Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 7月, 2013 4 次提交
  3. 15 7月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 24 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / dock / PCI: Synchronous handling of dock events for PCI devices · 21a31013
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The interactions between the ACPI dock driver and the ACPI-based PCI
hotplug (acpiphp) are currently problematic because of ordering
issues during hot-remove operations.

First of all, the current ACPI glue code expects that physical
devices will always be deleted before deleting the companion ACPI
device objects.  Otherwise, acpi_unbind_one() will fail with a
warning message printed to the kernel log, for example:

[  185.026073] usb usb5: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[  185.035150] pci 0000:1b:00.0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[  185.035515] pci 0000:18:02.0: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt
[  180.013656]  port1: Oops, 'acpi_handle' corrupt

This means, in particular, that struct pci_dev objects have to
be deleted before the struct acpi_device objects they are "glued"
with.

Now, the following happens the during the undocking of an ACPI-based
dock station:
 1) hotplug_dock_devices() invokes registered hotplug callbacks to
    destroy physical devices associated with the ACPI device objects
    depending on the dock station.  It calls dd->ops->handler() for
    each of those device objects.
 2) For PCI devices dd->ops->handler() points to
    handle_hotplug_event_func() that queues up a separate work item
    to execute _handle_hotplug_event_func() for the given device and
    returns immediately.  That work item will be executed later.
 3) hotplug_dock_devices() calls dock_remove_acpi_device() for each
    device depending on the dock station.  This runs acpi_bus_trim()
    for each of them, which causes the underlying ACPI device object
    to be destroyed, but the work items queued up by
    handle_hotplug_event_func() haven't been started yet.
 4) _handle_hotplug_event_func() queued up in step 2) are executed
    and cause the above failure to happen, because the PCI devices
    they handle do not have the companion ACPI device objects any
    more (those objects have been deleted in step 3).

The possible breakage doesn't end here, though, because
hotplug_dock_devices() may return before at least some of the
_handle_hotplug_event_func() work items spawned by it have a
chance to complete and then undock() will cause _DCK to be
evaluated and that will cause the devices handled by the
_handle_hotplug_event_func() to go away possibly while they are
being accessed.

This means that dd->ops->handler() for PCI devices should not point
to handle_hotplug_event_func().  Instead, it should point to a
function that will do the work of _handle_hotplug_event_func()
synchronously.  For this reason, introduce such a function,
hotplug_event_func(), and modity acpiphp_dock_ops to point to
it as the handler.

Unfortunately, however, this is not sufficient, because if the dock
code were not changed further, hotplug_event_func() would now
deadlock with hotplug_dock_devices() that called it, since it would
run unregister_hotplug_dock_device() which in turn would attempt to
acquire the dock station's hp_lock mutex already acquired by
hotplug_dock_devices().

To resolve that deadlock use the observation that
unregister_hotplug_dock_device() won't need to acquire hp_lock
if PCI bridges the devices on the dock station depend on are
prevented from being removed prematurely while the first loop in
hotplug_dock_devices() is in progress.

To make that possible, introduce a mechanism by which the callers of
register_hotplug_dock_device() can provide "init" and "release"
routines that will be executed, respectively, during the addition
and removal of the physical device object associated with the
given ACPI device handle.  Make acpiphp use two new functions,
acpiphp_dock_init() and acpiphp_dock_release(), that call
get_bridge() and put_bridge(), respectively, on the acpiphp bridge
holding the given device, for this purpose.

In addition to that, remove the dock station's list of
"hotplug devices" and make the dock code always walk the whole list
of "dependent devices" instead in such a way that the loops in
hotplug_dock_devices() and dock_event() (replacing the loops over
"hotplug devices") will take references to the list entries that
register_hotplug_dock_device() has been called for.  That prevents
the "release" routines associated with those entries from being
called while the given entry is being processed and for PCI
devices this means that their bridges won't be removed (by a
concurrent thread) while hotplug_event_func() handling them is
being executed.

This change is based on two earlier patches from Jiang Liu.

References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59501Reported-and-tested-by: NAlexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
Tracked-down-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Tested-by: NIllya Klymov <xanf@xanf.me>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      21a31013
  7. 23 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      PCI / ACPI: Use boot-time resource allocation rules during hotplug · d66ecb72
      由 Jiang Liu 提交于 
      On x86 platforms, the kernel respects PCI resource assignments from
the BIOS and only reassigns resources for unassigned BARs at boot
time.  However, with the ACPI-based hotplug (acpiphp), it ignores the
BIOS' PCI resource assignments completely and reassigns all resources
by itself.  This causes differences in PCI resource allocation
between boot time and runtime hotplug to occur, which is generally
undesirable and sometimes actively breaks things.

Namely, if there are enough resources, reassigning all PCI resources
during runtime hotplug should work, but it may fail if the resources
are constrained.  This may happen, for instance, when some PCI
devices with huge MMIO BARs are involved in the runtime hotplug
operations, because the current PCI MMIO alignment algorithm may
waste huge chunks of MMIO address space in those cases.

