- 18 11月, 2015 10 次提交
-
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
When this option is 0 (so the power well support is disabled) we are supposed to enable all power wells once and don't disable them unless we system suspend the device. Currently if the option is 0, we can call the power well enable handlers multiple times, whenever their refcount changes from 0->1. This may not be a problem for the HW, but it's not logical and may trigger some warnings in the power well code which doesn't expect this. So simply keep around a reference while we are not system suspended to solve this. For simplicity mark the module option read only, so we don't need to deal with re-enabling the feature during runtime. If someone really needs that it could be added later in a more proper way. v2: - fix typo in comment in intel_power_domains_suspend() (Patrik) Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447775063-24438-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
We don't need to reinit DDI and IRQs during PW1 enabling any more, since we don't toggle PW1 on-demand any more. We enable PW1 only as part of the display core init sequence and after this we initialize both DDI and IRQs later in the init sequence. So remove these init steps from the power well code. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-11-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
We need to disable the DC states during display core init to sanitize the HW state we inherit from the BIOS. We need to disable it during display core uninit too, since the power well framework will leave it enabled (since we get to the display core uninit step with all power domains disabled already). Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-9-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> [fix line over 80 chars checkpatch WARN in gen9_set_dc_state() (imre)] Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-8-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
With the DMC firmware installed we don't need to handle HW resources that are handled automatically by the firmware. Besides being redundant this can also interfere with the firmware, possibly getting it into a broken/blocked state. The on-demand handling of PW1 was already half-way removed, MISC IO was still handled in this way. After the last patch we init/uninit these HW resources manually as part of the display core init/uninit sequence, so we can now remove the on-demand handling for these completely. We still keep around the power wells (with no domains attached to them) since the manual toggling during display core init/uninit happens via the current API. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> [s/beeing/being/ in commit message (imre)] Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-7-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
We need to initialize the display core part early, before initializing the rest of the display power state. This is also described in the bspec termed "Display initialization sequence". Atm we run this sequence during driver loading after power domain HW state initialization which is too late and during runtime suspend/resume which is unneeded and can interere with DMC functionality which handles HW resources toggled by this init/uninit sequence automatically. The init sequence must be run as the first step of HW power state initialization and during system resume. The uninit sequence must be run during system suspend. To address the above move the init sequence to the initial HW power state setup and the uninit sequence to a new power domains suspend function called during system suspend. As part of the init sequence we also have to reprogram the DMC firmware as it's lost across a system suspend/resume cycle. After this change CD clock initialization during driver loading will happen only later after other dependent HW/SW parts are initialized, while during system resume it will get initialized as the last step of the init sequence. This distinction can be removed by some refactoring of platform independent parts. I left this refactoring out from this series since I didn't want to change non-SKL parts. This is a TODO for later. v2: - fix error path in i915_drm_suspend_late() - don't try to re-program the DMC firmware if it failed to load Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447774433-20834-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
Give a more proper name to this function. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-5-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Before this patch, we used the intel_display_power_{get,put} functions to make sure the PW1 and Misc I/O power wells were enabled all the time while LCPLL was enabled. We called a get() at intel_ddi_pll_init() when we discovered that LCPLL was enabled, then we would call put/get at skl_{un,}init_cdclk(). The problem is that skl_uninit_cdclk() is indirectly called by intel_runtime_suspend(). So it will only release its power well _after_ we already decided to runtime suspend. But since we only decide to runtime suspend after all power wells and refcounts are released, that basically means we will never decide to runtime suspend. So what this patch does to fix that problem is move the PW1 + Misc I/O power well handling out of the runtime PM mechanism: instead of calling intel_display_power_{get_put} - functions that touch the refcount -, we'll call the low level intel_power_well_{en,dis}able, which don't change the refcount. This way, it is now possible for the refcount to actually reach zero, and we'll now start runtime suspending/resuming. v2 (from Paulo): - Write a commit message since the original patch left it empty. - Rebase after the intel_power_well_{en,dis}able rename. - Use lookup_power_well() instead of hardcoded indexes. Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/rte (and every other rpm test) Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92211 Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92605Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
