It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent
to "CPU power".  The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create
confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too
liberally.

This contains the architecture visible changes.  Incidentally, only ARM
takes advantage of the available pow^H^H^Hcapacity scaling hooks and
therefore those changes outside kernel/sched/ are confined to one ARM
specific file.  The default arch_scale_smt_power() hook is not overridden
by anyone.

Replacements are as follows:

	arch_scale_freq_power  --> arch_scale_freq_capacity
	arch_scale_smt_power   --> arch_scale_smt_capacity
	SCHED_POWER_SCALE      --> SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE
	SCHED_POWER_SHIFT      --> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT

The local usage of "power" in arch/arm/kernel/topology.c is also changed
to "capacity" as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-48zba9qbznvglwelgq2cfygh@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent
to "CPU power".  The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create
confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too
liberally.

This is the remaining "power" -> "capacity" rename for local symbols.
Those symbols visible to the rest of the kernel are not included yet.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-yyyhohzhkwnaotr3lx8zd5aa@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent
to "CPU power".  The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create
confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too
liberally.

Since struct sched_group_power is really about compute capacity of sched
groups, let's rename it to struct sched_group_capacity. Similarly sgp
becomes sgc. Related variables and functions dealing with groups are also
adjusted accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-5yeix833vvgf2uyj5o36hpu9@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We have "power" (which should actually become "capacity") and "capacity"
which is a scaled down "capacity factor" in terms of unitary tasks.
Let's use "capacity_factor" to make room for proper usage of "capacity"
later.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-gk1co8sqdev3763opqm6ovml@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The capacity of a CPU/group should be some intrinsic value that doesn't
change with task placement.  It is like a container which capacity is
stable regardless of the amount of liquid in it (its "utilization")...
unless the container itself is crushed that is, but that's another story.

Therefore let's rename "has_capacity" to "has_free_capacity" in order to
better convey the wanted meaning.
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-djzkk027jm0e8x8jxy70opzh@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent
to "CPU power".  The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create
confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too
liberally.

To make things explicit and not create more confusion with the existing
"capacity" member, let's rename things as follows:

	power    -> compute_capacity
	capacity -> task_capacity

Note: none of those fields are actually used outside update_numa_stats().
Signed-off-by: NNicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-2e2ndymj5gyshyjq8am79f20@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified
to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.
Signed-off-by: NManuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1400780723-24626-1-git-send-email-manuel.schoelling@gmx.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The current no_hz idle load balancer do load balancing for *all* idle cpus,
even though the time due to load balance for a particular
idle cpu could be still a while in the future.  This introduces a much
higher load balancing rate than what is necessary.  The patch
changes the behavior by only doing idle load balancing on
behalf of an idle cpu only when it is due for load balancing.

On SGI's systems with over 3000 cores, the cpu responsible for idle balancing
got overwhelmed with idle balancing, and introduces a lot of OS noise
to workloads.  This patch fixes the issue.
Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NRuss Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: MichelLespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1400621967.2970.280.camel@schen9-DESKSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

sched_cfs_period_timer() reads cfs_b->period without locks before calling
do_sched_cfs_period_timer(), and similarly unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs()
would read cfs_b->period without the right lock. Thus a simultaneous
change of bandwidth could cause corruption on any platform where ktime_t
or u64 writes/reads are not atomic.

Extend cfs_b->lock from do_sched_cfs_period_timer() to include the read of
cfs_b->period to solve that issue; unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() can just
use 1 rather than the exact quota, much like distribute_cfs_runtime()
does.

There is also an unlocked read of cfs_b->runtime_expires, but a race
there would only delay runtime expiry by a tick. Still, the comparison
should just be != anyway, which clarifies even that problem.
Signed-off-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Tested-by: NRoman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
[peterz: Fix compile warn]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140519224945.20303.93530.stgit@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Affine wakeups have the potential to interfere with NUMA placement.
If a task wakes up too many other tasks, affine wakeups will get
disabled.

However, regardless of how many other tasks it wakes up, it gets
re-enabled once a second, potentially interfering with NUMA
placement of other tasks.

By decaying wakee_wakes in half instead of zeroing it, we can avoid
that problem for some workloads.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140516001332.67f91af2@annuminas.surriel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Update the migrate_improves/degrades_locality() functions with
knowledge of pseudo-interleaving.

Do not consider moving tasks around within the set of group's active
nodes as improving or degrading locality. Instead, leave the load
balancer free to balance the load between a numa_group's active nodes.

