1. 15 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      Revert "mm: add /proc controls for pdflush threads" · cd17cbfd
      Jens Axboe 提交于
      This reverts commit fafd688e.
      
      Work is progressing to switch away from pdflush as the process backing
      for flushing out dirty data. So it seems pointless to add more knobs
      to control pdflush threads. The original author of the patch did not
      have any specific use cases for adding the knobs, so we can easily
      revert this before 2.6.30 to avoid having to maintain this API
      forever.
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      cd17cbfd
  2. 07 4月, 2009 2 次提交
    • P
      mm: add /proc controls for pdflush threads · fafd688e
      Peter W Morreale 提交于
      Add /proc entries to give the admin the ability to control the minimum and
      maximum number of pdflush threads.  This allows finer control of pdflush
      on both large and small machines.
      
      The rationale is simply one size does not fit all.  Admins on large and/or
      small systems may want to tune the min/max pdflush thread count to best
      suit their needs.  Right now the min/max is hardcoded to 2/8.  While
      probably a fair estimate for smaller machines, large machines with large
      numbers of CPUs and large numbers of filesystems/block devices may benefit
      from larger numbers of threads working on different block devices.
      
      Even if the background flushing algorithm is radically changed, it is
      still likely that multiple threads will be involved and admins would still
      desire finer control on the min/max other than to have to recompile the
      kernel.
      
      The patch adds '/proc/sys/vm/nr_pdflush_threads_min' and
      '/proc/sys/vm/nr_pdflush_threads_max' with r/w permissions.
      
      The minimum value for nr_pdflush_threads_min is 1 and the maximum value is
      the current value of nr_pdflush_threads_max.  This minimum is required
      since additional thread creation is performed in a pdflush thread itself.
      
      The minimum value for nr_pdflush_threads_max is the current value of
      nr_pdflush_threads_min and the maximum value can be 1000.
      
      Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt is also updated.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, fix whitespace, use __read_mostly]
      Signed-off-by: NPeter W Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>
      Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      fafd688e
    • P
      mm: fix pdflush thread creation upper bound · a56ed663
      Peter W Morreale 提交于
      Fix a race on creating pdflush threads.  Without the patch, it is possible
      to create more than MAX_PDFLUSH_THREADS threads, and this has been
      observed in practice on IO loaded SMP machines.
      
      The fix involves moving the lock around to protect the check against the
      thread count and correctly dealing with thread creation failure.
      
      This fix also _mostly_ repairs a race condition on how quickly the threads
      are created.  The original intent was to create a pdflush thread (up to
      the max allowed) every second.  Without this patch is is possible to
      create NCPUS pdflush threads concurrently.  The 'mostly' caveat is because
      an assumption is made that thread creation will be successful.  If we fail
      to create the thread, the miss is not considered fatal.  (we will try
      again in 1 second)
      Signed-off-by: NPeter W Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>
      Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a56ed663
  3. 30 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      cpumask: remove dangerous CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR, &CPU_MASK_ALL · 1a2142af
      Rusty Russell 提交于
      Impact: cleanup
      
      (Thanks to Al Viro for reminding me of this, via Ingo)
      
      CPU_MASK_ALL is the (deprecated) "all bits set" cpumask, defined as so:
      
      	#define CPU_MASK_ALL (cpumask_t) { { ... } }
      
      Taking the address of such a temporary is questionable at best,
      unfortunately 321a8e9d (cpumask: add CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR macro) added
      CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR:
      
      	#define CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR (&CPU_MASK_ALL)
      
      Which formalizes this practice.  One day gcc could bite us over this
      usage (though we seem to have gotten away with it so far).
      
      So replace everywhere which used &CPU_MASK_ALL or CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR
      with the modern "cpu_all_mask" (a real const struct cpumask *).
      Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
      1a2142af
  4. 01 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 26 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 13 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  8. 22 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 20 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  10. 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • R
      Freezer: make kernel threads nonfreezable by default · 83144186
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently, the freezer treats all tasks as freezable, except for the kernel
      threads that explicitly set the PF_NOFREEZE flag for themselves.  This
      approach is problematic, since it requires every kernel thread to either
      set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly, or call try_to_freeze(), even if it doesn't
      care for the freezing of tasks at all.
      
