This patch implements support for ACPI _CCA object, which is introduced in
ACPIv5.1, can be used for specifying device DMA coherency attribute.

The parsing logic traverses device namespace to parse coherency
information, and stores it in acpi_device_flags. Then uses it to call
arch_setup_dma_ops() when creating each device enumerated in DSDT
during ACPI scan.

This patch also introduces acpi_dma_is_coherent(), which provides
an interface for device drivers to check the coherency information
similarly to the of_dma_is_coherent().
Signed-off-by: NMark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Make the button ACPI device ID array static const. Safes us a little bit
of code.
Signed-off-by: NMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use a #defined symbol ACPI_DT_NAMESPACE_HID instead of the PRP0001
string.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

If the special PRP0001 device ID is present in the given device's list
of ACPI/PNP IDs and the device has a valid "compatible" property in
the _DSD, it should be enumerated using the default mechanism,
unless some scan handlers match the IDs preceding PRP0001 in the
device's list of ACPI/PNP IDs.  In addition to that, no scan handlers
matching the IDs following PRP0001 in that list should be attached
to the device.

To make that happen, define a scan handler that will match PRP0001
and trigger the default enumeration for the matching devices if the
"compatible" property is present for them.

Since that requires the check for platform_id and device->handler
to be removed from acpi_default_enumeration(), move the fallback
invocation of acpi_default_enumeration() to acpi_bus_attach()
(after it's checked if there's a matching ACPI driver for the
device), which is a better place to call it, and do the platform_id
check in there too (device->handler is guaranteed to be unset at
the point where the function is looking for a matching ACPI driver).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>

acpi_scan_is_offline() may be called under the physical_node_lock
lock of the given device object's parent, so prevent lockdep from
complaining about that by annotating that instance with
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING.

Fixes: caa73ea1 (ACPI / hotplug / driver core: Handle containers in a special way)
Reported-and-tested-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit e1acdeb0 "ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_match_device()"
introduced code that may lead to a NULL pointer dereference when
trying to unlock a mutex.  Fix that.

Fixes: e1acdeb0 "ACPI / scan: Simplify acpi_match_device()"
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, the ACPI modalias creation covers two mutually exclusive
cases: If the PRP0001 device ID is present in the device's list of
ACPI/PNP IDs and the "compatible" property is present in _DSD, the
created modalias will follow the OF rules of modalias creation.
Otherwise, ACPI rules are used.

However, that is not really desirable, because the presence of PRP0001
in the list of device IDs generally does not preclude using other
ACPI/PNP IDs with that device and those other IDs may be of higher
priority.  In those cases, the other IDs should take preference over
PRP0001 and therefore they also should be present in the modalias.

For this reason, rework the modalias creation for ACPI so that it
shows both the ACPI-style and OF-style modalias strings if the
device has a non-empty list of ACPI/PNP IDs (other than PRP0001)
and a valid "compatible" property at the same time.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

If the special PRP0001 device ID is present in a device's _CID list,
it should not prevent any ACPI/PNP IDs preceding it in the device's
list of identifiers from being matched first.  That is, only if none
of the IDs preceding PRP0001 in the device's PNP/ACPI IDs list
matches the IDs recognized by the driver, the driver's list of
"compatible" IDs should be matched against the device's "compatible"
property, if present.

In addition to that, drivers can provide both acpi_match_table and
of_match_table at the same time and the of_compatible matching
should be used in that case too if PRP0001 is present in the
device's list of identifiers.

To make that happen, rework acpi_driver_match_device() to do the
"compatible" property check in addition to matching the driver's
list of ACPI IDs against the device's one.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Redefine acpi_companion_match() to return an ACPI device object
pointer instead of a bool and use it to remove some redundant code
from acpi_match_device().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Redefine the function used for matching the device's "compatible"
property against a given list of "compatible" strings to take
a pointer to that list instead of a driver object pointer to
make it more general.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The fixed event handler should return a value that is either 0 or 1
meanning if the event is handled or not, instead of an acpi_status to
mean if the handler runs well or not.
Suggested-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This new feature is to interpret AMD specific ACPI device to
platform device such as I2C, UART, GPIO found on AMD CZ and
later chipsets. It based on example intel LPSS. Now, it can
support AMD I2C, UART and GPIO.
Signed-off-by: NKen Xue <Ken.Xue@amd.com>
Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If an ACPI device object whose _STA returns 0 (not present and not
functional) has _PR0 or _PS0, its power_manageable flag will be set
and acpi_bus_init_power() will return 0 for it.  Consequently, if
such a device object is passed to the ACPI device PM functions, they
will attempt to carry out the requested operation on the device,
although they should not do that for devices that are not present.

