1. 11 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  2. 29 1月, 2014 7 次提交
  3. 12 11月, 2013 4 次提交
  4. 01 9月, 2013 3 次提交
  5. 29 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 14 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 07 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  8. 07 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: improve the delayed inode throttling · de3cb945
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The delayed inode code batches up changes to the btree in hopes of doing
      them in bulk.  As the changes build up, processes kick off worker
      threads and wait for them to make progress.
      
      The current code kicks off an async work queue item for each delayed
      node, which creates a lot of churn.  It also uses a fixed 1 HZ waiting
      period for the throttle, which allows us to build a lot of pending
      work and can slow down the commit.
      
      This changes us to watch a sequence counter as it is bumped during the
      operations.  We kick off fewer work items and have each work item do
      more work.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      de3cb945
  9. 21 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 20 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  11. 13 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  12. 12 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • M
      Btrfs: improve the noflush reservation · 08e007d2
      Miao Xie 提交于
      In some places(such as: evicting inode), we just can not flush the reserved
      space of delalloc, flushing the delayed directory index and delayed inode
      is OK, but we don't try to flush those things and just go back when there is
      no enough space to be reserved. This patch fixes this problem.
      
      We defined 3 types of the flush operations: NO_FLUSH, FLUSH_LIMIT and FLUSH_ALL.
      If we can in the transaction, we should not flush anything, or the deadlock
      would happen, so use NO_FLUSH. If we flushing the reserved space of delalloc
      would cause deadlock, use FLUSH_LIMIT. In the other cases, FLUSH_ALL is used,
      and we will flush all things.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      08e007d2
  13. 02 10月, 2012 2 次提交
  14. 21 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 29 8月, 2012 2 次提交
  16. 24 7月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: zero unused bytes in inode item · 293f7e07
      Li Zefan 提交于
      The otime field is not zeroed, so users will see random otime in an old
      filesystem with a new kernel which has otime support in the future.
      
      The reserved bytes are also not zeroed, and we'll have compatibility
      issue if we make use of those bytes.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
      293f7e07
    • J
      Btrfs: flush delayed inodes if we're short on space · 96c3f433
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Those crazy gentoo guys have been complaining about ENOSPC errors on their
      portage volumes.  This is because doing things like untar tends to create
      lots of new files which will soak up all the reservation space in the
      delayed inodes.  Usually this gets papered over by the fact that we will try
      and commit the transaction, however if this happens in the wrong spot or we
      choose not to commit the transaction you will be screwed.  So add the
      ability to expclitly flush delayed inodes to free up space.  Please test
      this out guys to make sure it works since as usual I cannot reproduce.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      96c3f433
  17. 15 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  18. 30 5月, 2012 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: convert the inode bit field to use the actual bit operations · 72ac3c0d
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Miao pointed this out while I was working on an orphan problem that messing
      with a bitfield where different ranges are protected by different locks
      doesn't work out right.  Turns out we've been doing this forever where we
      have different parts of the bit field protected by either no lock at all or
      different locks which could cause all sorts of weird problems including the
      issue I was hitting.  So instead make a runtime_flags thing that we use the
      normal bit operations on that are all atomic so we can keep having our
      no/different locking for the different flags and then make force_compress
      it's own thing so it can be treated normally.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      72ac3c0d
    • J
      Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence · 0c4d2d95
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody
      would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which
      serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's
      sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the
      board, and not just in file write.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      0c4d2d95
  19. 22 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  20. 17 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 16 12月, 2011 1 次提交