Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 20 4月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 16 4月, 2015 32 次提交
  5. 15 4月, 2015 4 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR VLV: Add single frame update. · c7240c3b
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      According to spec: "In PSR HW or SW mode, SW set this bit before writing
registers for a flip. It will be self-clear when it gets to the PSR
active state."

Some versions of spec mention that this is needed when in
"Persistent mode" but define it as same as "SW mode". Since this
fix the page flip case let's assume this is exactly what we need.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c7240c3b
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms. · 89251b17
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      On Haswell and Broadwell with link in standby when exit event happens
between vblank and VSC packet, PSR exit on panel but DPA transmitter
still sends black pixel. When this condition hits, panel will intermittently
display black frame.

The known W/A for this case involve the of single_frame update
that isn't supported on Haswell and to be supported on Broadwell
3 other workarounds would be required. So it is better and safe to
just deprecate link_standby for now.

Also, link fully off saves more power than link_standby and afwk
no OEM is requesting link standby on VBT. There is no reason for that.

For Skylake let's just consider it behaves like Broadwell until
we prove otherwise.

v2: Fix commit message (Durga).

v3: Fix conflict with PSR2.

Reference: HSD: bdwgfx/1912559
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      89251b17
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic · 3301d409
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      Since the beginning there is a missunderstanding on the meaning of this
dpcd bit.
This bit shouldn't indicate whether to use link standby or not, but just
be used to configure TP1, TP2 and TP3 times and tell hw aux should be skiped
since HW is the responsible one.

Even with help of frontbuffer tracking, HW is still fully responsible for
PSR exit logic with/without DP training.

DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT means the source doesn't need to do the training, but
it doesn't tell to avoid TP patterns, so we will send minimal TP1 and avoid
TP2. It also means that sink itself can take up to 5 idle frames for training.
6 in our case since we might be off by 1. So we also increment idle_frames by 4
here.

v2: Fix and improve commit message (Durga).
v3: Use minimal TP1 time avoiding TP2 and increase idle frame.

Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: Arthur Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      3301d409
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Remove wrong LINK_DISABLE. · cff5190c
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      This wrong logic and useless define came from first versions and
came along with all rework. Just now I notice how ugly, wrong and
useless this is.

val is already defined as 0 anyway and logic is completelly wrong
and useless. So let's starting the link_standby fix with this
cleaning.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      cff5190c
  7. 14 4月, 2015 2 次提交