Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 01 6月, 2012 3 次提交
  5. 14 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      Add PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS to prevent execve from granting privs · 259e5e6c
      由 Andy Lutomirski 提交于 
      With this change, calling
  prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)
disables privilege granting operations at execve-time.  For example, a
process will not be able to execute a setuid binary to change their uid
or gid if this bit is set.  The same is true for file capabilities.

Additionally, LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS is defined to ensure that
LSMs respect the requested behavior.

To determine if the NO_NEW_PRIVS bit is set, a task may call
  prctl(PR_GET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 0, 0, 0, 0);
It returns 1 if set and 0 if it is not set. If any of the arguments are
non-zero, it will return -1 and set errno to -EINVAL.
(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS behaves similarly.)

This functionality is desired for the proposed seccomp filter patch
series.  By using PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, it allows a task to modify the
system call behavior for itself and its child tasks without being
able to impact the behavior of a more privileged task.

Another potential use is making certain privileged operations
unprivileged.  For example, chroot may be considered "safe" if it cannot
affect privileged tasks.

Note, this patch causes execve to fail when PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS is
set and AppArmor is in use.  It is fixed in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: NWill Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Acked-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

v18: updated change desc
v17: using new define values as per 3.4
Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
      259e5e6c
  7. 10 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 28 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 14 2月, 2012 2 次提交
  13. 10 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  15. 07 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 06 1月, 2012 5 次提交
    • E
      security: remove the security_netlink_recv hook as it is equivalent to capable() · fd778461
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      Once upon a time netlink was not sync and we had to get the effective
capabilities from the skb that was being received.  Today we instead get
the capabilities from the current task.  This has rendered the entire
purpose of the hook moot as it is now functionally equivalent to the
capable() call.
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      fd778461
    • E
      capabilities: remove all _real_ interfaces · 2920a840
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      The name security_real_capable and security_real_capable_noaudit just don't
make much sense to me.  Convert them to use security_capable and
security_capable_noaudit.
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
      2920a840
    • E
      capabilities: introduce security_capable_noaudit · c7eba4a9
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      Exactly like security_capable except don't audit any denials.  This is for
places where the kernel may make decisions about what to do if a task has a
given capability, but which failing that capability is not a sign of a
security policy violation.  An example is checking if a task has
CAP_SYS_ADMIN to lower it's likelyhood of being killed by the oom killer.
This check is not a security violation if it is denied.
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
      c7eba4a9
    • E
      capabilities: reverse arguments to security_capable · b7e724d3
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      security_capable takes ns, cred, cap.  But the LSM capable() hook takes
cred, ns, cap.  The capability helper functions also take cred, ns, cap.
Rather than flip argument order just to flip it back, leave them alone.
Heck, this should be a little faster since argument will be in the right
place!
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      b7e724d3
    • E
      capabilities: remove the task from capable LSM hook entirely · 6a9de491
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      The capabilities framework is based around credentials, not necessarily the
current task.  Yet we still passed the current task down into LSMs from the
security_capable() LSM hook as if it was a meaningful portion of the security
decision.  This patch removes the 'generic' passing of current and instead
forces individual LSMs to use current explicitly if they think it is
appropriate.  In our case those LSMs are SELinux and AppArmor.

I believe the AppArmor use of current is incorrect, but that is wholely
unrelated to this patch.  This patch does not change what AppArmor does, it
just makes it clear in the AppArmor code that it is doing it.

The SELinux code still uses current in it's audit message, which may also be
wrong and needs further investigation.  Again this is NOT a change, it may
have always been wrong, this patch just makes it clear what is happening.
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      6a9de491
  19. 04 1月, 2012 8 次提交
  21. 20 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 16 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  25. 06 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  27. 10 9月, 2011 2 次提交
  29. 16 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  31. 11 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  33. 20 7月, 2011 2 次提交
  35. 19 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      security: new security_inode_init_security API adds function callback · 9d8f13ba
      由 Mimi Zohar 提交于 
      This patch changes the security_inode_init_security API by adding a
filesystem specific callback to write security extended attributes.
This change is in preparation for supporting the initialization of
multiple LSM xattrs and the EVM xattr.  Initially the callback function
walks an array of xattrs, writing each xattr separately, but could be
optimized to write multiple xattrs at once.

