- 29 5月, 2014 16 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Once again, these two functions look identical in the read and write case. Time to combine them together! Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Most of this code is the same for both the read and write paths, so combine everything and use the rw_ops when necessary. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
These functions are almost identical on both the read and write side. FLUSH_COND_STABLE will never be set for the read path, so leaving it in the generic code won't hurt anything. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
At this point, the read and write versions of this function look identical so both should use the same function. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Write adds a little bit of code dealing with flush flags, but since "how" will always be 0 when reading we can share the code. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The read and write paths set up this struct in exactly the same way, so create a single shared struct. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Combining these functions will let me make a single nfs_rw_common_ops struct (see the next patch). Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The read and write paths do exactly the same thing for the rpc_prepare rpc_op. This patch combines them together into a single function. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
I create a new struct nfs_rw_ops to decide the differences between reads and writes. This struct will be set when initializing a new nfs_pgio_descriptor, and then passed on to the nfs_rw_header when a new header is allocated. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
These functions are identical for the read and write paths so they can be combined. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The header had a pointer to the verifier that was set from the old write data struct. We don't need to keep the pointer around now that we have shared structures. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
The only difference is the write verifier field, but we can keep that for a little bit longer. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
At this point, the only difference between nfs_read_data and nfs_write_data is the write verifier. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Reads and writes have very similar results. This patch combines the two structs together with comments to show where the differing fields are used. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Reads and writes have very similar arguments. This patch combines them together and documents the few fields used only by write. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The write_pageio_init method is just a very convoluted way to grab the right nfs_pageio_ops vector. The vector to chose is not a choice of protocol version, but just a pNFS vs MDS I/O choice that can simply be done inside nfs_pageio_init_write based on the presence of a layout driver, and a new force_mds flag to the special case of falling back to MDS I/O on a pNFS-capable volume. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 16 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we suspect that the server may have cleared the suid/sgid bit, then mark the inode for revalidation. Reported-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
If the setting of NFS_INO_INVALIDATING gets reordered to before the clearing of NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA, then another task may hit a race window where both appear to be clear, even though the inode's pages are still in need of invalidation. Fix this by adding the appropriate memory barriers. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
There is a possible race in how the nfs_invalidate_mapping function is handled. Currently, we go and invalidate the pages in the file and then clear NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA. The problem is that it's possible for a stale page to creep into the mapping after the page was invalidated (i.e., via readahead). If another writer comes along and sets the flag after that happens but before invalidate_inode_pages2 returns then we could clear the flag without the cache having been properly invalidated. So, we must clear the flag first and then invalidate the pages. Doing this however, opens another race: It's possible to have two concurrent read() calls that end up in nfs_revalidate_mapping at the same time. The first one clears the NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA flag and then goes to call nfs_invalidate_mapping. Just before calling that though, the other task races in, checks the flag and finds it cleared. At that point, it trusts that the mapping is good and gets the lock on the page, allowing the read() to be satisfied from the cache even though the data is no longer valid. These effects are easily manifested by running diotest3 from the LTP test suite on NFS. That program does a series of DIO writes and buffered reads. The operations are serialized and page-aligned but the existing code fails the test since it occasionally allows a read to come out of the cache incorrectly. While mixing direct and buffered I/O isn't recommended, I believe it's possible to hit this in other ways that just use buffered I/O, though that situation is much harder to reproduce. The problem is that the checking/clearing of that flag and the invalidation of the mapping really need to be atomic. Fix this by serializing concurrent invalidations with a bitlock. At the same time, we also need to allow other places that check NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA to check whether we might be in the middle of invalidating the file, so fix up a couple of places that do that to look for the new NFS_INO_INVALIDATING flag. Doing this requires us to be careful not to set the bitlock unnecessarily, so this code only does that if it believes it will be doing an invalidation. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Scott Mayhew 提交于
We should always make sure the cached page is up-to-date when we're determining whether we can extend a write to cover the full page -- even if we've received a write delegation from the server. Commit c7559663 added logic to skip this check if we have a write delegation, which can lead to data corruption such as the following scenario if client B receives a write delegation from the NFS server: Client A: # echo 123456789 > /mnt/file Client B: # echo abcdefghi >> /mnt/file # cat /mnt/file 0�D0�abcdefghi Just because we hold a write delegation doesn't mean that we've read in the entire page contents. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.11+ Signed-off-by: NScott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Niels de Vos 提交于