To fix that problem make acpi_bus_init_power() return an error code
for devices that are not present which will cause power_manageable to
be cleared for them as appropriate in acpi_bus_get_power_flags().
However, the lists of power resources should not be freed for the
device in that case, so modify acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to keep
those lists even if acpi_bus_init_power() returns an error.
Accordingly, when deciding whether or not the lists of power
resources need to be freed, acpi_free_power_resources_lists()
should check the power.flags.power_resources flag instead of
flags.power_manageable, so make that change too.

Furthermore, if acpi_bus_attach() sees that flags.initialized is
unset for the given device, it should reset the power management
settings of the device and re-initialize them from scratch instead
of relying on the previous settings (the device may have appeared
after being not present previously, for example), so make it use
the 'valid' flag of the D0 power state as the initial value of
flags.power_manageable for it and call acpi_bus_init_power() to
discover its current power state.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+

Two _DEP-related failure messages are printed as dev_err() which is
unnecessary and annoying.  Use dev_dbg() to print them.

While at it, one of the messages should actually say it is related
to _DEP, so modify it to that effect.

Fixes: 40e7fcb1 (ACPI: Add _DEP support to fix battery issue on Asus T100TA)
Reported-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

ACPI 5.0 introduces _DEP (Operation Region Dependencies) to designate
device objects that OSPM should assign a higher priority in start
ordering due to future operation region accesses.

On Asus T100TA, ACPI battery info are read from a I2C slave device via
I2C operation region. Before I2C operation region handler is installed,
battery _STA always returns 0. There is a _DEP method of designating
start order under battery device node.

This patch is to implement _DEP feature to fix battery issue on the
Asus T100TA.  Introducing acpi_dep_list and adding dep_unmet count
in struct acpi_device. During ACPI namespace scan, create struct
acpi_dep_data for a valid pair of master (device pointed to by _DEP)/
slave(device with _DEP), record master's and slave's ACPI handle in
it and put it into acpi_dep_list. The dep_unmet count will increase
by one if there is a device under its _DEP. Driver's probe() should
return EPROBE_DEFER when find dep_unmet is larger than 0. When I2C
operation region handler is installed, remove all struct acpi_dep_data
on the acpi_dep_list whose master is pointed to I2C host controller
and decrease slave's dep_unmet. When dep_unmet decreases to 0, all
_DEP conditions are met and then do acpi_bus_attach() for the device
in order to resolve battery _STA issue on the Asus T100TA.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69011Tested-by: NJan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
Tested-by: NAdam Williamson <adamw@happyassassin.net>
Tested-by: NMichael Shigorin <shigorin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from
device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are
no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been
created yet or they do not exist at all).

The following functions are provided:

fwnode_property_present()
fwnode_property_read_u8()
fwnode_property_read_u16()
fwnode_property_read_u32()
fwnode_property_read_u64()
fwnode_property_read_string()
fwnode_property_read_u8_array()
fwnode_property_read_u16_array()
fwnode_property_read_u32_array()
fwnode_property_read_u64_array()
fwnode_property_read_string_array()

in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added
previously.  For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct
fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object
(depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be
obtained.

Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the
children of the device description object associated with a given
device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the
number of a given device's child nodes.

The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees.
Suggested-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We have lots of existing Device Tree enabled drivers and allocating
separate _HID for each is not feasible. Instead we allocate special _HID
"PRP0001" that means that the match should be done using Device Tree
compatible property using driver's .of_match_table instead if the driver
is missing .acpi_match_table.

If there is a need to distinguish from where the device is enumerated
(DT/ACPI) driver can check dev->of_node or ACPI_COMPATION(dev).
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Device Tree is used in many embedded systems to describe the system
configuration to the OS. It supports attaching properties or name-value
pairs to the devices it describe. With these properties one can pass
additional information to the drivers that would not be available
otherwise.