Also, switch from the group/task_weight functions to the group/task_fault
functions. The "weight" functions involve a division, but both calls use
the same divisor, so there's no point in doing that from these functions.

On a 4 node (x10 core) system, performance of SPECjbb2005 seems
unaffected, though the number of migrations with 2 8-warehouse wide
instances seems to have almost halved, due to the scheduler running
each instance on a single node.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140515130306.61aae7db@cuia.bos.redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently the NUMA balancing code only allows moving tasks between NUMA
nodes when the load on both nodes is in balance. This breaks down when
the load was imbalanced to begin with.

Allow tasks to be moved between NUMA nodes if the imbalance is small,
or if the new imbalance is be smaller than the original one.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140514132221.274b3463@annuminas.surriel.com

Sometimes ->nr_running may cross 2 but interrupt is not being
sent to rq's cpu. In this case we don't reenable the timer.
Looks like this may be the reason for rare unexpected effects,
if nohz is enabled.

Patch replaces all places of direct changing of nr_running
and makes add_nr_running() caring about crossing border.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140508225830.2469.97461.stgit@localhostSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Currently, in idle_balance(), we update rq->next_balance when we pull_tasks.
However, it is also important to update this in the !pulled_tasks case too.

When the CPU is "busy" (the CPU isn't idle), rq->next_balance gets computed
using sd->busy_factor (so we increase the balance interval when the CPU is
busy). However, when the CPU goes idle, rq->next_balance could still be set
to a large value that was computed with the sd->busy_factor.

Thus, we need to also update rq->next_balance in idle_balance() in the cases
where !pulled_tasks too, so that rq->next_balance gets updated without taking
the busy_factor into account when the CPU is about to go idle.

This patch makes rq->next_balance get updated independently of whether or
not we pulled_task. Also, we add logic to ensure that we always traverse
at least 1 of the sched domains to get a proper next_balance value for
updating rq->next_balance.

Additionally, since load_balance() modifies the sd->balance_interval, we
need to re-obtain the sched domain's interval after the call to
load_balance() in rebalance_domains() before we update rq->next_balance.

This patch adds and uses 2 new helper functions, update_next_balance() and
get_sd_balance_interval() to update next_balance and obtain the sched
domain's balance_interval.
Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: aswin@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399596562.2200.7.camel@j-VirtualBoxSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

On smaller systems, the top level sched domain will be an affine
domain, and select_idle_sibling is invoked for every SD_WAKE_AFFINE
wakeup. This seems to be working well.

On larger systems, with the node distance between far away NUMA nodes
being > RECLAIM_DISTANCE, select_idle_sibling is only called if the
waker and the wakee are on nodes less than RECLAIM_DISTANCE apart.

This patch leaves in place the policy of not pulling the task across
nodes on such systems, while fixing the issue that select_idle_sibling
is not called at all in certain circumstances.

The code will look for an idle CPU in the same CPU package as the
CPU where the task ran previously.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: george.mccollister@gmail.com
Cc: ktkhai@parallels.com
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140514114037.2d93266f@annuminas.surriel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

task_hot checks exec_start on any runnable task, but if it has been
migrated since the it last ran, then exec_start is a clock_task from
another cpu. If the old cpu's clock_task was sufficiently far ahead of
this cpu's then the task will not be considered for another migration
until it has run. Instead reset exec_start whenever a task is migrated,
since it is presumably no longer hot anyway.
Signed-off-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
[ Made it compile. ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140515225920.7179.13924.stgit@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

It was found that when running some workloads (such as AIM7) on large
systems with many cores, CPUs do not remain idle for long. Thus, tasks
can wake/get enqueued while doing idle balancing.

In this patch, while traversing the domains in idle balance, in
addition to checking for pulled_task, we add an extra check for
this_rq->nr_running for determining if we should stop searching for
tasks to pull. If there are runnable tasks on this rq, then we will
stop traversing the domains. This reduces the chance that idle balance
delays a task from running.

This patch resulted in approximately a 6% performance improvement when
running a Java Server workload on an 8 socket machine.
Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: aswin@hp.com
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398303035-18255-4-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Setting the numa_preferred_node for a task in task_numa_migrate
does nothing on a 2-node system. Either we migrate to the node
that already was our preferred node, or we stay where we were.

On a 4-node system, it can slightly decrease overhead, by not
calling the NUMA code as much. Since every node tends to be
directly connected to every other node, running on the wrong
node for a while does not do much damage.