The current lookup code wouldn't find a power well if it's not in any power domain. There wasn't any power wells before but an upcoming patch will detach the power domains from power well#1 and the MISC IO power wells, so fix things up accordingly. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
lookup_power_well() expects uniq power well IDs, but atm we have uninitialized IDs which would clash with those power wells with a 0 ID. This wasn't a problem so far since nothing looked up such a power well, but an upcoming patch will (Misc IO for SKL), so fix this up on platforms where this matters. Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPatrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446657859-9598-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
- 12 11月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Animesh Manna 提交于
As during disabling dc6 no need to check for csr firmware loading status, so removed the assert call (Requested by Damien). Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Tested-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> # SKL Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446069547-24760-14-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This removes two anti-patterns: - Locking shouldn't be used to synchronize with async work (of any form, whether callbacks, workers or other threads). This is what the mutex_lock/unlock seems to have been for in intel_csr_load_program. Instead ordering should be ensured with the generic wait_for_completion()/complete(). Or more specific functions provided by the core kernel like e.g. flush_work()/cancel_work_sync() in the case of synchronizing with a work item. - Don't invent own completion like the following code did with the (already removed) wait_for(csr_load_status_get()) pattern - it's really hard to get these right when you want them to be _really_ correct (and be fast) in all cases. Furthermore it's easier to read code using the well-known primitives than new ones using non-standard names. Before enabling/disabling DC6 check if the firmware is loaded successfully. This is guaranteed during runtime s/r, since otherwise we don't enable RPM, but not during system s/r. Note that it's still unclear whether we need to enable/disable DC6 during system s/r, until that's clarified, keep the current behavior and enable/disable DC6. Also after this patch there is a race during system s/r where the firmware may not be loaded yet, that's addressed in an upcoming patch. v2-v3: - unchanged v4: - rebased on latest drm-intel-nightly Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> [imre: added code and note about checking if the firmware loaded ok, before enabling/disabling it] Reviewed-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Tested-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> # SKL Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447341037-2623-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Avoids non-static functions since all the callers are in intel_rpm.c. Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> [imre: removed note about reg definitions from commit message, since it's not relevant any more] Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Tested-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> # SKL [Jani: make assert_csr_loaded static] Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446069547-24760-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
- 11 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
intel_runtime_pm_disable() takes an extra rpm reference which combined with the one we leak from intel_display_set_init_power() leaves the usage count at <original>+1 after the driver has been unloaded. The original ref is dropped explicitly in intel_runtime_pm_enable(). So the next time we load the driver we can no longer do runtime PM ever. This used to work, but commit 292b990e ("drm/i915: Update power domains on readout.") broke things by not dropping the init power domain during fbdev teardown. Based on the comment in intel_power_domains_fini(), the way it used to to work wasn't intentional. As in we weren't supposed to drop the init power during driver unload. And since we no longer do, we now leak an extra rpm reference. So fix things by throwing intel_runtime_pm_disable() to the bin, so that the only leaked reference comes from the init power domain. Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Fixes: 292b990e ("drm/i915: Update power domains on readout.") Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1446815313-9490-2-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 29 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
Kabylake is a Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics following Skylake. It is Gen9p5, so it inherits everything from Skylake. Let's start by adding the platform separated from Skylake but reusing most of all features, functions etc. Later we rebase the PCI-ID patch without is_skylake=1 so we don't replace what original Author did there. Few IS_SKYLAKEs if statements are not being covered by this patch on purpose: - Workarounds: Kabylake is derivated from Skylake H0 so no W/As apply here. - GuC: A following patch removes Kabylake support with an explanation: No firmware available yet. - DMC/CSR: Done in a separated patch since we need to be carefull and load the version for revision 7 since Kabylake is Skylake H0. v2: relative cleaner commit message and added the missed IS_KABYLAKE to intel_i2c.c as pointed out by Jani. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Animesh Manna 提交于
