1. 20 1月, 2015 2 次提交
    • O
      x86, fpu: Fix math_state_restore() race with kernel_fpu_begin() · 7575637a
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      math_state_restore() can race with kernel_fpu_begin() if irq comes
      right after __thread_fpu_begin(), __save_init_fpu() will overwrite
      fpu->state we are going to restore.
      
      Add 2 simple helpers, kernel_fpu_disable() and kernel_fpu_enable()
      which simply set/clear in_kernel_fpu, and change math_state_restore()
      to exclude kernel_fpu_begin() in between.
      
      Alternatively we could use local_irq_save/restore, but probably these
      new helpers can have more users.
      
      Perhaps they should disable/enable preemption themselves, in this case
      we can remove preempt_disable() in __restore_xstate_sig().
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com
      Cc: bp@suse.de
      Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
      Cc: luto@amacapital.net
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115192028.GD27332@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      7575637a
    • O
      x86, fpu: Introduce per-cpu in_kernel_fpu state · 14e153ef
      Oleg Nesterov 提交于
      interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() tries to detect if kernel_fpu_begin()
      is safe or not. In particular it should obviously deny the nested
      kernel_fpu_begin() and this logic looks very confusing.
      
      If use_eager_fpu() == T we rely on a) __thread_has_fpu() check in
      interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle(), and b) on the fact that _begin() does
      __thread_clear_has_fpu().
      
      Otherwise we demand that the interrupted task has no FPU if it is in
      kernel mode, this works because __kernel_fpu_begin() does clts() and
      interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle() checks X86_CR0_TS.
      
      Add the per-cpu "bool in_kernel_fpu" variable, and change this code
      to check/set/clear it. This allows to do more cleanups and fixes, see
      the next changes.
      
      The patch also moves WARN_ON_ONCE() under preempt_disable() just to
      make this_cpu_read() look better, this is not really needed. And in
      fact I think we should move it into __kernel_fpu_begin().
      Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com
      Cc: bp@suse.de
      Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
      Cc: luto@amacapital.net
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150115191943.GB27332@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      14e153ef
  2. 22 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      x86, kvm: fix kvm's usage of kernel_fpu_begin/end() · b1a74bf8
      Suresh Siddha 提交于
      Preemption is disabled between kernel_fpu_begin/end() and as such
      it is not a good idea to use these routines in kvm_load/put_guest_fpu()
      which can be very far apart.
      
      kvm_load/put_guest_fpu() routines are already called with
      preemption disabled and KVM already uses the preempt notifier to save
      the guest fpu state using kvm_put_guest_fpu().
      
      So introduce __kernel_fpu_begin/end() routines which don't touch
      preemption and use them instead of kernel_fpu_begin/end()
      for KVM's use model of saving/restoring guest FPU state.
      
      Also with this change (and with eagerFPU model), fix the host cr0.TS vm-exit
      state in the case of VMX. For eagerFPU case, host cr0.TS is always clear.
      So no need to worry about it. For the traditional lazyFPU restore case,
      change the cr0.TS bit for the host state during vm-exit to be always clear
      and cr0.TS bit is set in the __vmx_load_host_state() when the FPU
      (guest FPU or the host task's FPU) state is not active. This ensures
      that the host/guest FPU state is properly saved, restored
      during context-switch and with interrupts (using irq_fpu_usable()) not
      stomping on the active FPU state.
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1348164109.26695.338.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com
      Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      b1a74bf8
  3. 19 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      x86, fpu: use non-lazy fpu restore for processors supporting xsave · 304bceda
      Suresh Siddha 提交于
      Fundamental model of the current Linux kernel is to lazily init and
      restore FPU instead of restoring the task state during context switch.
      This changes that fundamental lazy model to the non-lazy model for
      the processors supporting xsave feature.
      
