1. 18 12月, 2015 3 次提交
  2. 27 11月, 2015 16 次提交
  3. 19 11月, 2015 4 次提交
  4. 16 11月, 2015 4 次提交
  5. 12 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 11 11月, 2015 2 次提交
  7. 09 11月, 2015 6 次提交
  8. 03 11月, 2015 3 次提交
  9. 29 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • C
      KVM: s390: use simple switch statement as multiplexer · 46b708ea
      Christian Borntraeger 提交于
      We currently do some magic shifting (by exploiting that exit codes
      are always a multiple of 4) and a table lookup to jump into the
      exit handlers. This causes some calculations and checks, just to
      do an potentially expensive function call.
      
      Changing that to a switch statement gives the compiler the chance
      to inline and dynamically decide between jump tables or inline
      compare and branches. In addition it makes the code more readable.
      
      bloat-o-meter gives me a small reduction in code size:
      
      add/remove: 0/7 grow/shrink: 1/1 up/down: 986/-1334 (-348)
      function                                     old     new   delta
      kvm_handle_sie_intercept                      72    1058    +986
      handle_prog                                  704     696      -8
      handle_noop                                   54       -     -54
      handle_partial_execution                      60       -     -60
      intercept_funcs                              120       -    -120
      handle_instruction                           198       -    -198
      handle_validity                              210       -    -210
      handle_stop                                  316       -    -316
      handle_external_interrupt                    368       -    -368
      
      Right now my gcc does conditional branches instead of jump tables.
      The inlining seems to give us enough cycles as some micro-benchmarking
      shows minimal improvements, but still in noise.
      Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
      46b708ea