Mmio register access after dc6/dc5 entry is not allowed when DC6 power states are enabled according to bspec (bspec-id 0527), so enabling dc6 as the last call in suspend flow. Addtional note from Imre: Currently we keep DC6 enabled during modesets and DPAUX transfers, which is not allowed according to the specification. This can lead at least to PLL locking failures, DPAUX timeouts and prevent deeper package power states (PC9/10). Fix this for now by enabling DC6 only when we know the above events (modeset, DPAUX) can't happen. This a temporary solution as some issues are still unsolved as described in [1] and [2], we'll address those as a follow-up. [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077669.html [2] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077787.html v1: Initial version. v2: Based on review comment from Daniel, - created a seperate patch for csr uninitialization set call. v3: Rebased on top of latest code. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@intel.com> Acked-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 06 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
The BIOS can leave the CHV display PHY in some odd state where some of the LDOs/lanes won't power down fully when unused. This will trigger a host of asserts that were added in: 30142273 drm/i915: Add CHV PHY LDO power sanity checks 6669e39f drm/i915: Add some CHV DPIO lane power state asserts To avoid that, skip the asserts until the PHY power well has been disabled at least once. That will fully reset the PHY, and once brought back up, the dynamic power down features will work correctly. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Deepak S<deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 30 9月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
According to the PCI docs and Rafael, we don't need to be doing explicit enables and disables in our init and teardown routines, as they're taken care of by the PCI core. So drop the pm_runtime_disable() at teardown and pm_runtime_set_active() at init. This fixes one failure of the basic-pci-d3-state test on my BYT. v2: drop extra get_noresume() and put_noidle() (Rafael) Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Animesh Manna 提交于
Another interesting criteria to work dmc as expected is pw1 to be enabled by driver and dmc will shut it off in its execution sequence. If already disabled by driver dmc will get confuse and behave differently than expected found during pc10 entry issue for skl. So berfore we disable power-well 1, added check if dmc firmware is present and driver will not disable power well 1, but for any reason if firmware is not present of failed to load we can shut off the power well 1 which will save some power. As skl is currently fully dependent on dmc to go in lowest possible power state (dc6) but the same is not applicable for bxt. Display engine can enter into dc9 without dmc, hence unblocking disable call. v1: Initial version. v2: Rebased as per current patch series. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NA.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 14 9月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
Use WARN_ONCE in a bunch of places and demote a message that would continually spam us. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Acked-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 01 9月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
At various points when changing the DPIO lane/phy power states, construct an expected value of the DISPLAY_PHY_STATUS register and compare it with the real thing. To construct the expected value we look at our shadow PHY_CONTROL register value (which should match what we've just written to the hardware), and we also need to look at the actual state of the cmn power wells as a disabled power well causes the relevant LDO status to be reported as 'on' in DISPLAY_PHY_STATUS. When initially powering up the PHY it performs various internal calibrations for which it fully powers up. That means that if we check for the expetected power state immediately upon releasing cmnreset we would get the occasional false positive. But we can of course poll until the expected value appears. It shouldn't be too long so this shouldn't make modesets substantially longer. One extra complication is introduced when we cross the streams, ie. drive port B with pipe B. In this case we trick CL2 (where the DPLL lives) into life by temporaily powering up the lanes in the second channel, and once the pipe is up and runnign we release the lane power override. At that point the power state of CL2 has somehow gotten entangled with the power state of the first channel. That means that constructing the expected DISPLAY_PHY_STATUS value is a bit tricky since based on the lane power states in the second channel, CL2 should also be powered down. But we can use the DPLL enable bit to determine when CL2 should be alive even if the lanes are powered down. However the power state of CL2 isn't actually tied in with the DPLL state, but to the state of the lanes in first channel, so we have to avoid checking the expected state between shutting down the DPLL and powering down the lanes in the first channel. So no calling assert_chv_phy_status() before the DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL write in chv_phy_powergate_lanes(), but after the write is a safe time to check. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Add some checks that the state of the DPIO lanes is more or less what we expect based on the overrides. The hardware only provides two bits per channel indicating whether all or some of the lanes are powered down, so we can't do an exact check. Additionally, CL2 powering down before we can check it adds another twist. To work around this we simply check for the 0 value of the CL2 register (which is what we get when it's powered down) and adjust our expectations. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 31 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Xiong Zhang 提交于