      Reasons driving this model change are:
      
      i. Newer processors support optimized state save/restore using xsaveopt and
      xrstor by tracking the INIT state and MODIFIED state during context-switch.
      This is faster than modifying the cr0.TS bit which has serializing semantics.
      
      ii. Newer glibc versions use SSE for some of the optimized copy/clear routines.
      With certain workloads (like boot, kernel-compilation etc), application
      completes its work with in the first 5 task switches, thus taking upto 5 #DNA
      traps with the kernel not getting a chance to apply the above mentioned
      pre-load heuristic.
      
      iii. Some xstate features (like AMD's LWP feature) don't honor the cr0.TS bit
      and thus will not work correctly in the presence of lazy restore. Non-lazy
      state restore is needed for enabling such features.
      
      Some data on a two socket SNB system:
       * Saved 20K DNA exceptions during boot on a two socket SNB system.
       * Saved 50K DNA exceptions during kernel-compilation workload.
       * Improved throughput of the AVX based checksumming function inside the
         kernel by ~15% as xsave/xrstor is faster than the serializing clts/stts
         pair.
      
      Also now kernel_fpu_begin/end() relies on the patched
      alternative instructions. So move check_fpu() which uses the
      kernel_fpu_begin/end() after alternative_instructions().
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1345842782-24175-7-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
      Merge 32-bit boot fix from,
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1347300665-6209-4-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
      Cc: Jim Kukunas <james.t.kukunas@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      304bceda
  4. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 22 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  6. 21 2月, 2012 3 次提交
    • L
      i387: support lazy restore of FPU state · 7e16838d
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This makes us recognize when we try to restore FPU state that matches
      what we already have in the FPU on this CPU, and avoids the restore
      entirely if so.
      
      To do this, we add two new data fields:
      
       - a percpu 'fpu_owner_task' variable that gets written any time we
         update the "has_fpu" field, and thus acts as a kind of back-pointer
         to the task that owns the CPU.  The exception is when we save the FPU
         state as part of a context switch - if the save can keep the FPU
         state around, we leave the 'fpu_owner_task' variable pointing at the
         task whose FP state still remains on the CPU.
      
       - a per-thread 'last_cpu' field, that indicates which CPU that thread
         used its FPU on last.  We update this on every context switch
         (writing an invalid CPU number if the last context switch didn't
         leave the FPU in a lazily usable state), so we know that *that*
         thread has done nothing else with the FPU since.
      
      These two fields together can be used when next switching back to the
      task to see if the CPU still matches: if 'fpu_owner_task' matches the
      task we are switching to, we know that no other task (or kernel FPU
      usage) touched the FPU on this CPU in the meantime, and if the current
      CPU number matches the 'last_cpu' field, we know that this thread did no
      other FP work on any other CPU, so the FPU state on the CPU must match
      what was saved on last context switch.
      
      In that case, we can avoid the 'f[x]rstor' entirely, and just clear the
      CR0.TS bit.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7e16838d
    • L
      i387: use 'restore_fpu_checking()' directly in task switching code · 80ab6f1e
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This inlines what is usually just a couple of instructions, but more
      importantly it also fixes the theoretical error case (can that FPU
      restore really ever fail? Maybe we should remove the checking).
      
      We can't start sending signals from within the scheduler, we're much too
      deep in the kernel and are holding the runqueue lock etc.  So don't
      bother even trying.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      80ab6f1e
    • L
      i387: fix up some fpu_counter confusion · cea20ca3
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This makes sure we clear the FPU usage counter for newly created tasks,
      just so that we start off in a known state (for example, don't try to
      preload the FPU state on the first task switch etc).
      
      It also fixes a thinko in when we increment the fpu_counter at task
      switch time, introduced by commit 34ddc81a ("i387: re-introduce FPU
      state preloading at context switch time").  We should increment the
      *new* task fpu_counter, not the old task, and only if we decide to use
      that state (whether lazily or preloaded).
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cea20ca3
  7. 19 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      i387: re-introduce FPU state preloading at context switch time · 34ddc81a
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      After all the FPU state cleanups and finally finding the problem that
      caused all our FPU save/restore problems, this re-introduces the
      preloading of FPU state that was removed in commit b3b0870e ("i387:
      do not preload FPU state at task switch time").
      