ACPI is another configuration mechanism (among other things) typically
seen, but not limited to, x86 machines. ACPI allows passing arbitrary
data from methods but there has not been mechanism equivalent to Device
Tree until the introduction of _DSD in the recent publication of the
ACPI 5.1 specification.

In order to facilitate ACPI usage in systems where Device Tree is
typically used, it would be beneficial to standardize a way to retrieve
Device Tree style properties from ACPI devices, which is what we do in
this patch.

If a given device described in ACPI namespace wants to export properties it
must implement _DSD method (Device Specific Data, introduced with ACPI 5.1)
that returns the properties in a package of packages. For example:

	Name (_DSD, Package () {
		ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
		Package () {
			Package () {"name1", <VALUE1>},
			Package () {"name2", <VALUE2>},
			...
		}
	})

The UUID reserved for properties is daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301
and is documented in the ACPI 5.1 companion document called "_DSD
Implementation Guide" [1], [2].

We add several helper functions that can be used to extract these
properties and convert them to different Linux data types.

The ultimate goal is that we only have one device property API that
retrieves the requested properties from Device Tree or from ACPI
transparent to the caller.

[1] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm
[2] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-device-properties-UUID.pdfReviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Reviewed-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 6ab34301 ("mfd: Add ACPI support") made the MFD subdevices
share the parent MFD ACPI companion if no _HID/_CID is specified for
the subdevice in mfd_cell description. However, since all the subdevices
share the ACPI companion, the match and modalias generation logic started
to use the ACPI companion as well resulting this:

  # cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/HID-SENSOR-200041.6.auto/modalias
  acpi:INT33D1:PNP0C50:

instead of the expected one

  # cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/HID-SENSOR-200041.6.auto/modalias
  platform:HID-SENSOR-200041

In other words the subdevice modalias is overwritten by the one taken from
ACPI companion. This causes udev not to load the driver anymore.

It is useful to be able to share the ACPI companion so that MFD subdevices
(and possibly other devices as well) can access the ACPI resources even if
they do not have ACPI representation in the namespace themselves.

An example where this is used is Minnowboard LPC driver that creates GPIO
as a subdevice among other things. Without the ACPI companion gpiolib is
not able to lookup the corresponding GPIO controller from ACPI GpioIo
resource.

To fix this, restrict the match and modalias logic to be limited to the
first (primary) physical device associated with the given ACPI comapnion.
The secondary devices will still be able to access the ACPI companion,
but they will be matched in a different way.

Fixes: 6ab34301 (mfd: Add ACPI support)
Reported-by: NJarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch is partial linuxized result of the following ACPICA commit:
  ACPICA commit: a73b66c6aa1846d055bb6390d9c9b9902f7d804d
  Subject: Add "has handler" flag to event/gpe status interfaces.
  This change adds a new flag, ACPI_EVENT_FLAGS_HAS_HANDLER to the
  acpi_get_event_status and acpi_get_gpe_status external interfaces. It
  is set if the event/gpe currently has a handler associated with it.
This patch contains the code to rename ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_HANDLE to
ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_HAS_HANDLER, and the corresponding updates of its usages.

Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/a73b66c6Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is a typo, it should be negative -errno instead.
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of
the core) removed the generation of "online" uevents for containers,
because "add" uevents are now generated for them automatically when
container system devices are registered.  However, there are user
space tools that need to be notified when the container and all of
its children have been enumerated, which doesn't happen any more.

For this reason, add a mechanism allowing "online" uevents to be
generated for ACPI containers after enumerating the container along
with all of its children.

Fixes: 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core)
Reported-and-tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Newer laptops and tablets that use ACPI may have thermal sensors and
other devices with thermal control capabilities outside the core CPU/SOC,
for thermal safety reasons.
They are exposed for the OS to use via
1) INT3400 ACPI device object as the master.
2) INT3401 ~ INT340B ACPI device objects as the slaves.

