1. 09 3月, 2014 5 次提交
  2. 18 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 09 12月, 2013 3 次提交
  4. 29 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 01 7月, 2013 3 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: invalidate handle if jbd2_journal_restart() fails · 41a5b913
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      If jbd2_journal_restart() fails the handle will have been disconnected
      from the current transaction.  In this situation, the handle must not
      be used for for any jbd2 function other than jbd2_journal_stop().
      Enforce this with by treating a handle which has a NULL transaction
      pointer as an aborted handle, and issue a kernel warning if
      jbd2_journal_extent(), jbd2_journal_get_write_access(),
      jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(), etc. is called with an invalid handle.
      
      This commit also fixes a bug where jbd2_journal_stop() would trip over
      a kernel jbd2 assertion check when trying to free an invalid handle.
      
      Also move the responsibility of setting current->journal_info to
      start_this_handle(), simplifying the three users of this function.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reported-by: NYounger Liu <younger.liu@huawei.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      41a5b913
    • T
      jbd2: fix theoretical race in jbd2__journal_restart · 39c04153
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Once we decrement transaction->t_updates, if this is the last handle
      holding the transaction from closing, and once we release the
      t_handle_lock spinlock, it's possible for the transaction to commit
      and be released.  In practice with normal kernels, this probably won't
      happen, since the commit happens in a separate kernel thread and it's
      unlikely this could all happen within the space of a few CPU cycles.
      
      On the other hand, with a real-time kernel, this could potentially
      happen, so save the tid found in transaction->t_tid before we release
      t_handle_lock.  It would require an insane configuration, such as one
      where the jbd2 thread was set to a very high real-time priority,
      perhaps because a high priority real-time thread is trying to read or
      write to a file system.  But some people who use real-time kernels
      have been known to do insane things, including controlling
      laser-wielding industrial robots.  :-)
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      39c04153
    • T
      jbd2: move superblock checksum calculation to jbd2_write_superblock() · fe52d17c
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Some of the functions which modify the jbd2 superblock were not
      updating the checksum before calling jbd2_write_superblock().  Move
      the call to jbd2_superblock_csum_set() to jbd2_write_superblock(), so
      that the checksum is calculated consistently.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      fe52d17c
  6. 13 6月, 2013 6 次提交
    • P
      jbd2: remove debug dependency on debug_fs and update Kconfig help text · 75497d06
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      Commit b6e96d00 ("jbd2: use module parameters instead of debugfs
      for jbd_debug") removed any need for a dependency on DEBUG_FS.  It
      also moved the /sys variables out from underneath the typical debugfs
      mount point.  Delete the dependency and update the /sys path to where
      the debug settings are currently.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      75497d06
    • P
      jbd2: use a single printk for jbd_debug() · 169f1a2a
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      Since the jbd_debug() is implemented with two separate printk()
      calls, it can lead to corrupted and misleading debug output like
      the following (see lines marked with "*"):
      
      [  290.339362] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 203): kjournald2: kjournald2 wakes
      [  290.339365] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 155): kjournald2: commit_sequence=42103, commit_request=42104
      [  290.339369] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 158): kjournald2: OK, requests differ
      [* 290.339376] (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit:
      [* 290.339379] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103
      [* 290.339382] JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104
      [  290.339410] (fs/jbd2/revoke.c, 566): jbd2_journal_write_revoke_records: Wrote 0 revoke records
      [  290.376555] (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 1088): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: commit 42104 complete, head 42079
      
      i.e. the debug output from log_wait_commit and journal_commit_transaction
      have become interleaved.  The output should have been:
      
      (fs/jbd2/journal.c, 648): jbd2_log_wait_commit: JBD2: want 42104, j_commit_sequence=42103
      (fs/jbd2/commit.c, 370): jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: JBD2: starting commit of transaction 42104
      
      It is expected that this is not easy to replicate -- I was only able
      to cause it on preempt-rt kernels, and even then only under heavy
      I/O load.
      Reported-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Suggested-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      169f1a2a
    • P
      jbd2: fix duplicate debug label for phase 2 · cfc7bc89
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      Currently we see this output:
      
        $git grep phase fs/jbd2
        fs/jbd2/commit.c:       jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 1\n");
        fs/jbd2/commit.c:       jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 2\n");
        fs/jbd2/commit.c:       jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 2\n");
        fs/jbd2/commit.c:       jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 3\n");
        fs/jbd2/commit.c:       jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 4\n");
        [...]
      
