- 12 6月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Herrmann 提交于
x86: PAT: fixed checkpatch errors (and whitespaces) Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Andreas Herrmann 提交于
Starting with commit 8d4a4300 (x86: cleanup PAT cpu validation) the PAT CPU feature flag is not cleared anymore. Now the error message "PAT enabled, but CPU feature cleared" in pat_init() is misleading. Furthermore the current code does not check for existence of the PAT CPU feature flag if a CPU is whitelisted in validate_pat_support. This patch clears pat_wc_enabled if boot CPU has no PAT feature flag and adapts the paranoia check. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Andreas Herrmann 提交于
If PAT support is advertised it should just work. No errata known. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 23 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Jones 提交于
Unconditionally enable PAT support on Centaur and Transmeta CPUs. All known models that advertise PAT have no known errata. Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Move the scattered checks for PAT support to a single function. Its moved to addon_cpuid_features.c as this file is shared between 32 and 64 bit. Remove the manipulation of the PAT feature bit and just disable PAT in the PAT layer, based on the PAT bit provided by the CPU and the current CPU version/model white list. Change the boot CPU check so it works on Voyager somewhere in the future as well :) Also panic, when a secondary has PAT disabled but the primary one has alrady switched to PAT. We have no way to undo that. The white list is kept for now to ensure that we can rely on known to work CPU types and concentrate on the software induced problems instead of fighthing CPU erratas and subtle wreckage caused by not yet verified CPUs. Once the PAT code has stabilized enough, we can remove the white list and open the can of worms. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeremy Fitzhardinge 提交于
The patch to suppress bitops-related warnings added a pile of ugly casts. Many of these were related to the management of x86 CPU capabilities. Clean these up by adding specific set/clear_cpu_cap macros, and use them consistently. Signed-off-by: NJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 13 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Venki Pallipadi 提交于
Some Intel features are spread around in different CPUID leafs like 0x5, 0x6 and 0xA. Make this feature detection code common across i386 and x86_64. Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo. This feature will be enabled automatically by current acpi-cpufreq driver. Refer to Intel Software Developer's Manual for more details about the feature. Thanks to hpa (H Peter Anvin) for the making the actual code detecting the scattered features data-driven. Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-