1. 11 10月, 2012 3 次提交
  2. 20 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 09 9月, 2012 4 次提交
  4. 18 8月, 2012 1 次提交
    • N
      md/raid10: fix problem with on-stack allocation of r10bio structure. · e0ee7785
      NeilBrown 提交于
      A 'struct r10bio' has an array of per-copy information at the end.
      This array is declared with size [0] and r10bio_pool_alloc allocates
      enough extra space to store the per-copy information depending on the
      number of copies needed.
      
      So declaring a 'struct r10bio on the stack isn't going to work.  It
      won't allocate enough space, and memory corruption will ensue.
      
      So in the two places where this is done, declare a sufficiently large
      structure and use that instead.
      
      The two call-sites of this bug were introduced in 3.4 and 3.5
      so this is suitable for both those kernels.  The patch will have to
      be modified for 3.4 as it only has one bug.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Reported-by: NIvan Vasilyev <ivan.vasilyev@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: NIvan Vasilyev <ivan.vasilyev@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      e0ee7785
  5. 16 8月, 2012 1 次提交
    • N
      md: Don't truncate size at 4TB for RAID0 and Linear · 667a5313
      NeilBrown 提交于
      commit 27a7b260
         md: Fix handling for devices from 2TB to 4TB in 0.90 metadata.
      
      changed 0.90 metadata handling to truncated size to 4TB as that is
      all that 0.90 can record.
      However for RAID0 and Linear, 0.90 doesn't need to record the size, so
      this truncation is not needed and causes working arrays to become too small.
      
      So avoid the truncation for RAID0 and Linear
      
      This bug was introduced in 3.1 and is suitable for any stable kernels
      from then onwards.
      As the offending commit was tagged for 'stable', any stable kernel
      that it was applied to should also get this patch.  That includes
      at least 2.6.32, 2.6.33 and 3.0. (Thanks to Ben Hutchings for
      providing that list).
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
      667a5313
  6. 02 8月, 2012 4 次提交
  7. 01 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  8. 31 7月, 2012 17 次提交
    • N
      blk: pass from_schedule to non-request unplug functions. · 74018dc3
      NeilBrown 提交于
      This will allow md/raid to know why the unplug was called,
      and will be able to act according - if !from_schedule it
      is safe to perform tasks which could themselves schedule.
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      74018dc3
    • N
      blk: centralize non-request unplug handling. · 9cbb1750
      NeilBrown 提交于
      Both md and umem has similar code for getting notified on an
      blk_finish_plug event.
      Centralize this code in block/ and allow each driver to
      provide its distinctive difference.
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      9cbb1750
    • N
      md: remove plug_cnt feature of plugging. · 0021b7bc
      NeilBrown 提交于
      This seemed like a good idea at the time, but after further thought I
      cannot see it making a difference other than very occasionally and
      testing to try to exercise the case it is most likely to help did not
      show any performance difference by removing it.
      
      So remove the counting of active plugs and allow 'pending writes' to
      be activated at any time, not just when no plugs are active.
      
      This is only relevant when there is a write-intent bitmap, and the
      updating of the bitmap will likely introduce enough delay that
      the single-threading of bitmap updates will be enough to collect large
      numbers of updates together.
      
      Removing this will make it easier to centralise the unplug code, and
      will clear the other for other unplug enhancements which have a
      measurable effect.
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      0021b7bc
    • A
      md/RAID1: Add missing case for attempting to repair known bad blocks. · d57368af
      Alexander Lyakas 提交于
      When doing resync or repair, attempt to correct bad blocks, according
      to WriteErrorSeen policy
      Signed-off-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      d57368af
    • A
      dm: use memweight() · 8fb980e3
      Akinobu Mita 提交于
      Use memweight() to count the total number of bits set in memory area.
      Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
      Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8fb980e3
    • M
      md/raid5: For odirect-write performance, do not set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE. · 895e3c5c
      majianpeng 提交于
      'sync' writes set both REQ_SYNC and REQ_NOIDLE.
      O_DIRECT writes set REQ_SYNC but not REQ_NOIDLE.
      
      We currently assume that a REQ_SYNC request will not be followed by
      more requests and so set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE to expedite the
      request.
      This is appropriate for sync requests, but not for O_DIRECT requests.
      
      So make the setting of STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE conditional on REQ_NOIDLE
      rather than REQ_SYNC.  This is consistent with the documented meaning
      of REQ_NOIDLE:
      
              __REQ_NOIDLE,           /* don't anticipate more IO after this one */
      Signed-off-by: NJianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      895e3c5c
    • N
      md/raid1: don't abort a resync on the first badblock. · b7219ccb
      NeilBrown 提交于
      If a resync of a RAID1 array with 2 devices finds a known bad block
      one device it will neither read from, or write to, that device for
      this block offset.
      So there will be one read_target (The other device) and zero write
      targets.
      This condition causes md/raid1 to abort the resync assuming that it
      has finished - without known bad blocks this would be true.
      
      When there are no write targets because of the presence of bad blocks
      we should only skip over the area covered by the bad block.
      RAID10 already gets this right, raid1 doesn't.  Or didn't.
      
      As this can cause a 'sync' to abort early and appear to have succeeded
      it could lead to some data corruption, so it suitable for -stable.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Reported-by: NAlexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      b7219ccb
    • N
      md: remove duplicated test on ->openers when calling do_md_stop() · 90cf195d
      NeilBrown 提交于
      do_md_stop tests mddev->openers while holding ->open_mutex,
      and fails if this count is too high.
      So callers do not need to check mddev->openers and doing so isn't
      very meaningful as they don't hold ->open_mutex so the number could
      change.
      