      There is clearly a duplicate label for phase 2, and they are
      both active (i.e. not in #if ... #else block).  Rename them to
      be "2a" and "2b" so the debug output is unambiguous.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      cfc7bc89
    • P
      jbd2: drop checkpoint mutex when waiting in __jbd2_log_wait_for_space() · 0ef54180
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      While trying to debug an an issue under extreme I/O loading
      on preempt-rt kernels, the following backtrace was observed
      via SysRQ output:
      
      rm              D ffff8802203afbc0  4600  4878   4748 0x00000000
       ffff8802217bfb78 0000000000000082 ffff88021fc2bb80 ffff88021fc2bb80
       ffff88021fc2bb80 ffff8802217bffd8 ffff8802217bffd8 ffff8802217bffd8
       ffff88021f1d4c80 ffff88021fc2bb80 ffff8802217bfb88 ffff88022437b000
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff8172dc34>] schedule+0x24/0x70
       [<ffffffff81225b5d>] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0xbd/0x140
       [<ffffffff81060390>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
       [<ffffffff81223635>] jbd2_log_do_checkpoint+0xf5/0x520
       [<ffffffff81223b09>] __jbd2_log_wait_for_space+0xa9/0x1f0
       [<ffffffff8121dc40>] start_this_handle.isra.10+0x2e0/0x530
       [<ffffffff81060390>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x50/0x50
       [<ffffffff8121e0a3>] jbd2__journal_start+0xc3/0x110
       [<ffffffff811de7ce>] ? ext4_rmdir+0x6e/0x230
       [<ffffffff8121e0fe>] jbd2_journal_start+0xe/0x10
       [<ffffffff811f308b>] ext4_journal_start_sb+0x5b/0x160
       [<ffffffff811de7ce>] ext4_rmdir+0x6e/0x230
       [<ffffffff811435c5>] vfs_rmdir+0xd5/0x140
       [<ffffffff8114370f>] do_rmdir+0xdf/0x120
       [<ffffffff8105c6b4>] ? task_work_run+0x44/0x80
       [<ffffffff81002889>] ? do_notify_resume+0x89/0x100
       [<ffffffff817361ae>] ? int_signal+0x12/0x17
       [<ffffffff81145d85>] sys_unlinkat+0x25/0x40
       [<ffffffff81735f22>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      What is interesting here, is that we call log_wait_commit, from
      within wait_for_space, but we are still holding the checkpoint_mutex
      as it surrounds mostly the whole of wait_for_space.  And then, as we
      are waiting, journal_commit_transaction can run, and if the JBD2_FLUSHED
      bit is set, then we will also try to take the same checkpoint_mutex.
      