      However, instead of simply reverting the removal, this reimplements
      preloading with several fixes, most notably
      
       - properly abstracted as a true FPU state switch, rather than as
         open-coded save and restore with various hacks.
      
         In particular, implementing it as a proper FPU state switch allows us
         to optimize the CR0.TS flag accesses: there is no reason to set the
         TS bit only to then almost immediately clear it again.  CR0 accesses
         are quite slow and expensive, don't flip the bit back and forth for
         no good reason.
      
       - Make sure that the same model works for both x86-32 and x86-64, so
         that there are no gratuitous differences between the two due to the
         way they save and restore segment state differently due to
         architectural differences that really don't matter to the FPU state.
      
       - Avoid exposing the "preload" state to the context switch routines,
         and in particular allow the concept of lazy state restore: if nothing
         else has used the FPU in the meantime, and the process is still on
         the same CPU, we can avoid restoring state from memory entirely, just
         re-expose the state that is still in the FPU unit.
      
         That optimized lazy restore isn't actually implemented here, but the
         infrastructure is set up for it.  Of course, older CPU's that use
         'fnsave' to save the state cannot take advantage of this, since the
         state saving also trashes the state.
      
      In other words, there is now an actual _design_ to the FPU state saving,
      rather than just random historical baggage.  Hopefully it's easier to
      follow as a result.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      34ddc81a
    • L
      i387: move TS_USEDFPU flag from thread_info to task_struct · f94edacf
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This moves the bit that indicates whether a thread has ownership of the
      FPU from the TS_USEDFPU bit in thread_info->status to a word of its own
      (called 'has_fpu') in task_struct->thread.has_fpu.
      
      This fixes two independent bugs at the same time:
      
       - changing 'thread_info->status' from the scheduler causes nasty
         problems for the other users of that variable, since it is defined to
         be thread-synchronous (that's what the "TS_" part of the naming was
         supposed to indicate).
      
         So perfectly valid code could (and did) do
      
      	ti->status |= TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK;
      
         and the compiler was free to do that as separate load, or and store
         instructions.  Which can cause problems with preemption, since a task
         switch could happen in between, and change the TS_USEDFPU bit. The
         change to TS_USEDFPU would be overwritten by the final store.
      
         In practice, this seldom happened, though, because the 'status' field
         was seldom used more than once, so gcc would generally tend to
         generate code that used a read-modify-write instruction and thus
         happened to avoid this problem - RMW instructions are naturally low
         fat and preemption-safe.
      
       - On x86-32, the current_thread_info() pointer would, during interrupts
         and softirqs, point to a *copy* of the real thread_info, because
         x86-32 uses %esp to calculate the thread_info address, and thus the
         separate irq (and softirq) stacks would cause these kinds of odd
         thread_info copy aliases.
      
         This is normally not a problem, since interrupts aren't supposed to
         look at thread information anyway (what thread is running at
         interrupt time really isn't very well-defined), but it confused the
         heck out of irq_fpu_usable() and the code that tried to squirrel
         away the FPU state.
      
         (It also caused untold confusion for us poor kernel developers).
      
      It also turns out that using 'task_struct' is actually much more natural
      for most of the call sites that care about the FPU state, since they
      tend to work with the task struct for other reasons anyway (ie
      scheduling).  And the FPU data that we are going to save/restore is
      found there too.
      
      Thanks to Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> for pointing us to
      the %esp issue.
      
      Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Reported-and-tested-by: NRaphael Prevost <raphael@buro.asia>
      Acked-and-tested-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NPeter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f94edacf
  8. 17 2月, 2012 5 次提交
    • L
      i387: move AMD K7/K8 fpu fxsave/fxrstor workaround from save to restore · 4903062b
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      The AMD K7/K8 CPUs don't save/restore FDP/FIP/FOP unless an exception is
      pending.  In order to not leak FIP state from one process to another, we
      need to do a floating point load after the fxsave of the old process,
      and before the fxrstor of the new FPU state.  That resets the state to
      the (uninteresting) kernel load, rather than some potentially sensitive
      user information.
      