From B spec, DDI_E port belong to PowerWell 2, but DDI_E share the powerwell_req/staus register bit with DDI_A which belong to DDI_A_E_POWER_WELL. In order to communicate with the connector on DDI-E, both DDI_A_E_POWER_WELL and POWER_WELL_2 must be enabled. Currently intel_dp_power_get(DDI_E) only enable DDI_A_E_POWER_WELL, this patch will not only enable DDI_a_E_POWER_WELL but also enable POWER_WELL_2. This patch also fix the DDI-E hotplug function. Signed-off-by: NXiong Zhang <xiong.y.zhang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 26 8月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We can choose to leave the display PHY CL2 powerdown up to some hardware signals, or we can force it. The BXT code forces the nonexistent CL2 in the x1 PHY to power down. Follow suit on CHV. Maybe it can still save some extra power by disabling some extra logic in CL1, or something. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
CHV has supports some form of automagic clock gating for the DPIO SUS clock. We can simply enable the magic bits and the hardware should take care of the rest. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Normmally the common lane in a PHY channel gets powered up when some of the data lanes get powered up. But when we're driving port B with pipe B we don't want to enabled any of the data lanes, and just want the DPLL in the common lane to be active. To make that happens we have to temporarily enable some data lanes after which we can access the DPLL registers in the common lane. Once the pipe is up and running we can drop the power override on the data lanes allowing them to shut down. From this point forward the common lane will in fact stay powered on until the data lanes in the other channel get powered down. Ville's extended explanation from the review thread: On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:47:41AM +0530, Deepak wrote: > One Q, why only for port B? Port C is also in same common lane right? Port B is in the first PHY channel which also houses CL1. CL1 always powers up whenever any lanes in either PHY channel are powered up. CL2 only powers up if lanes in the second channel (ie. the one with port C) powers up. So in this scenario (pipe B->port B) we want the DPLL from CL2, but ideally we only want to power up the lanes for port B. Powering up port B lanes will only power up CL1, but as we need CL2 instead we need to, temporarily, power up some lanes in port C as well. Crossing the streams the other way (pipe A->port C) is not a problem since CL1 powers up whenever anything else powers up. So powering up some port C lanes is enough on its own to make the CL1 DPLL operational, even though CL1 and the lanes live in separate channels. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> [danvet: Amend commit message with extended explanation.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Powergate the PHY lanes when they're not needed. For HDMI all four lanes are needed always, but for DP we can enable only the needed lanes. To power down the unused lanes we use some power down override bits in the DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL register. Without the overrides it appears that the hardware always powers on all the lanes. When the port is disabled the power down override is not needed and the lanes will shut off on their own. That also means the override is critical to actually be able to access the DPIO registers before the port is actually enabled. Additionally the common lanes will power down when not needed. CL1 remains on as long as anything else is on, CL2 will shut down when all the lanes in the same channel will shut down. There is one exception for CL2 that will be dealt in a separate patch for clarity. With potentially some lanes powered down, the DP code now has to check the number of active lanes before accessing PCS/TX registers. All registers in powered down blocks will reads as 0xffffffff, and soe we would drown in warnings from vlv_dpio_read() if we allowed the code to access all those registers. Another important detail in the DP code is the "TX latency optimal" setting. Normally the second TX lane acts as some kind of reset master, with the other lanes as slaves. But when only a single lane is enabled, that single lane obviously has to be the master. A bit of extra care is needed to reconstruct the initial state of the DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL register since it can't be read safely. So instead read the actual lane status from the DPLL/PHY_STATUS registers and use that to determine which lanes ought to be powergated initially. We also need to switch the PHY power modes to "deep PSR" to avoid a hard system hang when powering down the single channel PHY. Also sprinkle a few debug prints around so that we can monitor the DISPLAY_PHY_STATUS changes without having to read it and risk corrupting it. v2: Add locking to chv_powergate_phy_lanes() v3: Actually enable dynamic powerdown in the PHY and deal with the fallout Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Bunch of stuff needs the DPLL ref/cri clocks on both VLV and CHV, and having VGA mode enabled causes some problems for CHV. So let's just pull the code to configure those bits into the disp2d well enable hook. With the DPLL disable code also fixed to leave those bits alone we should now have a consistent DPLL state all the time even if the DPLL is disabled. This also neatly removes some duplicated code between the VLV and CHV codepaths. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
