated.
Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The driver supports old up SiRFprimaII SoCs, this patch makes it support
the new SiRFmarco as well.
SiRFmarco, as a SMP SoC, adds new SIRFSOC_GPIO_PAD_EN_CLR registers, to
disable GPIO pad, we should write 1 to the corresponding bit in the new
CLEAR register instead of writing 0 to SIRFSOC_GPIO_PAD_EN.
Signed-off-by: NBarry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Like the spear platform, the mvebu platform has multiple files: one
core file, and then one file per SoC family. More files will be added
later, as support for mach-orion5x and mach-mv78xx0 SoCs is added to
pinctrl-mvebu. For those reasons, having a separate subdirectory,
drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/ makes sense, and it had already been suggested
by Linus Wallej when the driver was originally submitted.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Including the core.h header for the pinctrl subsystem is not
necessary, and it is actually causing problems when moving the
pinctrl-mvebu drivers into a separate subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>