      We used to do this directly after the FPU state save, but that is
      actually very inconvenient, since it
      
       (a) corrupts what is potentially perfectly good FPU state that we might
           want to lazy avoid restoring later and
      
       (b) on x86-64 it resulted in a very annoying ordering constraint, where
           "__unlazy_fpu()" in the task switch needs to be delayed until after
           the DS segment has been reloaded just to get the new DS value.
      
      Coupling it to the fxrstor instead of the fxsave automatically avoids
      both of these issues, and also ensures that we only do it when actually
      necessary (the FP state after a save may never actually get used).  It's
      simply a much more natural place for the leaked state cleanup.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4903062b
    • L
      i387: do not preload FPU state at task switch time · b3b0870e
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Yes, taking the trap to re-load the FPU/MMX state is expensive, but so
      is spending several days looking for a bug in the state save/restore
      code.  And the preload code has some rather subtle interactions with
      both paravirtualization support and segment state restore, so it's not
      nearly as simple as it should be.
      
      Also, now that we no longer necessarily depend on a single bit (ie
      TS_USEDFPU) for keeping track of the state of the FPU, we migth be able
      to do better.  If we are really switching between two processes that
      keep touching the FP state, save/restore is inevitable, but in the case
      of having one process that does most of the FPU usage, we may actually
      be able to do much better than the preloading.
      
      In particular, we may be able to keep track of which CPU the process ran
      on last, and also per CPU keep track of which process' FP state that CPU
      has.  For modern CPU's that don't destroy the FPU contents on save time,
      that would allow us to do a lazy restore by just re-enabling the
      existing FPU state - with no restore cost at all!
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b3b0870e
    • L
      i387: don't ever touch TS_USEDFPU directly, use helper functions · 6d59d7a9
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This creates three helper functions that do the TS_USEDFPU accesses, and
      makes everybody that used to do it by hand use those helpers instead.
      
      In addition, there's a couple of helper functions for the "change both
      CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU at the same time" case, and the places that do
      that together have been changed to use those.  That means that we have
      fewer random places that open-code this situation.
      
      The intent is partly to clarify the code without actually changing any
      semantics yet (since we clearly still have some hard to reproduce bug in
      this area), but also to make it much easier to use another approach
      entirely to caching the CR0.TS bit for software accesses.
      
      Right now we use a bit in the thread-info 'status' variable (this patch
      does not change that), but we might want to make it a full field of its
      own or even make it a per-cpu variable.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6d59d7a9
    • L
      i387: move TS_USEDFPU clearing out of __save_init_fpu and into callers · b6c66418
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Touching TS_USEDFPU without touching CR0.TS is confusing, so don't do
      it.  By moving it into the callers, we always do the TS_USEDFPU next to
      the CR0.TS accesses in the source code, and it's much easier to see how
      the two go hand in hand.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b6c66418
    • L
      i387: fix x86-64 preemption-unsafe user stack save/restore · 15d8791c
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Commit 5b1cbac3 ("i387: make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust")
      added a sanity check to the #NM handler to verify that we never cause
      the "Device Not Available" exception in kernel mode.
      
      However, that check actually pinpointed a (fundamental) race where we do
      cause that exception as part of the signal stack FPU state save/restore
      code.
      
      Because we use the floating point instructions themselves to save and
      restore state directly from user mode, we cannot do that atomically with
      testing the TS_USEDFPU bit: the user mode access itself may cause a page
      fault, which causes a task switch, which saves and restores the FP/MMX
      state from the kernel buffers.
      
      This kind of "recursive" FP state save is fine per se, but it means that
      when the signal stack save/restore gets restarted, it will now take the
      '#NM' exception we originally tried to avoid.  With preemption this can
      happen even without the page fault - but because of the user access, we
      cannot just disable preemption around the save/restore instruction.
      
