1. 28 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  2. 25 4月, 2016 5 次提交
  3. 20 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 14 4月, 2016 10 次提交
  5. 12 4月, 2016 3 次提交
  6. 08 4月, 2016 3 次提交
  7. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  8. 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      drm/i915: Move execlists irq handler to a bottom half · 27af5eea
      Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
      Doing a lot of work in the interrupt handler introduces huge
      latencies to the system as a whole.
      
      Most dramatic effect can be seen by running an all engine
      stress test like igt/gem_exec_nop/all where, when the kernel
      config is lean enough, the whole system can be brought into
      multi-second periods of complete non-interactivty. That can
      look for example like this:
      
       NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [kworker/u8:3:143]
       Modules linked in: [redacted for brevity]
       CPU: 0 PID: 143 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Tainted: G     U       L  4.5.0-160321+ #183
       Hardware name: Intel Corporation Broadwell Client platform/WhiteTip Mountain 1
       Workqueue: i915 gen6_pm_rps_work [i915]
       task: ffff8800aae88000 ti: ffff8800aae90000 task.ti: ffff8800aae90000
       RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8104a3c2>]  [<ffffffff8104a3c2>] __do_softirq+0x72/0x1d0
       RSP: 0000:ffff88014f403f38  EFLAGS: 00000206
       RAX: ffff8800aae94000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000000006e0
       RDX: 0000000000000020 RSI: 0000000004208060 RDI: 0000000000215d80
       RBP: ffff88014f403f80 R08: 0000000b1b42c180 R09: 0000000000000022
       R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 000000000000a030
       R13: 0000000000000082 R14: ffff8800aa4d0080 R15: 0000000000000082
       FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88014f400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
       CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
       CR2: 00007fa53b90c000 CR3: 0000000001a0a000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
       DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
       DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
       Stack:
        042080601b33869f ffff8800aae94000 00000000fffc2678 ffff88010000000a
        0000000000000000 000000000000a030 0000000000005302 ffff8800aa4d0080
        0000000000000206 ffff88014f403f90 ffffffff8104a716 ffff88014f403fa8
       Call Trace:
        <IRQ>
        [<ffffffff8104a716>] irq_exit+0x86/0x90
        [<ffffffff81031e7d>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x3d/0x50
        [<ffffffff814f3eac>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x7c/0x90
        <EOI>
        [<ffffffffa01c5b40>] ? gen8_write64+0x1a0/0x1a0 [i915]
        [<ffffffff814f2b39>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x9/0x20
        [<ffffffffa01c5c44>] gen8_write32+0x104/0x1a0 [i915]
        [<ffffffff8132c6a2>] ? n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x372/0xae0
        [<ffffffffa017cc9e>] gen6_set_rps_thresholds+0x1be/0x330 [i915]
        [<ffffffffa017eaf0>] gen6_set_rps+0x70/0x200 [i915]
        [<ffffffffa0185375>] intel_set_rps+0x25/0x30 [i915]
        [<ffffffffa01768fd>] gen6_pm_rps_work+0x10d/0x2e0 [i915]
        [<ffffffff81063852>] ? finish_task_switch+0x72/0x1c0
        [<ffffffff8105ab29>] process_one_work+0x139/0x350
        [<ffffffff8105b186>] worker_thread+0x126/0x490
        [<ffffffff8105b060>] ? rescuer_thread+0x320/0x320
        [<ffffffff8105fa64>] kthread+0xc4/0xe0
        [<ffffffff8105f9a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
        [<ffffffff814f351f>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
        [<ffffffff8105f9a0>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x170/0x170
      
      I could not explain, or find a code path, which would explain
      a +20 second lockup, but from some instrumentation it was
      apparent the interrupts off proportion of time was between
      10-25% under heavy load which is quite bad.
      
      When a interrupt "cliff" is reached, which was >~320k irq/s on
      my machine, the whole system goes into a terrible state of the
      above described multi-second lockups.
      