dev_priv->chv_phy_control is protected by the power_domains->lock elsewhere, so also grab it when initializing chv_phy_control. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 05 8月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Similar to the ->enable vfunc in patch "drm/i915: Extract a intel_power_well_enable() function". v2 (from Paulo): - Same s/i915_/intel_/ bikeshed as the previous patch. - Update the commit hash. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
We need a bit book keeping around power wells' ops->enable(), namely a nice debug message and updating hw_enabled. Let's introduce a intel_power_well_enable() function to make sure all the callers do the same things. v2 (from Paulo): - s/i915_power_well_enable/intel_power_well_enable/ since everything else on this file uses intel_ instead of i915_. - Fix typo in commit message. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 13 7月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We do the exact same steps around the disp2d/pipe A power well enable/disable on VLV and CHV. Refactor the shared code into some helpers. Note that this means we now call vlv_power_sequencer_reset() before turning off the power well, whereas before we did it after. That doesn't matter though since vlv_power_sequencer_reset() just resets the power sequencer software tracking and doesn't touch the hardware at all. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
The pipe A power well is the "disp2d" well on CHV and pipe B and C wells don't even exist. Thereforce we can remove the checks for pipe A vs. others and just assume it's always pipe A. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Drop the spurious 'A' from the VLV/CHV ref clock enable define, and add the "REF" to the VLV ref clock selection bit. Also s/CLOCK/CLK/ for extra consistency. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We disable the DPLL VGA mode when enabling the DPLL, but we enaable it again when disabling the DPLL. Having VGA mode enabled even in unused DPLLs can cause problems for CHV, so it seems wiser to always keep it disabled. And let's just do that on all GMCH platforms to keep things as similar as possible between them. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 28 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Expecting CHV power wells to be just an extended versions of the VLV power wells, a bunch of commented out power wells were added in anticipation when Punit folks would implement it all. Turns out they never did, and instead CHV has fewer power wells than VLV. Rip out all the #if 0'ed junk that's not needed. v2: Rename the "pipe-a" well to "display" to match VLV Clarify the pipe A power well relationship to pipes B and C (Deepak) Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Not sure which LDO programming sequence delay should be used for the CHV PHY, but the spec says that 600ns is "Used by default for initial bringup", and the BIOS seems to use that, so let's do the same. Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 20 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
This patch fix spelling typo in intel_runtime_pm.c Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 08 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
With recent hardware/firmware there don't appear to be any glitches on the other PHY when we toggle the cmnreset for the other PHY. So detangle the cmnlane power wells from one another and let them be controlled independently. This reverts commit 3dd7b974. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Sometimes (exactly when is a bit unclear) DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL appears to get corrupted. The values I've managed to read from it seem to have some pattern but vary quite a lot. The corruption doesn't seem to just happen when the register is accessed, but can also happen spontaneosly during modeset. When this happens during a modeset things go south and the display doesn't light up. I've managed to hit the problemn when toggling HDMI on port D on and off. When things get corrupted the display doesn't light up, but as soon as I manually write the correct value to the register the display comes up. First I was suspicious that we ourselves accidentally overwrite it with garbage, but didn't catch anything with the reg_rw tracepoint. Also I sprinkled check all over the modeset path to see exactly when the corruption happens, and eg. the read back value was fine just before intel_dp_set_m(), and corrupted immediately after it. I also made my check function repair the register value whenever it was wrong, and with this approach the corruption repeated several times during the modeset operation, always seeming to trigger in the same exact calls to the check function, while other calls to the function never caught anything. So far I've not seen this problem occurring when carefully avoiding all read accesses to DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL. Not sure if that's just pure luck or an actual workaround, but we can hope it works. So let's avoid reading the register and instead track the desired value of the register in dev_priv. v2: Read out the power well state to determine initial register value v3: Use DPIO_CHx names instead of raw numbers Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDeepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-