Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 27 5月, 2017 5 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Replace vPorts with Port-VLAN · c57529e1
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      As explained in the cover letter, since the introduction of the bridge
offload in the mlxsw driver, information related to the offloaded bridge
and bridge ports was stored in the individual port struct,
mlxsw_sp_port.

This lead to a bloated struct storing both physical properties of the
port (e.g., autoneg status) as well as logical properties of an upper
bridge port (e.g., learning, mrouter indication). While this might work
well for simple devices, it proved to be hard to extend when stacked
devices were taken into account and more advanced use-cases (e.g., IGMP
snooping) considered.

This patch removes the excess information from the above struct and
instead stores it in more appropriate structs that represent the bridge
port, the bridge itself and a VLAN configured on the bridge port.

The membership of a port in a bridge is denoted using the Port-VLAN
struct, which points to the bridge port and also member in the bridge
VLAN group of the VLAN it represents. This allows us to completely
remove the vPort abstraction and consolidate many of the code paths
relating to VLAN-aware and unaware bridges.

Note that the FID / vFID code is currently duplicated, but this will
soon go away when the common FID core will be introduced.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c57529e1
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Don't create FIDs upon creation of VLAN uppers · ed9ddd3a
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      Up until now we used to create FIDs upon the creation of VLAN uppers on
top of the VLAN-aware bridge. This was done so that in case a router
interface (RIF) was configured on top of the bridge, the FID would
already be there.

Instead, simplify the code and only create the FID upon RIF creation.

This is an intermediary step towards the introduction of the common FID
core, in which this code would be completely removed.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ed9ddd3a
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Replace vPorts with Port-VLAN · 7cbecf24
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      We're going to get rid of vPorts completely later in the patchset, but
the router code is self-contained, so it's a good candidate to start the
transition with.

Convert all the functions that expects to operate on a vPort to operate
on a Port-VLAN instead.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7cbecf24
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Change signature of FID leave function · ce95e154
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When a vPort is destroyed, it leaves the FID it's currently mapped to
(if any) and drops the reference. The FID's leave function expects to
get the vPort as its argument, but this will have to change when the
vPort model is retired.

Change the function signature to expect a Port-VLAN struct instead and
patch the call sites accordingly.

The code introduced in this patch will be removed later in the patchset,
but this intermediary step is required in order to ease the code review.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ce95e154
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum: Set port's mode according to FID mappings · 4aafc368
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      We currently transition the port to "Virtual mode" upon the creation of
its first VLAN upper, as we need to classify incoming packets to a FID
using {Port, VID} and not only the VID.

However, it's more appropriate to transition the port to this mode when
the {Port, VID} are actually mapped to a FID. Either during the
enslavement of the VLAN upper to a VLAN-unaware bridge or the
configuration of a router port.

Do this change now in preparation for the introduction of the FID core,
where this operation will be encapsulated.

To prevent regressions, this patch also explicitly configures an OVS
slave to "Virtual mode". Otherwise, a packet that didn't hit an ACL rule
could be classified to an existing FID based on a global VID-to-FID
mapping, thus not incurring a FID mis-classification, which would
otherwise trap the packet to the CPU to be processed by the OVS daemon.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4aafc368
  3. 26 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 18 5月, 2017 6 次提交
  7. 01 5月, 2017 1 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Simplify VRF enslavement · b1e45526
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When a netdev is enslaved to a VRF master, its router interface (RIF)
needs to be destroyed (if exists) and a new one created using the
corresponding virtual router (VR).

>From the driver's perspective, the above is equivalent to an inetaddr
event sent for this netdev. Therefore, when a port netdev (or its
uppers) are enslaved to a VRF master, call the same function that
would've been called had a NETDEV_UP was sent for this netdev in the
inetaddr notification chain.

This patch also fixes a bug when a LAG netdev with an existing RIF is
enslaved to a VRF. Before this patch, each LAG port would drop the
reference on the RIF, but would re-join the same one (in the wrong VR)
soon after. With this patch, the corresponding RIF is first destroyed
and a new one is created using the correct VR.

Fixes: 7179eb5a ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for VRFs")
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b1e45526
  9. 21 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 29 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  13. 26 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 25 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  17. 22 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 17 3月, 2017 6 次提交
  21. 11 3月, 2017 6 次提交
  23. 02 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 11 2月, 2017 3 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for route replace · 599cf8f9
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      Upon the reception of an ENTRY_REPLACE notification, resolve the FIB
node corresponding to the prefix and length and insert the new route
before the first matching entry.

Since the notification also signals the deletion of the replaced route,
delete it from the driver's cache.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      599cf8f9
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add support for route append · 4283bce5
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When a new route is appended, it's placed after existing routes sharing
the same parameters (prefix, length, table ID, TOS and priority).

While the device supports only one route with the same prefix and length
in a single table, it's important to correctly place the appended route
in the driver's cache, as when a route is deleted the next one is
programmed into the device.

