- 13 12月, 2012 20 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Since we've kill the bigger one volume_mutex, we need to add devices list mutex back. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
- 'nr' is no more used. - btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() and __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() can share a bunch of code. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
When __merge_refs merges two refs, it is also needed to merge the inode_list of both refs. Otherwise we have missed backrefs and memory leaks. This happens for example if two inodes share an extent and both lie in the same leaf and thus also have the same parent. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Even if the hole punching is executed, the modification time of the file is not updated. So, current time is set to inode. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
Someone who is root or capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) could corrupt the superblock and make Btrfs printk("%s") crash while holding the uuid_mutex since nobody forces a limit on the string. Since the uuid_mutex is significant, the system would be unusable afterwards. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When creating a snapshot, failing to commit a transaction can end up with aborting the transaction, following by doing a cleanup for it, where we'll free all snapshots pending to disk. So we check it and avoid double free on pending snapshots. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When committing a transaction, we may bail out of running delayed refs due to ENOSPC, and then abort the current transaction to flip into readonly. But we'll hit a deadlock on ref head's lock since we forget to release its lock and other cleanup stuff. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Just use WARN_ON rather than an if containing only WARN_ON(1). A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression e; @@ - if (e) WARN_ON(1); + WARN_ON(e); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Use WARN rather than printk followed by WARN_ON(1), for conciseness. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression list es; @@ -printk( +WARN(1, es); -WARN_ON(1); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If we set BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC, we should log all the extent, but now we forget to take it into account, and set a wrong max key, if so, we will skip the file extent metadata when doing logging. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We forget to protect the modified_extents list, fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
There are two types of the file extent - inline extent and regular extent, When we log file extents, we didn't take inline extent into account, fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Consider the following case: Task1 Task2 start_transaction commit_transaction check pending snapshots list and the list is empty. add pending snapshot into list skip the delalloc flush end_transaction ... And then the problem that the snapshot is different with the source subvolume happen. This patch fixes the above problem by flush all pending stuffs when all the other tasks end the transaction. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If we flush inodes with pending delalloc in a transaction, we may join the same transaction handler more than 2 times. The reason is: Task use_count of trans handle commit_transaction 1 |-> btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes 1 |-> run_delalloc_nocow 1 |-> join_transaction 2 |-> cow_file_range 2 |-> join_transaction 3 In fact, cow_file_range needn't join the transaction again because the caller have joined the transaction, so we fix this problem by this way. Reported-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Variable 'found' is no more used. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
btrfs_wait_ordered_range expects for 'len' instead of 'end'. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When we log new names, we need to log just enough to recreate the inode during log replay, and there is no need to log extents along with it. This actually fixes a bug revealed by xfstests 241, where it shows that we're logging some extents that have not updated metadata, so we don't get proper EXTENT_DATA items to be copied to log tree. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
The current behavior is to allow mounting or remounting a filesystem writeable in degraded mode if at least one writeable device is present. The next failed write access to a missing device which is above the tolerance of the configured level of redundancy results in an read-only enforcement. Even without this, the next time barrier_all_devices() is called and more devices are missing than tolerable, the switch to read-only mode takes place. In order to behave predictably and to provide proper feedback to the user at mount time, this patch compares the number of missing devices with the number of devices that are tolerated to be missing according to the configured RAID level. If more devices are missing than tolerated, e.g. if two devices are missing in case of RAID1, only a read-only mount and remount is allowed. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
Correct spelling typo in btrfs. Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 jeff.liu 提交于
Remove an invalid size check up from btrfs_shrink_dev(). The new size should not larger than the device->total_bytes as it was already verified before coming to here(i.e. new_size < old_size). Remove invalid check up for btrfs_shrink_dev(). Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 13 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Though the process of the ordered extents is a bit different with the delalloc inode flush, but we can see it as a subset of the delalloc inode flush, so we also handle them by flush workers. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The process of the ordered operations is similar to the delalloc inode flush, so we handle them by flush workers. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch introduce a new worker pool named "flush_workers", and if we want to force all the inode with pending delalloc to the disks, we can queue those inodes into the work queue of the worker pool, in this way, those inodes will be flushed by multi-task. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave gave me an image of a very full file system that would abort the transaction because it ran out of space while committing the transaction. This is because we would think there was plenty of room to create a snapshot even though the global reserve was not full. This happens because we calculate the global reserve size before we unpin any space, so after we unpin the space we allow reservations to occur even though we haven't reserved all of the space for our global reserve. Fix this by adding to the global reserve while unpinning in order to make sure we always have enough space to do our work. With this patch we no longer end up with an aborted transaction, we return ENOSPC properly to the person trying to create the snapshot. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