On the Alexander's Sony VAIO VPCZ23A4R the BIOS allocates limited
MMIO resources for the dock station which contains a device
(graphics adapter) with a 256MB MMIO BAR.  An attempt to reassign
that during runtime hotplug causes the dock station MMIO window to be
exhausted and acpiphp fails to allocate resources for the majority
of devices on the dock station as a result.

To prevent that from happening, modify acpiphp to follow the boot
time resources allocation behavior so that the BIOS' resource
assignments are respected during runtime hotplug too.

[rjw: Changelog]
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56531Reported-and-tested-by: NAlexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NIllya Klymov <xanf@xanf.me>
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      d66ecb72
  9. 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 17 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  13. 13 4月, 2013 4 次提交
  15. 13 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks · 3757b948
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related
problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure.

First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with
acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct
acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created),
those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races
from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present
for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by
acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler).
Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and
acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock
should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by
these functions themselves.

For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device
addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the
acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim().
Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they
are always called under acpi_scan_lock.

Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously
with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help
of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the
ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example,
acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and
the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that
acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection.  In that case, the struct
acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be
invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue.  To protect agaist that,
make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on
ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if
their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear
the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work).

Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail,
in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the
context object to prevent leaks from happening.  It also needs to
run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on
previously in that case.  Modify the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      3757b948
  17. 03 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      PCI: acpiphp: Remove dead code for PCI host bridge hotplug · be6d2867
      由 Jiang Liu 提交于 
      Commit 668192b6 "PCI: acpiphp: Move host bridge hotplug
to pci_root.c" has moved PCI host bridge hotplug logic from acpiphp
to pci_root, but there is still PCI host bridge hotplug related
dead code left in acpiphp. So remove those dead code.

Now companion ACPI devices are always created before corresponding
PCI devices. And the ACPI event handle_hotplug_event_bridge() will be
installed only if it has associated PCI device. So remove dead code to
handle bridge hot-adding in function handle_hotplug_event_bridge().
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      be6d2867
  19. 02 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 26 1月, 2013 5 次提交
  23. 19 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead · b8bd759a
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.

For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it.  Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      b8bd759a
  25. 15 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  27. 03 1月, 2013 3 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument · 0cd6ac52
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument.  Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).

For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them.  The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().

Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add().  Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      0cd6ac52
    • R
      ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used · 636458de
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body.  Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).

Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      636458de
    • R
      ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start() · 02f57c67
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.

For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it.  Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().

Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.

This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      02f57c67
  29. 25 9月, 2012 2 次提交
    • J
      PCI: acpiphp: Handle PCIe ports without native hotplug capability · 5ba113f7
      由 Jiang Liu 提交于 
      Commit 0d52f54e (PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp
ignore root bridges using PCIe native hotplug) added code that made the
acpiphp driver completely ignore PCIe root complexes for which the kernel
had been granted control of the native PCIe hotplug feature by the BIOS
through _OSC. Later commit 619a5182
"PCI hotplug: Always allow acpiphp to handle non-PCIe bridges" relaxed
the constraints to allow acpiphp driver handle non-PCIe bridges under
such a complex.  The constraint needs to be relaxed further to allow
acpiphp driver to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability.

Some MR-IOV switch chipsets, such PLX8696, support multiple virtual PCIe
switches and may migrate downstream ports among virtual switches.  To
migrate a downstream port from the source virtual switch to the target, the
port needs to be hot-removed from the source and hot-added into the target.
The pciehp driver can't be used here because there are no slots within the
virtual PCIe switch.  So acpiphp driver is used to support downstream port
migration.  A typical configuration is as below:

    [Root without native PCIe HP]
        [Upstream port of vswitch without native PCIe HP]
            [Downstream port of vswitch with native PCIe HP]
                [PCIe endpoint]

Here acpiphp driver will be used to handle root ports and upstream port
in the virtual switch, and pciehp driver will be used to handle downstream
ports in the virtual switch.
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      5ba113f7
    • T
      PCI/ACPI: Pass acpi_pci_root to acpi_pci_drivers' add/remove interface · 55bfe3c0
      由 Taku Izumi 提交于 
      This patch changes .add/.remove interfaces of acpi_pci_driver.
In the current implementation acpi_handle is passed as a parameter
of .add/.remove interface.  However, the acpi_pci_root structure
contains more useful information than just the acpi_handle.  This
enables us to avoid some useless lookups in each acpi_pci_driver.

Note: This changes interfaces used by acpi_pci_register_driver(), an
exported symbol.  This patch updates all the in-kernel users, but any
out-of-kernel acpi_pci_register_driver() users will need updates.

[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      55bfe3c0
  31. 23 8月, 2012 2 次提交
  33. 18 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  35. 11 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  37. 21 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  39. 14 6月, 2012 3 次提交
  41. 28 2月, 2012 2 次提交