A fileid in NFS is a uint64. There are some occurrences where dprintk() outputs a signed fileid. This leads to confusion and more difficult to read debugging (negative fileids matching positive inode numbers). Signed-off-by: NNiels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> CC: Santosh Pradhan <spradhan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 25 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 06 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we're doing buffered writes, and there is no file locking involved, then we don't have to worry about whether or not the lock owner information is identical. By relaxing this check, we ensure that fork()ed child processes can write to a page without having to first sync dirty data that was written by the parent to disk. Reported-by: NQuentin Barnes <qbarnes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Tested-by: NQuentin Barnes <qbarnes@gmail.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
WRITE and COMMIT can use the machine credential. If WRITE is supported and COMMIT is not, make all (mach cred) writes FILE_SYNC4. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
When an NFSv4 client loses contact with the server it can lose any locks that it holds. Currently when it reconnects to the server it simply tries to reclaim those locks. This might succeed even though some other client has held and released a lock in the mean time. So the first client might think the file is unchanged, but it isn't. This isn't good. If, when recovery happens, the locks cannot be claimed because some other client still holds the lock, then we get a message in the kernel logs, but the client can still write. So two clients can both think they have a lock and can both write at the same time. This is equally not good. There was a patch a while ago http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/41917 which tried to address some of this, but it didn't seem to go anywhere. That patch would also send a signal to the process. That might be useful but for now this patch just causes writes to fail. For NFSv4 (unlike v2/v3) there is a strong link between the lock and the write request so we can fairly easily fail any IO of the lock is gone. While some applications might not expect this, it is still safer than allowing the write to succeed. Because this is a fairly big change in behaviour a module parameter, "recover_locks", is introduced which defaults to true (the current behaviour) but can be set to "false" to tell the client not to try to recover things that were lost. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
We must avoid buffering a WRITE that is using a credential key (e.g. a GSS context key) that is about to expire or has expired. We currently will paint ourselves into a corner by returning success to the applciation for such a buffered WRITE, only to discover that we do not have permission when we attempt to flush the WRITE (and potentially associated COMMIT) to disk. Use the RPC layer credential key timeout and expire routines which use a a watermark, gss_key_expire_timeo. We test the key in nfs_file_write. If a WRITE is using a credential with a key that will expire within watermark seconds, flush the inode in nfs_write_end and send only NFS_FILE_SYNC WRITEs by adding nfs_ctx_key_to_expire to nfs_need_sync_write. Note that this results in single page NFS_FILE_SYNC WRITEs. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> [Trond: removed a pr_warn_ratelimited() for now] Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 22 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add tracepoints for inode attribute updates, attribute revalidation, writeback start/end fsync start/end, attribute change start/end, permission check start/end. The intention is to enable performance tracing using 'perf'as well as improving debugging. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Scott Mayhew 提交于
Currently nfs_updatepage allows a write to be extended to cover a full page only if we don't have a byte range lock lock on the file... but if we have a write delegation on the file or if we have the whole file locked for writing then we should be allowed to extend the write as well. Signed-off-by: NScott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> [Trond: fix up call to nfs_have_delegation()] Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the state recovery failed, we want to ensure that the application doesn't try to use the same file descriptor for more reads or writes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This patch ensures that we free the rpc_task after the cleanup callbacks are done in order to avoid a deadlock problem that can be triggered if the callback needs to wait for another workqueue item to complete. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>= 3.5]
-
- 21 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
nfs_migrate_page() does not wait for FS-Cache to finish with a page, probably leading to the following bad-page-state: BUG: Bad page state in process python-bin pfn:17d39b page:ffffea00053649e8 flags:004000000000100c count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:(null) index:38686 (Tainted: G B ---------------- ) Pid: 31053, comm: python-bin Tainted: G B ---------------- 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.x86_64 #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8111bfe7>] bad_page+0x107/0x160 [<ffffffff8111ee69>] free_hot_cold_page+0x1c9/0x220 [<ffffffff8111ef19>] __pagevec_free+0x59/0xb0 [<ffffffff8104b988>] ? flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x128/0x130 [<ffffffff8112230c>] release_pages+0x21c/0x250 [<ffffffff8115b92a>] ? remove_migration_pte+0x28a/0x2b0 [<ffffffff8115f3f8>] ? mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page+0x18/0x70 [<ffffffff81122687>] ____pagevec_lru_add+0x167/0x180 [<ffffffff811226f8>] __lru_cache_add+0x58/0x70 [<ffffffff81122731>] lru_cache_add_lru+0x21/0x40 [<ffffffff81123f49>] putback_lru_page+0x69/0x100 [<ffffffff8115c0bd>] migrate_pages+0x13d/0x5d0 [<ffffffff81122687>] ? ____pagevec_lru_add+0x167/0x180 [<ffffffff81152ab0>] ? compaction_alloc+0x0/0x370 [<ffffffff8115255c>] compact_zone+0x4cc/0x600 [<ffffffff8111cfac>] ? get_page_from_freelist+0x15c/0x820 [<ffffffff810672f4>] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x1c4/0x3c0 [<ffffffff8115290e>] compact_zone_order+0x7e/0xb0 [<ffffffff81152a49>] try_to_compact_pages+0x109/0x170 [<ffffffff8111e94d>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5ed/0x850 [<ffffffff814c9136>] ? thread_return+0x4e/0x778 [<ffffffff81150d43>] alloc_pages_vma+0x93/0x150 [<ffffffff81167ea5>] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x135/0x340 [<ffffffff814cb6f6>] ? rwsem_down_read_failed+0x26/0x30 [<ffffffff81136755>] handle_mm_fault+0x245/0x2b0 [<ffffffff814ce383>] do_page_fault+0x123/0x3a0 [<ffffffff814cbdf5>] page_fault+0x25/0x30 nfs_migrate_page() calls nfs_fscache_release_page() which doesn't actually wait - even if __GFP_WAIT is set. The reason that doesn't wait is that fscache_maybe_release_page() might deadlock the allocator as the work threads writing to the cache may all end up sleeping on memory allocation. However, I wonder if that is actually a problem. There are a number of things I can do to deal with this: (1) Make nfs_migrate_page() wait. (2) Make fscache_maybe_release_page() honour the __GFP_WAIT flag. (3) Set a timeout around the wait. (4) Make nfs_migrate_page() return an error if the page is still busy. For the moment, I'll select (2) and (4). