Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 06 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 09 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 03 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 31 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 15 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 14 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 11 2月, 2017 2 次提交
    • A
      net/act_pedit: Introduce 'add' operation · 853a14ba
      由 Amir Vadai 提交于 
      This command could be useful to inc/dec fields.

For example, to forward any TCP packet and decrease its TTL:
$ tc filter add dev enp0s9 protocol ip parent ffff: \
    flower ip_proto tcp \
    action pedit munge ip ttl add 0xff pipe \
    action mirred egress redirect dev veth0

In the example above, adding 0xff to this u8 field is actually
decreasing it by one, since the operation is masked.
Signed-off-by: NAmir Vadai <amir@vadai.me>
Reviewed-by: NOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      853a14ba
    • A
      net/act_pedit: Support using offset relative to the conventional network headers · 71d0ed70
      由 Amir Vadai 提交于 
      Extend pedit to enable the user setting offset relative to network
headers. This change would enable to work with more complex header
schemes (vs the simple IPv4 case) where setting a fixed offset relative
to the network header is not enough.

After this patch, the action has information about the exact header type
and field inside this header. This information could be used later on
for hardware offloading of pedit.

Backward compatibility was being kept:
1. Old kernel <-> new userspace
2. New kernel <-> old userspace
3. add rule using new userspace <-> dump using old userspace
4. add rule using old userspace <-> dump using new userspace

When using the extended api, new netlink attributes are being used. This
way, operation will fail in (1) and (3) - and no malformed rule be added
or dumped. Of course, new user space that doesn't need the new
functionality can use the old netlink attributes and operation will
succeed.
Since action can support both api's, (2) should work, and it is easy to
write the new user space to have (4) work.

The action is having a strict check that only header types and commands
it can handle are accepted. This way future additions will be much
easier.

Usage example:
$ tc filter add dev enp0s9 protocol ip parent ffff: \
  flower \
    ip_proto tcp \
    dst_port 80 \
  action pedit munge tcp dport set 8080 pipe \
  action mirred egress redirect dev veth0

Will forward tcp port whose original dest port is 80, while modifying
the destination port to 8080.
Signed-off-by: NAmir Vadai <amir@vadai.me>
Reviewed-by: NOr Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      71d0ed70
  15. 30 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 18 11月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      netns: make struct pernet_operations::id unsigned int · c7d03a00
      由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于 
      Make struct pernet_operations::id unsigned.

There are 2 reasons to do so:

1)
This field is really an index into an zero based array and
thus is unsigned entity. Using negative value is out-of-bound
access by definition.

2)
On x86_64 unsigned 32-bit data which are mixed with pointers
via array indexing or offsets added or subtracted to pointers
are preffered to signed 32-bit data.

"int" being used as an array index needs to be sign-extended
to 64-bit before being used.

	void f(long *p, int i)
	{
		g(p[i]);
	}

  roughly translates to

	movsx	rsi, esi
	mov	rdi, [rsi+...]
	call 	g

MOVSX is 3 byte instruction which isn't necessary if the variable is
unsigned because x86_64 is zero extending by default.

Now, there is net_generic() function which, you guessed it right, uses
"int" as an array index:

	static inline void *net_generic(const struct net *net, int id)
	{
		...
		ptr = ng->ptr[id - 1];
		...
	}

And this function is used a lot, so those sign extensions add up.

Patch snipes ~1730 bytes on allyesconfig kernel (without all junk
messing with code generation):

	add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 70/598 up/down: 396/-2126 (-1730)

Unfortunately some functions actually grow bigger.
This is a semmingly random artefact of code generation with register
allocator being used differently. gcc decides that some variable
needs to live in new r8+ registers and every access now requires REX
prefix. Or it is shifted into r12, so [r12+0] addressing mode has to be
used which is longer than [r8]

However, overall balance is in negative direction:

	add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 70/598 up/down: 396/-2126 (-1730)
	function                                     old     new   delta
	nfsd4_lock                                  3886    3959     +73
	tipc_link_build_proto_msg                   1096    1140     +44
	mac80211_hwsim_new_radio                    2776    2808     +32
	tipc_mon_rcv                                1032    1058     +26
	svcauth_gss_legacy_init                     1413    1429     +16
	tipc_bcbase_select_primary                   379     392     +13
	nfsd4_exchange_id                           1247    1260     +13
	nfsd4_setclientid_confirm                    782     793     +11
		...
	put_client_renew_locked                      494     480     -14
	ip_set_sockfn_get                            730     716     -14
	geneve_sock_add                              829     813     -16
	nfsd4_sequence_done                          721     703     -18
	nlmclnt_lookup_host                          708     686     -22
	nfsd4_lockt                                 1085    1063     -22
	nfs_get_client                              1077    1050     -27
	tcf_bpf_init                                1106    1076     -30
	nfsd4_encode_fattr                          5997    5930     -67
	Total: Before=154856051, After=154854321, chg -0.00%
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c7d03a00
  19. 26 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • W
      net_sched: move tc_action into tcf_common · a85a970a
      由 WANG Cong 提交于 
      struct tc_action is confusing, currently we use it for two purposes:
1) Pass in arguments and carry out results from helper functions
2) A generic representation for tc actions

The first one is error-prone, since we need to make sure we don't
miss anything. This patch aims to get rid of this use, by moving
tc_action into tcf_common, so that they are allocated together
in hashtable and can be cast'ed easily.

And together with the following patch, we could really make
tc_action a generic representation for all tc actions and each
type of action can inherit from it.

Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a85a970a
  21. 08 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  23. 27 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 26 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  27. 01 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  29. 09 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 03 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  33. 07 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  35. 13 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  37. 22 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  39. 20 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  41. 14 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  43. 28 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      net_sched: act: Dont increment refcnt on replace · 1a29321e
      由 Jamal Hadi Salim 提交于 
       This is a bug fix. The existing code tries to kill many
 birds with one stone: Handling binding of actions to
 filters, new actions and replacing of action
 attributes. A simple test case to illustrate:

XXXX
 moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions add action drop index 12
 moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
 action order 1: gact action drop
  random type none pass val 0
  index 12 ref 1 bind 0
 moja@fe1:~$ sudo tc actions replace action ok index 12
 moja@fe1:~$ actions get action gact index 12
 action order 1: gact action drop
  random type none pass val 0
  index 12 ref 2 bind 0
XXXX

The above shows the refcounf being wrongly incremented on replace.
There are more complex scenarios with binding of actions to filters
that i am leaving out that didnt work as well...
Signed-off-by: NJamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1a29321e
  45. 21 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  47. 19 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  49. 06 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  51. 16 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  53. 15 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  55. 07 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  57. 02 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  59. 06 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  61. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  63. 20 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  65. 11 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  67. 07 6月, 2010 1 次提交