However, on an 8 node system, there are far more bad nodes
than there are good ones, and pretending that a second choice
is actually the preferred node can greatly delay, or even
prevent, a workload from converging.

The only time we can safely pretend that a second choice
node is the preferred node is when the task is part of a
workload that spans multiple NUMA nodes.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NVinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397235629-16328-4-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

When tasks have not converged on their preferred nodes yet, we want
to retry fairly often, to make sure we do not migrate a task's memory
to an undesirable location, only to have to move it again later.

This patch reduces the interval at which migration is retried,
when the task's numa_scan_period is small.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NVinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397235629-16328-3-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The NUMA code is smart enough to distribute the memory of workloads
that span multiple NUMA nodes across those NUMA nodes.

However, it still has a pretty high scan rate for such workloads,
because any memory that is left on a node other than the node of
the CPU that faulted on the memory is counted as non-local, which
causes the scan rate to go up.

Counting the memory on any node where the task's numa group is
actively running as local, allows the scan rate to slow down
once the application is settled in.

This should reduce the overhead of the automatic NUMA placement
code, when a workload spans multiple NUMA nodes.
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NVinod Chegu <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397235629-16328-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The following commit:

  e5fc6611 ("sched: Fix race in idle_balance()")

can potentially cause rq->max_idle_balance_cost to not be updated,
even when load_balance(NEWLY_IDLE) is attempted and the per-sd
max cost value is updated.

Preeti noticed a similar issue with updating rq->next_balance.

In this patch, we fix this by making sure we still check/update those values
even if a task gets enqueued while browsing the domains.
Signed-off-by: NJason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: aswin@hp.com
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1398725155-7591-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

This reverts commit 4c6c4e38 ("sched/core: Fix endless loop in
pick_next_task()"), which is not necessary after ("sched/rt: Substract number
of tasks of throttled queues from rq->nr_running").
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[conflict resolution with stop task checking patch]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394835307.18748.34.camel@HP-250-G1-Notebook-PC
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Mike reported that, while unlikely, its entirely possible for
scale_rt_power() to see the time go backwards. This yields rather
'interesting' results.

So like all other sites that deal with clocks; make this one ignore
backward clock movement too.
Reported-by: NMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140227094035.GZ9987@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We need to do it like we do for the other higher priority classes..
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Michael wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/336561397137116@web27h.yandex.ruSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Sasha reported that lockdep claims that the following commit:
made numa_group.lock interrupt unsafe:

  156654f4 ("sched/numa: Move task_numa_free() to __put_task_struct()")

While I don't see how that could be, given the commit in question moved
task_numa_free() from one irq enabled region to another, the below does
make both gripes and lockups upon gripe with numa=fake=4 go away.
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Fixes: 156654f4 ("sched/numa: Move task_numa_free() to __put_task_struct()")
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mgorman@suse.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1396860915.5170.5.camel@marge.simpson.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

task_hot() doesn't need the 'sched_domain' parameter, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394607111-1904-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The tmp value has been already calculated in:

  scaled_busy_load_per_task =
		(busiest->load_per_task * SCHED_POWER_SCALE) /
		busiest->group_power;
Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394555166-22894-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Check for fair tasks number to decide, that we've pulled a task.
rq's nr_running may contain throttled RT tasks.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394118975.19290.104.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1) Single cpu machine case.

When rq has only RT tasks, but no one of them can be picked
because of throttling, we enter in endless loop.

pick_next_task_{dl,rt} return NULL.

In pick_next_task_fair() we permanently go to retry

	if (rq->nr_running != rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
		return RETRY_TASK;

(rq->nr_running is not being decremented when rt_rq becomes
throttled).

No chances to unthrottle any rt_rq or to wake fair here,
because of rq is locked permanently and interrupts are
disabled.

2) In case of SMP this can cause a hang too. Although we unlock
   rq in idle_balance(), interrupts are still disabled.

The solution is to check for available tasks in DL and RT
classes instead of checking for sum.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394098321.19290.11.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

We close idle_exit_fair() bracket in case of we've pulled something or we've received
task of high priority class.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394098315.19290.10.camel@tkhaiSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Michael spotted that the idle_balance() push down created a task
priority problem.

Previously, when we called idle_balance() before pick_next_task() it
wasn't a problem when -- because of the rq->lock droppage -- an rt/dl
task slipped in.

Similarly for pre_schedule(), rt pre-schedule could have a dl task
slip in.

But by pulling it into the pick_next_task() loop, we'll not try a
higher task priority again.

