Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 1月, 2012 2 次提交
  3. 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 07 1月, 2012 2 次提交
  7. 04 1月, 2012 6 次提交
  9. 09 12月, 2011 4 次提交
  11. 04 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 02 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  15. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • P
      fs: add module.h to files that were implicitly using it · 143cb494
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      Some files were using the complete module.h infrastructure without
actually including the header at all.  Fix them up in advance so
once the implicit presence is removed, we won't get failures like this:

  CC [M]  fs/nfsd/nfssvc.o
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c: In function 'nfsd_create_serv':
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:335: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared (first use in this function)
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:335: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:335: error: for each function it appears in.)
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c: In function 'nfsd':
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c:555: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_put_and_exit'
make[3]: *** [fs/nfsd/nfssvc.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      143cb494
  17. 30 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  19. 29 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  21. 28 10月, 2011 2 次提交
    • A
      vfs: do (nearly) lockless generic_file_llseek · ef3d0fd2
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      The i_mutex lock use of generic _file_llseek hurts.  Independent processes
accessing the same file synchronize over a single lock, even though
they have no need for synchronization at all.

Under high utilization this can cause llseek to scale very poorly on larger
systems.

This patch does some rethinking of the llseek locking model:

First the 64bit f_pos is not necessarily atomic without locks
on 32bit systems. This can already cause races with read() today.
This was discussed on linux-kernel in the past and deemed acceptable.
The patch does not change that.

Let's look at the different seek variants:

SEEK_SET: Doesn't really need any locking.
If there's a race one writer wins, the other loses.

For 32bit the non atomic update races against read()
stay the same. Without a lock they can also happen
against write() now.  The read() race was deemed
acceptable in past discussions, and I think if it's
ok for read it's ok for write too.

=> Don't need a lock.

SEEK_END: This behaves like SEEK_SET plus it reads
the maximum size too. Reading the maximum size would have the
32bit atomic problem. But luckily we already have a way to read
the maximum size without locking (i_size_read), so we
can just use that instead.

Without i_mutex there is no synchronization with write() anymore,
however since the write() update is atomic on 64bit it just behaves
like another racy SEEK_SET.  On non atomic 32bit it's the same
as SEEK_SET.

=> Don't need a lock, but need to use i_size_read()

SEEK_CUR: This has a read-modify-write race window
on the same file. One could argue that any application
doing unsynchronized seeks on the same file is already broken.
But for the sake of not adding a regression here I'm
using the file->f_lock to synchronize this. Using this
lock is much better than the inode mutex because it doesn't
synchronize between processes.

=> So still need a lock, but can use a f_lock.

This patch implements this new scheme in generic_file_llseek.
I dropped generic_file_llseek_unlocked and changed all callers.
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      ef3d0fd2
    • S
      Add definition for share encryption · 96814ecb
      由 Steve French 提交于 
      Samba supports a setfs info level to negotiate encrypted
shares.  This patch adds the defines so we recognize
this info level.  Later patches will add the enablement
for it.
Acked-by: NJeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
      96814ecb
  23. 25 10月, 2011 4 次提交
  25. 23 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 21 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  29. 20 10月, 2011 8 次提交