For existing security_inode_init_security() calls, which have not yet
been converted to use the new callback function, such as those in
reiserfs and ocfs2, this patch defines security_old_inode_init_security().
Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
      9d8f13ba
  37. 25 4月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      SECURITY: Move exec_permission RCU checks into security modules · 1c990429
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Right now all RCU walks fall back to reference walk when CONFIG_SECURITY
is enabled, even though just the standard capability module is active.
This is because security_inode_exec_permission unconditionally fails
RCU walks.

Move this decision to the low level security module. This requires
passing the RCU flags down the security hook. This way at least
the capability module and a few easy cases in selinux/smack work
with RCU walks with CONFIG_SECURITY=y
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
      1c990429
  39. 23 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  41. 24 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      userns: security: make capabilities relative to the user namespace · 3486740a
      由 Serge E. Hallyn 提交于 
      - Introduce ns_capable to test for a capability in a non-default
  user namespace.
- Teach cap_capable to handle capabilities in a non-default
  user namespace.

The motivation is to get to the unprivileged creation of new
namespaces.  It looks like this gets us 90% of the way there, with
only potential uid confusion issues left.

I still need to handle getting all caps after creation but otherwise I
think I have a good starter patch that achieves all of your goals.

Changelog:
	11/05/2010: [serge] add apparmor
	12/14/2010: [serge] fix capabilities to created user namespaces
	Without this, if user serge creates a user_ns, he won't have
	capabilities to the user_ns he created.  THis is because we
	were first checking whether his effective caps had the caps
	he needed and returning -EPERM if not, and THEN checking whether
	he was the creator.  Reverse those checks.
	12/16/2010: [serge] security_real_capable needs ns argument in !security case
	01/11/2011: [serge] add task_ns_capable helper
	01/11/2011: [serge] add nsown_capable() helper per Bastian Blank suggestion
	02/16/2011: [serge] fix a logic bug: the root user is always creator of
		    init_user_ns, but should not always have capabilities to
		    it!  Fix the check in cap_capable().
	02/21/2011: Add the required user_ns parameter to security_capable,
		    fixing a compile failure.
	02/23/2011: Convert some macros to functions as per akpm comments.  Some
		    couldn't be converted because we can't easily forward-declare
		    them (they are inline if !SECURITY, extern if SECURITY).  Add
		    a current_user_ns function so we can use it in capability.h
		    without #including cred.h.  Move all forward declarations
		    together to the top of the #ifdef __KERNEL__ section, and use
		    kernel-doc format.
	02/23/2011: Per dhowells, clean up comment in cap_capable().
	02/23/2011: Per akpm, remove unreachable 'return -EPERM' in cap_capable.

(Original written and signed off by Eric;  latest, modified version
acked by him)

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: export current_user_ns() for ecryptfs]
[serge.hallyn@canonical.com: remove unneeded extra argument in selinux's task_has_capability]
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Acked-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3486740a
  43. 04 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • E
      LSM: Pass -o remount options to the LSM · ff36fe2c
      由 Eric Paris 提交于 
      The VFS mount code passes the mount options to the LSM.  The LSM will remove
options it understands from the data and the VFS will then pass the remaining
options onto the underlying filesystem.  This is how options like the
SELinux context= work.  The problem comes in that -o remount never calls
into LSM code.  So if you include an LSM specific option it will get passed
to the filesystem and will cause the remount to fail.  An example of where
this is a problem is the 'seclabel' option.  The SELinux LSM hook will
print this word in /proc/mounts if the filesystem is being labeled using
xattrs.  If you pass this word on mount it will be silently stripped and
ignored.  But if you pass this word on remount the LSM never gets called
and it will be passed to the FS.  The FS doesn't know what seclabel means
and thus should fail the mount.  For example an ext3 fs mounted over loop

# mount -o loop /tmp/fs /mnt/tmp
# cat /proc/mounts | grep /mnt/tmp
/dev/loop0 /mnt/tmp ext3 rw,seclabel,relatime,errors=continue,barrier=0,data=ordered 0 0
# mount -o remount /mnt/tmp
mount: /mnt/tmp not mounted already, or bad option
# dmesg
EXT3-fs (loop0): error: unrecognized mount option "seclabel" or missing value

This patch passes the remount mount options to an new LSM hook.
Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      ff36fe2c
  45. 23 2月, 2011 1 次提交
  47. 11 2月, 2011 1 次提交