1. 14 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 10 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      fix O_SYNC|O_APPEND syncing the wrong range on write() · d311d79d
      Al Viro 提交于
      It actually goes back to 2004 ([PATCH] Concurrent O_SYNC write support)
      when sync_page_range() had been introduced; generic_file_write{,v}() correctly
      synced
      	pos_after_write - written .. pos_after_write - 1
      but generic_file_aio_write() synced
      	pos_before_write .. pos_before_write + written - 1
      instead.  Which is not the same thing with O_APPEND, obviously.
      A couple of years later correct variant had been killed off when
      everything switched to use of generic_file_aio_write().
      
      All users of generic_file_aio_write() are affected, and the same bug
      has been copied into other instances of ->aio_write().
      
      The fix is trivial; the only subtle point is that generic_write_sync()
      ought to be inlined to avoid calculations useless for the majority of
      calls.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      d311d79d
  4. 07 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      swap: add a simple detector for inappropriate swapin readahead · 579f8290
      Shaohua Li 提交于
      This is a patch to improve swap readahead algorithm.  It's from Hugh and
      I slightly changed it.
      
      Hugh's original changelog:
      
      swapin readahead does a blind readahead, whether or not the swapin is
      sequential.  This may be ok on harddisk, because large reads have
      relatively small costs, and if the readahead pages are unneeded they can
      be reclaimed easily - though, what if their allocation forced reclaim of
      useful pages? But on SSD devices large reads are more expensive than
      small ones: if the readahead pages are unneeded, reading them in caused
      significant overhead.
      
      This patch adds very simplistic random read detection.  Stealing the
      PageReadahead technique from Konstantin Khlebnikov's patch, avoiding the
      vma/anon_vma sophistications of Shaohua Li's patch, swapin_nr_pages()
      simply looks at readahead's current success rate, and narrows or widens
      its readahead window accordingly.  There is little science to its
      heuristic: it's about as stupid as can be whilst remaining effective.
      
      The table below shows elapsed times (in centiseconds) when running a
      single repetitive swapping load across a 1000MB mapping in 900MB ram
      with 1GB swap (the harddisk tests had taken painfully too long when I
      used mem=500M, but SSD shows similar results for that).
      
      Vanilla is the 3.6-rc7 kernel on which I started; Shaohua denotes his
      Sep 3 patch in mmotm and linux-next; HughOld denotes my Oct 1 patch
      which Shaohua showed to be defective; HughNew this Nov 14 patch, with
      page_cluster as usual at default of 3 (8-page reads); HughPC4 this same
      patch with page_cluster 4 (16-page reads); HughPC0 with page_cluster 0
      (1-page reads: no readahead).
      
      HDD for swapping to harddisk, SSD for swapping to VertexII SSD.  Seq for
      sequential access to the mapping, cycling five times around; Rand for
      the same number of random touches.  Anon for a MAP_PRIVATE anon mapping;
      Shmem for a MAP_SHARED anon mapping, equivalent to tmpfs.
      
      One weakness of Shaohua's vma/anon_vma approach was that it did not
      optimize Shmem: seen below.  Konstantin's approach was perhaps mistuned,
      50% slower on Seq: did not compete and is not shown below.
      
      HDD        Vanilla Shaohua HughOld HughNew HughPC4 HughPC0
      Seq Anon     73921   76210   75611   76904   78191  121542
      Seq Shmem    73601   73176   73855   72947   74543  118322
      Rand Anon   895392  831243  871569  845197  846496  841680
      Rand Shmem 1058375 1053486  827935  764955  764376  756489
      
      SSD        Vanilla Shaohua HughOld HughNew HughPC4 HughPC0
      Seq Anon     24634   24198   24673   25107   21614   70018
      Seq Shmem    24959   24932   25052   25703   22030   69678
      Rand Anon    43014   26146   28075   25989   26935   25901
      Rand Shmem   45349   45215   28249   24268   24138   24332
      
      These tests are, of course, two extremes of a very simple case: under
      heavier mixed loads I've not yet observed any consistent improvement or
      degradation, and wider testing would be welcome.
      
      Shaohua Li:
      
      Test shows Vanilla is slightly better in sequential workload than Hugh's
      patch.  I observed with Hugh's patch sometimes the readahead size is
      shrinked too fast (from 8 to 1 immediately) in sequential workload if
      there is no hit.  And in such case, continuing doing readahead is good
      actually.
      
      I don't prepare a sophisticated algorithm for the sequential workload
      because so far we can't guarantee sequential accessed pages are swap out
      sequentially.  So I slightly change Hugh's heuristic - don't shrink
      readahead size too fast.
      
      Here is my test result (unit second, 3 runs average):
      	Vanilla		Hugh		New
      Seq	356		370		360
      Random	4525		2447		2444
      
      Attached graph is the swapin/swapout throughput I collected with 'vmstat
      2'.  The first part is running a random workload (till around 1200 of
      the x-axis) and the second part is running a sequential workload.
      swapin and swapout throughput are almost identical in steady state in
      both workloads.  These are expected behavior.  while in Vanilla, swapin
      is much bigger than swapout especially in random workload (because wrong
      readahead).
      
      Original patches by: Shaohua Li and Konstantin Khlebnikov.
      
      [fengguang.wu@intel.com: swapin_nr_pages() can be static]
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      579f8290
  5. 06 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • L
      execve: use 'struct filename *' for executable name passing · c4ad8f98
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This changes 'do_execve()' to get the executable name as a 'struct
      filename', and to free it when it is done.  This is what the normal
      users want, and it simplifies and streamlines their error handling.
      
      The controlled lifetime of the executable name also fixes a
      use-after-free problem with the trace_sched_process_exec tracepoint: the
      lifetime of the passed-in string for kernel users was not at all
      obvious, and the user-mode helper code used UMH_WAIT_EXEC to serialize
      the pathname allocation lifetime with the execve() having finished,
      which in turn meant that the trace point that happened after
      mm_release() of the old process VM ended up using already free'd memory.
      
      To solve the kernel string lifetime issue, this simply introduces
      "getname_kernel()" that works like the normal user-space getname()
      function, except with the source coming from kernel memory.
      
      As Oleg points out, this also means that we could drop the tcomm[] array
      from 'struct linux_binprm', since the pathname lifetime now covers
      setup_new_exec().  That would be a separate cleanup.
      Reported-by: NIgor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov@samsung.com>
      Tested-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c4ad8f98
  6. 02 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 01 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 31 1月, 2014 6 次提交
  9. 30 1月, 2014 4 次提交
  10. 29 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  11. 28 1月, 2014 21 次提交