Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

No need to malloc it any more.
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

If we don't store local data into global variables
it isn't necessary to lock anything.

v2: rebased on new SA interface
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

It never really belonged there in the first place.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

It isn't necessary any more and the suballocator seems to perform
even better.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Directly use the suballocator to get small chunks of memory.
It's equally fast and doesn't crash when we encounter a GPU reset.

v2: rebased on new SA interface.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

A startover with a new idea for a multiple ring allocator.
Should perform as well as a normal ring allocator as long
as only one ring does somthing, but falls back to a more
complex algorithm if more complex things start to happen.

We store the last allocated bo in last, we always try to allocate
after the last allocated bo. Principle is that in a linear GPU ring
progression was is after last is the oldest bo we allocated and thus
the first one that should no longer be in use by the GPU.

If it's not the case we skip over the bo after last to the closest
done bo if such one exist. If none exist and we are not asked to
block we report failure to allocate.

If we are asked to block we wait on all the oldest fence of all
rings. We just wait for any of those fence to complete.

v2: We need to be able to let hole point to the list_head, otherwise
    try free will never free the first allocation of the list. Also
    stop calling radeon_fence_signalled more than necessary.

v3: Don't free allocations without considering them as a hole,
    otherwise we might lose holes. Also return ENOMEM instead of ENOENT
    when running out of fences to wait for. Limit the number of holes
    we try for each ring to 3.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Use one wait queue for all rings. When one ring progress, other
likely does to and we are not expecting to have a lot of waiter
anyway.

Also add a fence_wait_any that will wait until the first fence
in the fence array (one fence per ring) is signaled. This allow
to wait on all rings.

v2: some minor cleanups and improvements.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Define the interface without modifying the allocation
algorithm in any way.

v2: rebase on top of fence new uint64 patch
v3: add ring to debugfs output
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Allocating and freeing it seperately.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Instead of offset + size keep start and end offset directly.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Make the suballocator self containing to locking.

v2: split the bugfix into a seperate patch.
v3: remove some unreleated changes.
Sig-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Some callers illegal called fence_wait_next/empty
while holding the ring emission mutex. So don't
relock the mutex in that cases, and move the actual
locking into the fence code.

v2: Don't try to unlock the mutex if it isn't locked.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Using 64bits fence sequence we can directly compare sequence
number to know if a fence is signaled or not. Thus the fence
list became useless, so does the fence lock that mainly
protected the fence list.

Things like ring.ready are no longer behind a lock, this should
be ok as ring.ready is initialized once and will only change
when facing lockup. Worst case is that we return an -EBUSY just
after a successfull GPU reset, or we go into wait state instead
of returning -EBUSY (thus delaying reporting -EBUSY to fence
wait caller).

v2: Remove left over comment, force using writeback on cayman and
    newer, thus not having to suffer from possibly scratch reg
    exhaustion
v3: Rebase on top of change to uint64 fence patch
v4: Change DCE5 test to force write back on cayman and newer but
    also any APU such as PALM or SUMO family
v5: Rebase on top of new uint64 fence patch
v6: Just break if seq doesn't change any more. Use radeon_fence
    prefix for all function names. Even if it's now highly optimized,
    try avoiding polling to often.
v7: We should never poll the last_seq from the hardware without
    waking the sleeping threads, otherwise we might lose events.
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This convert fence to use uint64_t sequence number intention is
to use the fact that uin64_t is big enough that we don't need to
care about wrap around.

Tested with and without writeback using 0xFFFFF000 as initial
fence sequence and thus allowing to test the wrap around from
32bits to 64bits.

v2: Add comment about possible race btw CPU & GPU, add comment
    stressing that we need 2 dword aligned for R600_WB_EVENT_OFFSET
    Read fence sequenc in reverse order of GPU write them so we
    mitigate the race btw CPU and GPU.

v3: Drop the need for ring to emit the 64bits fence, and just have
    each ring emit the lower 32bits of the fence sequence. We
    handle the wrap over 32bits in fence_process.

v4: Just a small optimization: Don't reread the last_seq value
    if loop restarts, since we already know its value anyway.
    Also start at zero not one for seq value and use pre instead
    of post increment in emmit, otherwise wait_empty will deadlock.
Signed-off-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

A single global mutex for ring submissions seems sufficient.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Nothing chipset or ring specific with it,
so also move it to radon_ring.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Don't hard code the 10 seconds timeout. Compute jobs
can run much longer.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

It isn't chipset specific, so it makes no sense
to have that inside r100.c.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Rings need to lock in order, otherwise
the ring subsystem can deadlock.

v2: fix error handling and number of locked doublewords.
v3: stop creating unneeded semaphores.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

It's never used and so practically superfluous.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

As discussed with Michel that name better
describes the behavior of this function.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Previusly multiple rings could trigger multiple GPU
resets at the same time.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Removing all the different error messages and
having just one standard behaviour over all
chipset generations.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

It makes no sense at all to have more than one flag.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Different rings have different criteria to test
if they are stuck.

v2: rebased on current drm-next
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Tested-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

- add support for rs6xx
- add support for DCE4/5
- fixup 6xx/7xx
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

RLC handles the interrupt controller and other tasks
on the GPU.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Currently the driver required 5 sets of ucode:
1. pfp - pre-fetch parser, part of the CP
2. me - micro engine, part of the CP
3. ce - constant engine, part of the CP
4. rlc - interrupt controller
5. mc - memory controller
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

This adds a new chunk id to the CS ioctl to support the
INDIRECT_BUFFER_CONST packet.

On SI, the CP adds a new engine called the CE (Constant Engine)
which runs simulatenously with the DE (Drawing Engine, formerly
called the ME).  This allows the CP to process two related IBs
simultaneously.  The CE is tasked with loading the constant data
(constant buffers, resource descriptors, samplers, etc.) while
the DE loads context register state and issues drawing commands.
It's up to the userspace application to sychronize the CE and the
DE using special synchronization packets.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

Only radeon_gem_object_unpin was used anymore, in only one place.
Signed-off-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

v2: fix typo.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König<christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NJerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>