1. 25 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      tipc: Remove duplicate check of message destination node · c74a4611
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Eliminates a check in the processing of TIPC messages arriving from
      off node that ensures the message is destined for this node, since this
      check duplicates an earlier check. (The check would be necessary if TIPC
      needed to be able to route incoming messages to another node, but the
      elimination of multi-cluster support means that this never happens and
      all incoming messages are consumed by the receiving node.)
      
      Note: This change involves the elimination of a single "if" statement
      with a large "then" clause; consequently, a significant number of lines
      end up getting re-indented. In addition, a simple message header access
      routine that is no longer referenced is eliminated. However, the only
      functional change is the elimination of the single check described above.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      c74a4611
  2. 07 2月, 2012 7 次提交
    • A
      tipc: Prevent loss of fragmented messages over unicast links · b76b27ca
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Modifies unicast link endpoint logic so an incoming fragmented message
      is not lost if reassembly cannot begin because there is no buffer big
      enough to hold the entire reassembled message. The link endpoint now
      ignores the first fragment completely, which causes the sending node to
      retransmit the first fragment so that reassembly can be re-attempted.
      
      Previously, the sender would have had no reason to retransmit the 1st
      fragment, so we would never have a chance to re-try the allocation.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      b76b27ca
    • A
      tipc: Major redesign of broadcast link ACK/NACK algorithms · 7a54d4a9
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Completely redesigns broadcast link ACK and NACK mechanisms to prevent
      spurious retransmit requests in dual LAN networks, and to prevent the
      broadcast link from stalling due to the failure of a receiving node to
      acknowledge receiving a broadcast message or request its retransmission.
      
      Note: These changes only impact the timing of when ACK and NACK messages
      are sent, and not the basic broadcast link protocol itself, so inter-
      operability with nodes using the "classic" algorithms is maintained.
      
      The revised algorithms are as follows:
      
      1) An explicit ACK message is still sent after receiving 16 in-sequence
      messages, and implicit ACK information continues to be carried in other
      unicast link message headers (including link state messages).  However,
      the timing of explicit ACKs is now based on the receiving node's absolute
      network address rather than its relative network address to ensure that
      the failure of another node does not delay the ACK beyond its 16 message
      target.
      
      2) A NACK message is now typically sent only when a message gap persists
      for two consecutive incoming link state messages; this ensures that a
      suspected gap is not confirmed until both LANs in a dual LAN network have
      had an opportunity to deliver the message, thereby preventing spurious NACKs.
      A NACK message can also be generated by the arrival of a single link state
      message, if the deferred queue is so big that the current message gap
      cannot be the result of "normal" mis-ordering due to the use of dual LANs
      (or one LAN using a bonded interface). Since link state messages typically
      arrive at different nodes at different times the problem of multiple nodes
      issuing identical NACKs simultaneously is inherently avoided.
      
      3) Nodes continue to "peek" at NACK messages sent by other nodes. If
      another node requests retransmission of a message gap suspected (but not
      yet confirmed) by the peeking node, the peeking node forgets about the
      gap and does not generate a duplicate retransmit request. (If the peeking
      node subsequently fails to receive the lost message, later link state
      messages will cause it to rediscover and confirm the gap and send another
      NACK.)
      
      4) Message gap "equality" is now determined by the start of the gap only.
      This is sufficient to deal with the most common cases of message loss,
      and eliminates the need for complex end of gap computations.
      
      5) A peeking node no longer tries to determine whether it should send a
      complementary NACK, since the most common cases of message loss don't
      require it to be sent. Consequently, the node no longer examines the
      "broadcast tag" field of a NACK message when peeking.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      7a54d4a9
    • A
      tipc: Fix problem with broadcast link synchronization between nodes · 47361c87
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Corrects a problem in which a link endpoint that activates as the
      result of receiving a RESET/STATE sequence of link protocol messages
      fails to properly record the broadcast link status information about
      the node to which it is now communicating with. (The problem does
      not occur with the more common RESET/ACTIVATE sequence of messages.)
      The fix ensures that the broadcast link status info is updated after
      the RESET message resets the link endpoint, rather than before, thereby
      preventing new information from being overwritten by the reset operation.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      47361c87
    • A
      tipc: Ensure broadcast link re-acquires node after link failure · 93499313
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Fix a bug that can prevent TIPC from sending broadcast messages to a node
      if contact with the node is lost and then regained. The problem occurs if
      the broadcast link first clears the flag indicating the node is part of the
      link's distribution set (when it loses contact with the node), and later
      fails to restore the flag (when contact is regained); restoration fails
      if contact with the node is regained by implicit unicast link activation
      triggered by the arrival of a data message, rather than explicitly by the
      arrival of a link activation message.
      
