- 28 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peng Tao 提交于
When compiling with EXT4FS_DEBUG on, gcc will complain with following warnings: linux-2.6/fs/ext4/ialloc.c: In function ‘ext4_count_free_inodes’: linux-2.6/fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1192: warning: format ‘%lu’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘ext4_group_t’ So add a type cast to suppress it. Signed-off-by: NPeng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Dilger 提交于
Enhance the inode allocator to take a goal inode number as a paremeter; if it is specified, it takes precedence over Orlov or parent directory inode allocation algorithms. The extents migration function uses the goal inode number so that the extent trees allocated the migration function use the correct flex_bg. In the future, the goal inode functionality will also be used to allocate an adjacent inode for the extended attributes. Also, for testing purposes the goal inode number can be specified via /sys/fs/{dev}/inode_goal. This can be useful for testing inode allocation beyond 2^32 blocks on very large filesystems. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Instead of using a random number to determine the goal parent grop for the Orlov top directories, use a hash of the directory name. This allows for repeatable results when trying to benchmark filesystem layout algorithms. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johann Lombardi 提交于
The goal inode is specificed by inode number which belongs to [1; s_inodes_count]. Signed-off-by: NJohann Lombardi <johann@sun.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If the caller isn't planning on modifying the block group descriptors, there's no need to pass in a pointer to a struct buffer_head. Nuking this saves a tiny amount of CPU time and stack space usage. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We have sb_bgl_lock() and ext4_group_info.bb_state bit spinlock to protech group information. The later is only used within mballoc code. Consolidate them to use sb_bgl_lock(). This makes the mballoc.c code much simpler and also avoid confusion with two locks protecting same info. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Move the function prototypes in group.h into ext4.h so they are all defined in one place. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 01 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Ext4's on-line resizing adds a new block group and then, only at the last step adjusts s_groups_count. However, it's possible on SMP systems that another CPU could see the updated the s_group_count and not see the newly initialized data structures for the just-added block group. For this reason, it's important to insert a SMP read barrier after reading s_groups_count and before reading any (for example) the new block group descriptors allowed by the increased value of s_groups_count. Unfortunately, we rather blatently violate this locking protocol documented in fs/ext4/resize.c. Fortunately, (1) on-line resizes happen relatively rarely, and (2) it seems rare that the filesystem code will immediately try to use just-added block group before any memory ordering issues resolve themselves. So apparently problems here are relatively hard to hit, since ext3 has been vulnerable to the same issue for years with no one apparently complaining. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If the Orlov allocator is having trouble finding an appropriate block group, the fallback code could loop forever, causing a soft lockup warning in find_group_orlov(): BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [cp:11728] ... Pid: 11728, comm: cp Not tainted (2.6.30-rc1-dirty #77) Lenovo EIP: 0060:[<c021650e>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0 EIP is at ext4_get_group_desc+0x54/0x9d ... Call Trace: [<c0218021>] find_group_orlov+0x2ee/0x334 [<c0120a5f>] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb [<c02188e3>] ext4_new_inode+0x2cf/0xb1a Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 14 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Ebbert 提交于
Missing braces caused the warning to print more than once. Signed-Off-By: NChuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 26 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Use lowercase names of quota functions instead of old uppercase ones. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
-
- 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This is a short-term warning, and even printk_ratelimit() can result in too much noise in system logs. So only print it once as a warning. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 3月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Instead of looping over all of the block groups in a flex group summing their summary statistics, start tracking used_dirs in struct flex_groups, and use struct flex_groups instead. This should save a bit of CPU for mkdir-heavy workloads. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Reduce pressure on the sb_bgl_lock family of locks by using atomic_t's to track the number of free blocks and inodes in each flex_group. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
I was seeing fsck errors on inode bitmaps after a 4 thread dbench run on a 4 cpu machine: Inode bitmap differences: -50736 -(50752--50753) etc... I believe that this is because ext4_free_inode() uses atomic bitops, and although ext4_new_inode() *used* to also use atomic bitops for synchronization, commit 39341867 changed this to use the sb_bgl_lock, so that we could also synchronize against read_inode_bitmap and initialization of uninit inode tables. However, that change left ext4_free_inode using atomic bitops, which I think leaves no synchronization between setting & unsetting bits in the inode table. The below patch fixes it for me, although I wonder if we're getting at all heavy-handed with this spinlock... Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The find_group_flex() inode allocator is now only used if the filesystem is mounted using the "oldalloc" mount option. It is replaced with the original Orlov allocator that has been updated for flex_bg filesystems (it should behave the same way if flex_bg is disabled). The inode allocator now functions by taking into account each flex_bg group, instead of each block group, when deciding whether or not it's time to allocate a new directory into a fresh flex_bg. The block allocator has also been changed so that the first block group in each flex_bg is preferred for use for storing directory blocks. This keeps directory blocks close together, which is good for speeding up e2fsck since large directories are more likely to look like this: debugfs: stat /home/tytso/Maildir/cur Inode: 1844562 Type: directory Mode: 0700 Flags: 0x81000 Generation: 1132745781 Version: 0x00000000:0000ad71 User: 15806 Group: 15806 Size: 1060864 File ACL: 0 Directory ACL: 0 Links: 2 Blockcount: 2072 Fragment: Address: 0 Number: 0 Size: 0 ctime: 0x499c0ff4:164961f4 -- Wed Feb 18 08:41:08 2009 atime: 0x499c0ff4:00000000 -- Wed Feb 18 08:41:08 2009 mtime: 0x49957f51:00000000 -- Fri Feb 13 09:10:25 2009 crtime: 0x499c0f57:00d51440 -- Wed Feb 18 08:38:31 2009 Size of extra inode fields: 28 BLOCKS: (0):7348651, (1-258):7348654-7348911 TOTAL: 259 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 22 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This is a workaround for find_group_flex() which badly needs to be replaced. One of its problems (besides ignoring the Orlov algorithm) is that it is a bit hyperactive about returning failure under suspicious circumstances. This can lead to spurious ENOSPC failures even when there are inodes still available. Work around this for now by retrying the search using find_group_other() if find_group_flex() returns -1. If find_group_other() succeeds when find_group_flex() has failed, log a warning message. A better block/inode allocator that will fix this problem for real has been queued up for the next merge window. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 2月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Duane Griffin 提交于
At the moment there are few restrictions on which flags may be set on which inodes. Specifically DIRSYNC may only be set on directories and IMMUTABLE and APPEND may not be set on links. Tighten that to disallow TOPDIR being set on non-directories and only NODUMP and NOATIME to be set on non-regular file, non-directories. Introduces a flags masking function which masks flags based on mode and use it during inode creation and when flags are set via the ioctl to facilitate future consistency. Signed-off-by: NDuane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com> Acked-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Duane Griffin 提交于
At present INDEX and EXTENTS are the only flags that new ext4 inodes do NOT inherit from their parent. In addition prevent the flags DIRTY, ECOMPR, IMAGIC, TOPDIR, HUGE_FILE and EXT_MIGRATE from being inherited. List inheritable flags explicitly to prevent future flags from accidentally being inherited. This fixes the TOPDIR flag inheritance bug reported at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866. Signed-off-by: NDuane Griffin <duaneg@dghda.com> Acked-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This mount option is largely superfluous, and in fact the way it was implemented was buggy; if a filesystem which did not have the extents feature flag was mounted -o extents, the filesystem would attempt to create and use extents-based file even though the extents feature flag was not eabled. The simplest thing to do is to nuke the mount option entirely. It's not all that useful to force the non-creation of new extent-based files if the filesystem can support it. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We need to mark the block/inode bitmap beyond the end of the group with '1'. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
For uninit block group, the on-disk bitmap is not initialized. That implies we cannot depend on the uptodate flag on the bitmap buffer_head to find bitmap validity. Use a new buffer_head flag which would be set after we properly initialize the bitmap. This also prevents (re-)initializing the uninit group bitmap every time we call ext4_read_block_bitmap(). Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
We need to make sure we update the inode bitmap and clear EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT flag with sb_bgl_lock held, since ext4_read_inode_bitmap() looks at EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT to decide whether to initialize the inode bitmap each time it is called. (introduced by commit c806e68f.) ext4_read_inode_bitmap does: spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(EXT4_SB(sb), block_group)); if (desc->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT)) { ext4_init_inode_bitmap(sb, bh, block_group, desc); and ext4_new_inode does if (!ext4_set_bit_atomic(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, group), ino, inode_bitmap_bh->b_data)) ...... ... spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, group)); gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT); i.e., on allocation we update the bitmap then we take the sb_bgl_lock and clear the EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT flag. What can happen is a parallel ext4_read_inode_bitmap can zero out the bitmap in between the above ext4_set_bit_atomic and spin_lock(sb_bg_lock..) The race results in below user visible errors EXT4-fs error (device sdb1): ext4_free_inode: bit already cleared for inode 168449 EXT4-fs warning (device sdb1): ext4_unlink: Deleting nonexistent file ... EXT4-fs warning (device sdb1): ext4_rmdir: empty directory has too many links ... # ls -al /mnt/tmp/f/p369/d3/d6/d39/db2/dee/d10f/d3f/l71 ls: /mnt/tmp/f/p369/d3/d6/d39/db2/dee/d10f/d3f/l71: Stale NFS file handle Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 04 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Rename some variables. We also unlock locks in the reverse order we acquired as a part of cleanup. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aneesh Kumar K.V 提交于
