1. 19 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 18 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 16 6月, 2012 3 次提交
  4. 14 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 13 6月, 2012 3 次提交
    • D
      mac80211: stop polling in disassociation · 79543d8e
      David Spinadel 提交于
      Stop connection monitor poll during disassociation.
      This clears the polling flags and if a scan was
      deferred it will be run.
      
      Without this fix, if a scan was deferred due to
      connection monitoring while disassociation happens,
      this scan blocks further scan requests until interface
      down/up which causes problems connecting to another AP.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Spinadel <david.spinadel@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      79543d8e
    • E
      mac80211: check sdata_running on ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask · 554a43d5
      Eliad Peller 提交于
      Otherwise, we might call the driver callback before
      the interface was uploaded.
      
      Solves the following warning:
      WARNING: at net/mac80211/driver-ops.h:12 ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask+0xbc/0x18c [mac80211]()
      wlan0:  Failed check-sdata-in-driver check, flags: 0x0
      Modules linked in: wlcore_sdio wl12xx wl18xx wlcore mac80211 cfg80211 [last unloaded: cfg80211]
      [<c001b964>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x12c) from [<c0495550>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
      [<c0495550>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c003ee28>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74)
      [<c003ee28>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x5c/0x74) from [<c003eefc>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48)
      [<c003eefc>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x48) from [<bf5c1ad0>] (ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask+0xbc/0x18c [mac80211])
      [<bf5c1ad0>] (ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask+0xbc/0x18c [mac80211]) from [<bf575960>] (nl80211_set_tx_bitrate_mask+0x350/0x358 [cfg80211])
      [<bf575960>] (nl80211_set_tx_bitrate_mask+0x350/0x358 [cfg80211]) from [<c03e9e94>] (genl_rcv_msg+0x1a8/0x1e8)
      [<c03e9e94>] (genl_rcv_msg+0x1a8/0x1e8) from [<c03e9164>] (netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0xc0)
      [<c03e9164>] (netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0xc0) from [<c03e9ce0>] (genl_rcv+0x28/0x34)
      [<c03e9ce0>] (genl_rcv+0x28/0x34) from [<c03e8e74>] (netlink_unicast+0x158/0x234)
      [<c03e8e74>] (netlink_unicast+0x158/0x234) from [<c03e93e0>] (netlink_sendmsg+0x218/0x298)
      [<c03e93e0>] (netlink_sendmsg+0x218/0x298) from [<c03b4e5c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xa4/0xc0)
      [<c03b4e5c>] (sock_sendmsg+0xa4/0xc0) from [<c03b5af4>] (__sys_sendmsg+0x1d8/0x254)
      [<c03b5af4>] (__sys_sendmsg+0x1d8/0x254) from [<c03b5ca8>] (sys_sendmsg+0x4c/0x70)
      [<c03b5ca8>] (sys_sendmsg+0x4c/0x70) from [<c0013980>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c)
      
      Note that calling the driver can also result
      in undefined behaviour since it doesn't have
      to deal with calls while down.
      Signed-off-by: NEliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
      [removed timestamps, added note - Johannes]
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      554a43d5
    • E
      cfg80211: fix potential deadlock in regulatory · fe20b39e
      Eliad Peller 提交于
      reg_timeout_work() calls restore_regulatory_settings() which
      takes cfg80211_mutex.
      
      reg_set_request_processed() already holds cfg80211_mutex
      before calling cancel_delayed_work_sync(reg_timeout),
      so it might deadlock.
      
      Call the async cancel_delayed_work instead, in order
      to avoid the potential deadlock.
      
      This is the relevant lockdep warning:
      
      cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: XX
      
      ======================================================
      [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
      3.4.0-rc5-wl+ #26 Not tainted
      -------------------------------------------------------
      kworker/0:2/1391 is trying to acquire lock:
       (cfg80211_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<bf28ae00>] restore_regulatory_settings+0x34/0x418 [cfg80211]
      
      but task is already holding lock:
       ((reg_timeout).work){+.+...}, at: [<c0059e94>] process_one_work+0x1f0/0x480
      
      which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
      the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
      -> #2 ((reg_timeout).work){+.+...}:
             [<c008fd44>] validate_chain+0xb94/0x10f0
             [<c0090b68>] __lock_acquire+0x8c8/0x9b0
             [<c0090d40>] lock_acquire+0xf0/0x114
             [<c005b600>] wait_on_work+0x4c/0x154
             [<c005c000>] __cancel_work_timer+0xd4/0x11c
             [<c005c064>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x1c/0x20
             [<bf28b274>] reg_set_request_processed+0x50/0x78 [cfg80211]
             [<bf28bd84>] set_regdom+0x550/0x600 [cfg80211]
             [<bf294cd8>] nl80211_set_reg+0x218/0x258 [cfg80211]
             [<c03c7738>] genl_rcv_msg+0x1a8/0x1e8
             [<c03c6a00>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0xc0
             [<c03c7584>] genl_rcv+0x28/0x34
             [<c03c6720>] netlink_unicast+0x15c/0x228
             [<c03c6c7c>] netlink_sendmsg+0x218/0x298
             [<c03933c8>] sock_sendmsg+0xa4/0xc0
             [<c039406c>] __sys_sendmsg+0x1e4/0x268
             [<c0394228>] sys_sendmsg+0x4c/0x70
             [<c0013840>] ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c
      
      -> #1 (reg_mutex){+.+.+.}:
             [<c008fd44>] validate_chain+0xb94/0x10f0
             [<c0090b68>] __lock_acquire+0x8c8/0x9b0
             [<c0090d40>] lock_acquire+0xf0/0x114
             [<c04734dc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x48/0x320
             [<bf28b2cc>] reg_todo+0x30/0x538 [cfg80211]
             [<c0059f44>] process_one_work+0x2a0/0x480
             [<c005a4b4>] worker_thread+0x1bc/0x2bc
             [<c0061148>] kthread+0x98/0xa4
             [<c0014af4>] kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8
      