'disk_key' is not used at all. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The argument 'tree_mod_log' is not necessary since all of callers enable it. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Since we don't use MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING to add nritems during rewinding, we should insert a MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE operation first. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Key MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE_WHILE_MOVING means that we're doing memmove inside an extent buffer node, and the node's number of items remains unchanged (unless we are inserting a single pointer, but we have MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for that). So we don't need to increase node's number of items during rewinding, otherwise we may get an node larger than leafsize and cause general protection errors later. Here is the details, - If we do memory move for inserting a single pointer, we need to add node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_ADD for adding. - If we do memory move for deleting a single pointer, we need to decrease node's nritems by one, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for deleting. - If we do memory move for balance left/right, we need to decrease node's nritems, and we honor MOD_LOG_KEY_REMOVE for balaning. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we find a bitmap free space entry, we may check the previous extent entry covers the offset or not. But if we find this entry is also a bitmap entry, we will continue to check the previous entry of the current one by a while loop. It is unnecessary because it is impossible that the extent entry which is in front of a bitmap entry can cover the offset of the entry after that bitmap entry. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Alex reported a problem where we were writing between chunks on a rbd device. The thing is we do bio_add_page using logical offsets, but the physical offset may be different. So when we map the bio now check to see if the bio is still ok with the physical offset, and if it is not split the bio up and redo the bio_add_page with the physical sector. This fixes the problem for Alex and doesn't affect performance in the normal case. Thanks, Reported-and-tested-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
In some places(such as: evicting inode), we just can not flush the reserved space of delalloc, flushing the delayed directory index and delayed inode is OK, but we don't try to flush those things and just go back when there is no enough space to be reserved. This patch fixes this problem. We defined 3 types of the flush operations: NO_FLUSH, FLUSH_LIMIT and FLUSH_ALL. If we can in the transaction, we should not flush anything, or the deadlock would happen, so use NO_FLUSH. If we flushing the reserved space of delalloc would cause deadlock, use FLUSH_LIMIT. In the other cases, FLUSH_ALL is used, and we will flush all things. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The comment is not coincident with the code. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
div_factor{_fine} has been implemented for two times, cleanup it. And I move them into a independent file named math.h because they are common math functions. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 09 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The direct-IO write path already had the i_size checks in mm/filemap.c, but it turns out the read path did not, and removing the block size checks in fs/block_dev.c (commit bbec0270: "blkdev_max_block: make private to fs/buffer.c") removed the magic "shrink IO to past the end of the device" code there. Fix it by truncating the IO to the size of the block device, like the write path already does. NOTE! I suspect the write path would be *much* better off doing it this way in fs/block_dev.c, rather than hidden deep in mm/filemap.c. The mm/filemap.c code is extremely hard to follow, and has various conditionals on the target being a block device (ie the flag passed in to 'generic_write_checks()', along with a conditional update of the inode timestamp etc). It is also quite possible that we should treat this whole block device size as a "s_maxbytes" issue, and try to make the logic even more generic. However, in the meantime this is the fairly minimal targeted fix. Noted by Milan Broz thanks to a regression test for the cryptsetup reencrypt tool. Reported-and-tested-by: NMilan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 06 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
READ is zero so the "rw & READ" test is always false. The intended test was "((rw & RW_MASK) == READ)". Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
The block device access simplification that avoided accessing the (racy) block size information (commit bbec0270: "blkdev_max_block: make private to fs/buffer.c") no longer checks the maximum block size in the block mapping path. That was _almost_ as simple as just removing the code entirely, because the readers and writers all check the size of the device anyway, so under normal circumstances it "just worked". However, the block size may be such that the end of the device may straddle one single buffer_head. At which point we may still want to access the end of the device, but the buffer we use to access it partially extends past the end. The 'bd_set_size()' function intentionally sets the block size to avoid this, but mounting the device - or setting the block size by hand to some other value - can modify that block size. So instead, teach 'submit_bh()' about the special case of the buffer head straddling the end of the device, and turning such an access into a smaller IO access, avoiding the problem. This, btw, also means that unlike before, we can now access the whole device regardless of device block size setting. So now, even if the device size is only 512-byte aligned, we can read and write even the last sector even when having a much bigger block size for accessing the rest of the device. So with this, we could now get rid of the 'bd_set_size()' block size code entirely - resulting in faster IO for the common case - but that would be a separate patch. Reported-and-tested-by: NRomain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> Reporeted-and-tested-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Reported-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 11月, 2012 4 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Noticed by Pavel Roskin; the thing in his patch I disagree with was compensating for that shite in callbacks instead of fixing it once in the iterator itself. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We are leaking fattr and fhandle if we decide that dentry is not to be invalidated, after all (e.g. happens to be a mountpoint). Just free both before that... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-