Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 9月, 2009 7 次提交
  3. 29 8月, 2009 21 次提交
  5. 27 8月, 2009 6 次提交
  7. 26 8月, 2009 1 次提交
    • D
      sparc64: Validate linear D-TLB misses. · d8ed1d43
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      When page alloc debugging is not enabled, we essentially accept any
virtual address for linear kernel TLB misses.  But with kgdb, kernel
address probing, and other facilities we can try to access arbitrary
crap.

So, make sure the address we miss on will translate to physical memory
that actually exists.

In order to make this work we have to embed the valid address bitmap
into the kernel image.  And in order to make that less expensive we
make an adjustment, in that the max physical memory address is
decreased to "1 << 41", even on the chips that support a 42-bit
physical address space.  We can do this because bit 41 indicates
"I/O space" and thus covers non-memory ranges.

The result of this is that:

1) kpte_linear_bitmap shrinks from 2K to 1K in size

2) we need 64K more for the valid address bitmap

We can't let the valid address bitmap be dynamically allocated
once we start using it to validate TLB misses, otherwise we have
crazy issues to deal with wrt. recursive TLB misses and such.

If we're in a TLB miss it could be the deepest trap level that's legal
inside of the cpu.  So if we TLB miss referencing the bitmap, the cpu
will be out of trap levels and enter RED state.

To guard against out-of-range accesses to the bitmap, we have to check
to make sure no bits in the physical address above bit 40 are set.  We
could export and use last_valid_pfn for this check, but that's just an
unnecessary extra memory reference.

On the plus side of all this, since we load all of these translations
into the special 4MB mapping TSB, and we check the TSB first for TLB
misses, there should be absolutely no real cost for these new checks
in the TLB miss path.

Reported-by: heyongli@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d8ed1d43
  9. 25 8月, 2009 2 次提交
    • J
      x86: Fix build with older binutils and consolidate linker script · c62e4320
      由 Jan Beulich 提交于 
      binutils prior to 2.17 can't deal with the currently possible
situation of a new segment following the per-CPU segment, but
that new segment being empty - objcopy misplaces the .bss (and
perhaps also the .brk) sections outside of any segment.

However, the current ordering of sections really just appears
to be the effect of cumulative unrelated changes; re-ordering
things allows to easily guarantee that the segment following
the per-CPU one is non-empty, and at once eliminates the need
for the bogus data.init2 segment.

Once touching this code, also use the various data section
helper macros from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h.

-v2: fix !SMP builds.
Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: <sam@ravnborg.org>
LKML-Reference: <4A94085D02000078000119A5@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c62e4320
    • A
      x86: Fix an incorrect argument of reserve_bootmem() · a6a06f7b
      由 Amerigo Wang 提交于 
      This line looks suspicious, because if this is true, then the
'flags' parameter of function reserve_bootmem_generic() will be
unused when !CONFIG_NUMA. I don't think this is what we want.
Signed-off-by: NWANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
LKML-Reference: <20090821083709.5098.52505.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      a6a06f7b
  11. 24 8月, 2009 3 次提交