1. 29 6月, 2007 1 次提交
  2. 15 2月, 2007 1 次提交
    • T
      [PATCH] remove many unneeded #includes of sched.h · cd354f1a
      Tim Schmielau 提交于
      After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h
      recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes.
      There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need
      anything defined in there.  Presumably these includes were once needed for
      macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the
      course of cleaning it up.
      
      To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only
      removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble.
      
      Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha,
      arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig,
      allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all
      configs in arch/arm/configs on arm.  I also checked that no new warnings were
      introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted
      by unnecessarily included header files).
      Signed-off-by: NTim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
      Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cd354f1a
  3. 30 11月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [MTD] Use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() for exported symbols. · dd36f267
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      While we're fixing up the newly-added symbol, change the neighbouring ones
      too, for consistency and also to reflect the author's interpretation of
      the GPL -- which is that _no_ non-GPL modules are permitted. The author
      always intended his code to be released under the GPL, and believes that
      any new interpretation of 'EXPORT_SYMBOL' as being any different from
      'EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL' is entirely invalid; the GPL requires that _all_
      exports have the semantics of the new 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL', which means the
      extra four characters are entirely redundant.
      
      But since those four extra characters trigger the check for illegal
      modules in a way that just EXPORT_SYMBOL does not, it's useful to change
      anyway. This action in no way indicates an admission that there is any
      legal distinction between the two states, and in particular does not
      indicate that the author believes that non-GPL modules may use symbols
      exported with EXPORT_SYMBOL alone.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      dd36f267
  4. 29 11月, 2006 3 次提交
  5. 22 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 14 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 25 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 01 4月, 2006 2 次提交
  10. 07 11月, 2005 2 次提交
  11. 23 5月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4