      It seems better to only require the kernel threads that want to or need to
      be frozen to use some freezer-related code and to remove any
      freezer-related code from the other (nonfreezable) kernel threads, which is
      done in this patch.
      
      The patch causes all kernel threads to be nonfreezable by default (ie.  to
      have PF_NOFREEZE set by default) and introduces the set_freezable()
      function that should be called by the freezable kernel threads in order to
      unset PF_NOFREEZE.  It also makes all of the currently freezable kernel
      threads call set_freezable(), so it shouldn't cause any (intentional)
      change of behaviour to appear.  Additionally, it updates documentation to
      describe the freezing of tasks more accurately.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fixes]
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NNigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
      Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
      Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      83144186
  11. 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  12. 26 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] pdflush: handle resume wakeups · d616e09a
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      pdflush is carefully designed to ensure that all wakeups have some
      corresponding work to do - if a woken-up pdflush thread discovers that it
      hasn't been given any work to do then this is considered an error.
      
      That all broke when swsusp came along - because a timer-delivered wakeup to a
      frozen pdflush thread will just get lost.  This causes the pdflush thread to
      get lost as well: the writeback timer is supposed to be re-armed by pdflush in
      process context, but pdflush doesn't execute the callout which does this.
      
      Fix that up by ignoring the return value from try_to_freeze(): jsut proceed,
      see if we have any work pending and only go back to sleep if that is not the
      case.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      d616e09a
  13. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  14. 09 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  15. 31 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] cpusets: confine pdflush to its cpuset · 28a42b9e
      Paul Jackson 提交于
      This patch keeps pdflush daemons on the same cpuset as their parent, the
      kthread daemon.
      
      Some large NUMA configurations put as much as they can of kernel threads
      and other classic Unix load in what's called a bootcpuset, keeping the rest
      of the system free for dedicated jobs.
      
      This effort is thwarted by pdflush, which dynamically destroys and
      recreates pdflush daemons depending on load.
      
      It's easy enough to force the originally created pdflush deamons into the
      bootcpuset, at system boottime.  But the pdflush threads created later were
      allowed to run freely across the system, due to the necessary line in their
      startup kthread():
      
              set_cpus_allowed(current, CPU_MASK_ALL);
      
      By simply coding pdflush to start its threads with the cpus_allowed
      restrictions of its cpuset (inherited from kthread, its parent) we can
      ensure that dynamically created pdflush threads are also kept in the
      bootcpuset.
      
      On systems w/o cpusets, or w/o a bootcpuset implementation, the following
      will have no affect, leaving pdflush to run on any CPU, as before.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      28a42b9e
  16. 26 6月, 2005 1 次提交
    • C
      [PATCH] Cleanup patch for process freezing · 3e1d1d28
      Christoph Lameter 提交于
      1. Establish a simple API for process freezing defined in linux/include/sched.h:
      
         frozen(process)		Check for frozen process
         freezing(process)		Check if a process is being frozen
         freeze(process)		Tell a process to freeze (go to refrigerator)
         thaw_process(process)	Restart process
         frozen_process(process)	Process is frozen now
      
      2. Remove all references to PF_FREEZE and PF_FROZEN from all
         kernel sources except sched.h
      
      3. Fix numerous locations where try_to_freeze is manually done by a driver
      
      4. Remove the argument that is no longer necessary from two function calls.
      
      5. Some whitespace cleanup
      
      6. Clear potential race in refrigerator (provides an open window of PF_FREEZE
         cleared before setting PF_FROZEN, recalc_sigpending does not check
         PF_FROZEN).
      
      This patch does not address the problem of freeze_processes() violating the rule
      that a task may only modify its own flags by setting PF_FREEZE. This is not clean
      in an SMP environment. freeze(process) is therefore not SMP safe!
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      3e1d1d28
  17. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4