1. 06 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 07 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • M
      PCI: Pull PCI 'latency timer' setup up into the core · 96c55900
      Myron Stowe 提交于
      The 'latency timer' of PCI devices, both Type 0 and Type 1,
      is setup in architecture-specific code [see: 'pcibios_set_master()'].
      There are two approaches being taken by all the architectures - check
      if the 'latency timer' is currently set between 16 and 255 and if not
      bring it within bounds, or, do nothing (and then there is the
      gratuitously different PA-RISC implementation).
      
      There is nothing architecture-specific about PCI's 'latency timer' so
      this patch pulls its setup functionality up into the PCI core by
      creating a generic 'pcibios_set_master()' function using the '__weak'
      attribute which can be used by all architectures as a default which,
      if necessary, can then be over-ridden by architecture-specific code.
      
      No functional change.
      Signed-off-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      96c55900
  3. 15 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 18 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 31 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      x86/PCI: Add option to not assign BAR's if not already assigned · 7bd1c365
      Mike Habeck 提交于
      The Linux kernel assigns BARs that a BIOS did not assign, most likely
      to handle broken BIOSes that didn't enumerate the devices correctly.
      On UV the BIOS purposely doesn't assign I/O BARs for certain devices/
      drivers we know don't use them (examples, LSI SAS, Qlogic FC, ...).
      We purposely don't assign these I/O BARs because I/O Space is a very
      limited resource.  There is only 64k of I/O Space, and in a PCIe
      topology that space gets divided up into 4k chucks (this is due to
      the fact that a pci-to-pci bridge's I/O decoder is aligned at 4k)...
      Thus a system can have at most 16 cards with I/O BARs: (64k / 4k = 16)
      
      SGI needs to scale to >16 devices with I/O BARs.  So by not assigning
      I/O BARs on devices we know don't use them, we can do that (iff the
      kernel doesn't go and assign these BARs that the BIOS purposely didn't
      assign).
      
      This patch will not assign a resource to a device BAR if that BAR was
      not assigned by the BIOS, and the kernel cmdline option 'pci=nobar'
      was specified.   This patch is closely modeled after the 'pci=norom'
      option that currently exists in the tree.
      Signed-off-by: NMike Habeck <habeck@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      7bd1c365
  6. 12 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 10 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 26 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 20 2月, 2010 3 次提交
  11. 25 11月, 2009 7 次提交
  12. 25 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 13 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 30 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 12 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      x86: attempt reboot via port CF9 if we have standard PCI ports · 14d7ca5c
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Impact: Changes reboot behavior.
      
      If port CF9 seems to be safe to touch, attempt it before trying the
      keyboard controller.  Port CF9 is not available on all chipsets (a
      significant but decreasing number of modern chipsets don't implement
      it), but port CF9 itself should in general be safe to poke (no ill
      effects if unimplemented) on any system which has PCI Configuration
      Method #1 or #2, as it falls inside the PCI configuration port range
      in both cases.  No chipset without PCI is known to have port CF9,
      either, although an explicit "pci=bios" would mean we miss this and
      therefore don't use port CF9.  An explicit "reboot=pci" can be used to
      force the use of port CF9.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      14d7ca5c
  17. 12 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  18. 11 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 09 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      x86/pci: removing subsys_initcall ordering dependencies · 8dd779b1
      Robert Richter 提交于
      So far subsys_initcalls has been executed in this order depending on
      the object order in the Makefile:
      
      arch/x86/pci/visws.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
      arch/x86/pci/numa.c:subsys_initcall(pci_numa_init);
      arch/x86/pci/acpi.c:subsys_initcall(pci_acpi_init);
      arch/x86/pci/legacy.c:subsys_initcall(pci_legacy_init);
      arch/x86/pci/irq.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_irq_init);
      arch/x86/pci/common.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
      
      This patch removes the ordering dependency. There is now only one
      subsys_initcall function that contains subsystem initialization code
      with a defined order.
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
      Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      8dd779b1
  20. 08 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  21. 11 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • G
      PCI: boot parameter to avoid expansion ROM memory allocation · bb71ad88
      Gary Hade 提交于
      Contention for scarce PCI memory resources has been growing
      due to an increasing number of PCI slots in large multi-node
      systems.  The kernel currently attempts by default to
      allocate memory for all PCI expansion ROMs so there has
      also been an increasing number of PCI memory allocation
      failures seen on these systems.  This occurs because the
      BIOS either (1) provides insufficient PCI memory resource
      for all the expansion ROMs or (2) provides adequate PCI
      memory resource for expansion ROMs but provides the
      space in kernel unexpected BIOS assigned P2P non-prefetch
      windows.
      
      The resulting PCI memory allocation failures may be benign
      when related to memory requests for expansion ROMs themselves
      but in some cases they can occur when attempting to allocate
      space for more critical BARs.  This can happen when a successful
      expansion ROM allocation request consumes memory resource
      that was intended for a non-ROM BAR.  We have seen this
      happen during PCI hotplug of an adapter that contains a
      P2P bridge where successful memory allocation for an
      expansion ROM BAR on device behind the bridge consumed
      memory that was intended for a non-ROM BAR on the P2P bridge.
      In all cases the allocation failure messages can be very
      confusing for users.
      