      The broadcast link now uses separate fields to track whether a node is
      theoretically capable of receiving broadcast messages versus whether it is
      actually part of the link's distribution set. The former member is updated
      by the receipt of link protocol messages, which can occur at any time; the
      latter member is updated only when contact with the node is gained or lost.
      This change also permits the simplification of several conditional
      expressions since the broadcast link's "supported" field can now only be
      set if there are working links to the associated node.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      93499313
    • A
      tipc: Prevent broadcast link stalling in dual LAN environments · 4d75313c
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Ensure that sequence number information about incoming broadcast link
      messages is initialized only by the activation of the first link to a
      given cluster node.  Previously, a race condition allowed reset and/or
      activation messages for a second link to re-initialize this sequence
      number information with obsolete values. This could trigger TIPC to
      request the retransmission of previously acknowledged broadcast link
      messages from that node, resulting in broadcast link processing becoming
      stalled if the node had already released one or more of those messages
      and was unable to perform the required retransmission.
      
      Thanks to Laser <gotolaser@gmail.com> for identifying this problem
      and assisting in the development of this fix.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      4d75313c
    • A
      tipc: Prevent transmission of outdated link protocol messages · 92d2c905
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Ensures that a link endpoint discards any previously deferred link
      protocol message whenever it attempts to send a new one.
      
      Previously, it was possible for a link protocol message that was unsent
      due to congestion to be transmitted after newer protocol messages had
      been sent. The stale link protocol message might then cause the receiving
      link endpoint to malfunction because of its outdated conent.
      
      Thanks to Osamu Kaminuma [okaminum@avaya.com] for diagnosing the problem
      and contributing a prototype patch.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      92d2c905
    • A
      tipc: improve the link deferred queue insertion algorithm · 8809b255
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Re-code the algorithm for inserting an out-of-sequence message into
      a unicast or broadcast link's deferred message queue.  It remains
      functionally equivalent but should be easier to understand/maintain.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      8809b255
  3. 30 12月, 2011 2 次提交
  4. 28 12月, 2011 3 次提交
  5. 18 9月, 2011 3 次提交
    • Y
      tipc: Remove unused link event tracking code · 94362c7e
      Ying Xue 提交于
      Elimintes prototype link event tracking functionality that has never
      been fleshed out and doesn't do anything useful at the current time.
      Signed-off-by: NYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      94362c7e
    • A
      tipc: Enhance sending of bulk name table messages · 9aa88c2a
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Modifies the initial transfer of name table entries to a new neighboring
      node so that the messages are enqueued as a unit, rather than individually.
      
      The revised algorithm now locates the link carrying the message only once,
      and eliminates unnecessary checks for link congestion, message fragmentation,
      and message bundling that are not required when sending these messages.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      9aa88c2a
    • A
      tipc: Ensure both nodes recognize loss of contact between them · b4b56102
      Allan Stephens 提交于
      Enhances TIPC to ensure that a node that loses contact with a
      neighboring node does not allow contact to be re-established until
      it sees that its peer has also recognized the loss of contact.
      
      Previously, nodes that were connected by two or more links could
      encounter a situation in which node A would lose contact with node B
      on all of its links, purge its name table of names published by B,
      and then fail to repopulate those names once contact with B was restored.
      This would happen because B was able to re-establish one or more links
      so quickly that it never reached a point where it had no links to A --
      meaning that B never saw a loss of contact with A, and consequently
      didn't re-publish its names to A.
      
      This problem is now prevented by enhancing the cleanup done by TIPC
      following a loss of contact with a neighboring node to ensure that
      node A ignores all messages sent by B until it receives a LINK_PROTOCOL
      message that indicates B has lost contact with A, thereby preventing
      the (re)establishment of links between the nodes. The loss of contact
      is recognized when a RESET or ACTIVATE message is received that has
      a "redundant link exists" field of 0, indicating that B's sending link
      endpoint is in a reset state and that B has no other working links.
      
      Additionally, TIPC now suppresses the sending of (most) link protocol
      messages to a neighboring node while it is cleaning up after an earlier
      loss of contact with that node. This stops the peer node from prematurely
      activating its link endpoint, which would prevent TIPC from later
      activating its own end. TIPC still allows outgoing RESET messages to
      occur during cleanup, to avoid problems if its own node recognizes
      the loss of contact first and tries to notify the peer of the situation.
      
      Finally, TIPC now recognizes an impending loss of contact with a peer node
      as soon as it receives a RESET message on a working link that is the
      peer's only link to the node, and ensures that the link protocol
      suppression mentioned above goes into effect right away -- that is,
      even before its own link endpoints have failed. This is necessary to
      ensure correct operation when there are redundant links between the nodes,
      since otherwise TIPC would send an ACTIVATE message upon receiving a RESET
      on its first link and only begin suppressing when a RESET on its second
      link was received, instead of initiating suppression with the first RESET
      message as it needs to.
      
      Note: The reworked cleanup code also eliminates a check that prevented
      a link endpoint's discovery object from responding to incoming messages
      while stale name table entries are being purged. This check is now
      unnecessary and would have slowed down re-establishment of communication
      between the nodes in some situations.
      Signed-off-by: NAllan Stephens <allan.stephens@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      b4b56102
  6. 01 9月, 2011 5 次提交
  7. 25 6月, 2011 2 次提交
  8. 11 5月, 2011 6 次提交
  9. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 14 3月, 2011 7 次提交
  11. 24 2月, 2011 3 次提交