- 29 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The commit cad20c27 was supposed to fix handling of devices first using public addresses and then switching to RPAs after pairing. Unfortunately it missed a couple of key places in the code. 1. When evaluating which devices should be removed from the existing white list we also need to consider whether we have an IRK for them or not, i.e. a call to hci_find_irk_by_addr() is needed. 2. In smp_notify_keys() we should not be requiring the knowledge of the RPA, but should simply keep the IRK around if the other conditions require it. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
-
- 06 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This patch implements the mgmt Start Limited Discovery command. Most of existing Start Discovery code is reused since the only difference is the presence of a 'limited' flag as part of the discovery state. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 10 12月, 2015 16 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
We can simplify a lot of code by making sure hdev->cur_adv_instance is always up-to-date. This allows e.g. the removal of the get_current_adv_instance() helper function and the special HCI_ADV_CURRENT value. This patch also makes selecting instance 0x00 explicit in the various calls where advertising instances aren't enabled, e.g. when HCI_ADVERTISING is set or we've just finished enabling LE. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The logic in powered_update_hci() to initialize the advertising data & state is a bit more complicated than it needs to be. It was previously not doing anything if HCI_LE_ENABLED wasn't set, but this was not obvious by quickly looking at the code. Now the conditions for the various actions are more explicit. Another simplification is due to the fact that __hci_req_schedule_adv_instance() takes care of setting hdev->cur_adv_instance so there's no need to set it before calling the function. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The hci_req_run() function already checks for empty cmd_q and bails out if necessary. Also, req.cmd_q should really be treated as private data of the request and not accessed directly. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The __hci_req_update_scan_rsp_data gets the instance to be updated which should get passed to update_inst_scan_rsp_data() instead of always enabling the current instance. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This flag just tells us whether hdev->adv_instances is empty or not. We can equally well use the list_empty() function to get this information. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The request to update HCI during power on is always coming either from hdev->req_workqueue or through an ioctl, so it's safe to use hci_req_sync for it. This way we also eliminate potential races with incoming mgmt commands or other actions while powering on. Part of this refactoring is the splitting of mgmt_powered() into mgmt_power_on() and __mgmt_power_off() functions. The main reason is the different requirements as far as hdev locking is concerned, as highlighted with the __ prefix of the power off API. Since the power on in the case of clearing the AUTO_OFF flag cannot be done synchronously in the set_powered mgmt handler, the hci_power_on work callback is extended to cover this (which also simplifies the set_powered helper a lot). Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
We'll soon need this both in hci_request.c and mgmt.c so move it to hci_request.c as a generic helper. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
We'll soon need to update the EIR both from hci_request.c and mgmt.c so move update_eir() as a more generic request helper to hci_request.c. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
We'll soon need this both from hci_request.c and mgmt.c so move it as a request helper function to hci_request.c. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Since the other discoverable changes are behind req_workqueue now it only makes sense to move the discoverable timeout there as well. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The discoverable mode is intrinsically linked with the connectable mode e.g. through sharing the same HCI command (Write Scan Enable) for BR/EDR. It makes therefore sense to move it to hci_request.c and run the changes through the same hdev->req_workqueue. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The Class of Device needs to be changed e.g. for limited discoverable mode. In preparation of moving the discoverable mode to hci_request.c and hdev->req_workqueue, move the Class of Device helpers there first. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This way the connectable changes are synchronized against each other, which helps avoid potential races. The connectable mode is also linked together with LE advertising which makes is more convenient to have it behind the same workqueue. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This paves the way for eventually performing advertising changes through the hdev->req_workqueue. Some new APIs need to be exposed from mgmt.c to hci_request.c and vice-versa, but many of them will go away once hdev->req_workqueue gets used. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This way we avoid the need to do a forward declaration in later patches. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Since Add/Remove Device perform the page scan updates independently from the HCI command completion we've introduced a potential race when multiple mgmt commands are queued. Doing the page scan updates through the req_workqueue ensures that the state changes are performed in a race-free manner. At the same time, to make the request helper more widely usable, extend it to also cover Inquiry Scan changes since those are behind the same HCI command. This is also reflected in the new name of the API as well as the work struct name. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 23 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
There were a couple of code paths missed by the previous patch that added a HCI status return parameter to __hci_req_sync. This patch adds the missing assignments for them. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 20 11月, 2015 17 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The hci_req_sync_cancel() is just as much related to the request cleanup as hci_request_cancel_all() is. Just move the former into the latter and do the cleanup from a single place in hci_dev_do_close(). The important thing is to avoid deadlocks by holding the req_sync lock: previously hci_request_cancel_all was done right after releasing the lock and with this patch it's right before taking it. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