      This patch provides a new 'pci=norom' kernel boot parameter
      that can be used to disable the default PCI expansion ROM memory
      resource allocation.  This provides a way to avoid the above
      described issues on systems that do not contain PCI devices
      for which drivers or user-level applications depend on the
      default PCI expansion ROM memory resource allocation behavior.
      Signed-off-by: NGary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      bb71ad88
  22. 06 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      PCI/x86: fix up PCI stuff so that PCI_GOANY supports OLPC · 2bdd1b03
      Andres Salomon 提交于
      Previously, one would have to specifically choose CONFIG_OLPC and
      CONFIG_PCI_GOOLPC in order to enable PCI_OLPC.  That doesn't really work
      for distro kernels, so this patch allows one to choose CONFIG_OLPC and
      CONFIG_PCI_GOANY in order to build in OLPC support in a generic kernel (as
      requested by Robert Millan).
      
      This also moves GOOLPC before GOANY in the menuconfig list.
      
      Finally, make pci_access_init return early if we detect OLPC hardware.
      There's no need to continue probing stuff, and pci_pcbios_init
      specifically trashes our settings (we didn't run into that before because
      PCI_GOANY wasn't supported).
      Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      2bdd1b03
  23. 06 5月, 2008 2 次提交
  24. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 27 4月, 2008 3 次提交
    • Y
      x86: add pci=check_enable_amd_mmconf and dmi check · 5f0b2976
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      so will disable that feature by default, and only enable that via
      pci=check_enable_amd_mmconf or for system match with dmi table.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      5f0b2976
    • Y
      x86: clear pci_mmcfg_virt when mmcfg get rejected · 0b64ad71
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      For x86_64, need to free pci_mmcfg_virt, and iounmap some pointers
      when MMCONF is not reserved in E820 or acpi _CRS and get rejected.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      0b64ad71
    • R
      x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources · 7752d5cf
      Robert Hancock 提交于
      This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved
      motherboard resources.  If the MMCONFIG table is found to be reserved in
      ACPI, we don't bother checking the E820 table.  The PCI Express firmware
      spec apparently tells BIOS developers that reservation in ACPI is required
      and E820 reservation is optional, so checking against ACPI first makes
      sense.  Many BIOSes don't reserve the MMCONFIG region in E820 even though
      it is perfectly functional, the existing check needlessly disables MMCONFIG
      in these cases.
      
      In order to do this, MMCONFIG setup has been split into two phases.  If PCI
      configuration type 1 is not available then MMCONFIG is enabled early as
      before.  Otherwise, it is enabled later after the ACPI interpreter is
      enabled, since we need to be able to execute control methods in order to
      check the ACPI reserved resources.  Presently this is just triggered off
      the end of ACPI interpreter initialization.
      
      There are a few other behavioral changes here:
      
      - Validate all MMCONFIG configurations provided, not just the first one.
      
      - Validate the entire required length of each configuration according to
        the provided ending bus number is reserved, not just the minimum required
        allocation.
      
      - Validate that the area is reserved even if we read it from the chipset
        directly and not from the MCFG table.  This catches the case where the
        BIOS didn't set the location properly in the chipset and has mapped it
        over other things it shouldn't have.
      
      This also cleans up the MMCONFIG initialization functions so that they
      simply do nothing if MMCONFIG is not compiled in.
      
      Based on an original patch by Rajesh Shah from Intel.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: many fixes and cleanups]
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
      Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Tested-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Cc: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
      Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      7752d5cf
  26. 21 4月, 2008 2 次提交
    • B
      PCI: x86: use generic pci_enable_resources() · b81d988c
      Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
      Use the generic pci_enable_resources() instead of the arch-specific code.
      
      Unlike this arch-specific code, the generic version:
          - checks for resource collisions with "!r->parent"
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      b81d988c
    • G
      PCI: remove initial bios sort of PCI devices on x86 · 1ba6ab11
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      We currently keep 2 lists of PCI devices in the system, one in the
      driver core, and one all on its own.  This second list is sorted at boot
      time, in "BIOS" order, to try to remain compatible with older kernels
      (2.2 and earlier days).  There was also a "nosort" option to turn this
      sorting off, to remain compatible with even older kernel versions, but
      that just ends up being what we have been doing from 2.5 days...
      
      Unfortunately, the second list of devices is not really ever used to 
      determine the probing order of PCI devices or drivers[1].  That is done
      using the driver core list instead.  This change happened back in the
      early 2.5 days.
      
      Relying on BIOS ording for the binding of drivers to specific device
      names is problematic for many reasons, and userspace tools like udev
      exist to properly name devices in a persistant manner if that is needed,
      no reliance on the BIOS is needed.
      
      Matt Domsch and others at Dell noticed this back in 2006, and added a
      boot option to sort the PCI device lists (both of them) in a
      breadth-first manner to help remain compatible with the 2.4 order, if
      needed for any reason.  This option is not going away, as some systems
      rely on them.
      
      This patch removes the sorting of the internal PCI device list in "BIOS"
      mode, as it's not needed at all anymore, and hasn't for many years.
      I've also removed the PCI flags for this from some other arches that for
      some reason defined them, but never used them.
      
      This should not change the ordering of any drivers or device probing.
      
      [1] The old-style pci_get_device and pci_find_device() still used this
      sorting order, but there are very few drivers that use these functions,
      as they are deprecated for use in this manner.  If for some reason, a
      driver rely on the order and uses these functions, the breadth-first
      boot option will resolve any problem.
      
      Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      1ba6ab11
  27. 11 2月, 2008 1 次提交