- 16 4月, 2015 8 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Cachefiles should perform fs modifications (eg. vfs_unlink()) on the top layer only and should not attempt to alter the lower layer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix inconsistent use of file_inode() vs file->f_path.dentry->d_inode. Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make pathwalk use d_is_reg() rather than S_ISREG() to determine whether to honour O_TRUNC. Since this occurs after complete_walk(), the dentry type field cannot change and the inode pointer cannot change as we hold a ref on the dentry, so this should be safe. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix up debugfs to use d_is_dir(dentry) in place of S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Where we have: if (!dentry->d_inode || d_is_negative(dentry)) { type constructions in pathwalk we should be able to eliminate the check of d_inode and rely solely on the result of d_is_negative() or d_is_positive(). What we do have to take care to do is to read d_inode after calling a d_is_xxx() typecheck function to get the barriering right. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Don't use d_inode as a variable name as it now masks a function name. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Impose ordering on accesses of d_inode and d_flags to avoid the need to do this: if (!dentry->d_inode || d_is_negative(dentry)) { when this: if (d_is_negative(dentry)) { should suffice. This check is especially problematic if a dentry can have its type field set to something other than DENTRY_MISS_TYPE when d_inode is NULL (as in unionmount). What we really need to do is stick a write barrier between setting d_inode and setting d_flags and a read barrier between reading d_flags and reading d_inode. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 12 4月, 2015 32 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
we can do that now - all we need is to clear IOCB_DIRECT from ->ki_flags in "can't do dio" case. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... avoiding write_iter/fcntl races. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... returning -E... upon error and amount of data left in iter after (possible) truncation upon success. Note, that normal case gives a non-zero (positive) return value, so any tests for != 0 _must_ be updated. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Conflicts: fs/ext4/file.c
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Alignment checks for dio depend upon the range truncation done by generic_write_checks(). They can be done as soon as we got ocfs2_rw_lock() and that actually makes ocfs2_prepare_inode_for_write() simpler. The only thing to watch out for is restoring the original count in "unlock and redo without dio" case. Position doesn't need to be restored, since we change it only in O_APPEND case and in that case it will be reassigned anyway. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's &iocb->ki_pos; no need to obfuscate. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
it's easier to do generic_write_checks() first Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
already done by caller. We used to call __fuse_direct_write(), which called generic_write_checks(); now the former got expanded, bringing the latter to the surface. It used to be called all along and calling it from there had been wrong all along... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
simpler that way... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all remaining callers are passing 0; some just obscure that fact. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
That allows ->write_iter() instances much more convenient life wrt iocb->ki_pos (and fixes several filesystems with borderline POSIX violations when zero-length write succeeds and changes the current position). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Now that no one is using rw, remove it completely. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
The rw parameter to direct_IO is redundant with iov_iter->type, and treated slightly differently just about everywhere it's used: some users do rw & WRITE, and others do rw == WRITE where they should be doing a bitwise check. Simplify this with the new iov_iter_rw() helper, which always returns either READ or WRITE. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
And use iov_iter_rw() instead. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Most filesystems call through to these at some point, so we'll start here. Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
no remaining users Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
all remaining instances of aio_{read,write} (all 4 of them) have explicit ->read and ->write resp.; do_sync_read/do_sync_write is never called by __vfs_read/__vfs_write anymore and no other users had been left. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
store reference to iter instead of that to iovec Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
we just change the calling conventions here; more work to follow. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
All places outside of core VFS that checked ->read and ->write for being NULL or called the methods directly are gone now, so NULL {read,write} with non-NULL {read,write}_iter will do the right thing in all cases. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and fix the case when the area we are asked to read crosses a hugepage boundary Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and request the same from the local cache - all filesystems with anything usable for that support those already. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-