      -> #0 (cfg80211_mutex){+.+.+.}:
             [<c008ed58>] print_circular_bug+0x68/0x2cc
             [<c008fb28>] validate_chain+0x978/0x10f0
             [<c0090b68>] __lock_acquire+0x8c8/0x9b0
             [<c0090d40>] lock_acquire+0xf0/0x114
             [<c04734dc>] mutex_lock_nested+0x48/0x320
             [<bf28ae00>] restore_regulatory_settings+0x34/0x418 [cfg80211]
             [<bf28b200>] reg_timeout_work+0x1c/0x20 [cfg80211]
             [<c0059f44>] process_one_work+0x2a0/0x480
             [<c005a4b4>] worker_thread+0x1bc/0x2bc
             [<c0061148>] kthread+0x98/0xa4
             [<c0014af4>] kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      Chain exists of:
        cfg80211_mutex --> reg_mutex --> (reg_timeout).work
      
       Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
             CPU0                    CPU1
             ----                    ----
        lock((reg_timeout).work);
                                     lock(reg_mutex);
                                     lock((reg_timeout).work);
        lock(cfg80211_mutex);
      
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      2 locks held by kworker/0:2/1391:
       #0:  (events){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0059e94>] process_one_work+0x1f0/0x480
       #1:  ((reg_timeout).work){+.+...}, at: [<c0059e94>] process_one_work+0x1f0/0x480
      
      stack backtrace:
      [<c001b928>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x12c) from [<c0471d3c>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
      [<c0471d3c>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c008ef70>] (print_circular_bug+0x280/0x2cc)
      [<c008ef70>] (print_circular_bug+0x280/0x2cc) from [<c008fb28>] (validate_chain+0x978/0x10f0)
      [<c008fb28>] (validate_chain+0x978/0x10f0) from [<c0090b68>] (__lock_acquire+0x8c8/0x9b0)
      [<c0090b68>] (__lock_acquire+0x8c8/0x9b0) from [<c0090d40>] (lock_acquire+0xf0/0x114)
      [<c0090d40>] (lock_acquire+0xf0/0x114) from [<c04734dc>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x48/0x320)
      [<c04734dc>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x48/0x320) from [<bf28ae00>] (restore_regulatory_settings+0x34/0x418 [cfg80211])
      [<bf28ae00>] (restore_regulatory_settings+0x34/0x418 [cfg80211]) from [<bf28b200>] (reg_timeout_work+0x1c/0x20 [cfg80211])
      [<bf28b200>] (reg_timeout_work+0x1c/0x20 [cfg80211]) from [<c0059f44>] (process_one_work+0x2a0/0x480)
      [<c0059f44>] (process_one_work+0x2a0/0x480) from [<c005a4b4>] (worker_thread+0x1bc/0x2bc)
      [<c005a4b4>] (worker_thread+0x1bc/0x2bc) from [<c0061148>] (kthread+0x98/0xa4)
      [<c0061148>] (kthread+0x98/0xa4) from [<c0014af4>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
      cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain
      cfg80211: World regulatory domain updated:
      cfg80211:   (start_freq - end_freq @ bandwidth), (max_antenna_gain, max_eirp)
      cfg80211:   (2402000 KHz - 2472000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
      cfg80211:   (2457000 KHz - 2482000 KHz @ 20000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
      cfg80211:   (2474000 KHz - 2494000 KHz @ 20000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
      cfg80211:   (5170000 KHz - 5250000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
      cfg80211:   (5735000 KHz - 5835000 KHz @ 40000 KHz), (300 mBi, 2000 mBm)
      
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NEliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      fe20b39e
  6. 12 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 09 6月, 2012 7 次提交
  8. 08 6月, 2012 9 次提交
  9. 07 6月, 2012 3 次提交
  10. 06 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 05 6月, 2012 9 次提交
  12. 04 6月, 2012 1 次提交
    • E
      drop_monitor: dont sleep in atomic context · bec4596b
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      drop_monitor calls several sleeping functions while in atomic context.
      
       BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:943
       in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 2103, name: kworker/0:2
       Pid: 2103, comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 3.5.0-rc1+ #55
       Call Trace:
        [<ffffffff810697ca>] __might_sleep+0xca/0xf0
        [<ffffffff811345a3>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1b3/0x1c0
        [<ffffffff8105578c>] ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x11c/0x130
        [<ffffffff815343fb>] __alloc_skb+0x4b/0x230
        [<ffffffffa00b0360>] ? reset_per_cpu_data+0x160/0x160 [drop_monitor]
        [<ffffffffa00b022f>] reset_per_cpu_data+0x2f/0x160 [drop_monitor]
        [<ffffffffa00b03ab>] send_dm_alert+0x4b/0xb0 [drop_monitor]
        [<ffffffff810568e0>] process_one_work+0x130/0x4c0
        [<ffffffff81058249>] worker_thread+0x159/0x360
        [<ffffffff810580f0>] ? manage_workers.isra.27+0x240/0x240
        [<ffffffff8105d403>] kthread+0x93/0xa0
        [<ffffffff816be6d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
        [<ffffffff8105d370>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x80/0x80
        [<ffffffff816be6d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
      
      Rework the logic to call the sleeping functions in right context.
      
      Use standard timer/workqueue api to let system chose any cpu to perform
      the allocation and netlink send.
      
      Also avoid a loop if reset_per_cpu_data() cannot allocate memory :
      use mod_timer() to wait 1/10 second before next try.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
      Reviewed-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bec4596b