Cure this by creating a re-start condition in pick_next_task(); and
triggering this from pick_next_task_{rt,fair}().

It also fixes a live-lock where we get stuck in pick_next_task_fair()
due to idle_balance() seeing !0 nr_running but there not actually
being any fair tasks about.
Reported-by: NMichael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: 38033c37 ("sched: Push down pre_schedule() and idle_balance()")
Tested-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140224121218.GR15586@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The struct sched_avg of struct rq is only used in case group
scheduling is enabled inside __update_tg_runnable_avg() to update
per-cpu representation of a task group.  I.e. that there is no need to
maintain the runnable avg of a rq in the !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case.

This patch guards struct sched_avg of struct rq and
update_rq_runnable_avg() with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.

There is an extra empty definition for update_rq_runnable_avg()
necessary for the !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED && CONFIG_SMP case.

The function print_cfs_group_stats() which prints out struct sched_avg
of struct rq is already guarded with CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
Reviewed-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/530DCDC5.1060406@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

dequeue_entity() is called when p->on_rq and sets se->on_rq = 0
which appears to guarentee that the !se->on_rq condition is met.
If the task has done set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) without
schedule() the second condition will be met and vruntime will be
incorrectly adjusted twice.

In certain cases this can result in the task's vruntime never increasing
past the vruntime of other tasks on the CFS' run queue, starving them of
CPU time.

This patch changes switched_from_fair() to use !p->on_rq instead of
!se->on_rq.

I'm able to cause a task with a priority of 120 to starve all other
tasks with the same priority on an ARM platform running 3.2.51-rt72
PREEMPT RT by writing one character at time to a serial tty (16550 UART)
in a tight loop. I'm also able to verify making this change corrects the
problem on that platform and kernel version.
Signed-off-by: NGeorge McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392767811-28916-1-git-send-email-george.mccollister@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The user explicitly disabled load balancing, else this core would not be
disconnected.  Don't add these to nohz.idle_cpus_mask.
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-vmme4f49psirp966pklm5l9j@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Brings select_task_rq_fair() description comments up-to-date.
Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392732864-10927-1-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Dan Carpenter reported:

> kernel/sched/rt.c:1347 pick_next_task_rt() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'prev' (see line 1338)
> kernel/sched/deadline.c:1011 pick_next_task_dl() warn: variable dereferenced before check 'prev' (see line 1005)

Kirill also spotted that migrate_tasks() will have an instant NULL
deref because pick_next_task() will immediately deref prev.

Instead of fixing all the corner cases because migrate_tasks() can
pass in a NULL prev task in the unlikely case of hot-un-plug, provide
a fake task such that we can remove all the NULL checks from the far
more common paths.

A further problem; not previously spotted; is that because we pushed
pre_schedule() and idle_balance() into pick_next_task() we now need to
avoid those getting called and pulling more tasks on our dying CPU.

We avoid pull_{dl,rt}_task() by setting fake_task.prio to MAX_PRIO+1.
We also note that since we call pick_next_task() exactly the amount of
times we have runnable tasks present, we should never land in
idle_balance().

Fixes: 38033c37 ("sched: Push down pre_schedule() and idle_balance()")
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reported-by: NKirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140212094930.GB3545@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Remove idle_balance() from the public life; also reduce some #ifdef
clutter by folding the pick_next_task_fair() idle path into
idle_balance().

Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Reported-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140211151148.GP27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Sasha reported:

[  522.645288] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at ...
[  522.646271] IP: [<ffffffff81186c6f>] check_preempt_wakeup+0x11f/0x210
		...
[  522.650021] Call Trace:
[  522.650021]  <IRQ>
[  522.650021]  [<ffffffff8117361d>] check_preempt_curr+0x3d/0xb0
[  522.650021]  [<ffffffff81175d88>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x18/0x130
		...

which was caused by the se-depth changed during the time when task is not
FAIR, and we will use the wrong depth value after it switched back to FAIR.

This patch reset the depth at the time when task switched to FAIR, make sure
that we always have the correct value when task is FAIR.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5305732D.70001@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Normally task_numa_work scans over a fairly small amount of memory,
but it is possible to run into a large unpopulated part of virtual
memory, with no pages mapped. In that case, task_numa_work can run
for a while, and it may make sense to reschedule as required.

Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NXing Gang <gang.xing@hp.com>
Tested-by: NChegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392761566-24834-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Since is_same_group() is only used in the group scheduling code, there is
no need to define it outside CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391005773-29493-1-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>