Following the reception of an ENTRY_APPEND notification, resolve the
FIB node corresponding to the prefix and length and correctly place the
new entry in its entry list.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4283bce5
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Correctly handle identical routes · 9aecce1c
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      In the device, routes are indexed in a routing table based on the prefix
and its length. This is in contrast to the kernel's FIB where several
FIB aliases can exist with these parameters being identical. In such
cases, the routes will be sorted by table ID (LOCAL first, then MAIN),
TOS and finally priority (metric).

During lookup, these routes will be evaluated in order. In case the
packet's TOS field is non-zero and a FIB alias with a matching TOS is
found, then it's selected. Otherwise, the lookup defaults to the route
with TOS 0 (if it exists). However, if the requested scope is narrower
than the one found, then the lookup continues.

To best reflect the kernel's datapath we should take the above into
account. Given a prefix and its length, the reflected route will always
be the first one in the FIB alias list. However, if the route has a
non-zero TOS then its action will be converted to trap instead of
forward, since we currently don't support TOS-based routing. If this
turns out to be a real issue, we can add support for that using
policy-based switching.

The route's scope can be effectively ignored as any packet being routed
by the device would've been looked-up using the widest scope (UNIVERSE).

To achieve that we need to do two changes. Firstly, we need to create
another struct (FIB node) that will hold the list of FIB entries sharing
the same prefix and length. This struct will be hashed using these two
parameters.

Secondly, we need to change the route reflection to match the above
logic, so that the first FIB entry in the list will be programmed into
the device while the rest will remain in the driver's cache in case of
subsequent changes.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9aecce1c
  27. 09 2月, 2017 4 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Don't reflect LINKDOWN nexthops · df6dd79b
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      The kernel resolves the nexthops for a given route using
FIB_LOOKUP_IGNORE_LINKSTATE which means a notification can be sent for a
route with one of its nexthops being LINKDOWN.

In case IGNORE_ROUTES_WITH_LINKDOWN is set for the nexthop netdev, then
we shouldn't reflect the nexthop to the device's table.

Once the nexthop netdev's carrier goes up we'll be notified using NH_ADD
and reflect it to the device.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      df6dd79b
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Flush resources when RIF is deleted · 9665b745
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When the last IP address is removed from a netdev, its RIF is deleted.
However, if user didn't first remove neighbours and nexthops using this
interface, then they would still be present in the device's tables.

Therefore, whenever a RIF is deleted, make sure all the neighbours and
nexthops (adjacency entries) using it are removed from the relevant
tables as well.

The action associated with any route using this RIF would be refreshed,
most likely to trap. If the kernel decides to remove the route (f.e.,
because all the nexthops are now DEAD), then an event would be sent,
causing the route to be removed from the device.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9665b745
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Reflect nexthop status changes · ad178c8e
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When a packet hits a multipath route in the device's routing table, a
hash is computed over its headers, which is then used to select the
appropriate nexthop from the device's adjacency table.

There are situations in which the kernel removes a nexthop from a
multipath route (e.g., no carrier) and the device should do the same.

Upon the reception of NH_{ADD,DEL} events, add or remove a nexthop from
the device's adjacency table and refresh all the routes using the
nexthop group. If all the nexthops of a multipath route are invalid,
then any packet hitting the route would be trapped to the CPU for
forwarding.

If all the nexthops are DEAD, then the kernel would remove the route
entirely. On the other hand, if all the nexthops are merely LINKDOWN,
then the kernel would keep the route and forward any incoming packet
using a different route.

While the last case might sound like a problem, it's expected that a
routing daemon running in user space would remove such a route from the
FIB as it's dumped with the DEAD flag set.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ad178c8e
    • I
      mlxsw: spectrum_router: Use trap action only for some route types · 70ad3506
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      The device can have one of three actions associated with a route:

1) Remote - packets continue to the adjacency table
2) Local - packets continue to the neighbour table
3) Trap - packets continue to the CPU

The first two actions can also trap packets to the CPU, but they do so
using a different trap ID, which has a lower traffic class and less
allotted bandwidth.

We currently use the third action for both RTN_{LOCAL,BROADCAST} routes
and RTN_UNICAST routes not pointing to the switch ports.

However, packets that merely need to be forwarded by the switch are
likely not control packets and can be therefore scheduled towards the
CPU using a lower traffic class.

Achieve the above by assigning the third action only to local and
broadcast routes and have any other route use either of the first two
actions, based on whether the route is gatewayed or not.

This will also allow us to refresh routes using the local action and
have them trap packets when their RIF is no longer valid following a
NH_DEL event.

One side effect of this patch is that we no longer give special
treatment to multipath routes using both switch and non-switch ports
towards their nexthops. If at least one of the nexthops can be resolved,
then the device will forward the packets instead of trapping them.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      70ad3506