1. 25 4月, 2010 3 次提交
    • A
      KVM: PPC: Combine extension interrupt handlers · c8c0b6f2
      Alexander Graf 提交于
      When we for example get an Altivec interrupt, but our guest doesn't support
      altivec, we need to inject a program interrupt, not an altivec interrupt.
      
      The same goes for paired singles. When an altivec interrupt arrives, we're
      pretty sure we need to emulate the instruction because it's a paired single
      operation.
      
      So let's make all the ext handlers aware that they need to jump to the
      program interrupt handler when an extension interrupt arrives that
      was not supposed to arrive for the guest CPU.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      c8c0b6f2
    • A
      KVM: PPC: Add hidden flag for paired singles · 3c402a75
      Alexander Graf 提交于
      The Gekko implements an extension called paired singles. When the guest wants
      to use that extension, we need to make sure we're not running the host FPU,
      because all FPU instructions need to get emulated to accomodate for additional
      operations that occur.
      
      This patch adds an hflag to track if we're in paired single mode or not.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      3c402a75
    • A
      KVM: PPC: Add AGAIN type for emulation return · 37f5bca6
      Alexander Graf 提交于
      Emulation of an instruction can have different outcomes. It can succeed,
      fail, require MMIO, do funky BookE stuff - or it can just realize something's
      odd and will be fixed the next time around.
      
      Exactly that is what EMULATE_AGAIN means. Using that flag we can now tell
      the caller that nothing happened, but we still want to go back to the
      guest and see what happens next time we come around.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      37f5bca6
  2. 20 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  4. 01 3月, 2010 15 次提交
  5. 08 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 05 11月, 2009 1 次提交