      It seems that we need to drop the checkpoint_mutex while sitting in
      jbd2_log_wait_commit, if we want to guarantee that progress can be made
      by jbd2_journal_commit_transaction().  There does not seem to be
      anything preempt-rt specific about this, other then perhaps increasing
      the odds of it happening.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      0ef54180
    • P
      jbd2: relocate assert after state lock in journal_commit_transaction() · 3ca841c1
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      The state lock is taken after we are doing an assert on the state
      value, not before.  So we might in fact be doing an assert on a
      transient value.  Ensure the state check is within the scope of
      the state lock being taken.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      3ca841c1
    • D
      jbd2: optimize jbd2_journal_force_commit · 9ff86446
      Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
      Current implementation of jbd2_journal_force_commit() is suboptimal because
      result in empty and useless commits. But callers just want to force and wait
      any unfinished commits. We already have jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested()
      which does exactly what we want, except we are guaranteed that we do not hold
      journal transaction open.
      Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      9ff86446
  7. 05 6月, 2013 8 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: transaction reservation support · 8f7d89f3
      Jan Kara 提交于
      In some cases we cannot start a transaction because of locking
      constraints and passing started transaction into those places is not
      handy either because we could block transaction commit for too long.
      Transaction reservation is designed to solve these issues.  It
      reserves a handle with given number of credits in the journal and the
      handle can be later attached to the running transaction without
      blocking on commit or checkpointing.  Reserved handles do not block
      transaction commit in any way, they only reduce maximum size of the
      running transaction (because we have to always be prepared to
      accomodate request for attaching reserved handle).
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      8f7d89f3
    • J
      jbd2: remove unused waitqueues · f29fad72
      Jan Kara 提交于
      j_wait_logspace and j_wait_checkpoint are unused.  Remove them.
      Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      f29fad72
    • J
      jbd2: fix race in t_outstanding_credits update in jbd2_journal_extend() · fe1e8db5
      Jan Kara 提交于
      jbd2_journal_extend() first checked whether transaction can accept
      extending handle with more credits and then added credits to
      t_outstanding_credits.  This can race with start_this_handle() adding
      another handle to a transaction and thus overbooking a transaction.
      Make jbd2_journal_extend() use atomic_add_return() to close the race.
      Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      fe1e8db5
    • J
      jbd2: cleanup needed free block estimates when starting a transaction · 76c39904
      Jan Kara 提交于
      __jbd2_log_space_left() and jbd_space_needed() were kind of odd.
      jbd_space_needed() accounted also credits needed for currently
      committing transaction while it didn't account for credits needed for
      control blocks.  __jbd2_log_space_left() then accounted for control
      blocks as a fraction of free space.  Since results of these two
      functions are always only compared against each other, this works
      correct but is somewhat strange.  Move the estimates so that
      jbd_space_needed() returns number of blocks needed for a transaction
      including control blocks and __jbd2_log_space_left() returns free
      space in the journal (with the committing transaction already
      subtracted).  Rename functions to jbd2_log_space_left() and
      jbd2_space_needed() while we are changing them.
      Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      76c39904
    • J
      jbd2: remove outdated comment · 2f387f84
      Jan Kara 提交于
      The comment about credit estimates isn't true anymore. We do what the
      comment describes now.
      Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      2f387f84
    • J
      jbd2: refine waiting for shadow buffers · b34090e5
      Jan Kara 提交于
      Currently when we add a buffer to a transaction, we wait until the
      buffer is removed from BJ_Shadow list (so that we prevent any changes
      to the buffer that is just written to the journal).  This can take
      unnecessarily long as a lot happens between the time the buffer is
      submitted to the journal and the time when we remove the buffer from
      BJ_Shadow list.  (e.g.  We wait for all data buffers in the
      transaction, we issue a cache flush, etc.)  Also this creates a
      dependency of do_get_write_access() on transaction commit (namely
      waiting for data IO to complete) which we want to avoid when
      implementing transaction reservation.
      
      So we modify commit code to set new BH_Shadow flag when temporary
      shadowing buffer is created and we clear that flag once IO on that
      buffer is complete.  This allows do_get_write_access() to wait only
      for BH_Shadow bit and thus removes the dependency on data IO
      completion.
      Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      b34090e5
    • J
      jbd2: remove journal_head from descriptor buffers · e5a120ae
      Jan Kara 提交于
      Similarly as for metadata buffers, also log descriptor buffers don't
      really need the journal head. So strip it and remove BJ_LogCtl list.
      Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      e5a120ae
    • J
      jbd2: don't create journal_head for temporary journal buffers · f5113eff
      Jan Kara 提交于
      When writing metadata to the journal, we create temporary buffer heads
      for that task.  We also attach journal heads to these buffer heads but
      the only purpose of the journal heads is to keep buffers linked in
      transaction's BJ_IO list.  We remove the need for journal heads by
      reusing buffer_head's b_assoc_buffers list for that purpose.  Also
      since BJ_IO list is just a temporary list for transaction commit, we
      use a private list in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() for that thus
      removing BJ_IO list from transaction completely.
      Reviewed-by: NZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      f5113eff
  8. 28 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  9. 22 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 30 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 22 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: trace when lock_buffer in do_get_write_access takes a long time · f783f091
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      While investigating interactivity problems it was clear that processes
      sometimes stall for long periods of times if an attempt is made to
      lock a buffer which is undergoing writeback.  It would stall in
      a trace looking something like
      
