Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>

Now most of ARM machines has the alsmot same __clk_get/put() macro

So place it at the arch/arm/include/asm/clkdev.h and remove the reduntant header files

But some machines don't have the same form as above. It can use the machince specific clkdev file by HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV config

Now there are only 3 caese.

1) define the clk structure with clkdev macro => Need to move clk structure to proper header file

arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/clkdev.h
arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/clkdev.h
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/clkdev.h
arch/arm/mach-integrator/include/mach/clkdev.h

2) export the __clk_get/put function at clock.c

arch/arm/mach-shmobile/include/mach/clkdev.h

3) demuxing the clk source
arch/arm/mach-u300/include/mach/clkdev.h
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Acked-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Acked-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Signed-off-by: NBarry Song <baohua.song@csr.com>
Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

To be able to relocate the .bss section at run time independently from
the rest of the code, we must make sure that no GOTOFF relocations are
used with .bss symbols.  This usually means that no global variables can
be marked static unless they're also const.

Let's remove the static qualifier from current offenders, or turn them
into const variables when possible.  Next commit will ensure the build
fails if one of those is reintroduced due to otherwise enforced coding
standards for the kernel.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

This uncouple PHYS_OFFSET from the platform definitions, thereby
facilitating run-time computation of the physical memory offset.
Acked-by: NNicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Acked-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Acked-by: NMagnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: NJean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Acked-by: NWan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NKukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NEric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NJiandong Zheng <jdzheng@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The previous nuc932 support patches have been discarded by me and because it belongs to
another SoCs series named nuc93x,at present, which included nuc931 and nuc932, I think it is
better to create a new mach-nuc93x,So I made the patch,and request your advice.Thanks!
Signed-off-by: NWan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>