This patch introduces a scan handler to enumerate the INT3400
ACPI device object to platform bus, and prevent its slaves
from being enumerated before the controller driver being probed.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>

The _SUN device indentification object is not guaranteed to return
the same value every time it is executed, so we should not cache its
return value, but rather execute it every time as needed.  If it is
cached, an incorrect stale value may be used in some situations.

This issue was exposed by commit 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add
acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace).  Fix it
by avoiding to cache the return value of _SUN.

Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace)
Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, notify callbacks for fixed button events are run from
interrupt context.  That is not necessary and after commit 0bf6368e
(ACPI / button: Add ACPI Button event via netlink routine) it causes
netlink routines to be called from interrupt context which is not
correct.

Also, that is different from non-fixed device events (including
non-fixed button events) whose notify callbacks are all executed from
process context.

For the above reasons, make fixed button device notify callbacks run
in process context which will avoid the deadlock when using netlink
to report button events to user space.

Fixes: 0bf6368e (ACPI / button: Add ACPI Button event via netlink routine)
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/21/606Reported-by: NBenjamin Block <bebl@mageta.org>
Reported-by: NKnut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
[rjw: Function names, subject and changelog.]
Cc: 3.15+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We generally don't allow ACPI drivers to bind to ACPI device objects
that companion "physical" device objects are created for to avoid
situations in which two different drivers may attempt to handle one
device at the same time.  Recent ACPI device enumeration rework
extended that approach to ACPI PNP devices by starting to use a scan
handler for enumerating them.  However, we previously allowed ACPI
drivers to bind to ACPI device objects with existing PNP device
companions and changing that led to functional regressions on some
systems.

For this reason, add a special check for PNP devices in
acpi_device_probe() so that ACPI drivers can bind to ACPI device
objects having existing PNP device companions as before.

Fixes: eec15edb (ACPI / PNP: use device ID list for PNPACPI device enumeration)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81511
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81971Reported-by: NGabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NDirk Griesbach <spamthis@freenet.de>
Cc: 3.16+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.16+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY is not configured, memory_device_handler.attach
is not set.  In acpi_scan_attach_handler(), the acpi_device->handler will
not be initialized.

In acpi_scan_hot_remove(), it doesn't check if acpi_device->handler is NULL.
If we do memory hot-remove without ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY configured, the kernel
will panic.

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000088
 IP: [<ffffffff813e318f>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x1d7/0x4c4
 PGD 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
 Modules linked in: sd_mod(E) sr_mod(E) cdrom(E) crc_t10dif(E) crct10dif_common(E) ata_piix(E) libata(E)
 CPU: 0 PID: 41 Comm: kworker/u2:1 Tainted: G            E 3.16.0-rc7--3.16-rc7-tangchen+ #20
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
 Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug acpi_hotplug_work_fn
 task: ffff8800182436c0 ti: ffff880018254000 task.ti: ffff880018254000
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff813e318f>]  [<ffffffff813e318f>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x1d7/0x4c4
 RSP: 0000:ffff880018257da8  EFLAGS: 00000246
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88001cd8d800 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88001e40e6f8 RDI: 0000000000000246
 RBP: ffff880018257df0 R08: 0000000000000096 R09: 00000000000011a0
 R10: 63735f6970636120 R11: 725f746f685f6e61 R12: 0000000000000003
 R13: ffff88001cc1c400 R14: ffff88001e062028 R15: 0000000000000040
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88001e400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
 CR2: 0000000000000088 CR3: 000000001a9a2000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 0000000000000000 DR7: 0000000000000000
 Stack:
  00000000523cab58 ffff88001cd8d9f8 ffff88001852d480 00000000523cab58
  ffff88001852d480 ffff880018221e40 ffff88001cc1c400 ffff88001cce2d00
  0000000000000040 ffff880018257e08 ffffffff813dc31d ffff88001852d480
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff813dc31d>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1e/0x29
  [<ffffffff8108eefb>] process_one_work+0x17b/0x460
  [<ffffffff8108f69d>] worker_thread+0x11d/0x5b0
  [<ffffffff8108f580>] ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0
  [<ffffffff81096811>] kthread+0xe1/0x100
  [<ffffffff81096730>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1a0/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff816cc6bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81096730>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1a0/0x1a0

This patch fixes this problem by checking if acpi_device->handler is NULL
in acpi_scan_hot_remove().