      [<ffffffff811a39de>] __lock_buffer+0x2e/0x30
      [<ffffffff8123a60f>] do_get_write_access+0x43f/0x4b0
      [<ffffffff8123a7cb>] jbd2_journal_get_write_access+0x2b/0x50
      [<ffffffff81220f79>] __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x39/0x80
      [<ffffffff811f3198>] ext4_reserve_inode_write+0x78/0xa0
      [<ffffffff811f3209>] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x49/0x220
      [<ffffffff811f57d1>] ext4_dirty_inode+0x41/0x60
      [<ffffffff8119ac3e>] __mark_inode_dirty+0x4e/0x2d0
      [<ffffffff8118b9b9>] update_time+0x79/0xc0
      [<ffffffff8118ba98>] file_update_time+0x98/0x100
      [<ffffffff81110ffc>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x17c/0x3b0
      [<ffffffff811112aa>] generic_file_aio_write+0x7a/0xf0
      [<ffffffff811ea853>] ext4_file_write+0x83/0xd0
      [<ffffffff81172b23>] do_sync_write+0xa3/0xe0
      [<ffffffff811731ae>] vfs_write+0xae/0x180
      [<ffffffff8117361d>] sys_write+0x4d/0x90
      [<ffffffff8159d62d>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
      [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
      Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      f783f091
  12. 20 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      procfs: new helper - PDE_DATA(inode) · d9dda78b
      Al Viro 提交于
      The only part of proc_dir_entry the code outside of fs/proc
      really cares about is PDE(inode)->data.  Provide a helper
      for that; static inline for now, eventually will be moved
      to fs/proc, along with the knowledge of struct proc_dir_entry
      layout.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      d9dda78b
  14. 04 4月, 2013 2 次提交
    • D
      jbd2: fix race between jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint and ->j_commit_callback · 794446c6
      Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
      The following race is possible:
      
      [kjournald2]                              other_task
      jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()
        j_state = T_FINISHED;
        spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
                                               ->jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()
      					   ->jbd2_journal_free_transaction();
      					     ->kmem_cache_free(transaction)
        ->j_commit_callback(journal, transaction);
          -> USE_AFTER_FREE
      
      WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:62 __list_del_entry+0x1c0/0x250()
      Hardware name:
      list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff88019a4ec198, but was 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b
      Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel microcode sg xhci_hcd button sd_mod crc_t10dif aesni_intel ablk_helper cryptd lrw aes_x86_64 xts gf128mul ahci libahci pata_acpi ata_generic dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
      Pid: 16400, comm: jbd2/dm-1-8 Tainted: G        W    3.8.0-rc3+ #107
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff8106fb0d>] warn_slowpath_common+0xad/0xf0
       [<ffffffff8106fc06>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50
       [<ffffffff813637e9>] ? ext4_journal_commit_callback+0x99/0xc0
       [<ffffffff8148cae0>] __list_del_entry+0x1c0/0x250
       [<ffffffff813637bf>] ext4_journal_commit_callback+0x6f/0xc0
       [<ffffffff813ca336>] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x23a6/0x2570
       [<ffffffff8108aa42>] ? try_to_del_timer_sync+0x82/0xa0
       [<ffffffff8108b491>] ? del_timer_sync+0x91/0x1e0
       [<ffffffff813d3ecf>] kjournald2+0x19f/0x6a0
       [<ffffffff810ad630>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
       [<ffffffff813d3d30>] ? bit_spin_lock+0x80/0x80
       [<ffffffff810ac6be>] kthread+0x10e/0x120
       [<ffffffff810ac5b0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
       [<ffffffff818ff6ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
       [<ffffffff810ac5b0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
      
      In order to demonstrace this issue one should mount ext4 with mount -o
      discard option on SSD disk.  This makes callback longer and race
      window becomes wider.
      
