Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 5月, 2008 2 次提交
    • A
      x86: setup stack canary for the idle threads · ce22bd92
      由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于 
      The idle threads for non-boot CPUs are a bit special in how they
are created; the result is that these don't have the stack canary
set up properly in their PDA. Easiest fix is to just always set
the PDA up correctly when entering the idle thread; this is a NOP
for the boot cpu.
Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      ce22bd92
    • I
      x86: fix stackprotector canary updates during context switches · e0032087
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      fix a bug noticed and fixed by pageexec@freemail.hu.

if built with -fstack-protector-all then we'll have canary checks built
into the __switch_to() function. That does not work well with the
canary-switching code there: while we already use the %rsp of the
new task, we still call __switch_to() whith the previous task's canary
value in the PDA, hence the __switch_to() ssp prologue instructions
will store the previous canary. Then we update the PDA and upon return
from __switch_to() the canary check triggers and we panic.

so update the canary after we have called __switch_to(), where we are
at the same stackframe level as the last stackframe of the next
(and now freshly current) task.

Note: this means that we call __switch_to() [and its sub-functions]
still with the old canary, but that is not a problem, both the previous
and the next task has a high-quality canary. The only (mostly academic)
disadvantage is that the canary of one task may leak onto the stack of
another task, increasing the risk of information leaks, were an attacker
able to read the stack of specific tasks (but not that of others).

To solve this we'll have to reorganize the way we switch tasks, and move
the PDA setting into the switch_to() assembly code. That will happen in
another patch.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      e0032087
  3. 27 4月, 2008 1 次提交
    • P
      fix idle (arch, acpi and apm) and lockdep · 7f424a8b
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      OK, so 25-mm1 gave a lockdep error which made me look into this.

The first thing that I noticed was the horrible mess; the second thing I
saw was hacks like: 71e93d15

The problem is that arch idle routines are somewhat inconsitent with
their IRQ state handling and instead of fixing _that_, we go paper over
the problem.

So the thing I've tried to do is set a standard for idle routines and
fix them all up to adhere to that. So the rules are:

  idle routines are entered with IRQs disabled
  idle routines will exit with IRQs enabled

Nearly all already did this in one form or another.

Merge the 32 and 64 bit bits so they no longer have different bugs.

As for the actual lockdep warning; __sti_mwait() did a plainly un-annotated
irq-enable.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      7f424a8b
  5. 25 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 20 4月, 2008 3 次提交
  9. 17 4月, 2008 3 次提交
  11. 11 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 26 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • I
      x86: fix execve with -fstack-protect · 5d119b2c
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      pointed out by pageexec@freemail.hu:

> what happens here is that gcc treats the argument area as owned by the
> callee, not the caller and is allowed to do certain tricks. for ssp it
> will make a copy of the struct passed by value into the local variable
> area and pass *its* address down, and it won't copy it back into the
> original instance stored in the argument area.
>
> so once sys_execve returns, the pt_regs passed by value hasn't at all
> changed and its default content will cause a nice double fault (FWIW,
> this part took me the longest to debug, being down with cold didn't
> help it either ;).

To fix this we pass in pt_regs by pointer.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      5d119b2c
  17. 09 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 30 1月, 2008 26 次提交