Fixes: d22ddcbc (ACPI / hotplug: Add demand_offline hotplug profile flag)
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+
[rjw: Subject]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI device enumeration code in Linux assumes that buttons always
are wakeup devices, so it calls acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() for them
which leads to undesirable side effects.  Namely, that function sets
up implicit device wake notification mechanism for a given GPE if
there is no handler method in the ACPI namespace, which from the
ACPICA's perspective means that there always is a way to handle
that GPE if enabled.  However, we don't handle wake notify events
for buttons, so if there are no handler methods for their GPEs in
the namespace, enabling a button GPE at run time leads to a GPE
storm in some cases (the GPE triggers, ACPICA carries out the
implicit wake notification for it which isn't handled, so the
GPE triggers again and so on).

To prevent that from happening use acpi_mark_gpe_for_wake()
instead of acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake() for buttons which will cause
ACPICA to only enable button GPEs if there are handler methods for
the in the namespace.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since all of the acpi_set_hp_context() callers pass at least one NULL
function pointer and one caller passes NULL function pointers only
to it, drop function pointer arguments from acpi_set_hp_context()
and make the callers initialize the function pointers in struct
acpi_hotplug_context by themselves before passing it to
acpi_set_hp_context().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
platform bus, change the code to enumerate ACPI device objects to
platform bus by default.  Namely, create platform devices for the
ACPI device objects that
 1. Have pnp.type.platform_id set (device objects with _HID currently).
 2. Do not have a scan handler attached.
 3. Are not SPI/I2C slave devices (that should be enumerated to the
    appropriate buses bus by their parent).
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Subject and changelog, rebase and code cleanup]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Currently, some scan handlers can be compiled out entirely, which
leaves the device objects they normally attach to without a scan
handler.  This isn't a problem as long as we don't have any default
enumeration mechanism that applies to all devices without a scan
handler.  However, if such a default enumeration is added, it still
should not be applied to devices that are normally attached to by
scan handlers, because that may result in creating "physical" device
objects of a wrong type for them.

Since we are going to create platform device objects for all ACPI
device objects with pnp.type.platform_id set by default, clear
pnp.type.platform_id where there is a matching scan handler without
an .attach() callback and otherwise simply treat that scan handler
as though the .attach() callback was present but always returned 0.

This will allow us to compile out scan handler callbacks and leave
the device ID lists used by them so as to prevent creating platform
device objects for the matching ACPI devices.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Only certain types of ACPI device objects can be enumerated as
platform devices, so in order to distinguish them from the others
introduce a new ACPI device PNP type flag, platform_id, and set it
for devices with a valid _HID to start with.

This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not
handle this in the right way currently.  Namely, if an ACPI device
object
 1. Has a _CRS method,
 2. Has an identification of
    "three capital characters followed by four hex digits",
 3. Is not in the excluded IDs list,
it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will
be create for it).  This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is
used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI.

However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the
platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be
created for them).  As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c
is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP
device objects for matching devices.  That list has been continuously
growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to
grow even more in the future.

To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices
as platform devices by default.  To this end, change the way of
enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that
will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI
device objects whose device IDs are present in that list.

The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains
all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers,
so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the
PNP drivers.  Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce
its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any
technical reasons into platform drivers.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Introduce a .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers to allow them to
use more elaborate matching algorithms if necessary.  That is needed
for the upcoming PNP scan handler in particular.

This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices
during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.)
if that isn't necessary.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Fixed hardware does not exist on HW-reduced ACPI platforms since the
programming interface for them is not implemented on them, so no need
to scan that hardware on them.

This patch avoids creating the fixed power button ACPI device and
eliminates a probe error message from ACPI button driver on ASUS T100.
Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is
acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core,
simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the
ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to
acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to
the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h.  Modify the
definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is
an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of
struct acpi_hp_work accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost()
everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug
_OST is supported unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions
of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock
operations using register_hotplug_dock_device().

That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI
dock operations to be dropped in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock
operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to
struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that
callback if available.  Also rename the existing .event() callback
in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible
confusion in the future.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>