- 04 7月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Joerg Roedel 提交于
Use the already defined DMA_PTE_LARGE_PAGE for testing instead of hardcoding the value again. Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Decrease the device reference count avoid memory leak. Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Use inline function dma_pte_superpage() instead of macro for better readability. Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Alloc_domain() will initialize domain->nid to -1. So the initialization for domain->nid in md_domain_init() is redundant, clear it. Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Use list_for_each_entry_safe() instead of list_entry() to simplify code. Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
-
- 20 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Function dmar_iommu_notify_scope_dev() makes a wrong assumption that there's one RMRR for each PCI device at most, which causes DMA failure on some HP platforms. So enhance dmar_iommu_notify_scope_dev() to handle multiple RMRRs for the same PCI device. Fixbug: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879482 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15 Reported-by: NTom Mingarelli <thomas.mingarelli@hp.com> Tested-by: NLinda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
-
- 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Akinobu Mita 提交于
This adds support for the DMA Contiguous Memory Allocator for intel-iommu. This change enables dma_alloc_coherent() to allocate big contiguous memory. It is achieved in the same way as nommu_dma_ops currently does, i.e. trying to allocate memory by dma_alloc_from_contiguous() and alloc_pages() is used as a fallback. Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Commit 146922ec ("iommu/vt-d: Make get_domain_for_dev() take struct device") introduced new variables bridge_bus and bridge_devfn to identify the upstream PCIe to PCI bridge responsible for the given target device. Leaving the original bus/devfn variables to identify the target device itself, now that it is no longer assumed to be PCI and we can no longer trivially find that information. However, the patch failed to correctly use the new variables in all cases; instead using the as-yet-uninitialised 'bus' and 'devfn' variables. Reported-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Commit ea8ea460 "iommu/vt-d: Clean up and fix page table clear/free behaviour" introduces possible leakage of DMA page tables due to: for (pte = page_address(pg); !first_pte_in_page(pte); pte++) { if (dma_pte_present(pte) && !dma_pte_superpage(pte)) freelist = dma_pte_list_pagetables(domain, level - 1, pte, freelist); } For the first pte in a page, first_pte_in_page(pte) will always be true, thus dma_pte_list_pagetables() will never be called and leak DMA page tables if level is bigger than 1. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
If we hit this error condition then we want to return a NULL pointer and not a freed variable. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 24 3月, 2014 28 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
It might not be... Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Mostly made redundant by using dev_name() instead of pci_name(), and one instance of using *dev->dma_mask instead of pdev->dma_mask. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Should hopefully never happen (RMRRs are an abomination) but while we're busy eliminating all the PCI assumptions, we might as well do it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Pass the struct device to it, and also make it return the bus/devfn to use, since that is also stored in the DMAR table. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
It's accessible via info->iommu->segment so this is redundant. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
This was problematic because it works by domain/bus/devfn and we want to make device_to_iommu() use only a struct device * (for handling non-PCI devices). Now that the iommu pointer is reliably stored in the device_domain_info, we don't need to look it up. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Now we store the iommu in the device_domain_info, we don't need to do a lookup. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
By moving this into get_domain_for_dev() we can make dmar_insert_dev_info() suitable for use with "special" domains such as the si_domain, which currently use domain_add_dev_info(). Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
It's not only for PCI devices any more, and the scope information for an ACPI device provides the bus and devfn so that has to be stored here too. It is the device pointer itself which needs to be protected with RCU, so the __rcu annotation follows it into the definition of struct dmar_dev_scope, since we're no longer just passing arrays of device pointers around. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
In commit 2e12bc29 ("intel-iommu: Default to non-coherent for domains unattached to iommus") we decided to err on the side of caution and always assume that it's possible that a device will be attached which is behind a non-coherent IOMMU. In some cases, however, that just *cannot* happen. If there *are* no IOMMUs in the system which are non-coherent, then we don't need to do it. And flushing the dcache is a *significant* performance hit. Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-
由 David Woodhouse 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-