      So remove the unnecessary tests on mddev->openers.
      These are not called often enough for there to be any gain in
      an early test on ->open_mutex to avoid the need for a slightly more
      costly mutex_lock call.
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      90cf195d
    • M
      raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer · 3f9e7c14
      majianpeng 提交于
      Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
      bio which be merged into to the same request.
      Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
      operation like re-write and re-read.
      
      V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
      layer.
      Signed-off-by: NJianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      3f9e7c14
    • S
      md/raid1: prevent merging too large request · 12cee5a8
      Shaohua Li 提交于
      For SSD, if request size exceeds specific value (optimal io size), request size
      isn't important for bandwidth. In such condition, if making request size bigger
      will cause some disks idle, the total throughput will actually drop. A good
      example is doing a readahead in a two-disk raid1 setup.
      
      So when should we split big requests? We absolutly don't want to split big
      request to very small requests. Even in SSD, big request transfer is more
      efficient. This patch only considers request with size above optimal io size.
      
      If all disks are busy, is it worth doing a split? Say optimal io size is 16k,
      two requests 32k and two disks. We can let each disk run one 32k request, or
      split the requests to 4 16k requests and each disk runs two. It's hard to say
      which case is better, depending on hardware.
      
      So only consider case where there are idle disks. For readahead, split is
      always better in this case. And in my test, below patch can improve > 30%
      thoughput. Hmm, not 100%, because disk isn't 100% busy.
      
      Such case can happen not just in readahead, for example, in directio. But I
      suppose directio usually will have bigger IO depth and make all disks busy, so
      I ignored it.
      
      Note: if the raid uses any hard disk, we don't prevent merging. That will make
      performace worse.
      Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      12cee5a8
    • S
      md/raid1: read balance chooses idlest disk for SSD · 9dedf603
      Shaohua Li 提交于
      SSD hasn't spindle, distance between requests means nothing. And the original
      distance based algorithm sometimes can cause severe performance issue for SSD
      raid.
      
      Considering two thread groups, one accesses file A, the other access file B.
      The first group will access one disk and the second will access the other disk,
      because requests are near from one group and far between groups. In this case,
      read balance might keep one disk very busy but the other relative idle.  For
      SSD, we should try best to distribute requests to as many disks as possible.
      There isn't spindle move penality anyway.
      
      With below patch, I can see more than 50% throughput improvement sometimes
      depending on workloads.
      
      The only exception is small requests can be merged to a big request which
      typically can drive higher throughput for SSD too. Such small requests are
      sequential reads. Unlike hard disk, sequential read which can't be merged (for
      example direct IO, or read without readahead) can be ignored for SSD. Again
      there is no spindle move penality. readahead dispatches small requests and such
      requests can be merged.
      
      Last patch can help detect sequential read well, at least if concurrent read
      number isn't greater than raid disk number. In that case, distance based
      algorithm doesn't work well too.
      
      V2: For hard disk and SSD mixed raid, doesn't use distance based algorithm for
      random IO too. This makes the algorithm generic for raid with SSD.
      Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      9dedf603
    • S
      md/raid1: make sequential read detection per disk based · be4d3280
      Shaohua Li 提交于
      Currently the sequential read detection is global wide. It's natural to make it
      per disk based, which can improve the detection for concurrent multiple
      sequential reads. And next patch will make SSD read balance not use distance
      based algorithm, where this change help detect truly sequential read for SSD.
      Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      be4d3280
    • J
      MD RAID10: Export md_raid10_congested · cc4d1efd
      Jonathan Brassow 提交于
      md/raid10: Export is_congested test.
      
      In similar fashion to commits
      	11d8a6e3
      	1ed7242e
      we export the RAID10 congestion checking function so that dm-raid.c can
      make use of it and make use of the personality.  The 'queue' and 'gendisk'
      structures will not be available to the MD code when device-mapper sets
      up the device, so we conditionalize access to these fields also.
      Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      cc4d1efd
    • J
      MD: Move macros from raid1*.h to raid1*.c · 473e87ce
      Jonathan Brassow 提交于
      MD RAID1/RAID10: Move some macros from .h file to .c file
      
      There are three macros (IO_BLOCKED,IO_MADE_GOOD,BIO_SPECIAL) which are defined
      in both raid1.h and raid10.h.  They are only used in there respective .c files.
      However, if we wish to make RAID10 accessible to the device-mapper RAID
      target (dm-raid.c), then we need to move these macros into the .c files where
      they are used so that they do not conflict with each other.
      
      The macros from the two files are identical and could be moved into md.h, but
      I chose to leave the duplication and have them remain in the personality
      files.
      Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      473e87ce
    • J
      MD RAID1: rename mirror_info structure · 0eaf822c
      Jonathan Brassow 提交于
      MD RAID1: Rename the structure 'mirror_info' to 'raid1_info'
      
      The same structure name ('mirror_info') is used by raid10.  Each of these
      structures are defined in there respective header files.  If dm-raid is
      to support both RAID1 and RAID10, the header files will be included and
      the structure names must not collide.  While only one of these structure
      names needs to change, this patch adds consistency to the naming of the
      structure.
      Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      0eaf822c
    • J
      MD RAID10: rename mirror_info structure · dc280d98
      Jonathan Brassow 提交于
      MD RAID10: Rename the structure 'mirror_info' to 'raid10_info'
      
      The same structure name ('mirror_info') is used by raid1.  Each of these
      structures are defined in there respective header files.  If dm-raid is
      to support both RAID1 and RAID10, the header files will be included and
      the structure names must not collide.
      Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      dc280d98
    • J
      MD RAID10: Fix compiler warning. · 3bbae04b
      Jonathan Brassow 提交于
      MD RAID10:  Fix compiler warning.
      
      Initialize variable to prevent compiler warning.
      Signed-off-by: NJonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
      3bbae04b
  9. 27 7月, 2012 8 次提交