      There are various ways to solve this, including using the
      "enable/disable_page_fault()" helpers to not allow page faults at all
      during the sequence, and fall back to copying things by hand without the
      use of the native FP state save/restore instructions.
      
      However, the simplest thing to do is to just allow the #NM from kernel
      space, but fix the race in setting and clearing CR0.TS that this all
      exposed: the TS bit changes and the TS_USEDFPU bit absolutely have to be
      atomic wrt scheduling, so while the actual state save/restore can be
      interrupted and restarted, the act of actually clearing/setting CR0.TS
      and the TS_USEDFPU bit together must not.
      
      Instead of just adding random "preempt_disable/enable()" calls to what
      is already excessively ugly code, this introduces some helper functions
      that mostly mirror the "kernel_fpu_begin/end()" functionality, just for
      the user state instead.
      
      Those helper functions should probably eventually replace the other
      ad-hoc CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU tests too, but I'll need to think about it
      some more: the task switching functionality in particular needs to
      expose the difference between the 'prev' and 'next' threads, while the
      new helper functions intentionally were written to only work with
      'current'.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      15d8791c
  9. 16 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      i387: fix sense of sanity check · c38e2345
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      The check for save_init_fpu() (introduced in commit 5b1cbac3: "i387:
      make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust") was the wrong way around, but
      I hadn't noticed, because my "tests" were bogus: the FPU exceptions are
      disabled by default, so even doing a divide by zero never actually
      triggers this code at all unless you do extra work to enable them.
      
      So if anybody did enable them, they'd get one spurious warning.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c38e2345
  10. 14 2月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      i387: make irq_fpu_usable() tests more robust · 5b1cbac3
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Some code - especially the crypto layer - wants to use the x86
      FP/MMX/AVX register set in what may be interrupt (typically softirq)
      context.
      
      That *can* be ok, but the tests for when it was ok were somewhat
      suspect.  We cannot touch the thread-specific status bits either, so
      we'd better check that we're not going to try to save FP state or
      anything like that.
      
      Now, it may be that the TS bit is always cleared *before* we set the
      USEDFPU bit (and only set when we had already cleared the USEDFP
      before), so the TS bit test may actually have been sufficient, but it
      certainly was not obviously so.
      
      So this explicitly verifies that we will not touch the TS_USEDFPU bit,
      and adds a few related sanity-checks.  Because it seems that somehow
      AES-NI is corrupting user FP state.  The cause is not clear, and this
      patch doesn't fix it, but while debugging it I really wanted the code to
      be more obviously correct and robust.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5b1cbac3
    • L
      i387: math_state_restore() isn't called from asm · be98c2cd
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      It was marked asmlinkage for some really old and stale legacy reasons.
      Fix that and the equally stale comment.
      
      Noticed when debugging the irq_fpu_usable() bugs.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      be98c2cd
  11. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 07 4月, 2011 1 次提交
    • H
      x86-32, fpu: Fix FPU exception handling on non-SSE systems · f994d99c
      Hans Rosenfeld 提交于
      On 32bit systems without SSE (that is, they use FSAVE/FRSTOR for FPU
      context switches), FPU exceptions in user mode cause Oopses, BUGs,
      recursive faults and other nasty things:
      
      fpu exception: 0000 [#1]
      last sysfs file: /sys/power/state
      Modules linked in: psmouse evdev pcspkr serio_raw [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
      