      By moving the GT interrupt handling to a tasklet in a most
      simple way, the problem above disappears completely.
      
      Testing the effect on sytem-wide latencies using
      igt/gem_syslatency shows the following before this patch:
      
      gem_syslatency: cycles=1532739, latency mean=416531.829us max=2499237us
      gem_syslatency: cycles=1839434, latency mean=1458099.157us max=4998944us
      gem_syslatency: cycles=1432570, latency mean=2688.451us max=1201185us
      gem_syslatency: cycles=1533543, latency mean=416520.499us max=2498886us
      
      This shows that the unrelated process is experiencing huge
      delays in its wake-up latency. After the patch the results
      look like this:
      
      gem_syslatency: cycles=808907, latency mean=53.133us max=1640us
      gem_syslatency: cycles=862154, latency mean=62.778us max=2117us
      gem_syslatency: cycles=856039, latency mean=58.079us max=2123us
      gem_syslatency: cycles=841683, latency mean=56.914us max=1667us
      
      Showing a huge improvement in the unrelated process wake-up
      latency. It also shows an approximate halving in the number
      of total empty batches submitted during the test. This may
      not be worrying since the test puts the driver under
      a very unrealistic load with ncpu threads doing empty batch
      submission to all GPU engines each.
      
      Another benefit compared to the hard-irq handling is that now
      work on all engines can be dispatched in parallel since we can
      have up to number of CPUs active tasklets. (While previously
      a single hard-irq would serially dispatch on one engine after
      another.)
      
      More interesting scenario with regards to throughput is
      "gem_latency -n 100" which  shows 25% better throughput and
      CPU usage, and 14% better dispatch latencies.
      
      I did not find any gains or regressions with Synmark2 or
      GLbench under light testing. More benchmarking is certainly
      required.
      
      v2:
         * execlists_lock should be taken as spin_lock_bh when
           queuing work from userspace now. (Chris Wilson)
         * uncore.lock must be taken with spin_lock_irq when
           submitting requests since that now runs from either
           softirq or process context.
      
      v3:
         * Expanded commit message with more testing data;
         * converted missed locking sites to _bh;
         * added execlist_lock comment. (Chris Wilson)
      
      v4:
         * Mention dispatch parallelism in commit. (Chris Wilson)
         * Do not hold uncore.lock over MMIO reads since the block
           is already serialised per-engine via the tasklet itself.
           (Chris Wilson)
         * intel_lrc_irq_handler should be static. (Chris Wilson)
         * Cancel/sync the tasklet on GPU reset. (Chris Wilson)
         * Document and WARN that tasklet cannot be active/pending
           on engine cleanup. (Chris Wilson/Imre Deak)
      Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
      Testcase: igt/gem_exec_nop/all
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94350Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1459768316-6670-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
      27af5eea
  9. 31 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: Refer to GGTT {,VM} consistently · 72e96d64
      Joonas Lahtinen 提交于
      Refer to the GGTT VM consistently as "ggtt->base" instead of just "ggtt",
      "vm" or indirectly through other variables like "dev_priv->ggtt.base"
      to avoid confusion with the i915_ggtt object itself and PPGTT VMs.
      
      Refer to the GGTT as "ggtt" instead of indirectly through chaining.
      
      As a bonus gets rid of the long-standing i915_obj_to_ggtt vs.
      i915_gem_obj_to_ggtt conflict, due to removal of i915_obj_to_ggtt!
      
      v2:
      - Added some more after grepping sources with Chris
      
      v3:
      - Refer to GGTT VM through ggtt->base consistently instead of ggtt_vm
        (Chris)
      
      v4:
      - Convert all dev_priv->ggtt->foo accesses to ggtt->foo.
      
      v5:
      - Make patch checker happy
      
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      72e96d64
  10. 30 3月, 2016 2 次提交
  11. 24 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 18 3月, 2016 3 次提交
  13. 17 3月, 2016 2 次提交
  14. 16 3月, 2016 5 次提交
  15. 02 3月, 2016 1 次提交