      In order to fix this we should mark transaction as finished only after
      callbacks have completed
      Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      794446c6
    • T
      ext4/jbd2: don't wait (forever) for stale tid caused by wraparound · d76a3a77
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      In the case where an inode has a very stale transaction id (tid) in
      i_datasync_tid or i_sync_tid, it's possible that after a very large
      (2**31) number of transactions, that the tid number space might wrap,
      causing tid_geq()'s calculations to fail.
      
      Commit deeeaf13 "jbd2: fix fsync() tid wraparound bug", later modified
      by commit e7b04ac0 "jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily",
      attempted to fix this problem, but it only avoided kjournald spinning
      forever by fixing the logic in jbd2_log_start_commit().
      
      Unfortunately, in the codepaths in fs/ext4/fsync.c and fs/ext4/inode.c
      that might call jbd2_log_start_commit() with a stale tid, those
      functions will subsequently call jbd2_log_wait_commit() with the same
      stale tid, and then wait for a very long time.  To fix this, we
      replace the calls to jbd2_log_start_commit() and
      jbd2_log_wait_commit() with a call to a new function,
      jbd2_complete_transaction(), which will correctly handle stale tid's.
      
      As a bonus, jbd2_complete_transaction() will avoid locking
      j_state_lock for writing unless a commit needs to be started.  This
      should have a small (but probably not measurable) improvement for
      ext4's scalability.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reported-by: NBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
      Reported-by: NGeorge Barnett <gbarnett@atlassian.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      
      d76a3a77
  15. 12 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: fix use after free in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() · ad56edad
      Jan Kara 提交于
      jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() didn't get a reference to journal_head it
      was working with. This is OK in most of the cases since the journal head
      should be attached to a transaction but in rare occasions when we are
      journalling data, __ext4_journalled_writepage() can race with
      jbd2_journal_invalidatepage() stripping buffers from a page and thus
      journal head can be freed under hands of jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata().
      
      Fix the problem by getting own journal head reference in
      jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() (and also in jbd2_journal_set_triggers()
      which can possibly have the same issue).
      Reported-by: NZheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      ad56edad
  16. 03 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      jbd2: fix ERR_PTR dereference in jbd2__journal_start · df05c1b8
      Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
      If start_this_handle() failed handle will be initialized
      to ERR_PTR() and can not be dereferenced.
      
      paging request at fffffffffffffff6
      IP: [<ffffffff813c073f>] jbd2__journal_start+0x18f/0x290
      PGD 200e067 PUD 200f067 PMD 0
      Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
      Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf coretemp kvm_intel kvm crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel microcode sg xhci_hcd button sd_mod crc_t10dif aesni_intel ablk_helper cryptd lrw aes_x86_64 xts gf128mul ahci libahci pata_acpi ata_generic dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
      CPU 0 journal commit I/O error
      
      Pid: 2694, comm: fio Not tainted 3.8.0-rc3+ #79                  /DQ67SW
      RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813c073f>]  [<ffffffff813c073f>] jbd2__journal_start+0x18f/0x290
      RSP: 0018:ffff880233b8ba58  EFLAGS: 00010292
      RAX: 00000000ffffffe2 RBX: ffffffffffffffe2 RCX: 0000000000000006
      RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff82128f48
      RBP: ffff880233b8ba98 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88021440a6e0
      Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      df05c1b8
  17. 10 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: use module parameters instead of debugfs for jbd_debug · b6e96d00
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      There are multiple reasons to move away from debugfs.  First of all,
      we are only using it for a single parameter, and it is much more
      complicated to set up (some 30 lines of code compared to 3), and one
      more thing that might fail while loading the jbd2 module.
      
      Secondly, as a module paramter it can be specified as a boot option if
      jbd2 is built into the kernel, or as a parameter when the module is
      loaded, and it can also be manipulated dynamically under
      /sys/module/jbd2/parameters/jbd2_debug.  So it is more flexible.
      
      Ultimately we want to move away from using jbd_debug() towards
      tracepoints, but for now this is still a useful simplification of the
      code base.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      b6e96d00