Rename the lower bits with suffix _lo and add helper to access the values. Also rename bg_itable_unused_hi to bg_pad as in e2fsprogs. Signed-off-by: NAneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 01 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 14 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Wrap access to task credentials so that they can be separated more easily from the task_struct during the introduction of COW creds. Change most current->(|e|s|fs)[ug]id to current_(|e|s|fs)[ug]id(). Change some task->e?[ug]id to task_e?[ug]id(). In some places it makes more sense to use RCU directly rather than a convenient wrapper; these will be addressed by later patches. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: adilger@sun.com Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-
- 07 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Bohe 提交于
When initializing an uninitialized block group in ext4_new_inode(), its block group checksum must be re-calculated. This fixes a race when several threads try to allocate a new inode in an UNINIT'd group. There is some question whether we need to be initializing the block bitmap in ext4_new_inode() at all, but for now, if we are going to init the block group, let's eliminate the race. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Bohe <frederic.bohe@bull.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 1月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Nearly all places in the ext3/4 code which uses "unsigned long" is probably a bug, since on 32-bit systems a ulong a 32-bits, which means we are wasting stack space on 64-bit systems. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This removes annoying blank syslog entries emitted by ext4_error() or ext4_warning(), since these functions add their own newline. Signed-off-by: NNick Warne <nick@ukfsn.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Mayhar 提交于
A few weeks ago I posted a patch for discussion that allowed ext4 to run without a journal. Since that time I've integrated the excellent comments from Andreas and fixed several serious bugs. We're currently running with this patch and generating some performance numbers against both ext2 (with backported reservations code) and ext4 with and without a journal. It just so happens that running without a journal is slightly faster for most everything. We did iozone -T -t 4 s 2g -r 256k -T -I -i0 -i1 -i2 which creates 4 threads, each of which create and do reads and writes on a 2G file, with a buffer size of 256K, using O_DIRECT for all file opens to bypass the page cache. Results: ext2 ext4, default ext4, no journal initial writes 13.0 MB/s 15.4 MB/s 15.7 MB/s rewrites 13.1 MB/s 15.6 MB/s 15.9 MB/s reads 15.2 MB/s 16.9 MB/s 17.2 MB/s re-reads 15.3 MB/s 16.9 MB/s 17.2 MB/s random readers 5.6 MB/s 5.6 MB/s 5.7 MB/s random writers 5.1 MB/s 5.3 MB/s 5.4 MB/s So it seems that, so far, this was a useful exercise. Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 10月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Bohe 提交于
This fixes a bug which caused on-line resizing of filesystems with a 1k blocksize to fail. The root cause of this bug was the fact that if an uninitalized bitmap block gets read in by userspace (which e2fsprogs does try to avoid, but can happen when the blocksize is less than the pagesize and an adjacent blocks is read into memory) ext4_read_block_bitmap() was erroneously depending on the buffer uptodate flag to decide whether it needed to initialize the bitmap block in memory --- i.e., to set the standard set of blocks in use by a block group (superblock, bitmaps, inode table, etc.). Essentially, ext4_read_block_bitmap() assumed it was the only routine that might try to read a block containing a block bitmap, which is simply not true. To fix this, ext4_read_block_bitmap() and ext4_read_inode_bitmap() must always initialize uninitialized bitmap blocks. Once a block or inode is allocated out of that bitmap, it will be marked as initialized in the block group descriptor, so in general this won't result any extra unnecessary work. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Bohe <frederic.bohe@bull.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 20 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
The find_group_flex() function starts with best_flex as the parent_fbg_group, which happens to have 0 inodes free. Some of the flex groups searched have free blocks and free inodes, but the flex_freeb_ratio is < 10, so they're skipped. Then when a group is compared to the current "best" flex group, it does not have more free blocks than "best", so it is skipped as well. This continues until no flex group with free inodes is found which has a proper ratio or which has more free blocks than the "best" group, and we're left with a "best" group that has 0 inodes free, and we return -ENOSPC. We fix this by changing the logic so that if the current "best" flex group has no inodes free, and the current one does have room, it is promoted to the next "best." Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 03 8月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
I noticed when filling a 1T filesystem with 4 threads using the fs_mark benchmark: fs_mark -d /mnt/test -D 256 -n 100000 -t 4 -s 20480 -F -S 0 that I occasionally got checksum mismatch errors: EXT4-fs error (device sdb): ext4_init_inode_bitmap: Checksum bad for group 6935 etc. I'd reliably get 4-5 of them during the run. It appears that the problem is likely a race to init the bg's when the uninit_bg feature is enabled. With the patch below, which adds sb_bgl_locking around initialization, I was able to complete several runs with no errors or warnings. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
ext4_read_block_bitmap and read_inode_bitmap do essentially the same thing, and yet they are structured quite differently. I came across this difference while looking at doing bg locking during bg initialization. This patch: * removes unnecessary casts in the error messages * renames read_inode_bitmap to ext4_read_inode_bitmap * and more substantially, restructures the inode bitmap reading function to be more like the block bitmap counterpart. The change to the inode bitmap reader simplifies the locking to be applied in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-