- 06 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
Unconditionally call Yama when CONFIG_SECURITY_YAMA_STACKED is selected, no matter what LSM module is primary. Ubuntu and Chrome OS already carry patches to do this, and Fedora has voiced interest in doing this as well. Instead of having multiple distributions (or LSM authors) carrying these patches, just allow Yama to be called unconditionally when selected by the new CONFIG. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Acked-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
-
- 10 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
The higher ptrace restriction levels should be blocking even PTRACE_TRACEME requests. The comments in the LSM documentation are misleading about when the checks happen (the parent does not go through security_ptrace_access_check() on a PTRACE_TRACEME call). Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.5.x and later Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
When checking capabilities, the question we want to be asking is "does current() have the capability in the child's namespace?" Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
-
- 23 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
GCC complains that we don't use "one" any more after 389da25f "Yama: add additional ptrace scopes". security/yama/yama_lsm.c:322:12: warning: ?one? defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
-
- 19 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This expands the available Yama ptrace restrictions to include two more modes. Mode 2 requires CAP_SYS_PTRACE for PTRACE_ATTACH, and mode 3 completely disables PTRACE_ATTACH (and locks the sysctl). Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
For a process to entirely disable Yama ptrace restrictions, it can use the special PR_SET_PTRACER_ANY pid to indicate that any otherwise allowed process may ptrace it. This is stronger than calling PR_SET_PTRACER with pid "1" because it includes processes in external pid namespaces. This is currently needed by the Chrome renderer, since its crash handler (Breakpad) runs external to the renderer's pid namespace. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-
- 10 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This adds the Yama Linux Security Module to collect DAC security improvements (specifically just ptrace restrictions for now) that have existed in various forms over the years and have been carried outside the mainline kernel by other Linux distributions like Openwall and grsecurity. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-