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The writeback code is already capable of passing errors back to user space by means of the open_context->error. In the case of ENOSPC, Neil Brown is reporting seeing 2 errors being returned. Neil writes: "e.g. if /mnt2/ if an nfs mounted filesystem that has no space then strace dd if=/dev/zero conv=fsync >> /mnt2/afile count=1 reported Input/output error and the relevant parts of the strace output are: write(1, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 512) = 512 fsync(1) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) close(1) = -1 ENOSPC (No space left on device)" Neil then shows that the duplication of error messages appears to be due to the use of the PageError() mechanism, which causes filemap_fdatawait_range to return the extra EIO. The regression was introduced by commit 7b281ee0 (NFS: fsync() must exit with an error if page writeback failed). Fix this by removing the call to SetPageError(), and just relying on open_context->error reporting the ENOSPC back to fsync(). Reported-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Tested-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [3.6+]
-
- 11 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Jian reported that the following sequence would leave "testfile" with corrupt data: # mount localhost:/export /mnt/nfs/ -o vers=3 # echo abc > /mnt/nfs/testfile; echo def >> /export/testfile; echo ghi >> /mnt/nfs/testfile # cat -v /export/testfile abc ^@^@^@^@ghi While there's no locking involved here, the operations are serialized, so CTO should prevent corruption. The first write to the file is fine and writes 4 bytes. The file is then extended on the server. When it's reopened a GETATTR is issued and the size change is noticed. This causes NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA to be set on the file. Because the file is opened for write only, nfs_want_read_modify_write() returns 0 to nfs_write_begin(). nfs_updatepage then calls nfs_write_pageuptodate() to see if it should extend the nfs_page to cover the whole page. NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA is still set on the file at that point, but that flag is ignored and nfs_pageuptodate erroneously extends the write to cover the whole page, with the write done on the server side filled in with zeroes. This patch just has that function check for NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA in addition to NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE. This fixes the bug, but looking over the code, I wonder if we might have a similar bug in nfs_revalidate_size(). The difference between those two flags is very subtle, so it seems like we ought to be checking for NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA in most of the places that we look for NFS_INO_REVAL_PAGECACHE. I believe this is regression introduced by commit 8d197a56. The code did check for NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA prior to that patch. Original bug report is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885743 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.5+ Reported-by: NJian Li <jiali@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yanchuan Nian 提交于
The slab cache in nfs_commit_mempool is wrong, and I think it is just a slip. I tested it on a x86-32 machine, the size of nfs_write_header is 544, and the size of nfs_commit_data is 408, so it works fine. It is also true that sizeof(struct nfs_write_header) > sizeof(struct nfs_commit_data) on other platforms in my opinoin. Just fix it. Signed-off-by: NYanchuan Nian <ycnian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
...and ensure that we set the return value for nfs_page_async_flush() to zero! (Reported-by: Dros Adamson) Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 29 9月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server reboots before it can commit the unstable writes to disk, then nfs_commit_release_pages() will detect this when it compares the verifier returned by COMMIT to the one returned by WRITE. When this happens, the client needs to resend those writes in order to guarantee that they make it to stable storage. This patch adds a signalling mechanism to notify fsync() that it needs to retry all writes before it can exit. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want to be able to pass on the information that the page was not dirtied under a lock. Instead of adding a flag parameter, do this by passing a pointer to a 'struct nfs_lock_owner' that may be NULL. Also reuse this structure in struct nfs_lock_context to carry the fl_owner_t and pid_t. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 03 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...and ensure that we tear down the nfs_commit_data cache too when unloading the module. Cc: Bryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 01 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
GFP_NOFS is _more_ permissive than GFP_NOIO in that it will initiate IO, just not of any filesystem data. The problem is that previously NOFS was correct because that avoids recursion into the NFS code. With swap-over-NFS, it is no longer correct as swap IO can lead to this recursion. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
The VM does not like PG_private set on PG_swapcache pages. As suggested by Trond in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/25/348, this patch disables NFS data cache revalidation on swap files. as it does not make sense to have other clients change the file while it is being used as swap. This avoids setting PG_private on swap pages, since there ought to be no further races with invalidate_inode_pages2() to deal with. Since we cannot set PG_private we cannot use page->private which is already used by PG_swapcache pages to store the nfs_page. Thus augment the new nfs_page_find_request logic. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-