The only user of this, le_scan_restart_work(), is so short and simple that it makes sense to just merge the code there. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Merge le_scan_disable_work_complete into the main le_scan_disable_work function and take advantage of the updated bredr_inquiry() to run the Inquiry through hci_req_sync(). Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Passing the needed inquiry length to bredr_inquiry() makes it possible to also use this helper for interleaved discovery where the controller doesn't support simultaneous Inquiry & LE scan. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Since discovery also deals with LE scanning it makes sense to move it behind the same req_workqueue as other LE scanning changes. This also simplifies the logic since we do many of the actions in a synchronous manner. Part of this refactoring is moving hci_req_stop_discovery() to hci_request.c. At the same time the function receives support for properly handling the STOPPING state since that's the state we'll be in when stopping through the req_workqueue. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Since discovery also deals with LE scanning it makes sense to move it behind the same req_workqueue as other LE scanning changes. This also simplifies the logic since we do many of the actions in a synchronous manner. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
In some circumstances it may be useful to abort the request through checks done in the request callback. To make the feature possible this patch changes the return value of the request callback from void to int and aborts the request if a non-zero value is returned. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
To avoid any risks of races, place also these LE scan modification work callbacks behind the same work queue as the other LE scan changes. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
There are no more external users so this API can be made private. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Since explicit connect requests are also a sub-category of passive scan updates, run them through the same workqueue as the other passive scan changes. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
In some cases it may be important to get the exact HCI status rather than the converted HCI-to-errno value. Add an optional return parameter to the hci_req_sync() API to allow for this. Since there are no good HCI translation candidates for cancelation and timeout, use the "unknown" status code for those cases. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Instead of firing off a simple async request queue all background scan updates through req_workqueue and use hci_req_sync() there to ensure that no two updates overlap with each other. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
Prepare hci_request.c to have code for doing synchronous HCI requests, such as LE scanning or advertising changes. The necessary work callbacks will be set up in hci_request_setup() and cleaned up in hci_request_cancel_all(). The former is used when an HCI device get registered, and the latter each time it is powered off (or unregistered). Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
To make it clear which HCI request APIs target specifically synchronous requests, add 'sync' to the API names. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
hci_request.c is a more natural place for the synchronous request handling. Furthermore, we will soon need access to some of the previously private-to-hci_core.c functions from hci_request.c. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
We can reduce the size of the hci_ctrl struct by converting 'bool req_start' to 'u8 req_flags' and making the two function pointers a union (since only one is ever set at a time). Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The new hci_skb_pkt_* wrappers only help if they are used consistently in the Bluetooth subsystem. So first convert the core packet handling. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 26 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The SKB context buffer for HCI request is really not just for requests, information in their are preserved for the whole HCI layer. So it makes more sense to actually rename it into bt_cb()->hci and also call it then struct hci_ctrl. In addition that allows moving the decoded opcode for outgoing packets into that struct. So far it was just consuming valuable space from the main shared items. And opcode are not valid for L2CAP packets. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
-
- 22 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
There are several different places needing to make sure that a connection gets disconnected or canceled. The exact action needed depends on the connection state, so centralizing this logic can save quite a lot of code duplication. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 11 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Pawlowski 提交于
This patch adds hci_lookup_le_connect method, that will be used to check wether outgoing le connection attempt is in progress. Signed-off-by: NJakub Pawlowski <jpawlowski@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 02 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
This patch adds a second possible callback for HCI requests where the callback will receive the full skb of the last successfully completed HCI command. This API is useful for cases where we want to use a request to read some data and the existing hci_event.c handlers do not store it e.g. in the hci_dev struct. The reason the patch is a bit bigger than just adding the new API is because the hci_req_cmd_complete() functions required some refactoring to enable it: now hci_req_cmd_complete() is simply used to request the callback pointers if any, and the actual calling of them happens from a single place at the end of hci_event_packet(). The reason for this is that we need to pass the original skb (without any skb_pull, etc modifications done to it) and it's simplest to keep track of it within the hci_event_packet() function. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-