Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 04 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 29 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 10 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • D
      pcmcia: re-work pcmcia_request_irq() · eb14120f
      由 Dominik Brodowski 提交于 
      Instead of the old pcmcia_request_irq() interface, drivers may now
choose between:

- calling request_irq/free_irq directly. Use the IRQ from *p_dev->irq.

- use pcmcia_request_irq(p_dev, handler_t); the PCMCIA core will
  clean up automatically on calls to pcmcia_disable_device() or
  device ejection.

- drivers still not capable of IRQF_SHARED (or not telling us so) may
  use the deprecated pcmcia_request_exclusive_irq() for the time
  being; they might receive a shared IRQ nonetheless.

CC: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
CC: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
CC: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
      eb14120f
  7. 27 4月, 2010 4 次提交
  9. 13 4月, 2010 1 次提交
    • A
      MIPS: Fix SSB PCIcore IO resource management · 847253b9
      由 Andreas Ferber 提交于 
      The SSB PCIcore code reused the IO resource fixup code from the original
2.4.x Broadcom patch for BCM47xx based devices, which was a quick hack
for doing PCI IO resource configuration back then (the boot loader
doesn't configure PCI devices on this platform).

However, this code is no longer necessary since the kernel now can do
PCI resource management fine all by itself, so remove the old code.

When removing the code, it becomes obvious that the mem_offset setting
in the PCIcore driver was wrong, however this was masked by the fixup
code before, except in a few cases involving yenta_socket. For BCM47xx,
the correct offset is 0, and since this is the only device using PCIcore
in host mode, the offset can simply be removed unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Ferber <af@chaos-agency.de>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Markus Wigge <markus@cultcom.de>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/1070/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      847253b9
  11. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h

percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.

percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.

  http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py

The script does the followings.

* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
  only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
  gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.

* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
  blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
  to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
  core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
  alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
  doesn't seem to be any matching order.

* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
  because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
  an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
  file.

The conversion was done in the following steps.

1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
   over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
   and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
   files.

2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
   some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
   embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
   inclusions to around 150 files.

3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
   from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.

4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
   e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
   APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.

5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
   editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
   files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
   inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
   wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
   slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
   necessary.

6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.

7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
   were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
   distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
   more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
   build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).

   * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
   * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
   * s390 SMP allmodconfig
   * alpha SMP allmodconfig
   * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig

8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
   a separate patch and serve as bisection point.

Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  13. 11 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 20 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 16 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  19. 09 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  21. 04 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  23. 24 11月, 2009 3 次提交
  25. 11 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 09 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 28 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 23 9月, 2009 3 次提交
  33. 17 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  35. 15 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  37. 09 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  39. 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  41. 20 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  43. 14 8月, 2009 1 次提交
  45. 09 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  47. 03 7月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      MIPS: BC47xx: Fix SSB irq setup · ea4bbfd0
      由 matthieu castet 提交于 
      The current ssb irq setup in ssb_mipscore_init has the problem that it
configures some device on some irq without checking that the irq is not
taken by an other device.

For example in my case PCI host is on irq 0 and IPSEC on irq 3.
The current code:
  - store in dev->irq that IPSEC irq is 3 + 2
  - do a set_irq 0->3 on PCI host

But now IPSEC irq is not routed anymore to the mips code and dev->irq is
wrong.  This causes a problem described in [1].

This patch tries to solve the problem by making set_irq configure the
device we want to take the irq on the shared irq0. The previous example
becomes:
  - store in dev->irq that IPSEC irq is 3 + 2
  - do a set_irq 0->3 on PCI host:
  - irq 3 is already taken by IPSEC. do a set_irq 3->0 on IPSEC

I also added some code to print the irq configuration after irq setup to
allow easier debugging. And I add extra checking in ssb_mips_irq to report
device without irq or device with not routed irq.

[1] http://www.danm.de/files/src/bcm5365p/REPORTED_DEVICESSigned-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Acked-by : Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Tested-by: NFlorian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      ea4bbfd0
  49. 08 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  51. 28 3月, 2009 2 次提交
  53. 06 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  55. 10 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  57. 30 1月, 2009 1 次提交