1. 08 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  2. 05 9月, 2005 3 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] uml: SYSEMU: slight cleanup and speedup · 640aa46e
      Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso 提交于
      As a follow-up to "UML Support - Ptrace: adds the host SYSEMU support, for
      UML and general usage" (i.e.  uml-support-* in current mm).
      
      Avoid unconditionally jumping to work_pending and code copying, just reuse
      the already existing resume_userspace path.
      
      One interesting note, from Charles P.  Wright, suggested that the API is
      improvable with no downsides for UML (except that it will have to support
      yet another host API, since dropping support for the current API, for UML,
      is not reasonable from users' point of view).
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      CC: Charles P. Wright <cwright@cs.sunysb.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      640aa46e
    • B
      [PATCH] Uml support: reorganize PTRACE_SYSEMU support · c8c86cec
      Bodo Stroesser 提交于
      With this patch, we change the way we handle switching from PTRACE_SYSEMU to
      PTRACE_{SINGLESTEP,SYSCALL}, to free TIF_SYSCALL_EMU from double use as a
      preparation for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP extension, without changing the
      behavior of the host kernel.
      Signed-off-by: NBodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      c8c86cec
    • L
      [PATCH] UML Support - Ptrace: adds the host SYSEMU support, for UML and general usage · ed75e8d5
      Laurent Vivier 提交于
            Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
            Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>,
            Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
      
      Adds a new ptrace(2) mode, called PTRACE_SYSEMU, resembling PTRACE_SYSCALL
      except that the kernel does not execute the requested syscall; this is useful
      to improve performance for virtual environments, like UML, which want to run
      the syscall on their own.
      
      In fact, using PTRACE_SYSCALL means stopping child execution twice, on entry
      and on exit, and each time you also have two context switches; with SYSEMU you
      avoid the 2nd stop and so save two context switches per syscall.
      
      Also, some architectures don't have support in the host for changing the
      syscall number via ptrace(), which is currently needed to skip syscall
      execution (UML turns any syscall into getpid() to avoid it being executed on
      the host).  Fixing that is hard, while SYSEMU is easier to implement.
      
      * This version of the patch includes some suggestions of Jeff Dike to avoid
        adding any instructions to the syscall fast path, plus some other little
        changes, by myself, to make it work even when the syscall is executed with
        SYSENTER (but I'm unsure about them). It has been widely tested for quite a
        lot of time.
      
      * Various fixed were included to handle the various switches between
        various states, i.e. when for instance a syscall entry is traced with one of
        PT_SYSCALL / _SYSEMU / _SINGLESTEP and another one is used on exit.
        Basically, this is done by remembering which one of them was used even after
        the call to ptrace_notify().
      
      * We're combining TIF_SYSCALL_EMU with TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE or TIF_SINGLESTEP
        to make do_syscall_trace() notice that the current syscall was started with
        SYSEMU on entry, so that no notification ought to be done in the exit path;
        this is a bit of a hack, so this problem is solved in another way in next
        patches.
      
      * Also, the effects of the patch:
      "Ptrace - i386: fix Syscall Audit interaction with singlestep"
      are cancelled; they are restored back in the last patch of this series.
      
      Detailed descriptions of the patches doing this kind of processing follow (but
      I've already summed everything up).
      
      * Fix behaviour when changing interception kind #1.
      
        In do_syscall_trace(), we check the status of the TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag
        only after doing the debugger notification; but the debugger might have
        changed the status of this flag because he continued execution with
        PTRACE_SYSCALL, so this is wrong.  This patch fixes it by saving the flag
        status before calling ptrace_notify().
      
      * Fix behaviour when changing interception kind #2:
        avoid intercepting syscall on return when using SYSCALL again.
      
        A guest process switching from using PTRACE_SYSEMU to PTRACE_SYSCALL
        crashes.
      
        The problem is in arch/i386/kernel/entry.S.  The current SYSEMU patch
        inhibits the syscall-handler to be called, but does not prevent
        do_syscall_trace() to be called after this for syscall completion
        interception.
      
        The appended patch fixes this.  It reuses the flag TIF_SYSCALL_EMU to
        remember "we come from PTRACE_SYSEMU and now are in PTRACE_SYSCALL", since
        the flag is unused in the depicted situation.
      
      * Fix behaviour when changing interception kind #3:
        avoid intercepting syscall on return when using SINGLESTEP.
      
        When testing 2.6.9 and the skas3.v6 patch, with my latest patch and had
        problems with singlestepping on UML in SKAS with SYSEMU.  It looped
        receiving SIGTRAPs without moving forward.  EIP of the traced process was
        the same for all SIGTRAPs.
      
      What's missing is to handle switching from PTRACE_SYSCALL_EMU to
      PTRACE_SINGLESTEP in a way very similar to what is done for the change from
      PTRACE_SYSCALL_EMU to PTRACE_SYSCALL_TRACE.
      
      I.e., after calling ptrace(PTRACE_SYSEMU), on the return path, the debugger is
      notified and then wake ups the process; the syscall is executed (or skipped,
      when do_syscall_trace() returns 0, i.e.  when using PTRACE_SYSEMU), and
      do_syscall_trace() is called again.  Since we are on the return path of a
      SYSEMU'd syscall, if the wake up is performed through ptrace(PTRACE_SYSCALL),
      we must still avoid notifying the parent of the syscall exit.  Now, this
      behaviour is extended even to resuming with PTRACE_SINGLESTEP.
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ed75e8d5
  3. 01 5月, 2005 2 次提交
  4. 30 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      x86: make traps on 'iret' be debuggable in user space · a879cbbb
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This makes a trap on the 'iret' that returns us to user space
      cause a nice clean SIGSEGV, instead of just a hard (and silent)
      exit.
      
      That way a debugger can actually try to see what happened, and
      we also properly notify everybody who might be interested about
      us being gone.
      
      This loses the error code, but tells the debugger what happened
      with ILL_BADSTK in the siginfo.
      a879cbbb
  5. 17 4月, 2005 2 次提交
    • S
      [PATCH] fix crash in entry.S restore_all · 5df24082
      Stas Sergeev 提交于
      Fix the access-above-bottom-of-stack crash.
      
      1. Allows to preserve the valueable optimization
      
      2. Works for NMIs
      
      3.  Doesn't care whether or not there are more of the like instances
         where the stack is left empty.
      
      4. Seems to work for me without the crashes:) 
      
      (akpm: this is still under discussion, although I _think_ it's OK.  You might
      want to hold off)
      
      Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru> 
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5df24082
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4