Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Y
      x86/irq: mark NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC broken · ca713c2a
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      It causes crash on system with lots of cards with MSI-X
when irq_balancer enabled...

The patches fixing it were both complex and fragile, according
to Eric they were also doing quite dangerous things to the
hardware.

Instead we now have patches that solve this problem via static
NUMA node mappings - not dynamic allocation and balancing.

The patches are much simpler than this method but are still too
large outside of the merge window, so we mark the dynamic balancer
as broken for now, and queue up the new approach for v2.6.31.

[ Impact: deactivate broken kernel feature ]
Reported-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
LKML-Reference: <49E68C41.4020801@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      ca713c2a
  3. 14 4月, 2009 3 次提交
    • P
      x86, irq: Remove IRQ_DISABLED check in process context IRQ move · 6ec3cfec
      由 Pallipadi, Venkatesh 提交于 
      As discussed in the thread here:

  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123964468521142&w=2

Eric W. Biederman observed:

> It looks like some additional bugs have slipped in since last I looked.
>
> set_irq_affinity does this:
> ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
>        if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT || desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED) {
>                cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, cpumask);
>                desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, cpumask);
>        } else {
>                desc->status |= IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
>                cpumask_copy(desc->pending_mask, cpumask);
>        }
> #else
>
> That IRQ_DISABLED case is a software state and as such it has nothing to
> do with how safe it is to move an irq in process context.

[...]

>
> The only reason we migrate MSIs in interrupt context today is that there
> wasn't infrastructure for support migration both in interrupt context
> and outside of it.

Yes. The idea here was to force the MSI migration to happen in process
context. One of the patches in the series did

        disable_irq(dev->irq);
        irq_set_affinity(dev->irq, cpumask_of(dev->cpu));
        enable_irq(dev->irq);

with the above patch adding irq/manage code check for interrupt disabled
and moving the interrupt in process context.

IIRC, there was no IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT when we were developing this HPET
code and we ended up having this ugly hack. IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT was there
when we eventually submitted the patch upstream. But, looks like I did a
blind rebasing instead of using IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT in hpet MSI code.

Below patch fixes this. i.e., revert commit 932775a4
and add PCNTXT to HPET MSI setup. Also removes copying of desc->affinity
in generic code as set_affinity routines are doing it internally.
Reported-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Acked-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Li Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "lcm@us.ibm.com" <lcm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
LKML-Reference: <20090413222058.GB8211@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      6ec3cfec
    • L
      Fix quilt merge error in acpi-cpufreq.c · 1c98aa74
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      We ended up incorrectly using '&cur' instead of '&readin' in the
work_on_cpu() -> smp_call_function_single() transformation in commit
01599fca ("cpufreq: use
smp_call_function_[single|many]() in acpi-cpufreq.c").

Andrew explains:
 "OK, the acpi tree went and had conflicting changes merged into it after
  I'd written the patch and it appears that I incorrectly reverted part
  of 18b2646f while fixing the resulting
  rejects.

  Switching it to `readin' looks correct."
Acked-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      1c98aa74
    • A
      cpufreq: use smp_call_function_[single|many]() in acpi-cpufreq.c · 01599fca
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      Atttempting to rid us of the problematic work_on_cpu().  Just use
smp_call_fuction_single() here.

This repairs a 10% sysbench(oltp)+mysql regression which Mike reported,
due to

  commit 6b44003e
  Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
  Date:   Thu Apr 9 09:50:37 2009 -0600

      work_on_cpu(): rewrite it to create a kernel thread on demand

It seems that the kernel calls these acpi-cpufreq functions at a quite
high frequency.

Valdis Kletnieks also reports that this causes 70-90 forks per second on
his hardware.

Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
[ Made it use smp_call_function_many() instead of looping over cpu's
  with smp_call_function_single()    - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      01599fca
  5. 12 4月, 2009 3 次提交
    • S
      x86: add linux kernel support for YMM state · a30469e7
      由 Suresh Siddha 提交于 
      Impact: save/restore Intel-AVX state properly between tasks

Intel Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) introduce 256-bit vector processing
capability. More about AVX at http://software.intel.com/sites/avx

Add OS support for YMM state management using xsave/xrstor infrastructure
to support AVX.
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <1239402084.27006.8057.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      a30469e7
    • M
      x86: fix wrong section of pat_disable & make it static · 1ee4bd92
      由 Marcin Slusarz 提交于 
      pat_disable cannot be __cpuinit anymore because it's called from pat_init
and the callchain looks like this:
pat_disable [cpuinit] <- pat_init <- generic_set_all <-
 ipi_handler <- set_mtrr <- (other non init/cpuinit functions)

WARNING: arch/x86/mm/built-in.o(.text+0x449e): Section mismatch in reference
from the function pat_init() to the function .cpuinit.text:pat_disable()
The function pat_init() references
the function __cpuinit pat_disable().
This is often because pat_init lacks a __cpuinit
annotation or the annotation of pat_disable is wrong.

Non CONFIG_X86_PAT version of pat_disable is static inline, so this version
can be static too (and there are no callers outside of this file).
Signed-off-by: NMarcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
LKML-Reference: <49DFB055.6070405@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      1ee4bd92
    • R
      x86: Fix section mismatches in mpparse · 57592224
      由 Rakib Mullick 提交于 
      Impact: fix section mismatch

In arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c, smp_reserve_bootmem() has been called
and also refers to a function which is in .init section. Thus causes
the first warning. And check_irq_src() also requires an __init,
because it refers to an .init section.
Signed-off-by: NRakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <b9df5fa10904102004g51265d9axc8d07278bfdb6ba0@mail.gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      57592224
  7. 11 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 10 4月, 2009 3 次提交
  11. 09 4月, 2009 18 次提交
  13. 08 4月, 2009 6 次提交
  15. 07 4月, 2009 5 次提交