      Pid: 1638, comm: fxsave-32-excep Not tainted 2.6.35-07798-g58a992b9-dirty #633 VP3-596B-DD/VT82C597
      EIP: 0060:[<c1003527>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0
      EIP is at math_error+0x1b4/0x1c8
      EAX: 00000003 EBX: cf9be7e0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: cf9c5c00
      ESI: cf9d9fb4 EDI: c1372db3 EBP: 00000010 ESP: cf9d9f1c
      DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
      Process fxsave-32-excep (pid: 1638, ti=cf9d8000 task=cf9be7e0 task.ti=cf9d8000)
      Stack:
      00000000 00000301 00000004 00000000 00000000 cf9d3000 cf9da8f0 00000001
      <0> 00000004 cf9b6b60 c1019a6b c1019a79 00000020 00000242 000001b6 cf9c5380
      <0> cf806b40 cf791880 00000000 00000282 00000282 c108a213 00000020 cf9c5380
      Call Trace:
      [<c1019a6b>] ? need_resched+0x11/0x1a
      [<c1019a79>] ? should_resched+0x5/0x1f
      [<c108a213>] ? do_sys_open+0xbd/0xc7
      [<c108a213>] ? do_sys_open+0xbd/0xc7
      [<c100353b>] ? do_coprocessor_error+0x0/0x11
      [<c12d5965>] ? error_code+0x65/0x70
      Code: a8 20 74 30 c7 44 24 0c 06 00 03 00 8d 54 24 04 89 d9 b8 08 00 00 00 e8 9b 6d 02 00 eb 16 8b 93 5c 02 00 00 eb 05 e9 04 ff ff ff <9b> dd 32 9b e9 16 ff ff ff 81 c4 84 00 00 00 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 c6
      EIP: [<c1003527>] math_error+0x1b4/0x1c8 SS:ESP 0068:cf9d9f1c
      
      This usually continues in slight variations until the system is reset.
      
      This bug was introduced by commit 58a992b9:
      	x86-32, fpu: Rewrite fpu_save_init()
      Signed-off-by: NHans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@amd.com>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302106003-366952-1-git-send-email-hans.rosenfeld@amd.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      f994d99c
  13. 23 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  14. 14 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 10 9月, 2010 8 次提交
  16. 01 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 22 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  18. 20 7月, 2010 2 次提交
    • S
      x86, xsave: Use xsaveopt in context-switch path when supported · 6bad06b7
      Suresh Siddha 提交于
      xsaveopt is a more optimized form of xsave specifically designed
      for the context switch usage. xsaveopt doesn't save the state that's not
      modified from the prior xrstor. And if a specific feature state gets
      modified to the init state, then xsaveopt just updates the header bit
      in the xsave memory layout without updating the corresponding memory
      layout.
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      LKML-Reference: <20100719230205.604014179@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      6bad06b7
    • S
      x86, xsave: Sync xsave memory layout with its header for user handling · 29104e10
      Suresh Siddha 提交于
      With xsaveopt, if a processor implementation discern that a processor state
      component is in its initialized state it may modify the corresponding bit in
      the xsave_hdr.xstate_bv as '0', with out modifying the corresponding memory
      layout. Hence wHile presenting the xstate information to the user, we always
      ensure that the memory layout of a feature will be in the init state if the
      corresponding header bit is zero. This ensures the consistency and avoids the
      condition of the user seeing some some stale state in the memory layout during
      signal handling, debugging etc.
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      LKML-Reference: <20100719230205.351459480@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      29104e10
  19. 07 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • S
      x86: Avoid unnecessary __clear_user() and xrstor in signal handling · 8e221b6d
      Suresh Siddha 提交于
      fxsave/xsave doesn't touch all the bytes in the memory layout used by
      these instructions. Specifically SW reserved (bytes 464..511) fields
      in the fxsave frame and the reserved fields in the xsave header.
      
      To present a clean context for the signal handling, just clear these fields
      instead of clearing the complete fxsave/xsave memory layout, when we dump these
      registers directly to the user signal frame.
      
      Also avoid the call to second xrstor (which inits the state not passed
      in the signal frame) in restore_user_xstate() if all the state has already
      been restored by the first xrstor.
      
      These changes improve the performance of signal handling(by ~3-5% as measured
      by the lat_sig).
      Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
      LKML-Reference: <1277249017.2847.85.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      8e221b6d
  20. 12 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 11 5月, 2010 2 次提交