Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 13
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      cifs: Wait for writebacks to complete before attempting write. · c11f1df5
      由 Sachin Prabhu 提交于 
      Problem reported in Red Hat bz 1040329 for strict writes where we cache
only when we hold oplock and write direct to the server when we don't.

When we receive an oplock break, we first change the oplock value for
the inode in cifsInodeInfo->oplock to indicate that we no longer hold
the oplock before we enqueue a task to flush changes to the backing
device. Once we have completed flushing the changes, we return the
oplock to the server.

There are 2 ways here where we can have data corruption
1) While we flush changes to the backing device as part of the oplock
break, we can have processes write to the file. These writes check for
the oplock, find none and attempt to write directly to the server.
These direct writes made while we are flushing from cache could be
overwritten by data being flushed from the cache causing data
corruption.
2) While a thread runs in cifs_strict_writev, the machine could receive
and process an oplock break after the thread has checked the oplock and
found that it allows us to cache and before we have made changes to the
cache. In that case, we end up with a dirty page in cache when we
shouldn't have any. This will be flushed later and will overwrite all
subsequent writes to the part of the file represented by this page.

Before making any writes to the server, we need to confirm that we are
not in the process of flushing data to the server and if we are, we
should wait until the process is complete before we attempt the write.
We should also wait for existing writes to complete before we process
an oplock break request which changes oplock values.

We add a version specific  downgrade_oplock() operation to allow for
differences in the oplock values set for the different smb versions.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NSachin Prabhu <sprabhu@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
      c11f1df5
  3. 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 12 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      cifs: fix the race in cifs_writev() · 19dfc1f5
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      O_APPEND handling there hadn't been completely fixed by Pavel's
patch; it checks the right value, but it's racy - we can't really
do that until i_mutex has been taken.

Fix by switching to __generic_file_aio_write() (open-coding
generic_file_aio_write(), actually) and pulling mutex_lock() above
inode_size_read().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      19dfc1f5
  7. 08 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 04 4月, 2014 2 次提交
  11. 02 4月, 2014 4 次提交
  13. 13 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      fs: push sync_filesystem() down to the file system's remount_fs() · 02b9984d
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Previously, the no-op "mount -o mount /dev/xxx" operation when the
file system is already mounted read-write causes an implied,
unconditional syncfs().  This seems pretty stupid, and it's certainly
documented or guaraunteed to do this, nor is it particularly useful,
except in the case where the file system was mounted rw and is getting
remounted read-only.

However, it's possible that there might be some file systems that are
actually depending on this behavior.  In most file systems, it's
probably fine to only call sync_filesystem() when transitioning from
read-write to read-only, and there are some file systems where this is
not needed at all (for example, for a pseudo-filesystem or something
like romfs).
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Cc: codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
      02b9984d
  15. 01 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 24 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  19. 15 2月, 2014 2 次提交
    • P
      CIFS: Fix too big maxBuf size for SMB3 mounts · 2365c4ea
      由 Pavel Shilovsky 提交于 
      SMB3 servers can respond with MaxTransactSize of more than 4M
that can cause a memory allocation error returned from kmalloc
in a lock codepath. Also the client doesn't support multicredit
requests now and allows buffer sizes of 65536 bytes only. Set
MaxTransactSize to this maximum supported value.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.7+
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
      2365c4ea
    • J
      cifs: ensure that uncached writes handle unmapped areas correctly · 5d81de8e
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      It's possible for userland to pass down an iovec via writev() that has a
bogus user pointer in it. If that happens and we're doing an uncached
write, then we can end up getting less bytes than we expect from the
call to iov_iter_copy_from_user. This is CVE-2014-0069

cifs_iovec_write isn't set up to handle that situation however. It'll
blindly keep chugging through the page array and not filling those pages
with anything useful. Worse yet, we'll later end up with a negative
number in wdata->tailsz, which will confuse the sending routines and
cause an oops at the very least.

Fix this by having the copy phase of cifs_iovec_write stop copying data
in this situation and send the last write as a short one. At the same
time, we want to avoid sending a zero-length write to the server, so
break out of the loop and set rc to -EFAULT if that happens. This also
allows us to handle the case where no address in the iovec is valid.

[Note: Marking this for stable on v3.4+ kernels, but kernels as old as
       v2.6.38 may have a similar problem and may need similar fix]

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.4+
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
      5d81de8e
  21. 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      [CIFS] Fix cifsacl mounts over smb2 to not call cifs · 42eacf9e
      由 Steve French 提交于 
      When mounting with smb2/smb3 (e.g. vers=2.1) and cifsacl mount option,
it was trying to get the mode by querying the acl over the cifs
rather than smb2 protocol.  This patch makes that protocol
independent and makes cifsacl smb2 mounts return a more intuitive
operation not supported error (until we add a worker function
for smb2_get_acl).

Note that a previous patch fixed getxattr/setxattr for the CIFSACL xattr
which would unconditionally call cifs_get_acl and cifs_set_acl (even when
mounted smb2). I made those protocol independent last week (new protocol
version operations "get_acl" and "set_acl" but did not add an
smb2_get_acl and smb2_set_acl yet so those now simply return EOPNOTSUPP
which at least is better than sending cifs requests on smb2 mount)

The previous patches did not fix the one remaining case though ie
mounting with "cifsacl" when getting mode from acl would unconditionally
end up calling "cifs_get_acl_from_fid" even for smb2 - so made that protocol
independent but to make that protocol independent had to make sure that the callers
were passing the protocol independent handle structure (cifs_fid) instead
of cifs specific _u16 network file handle (ie cifs_fid instead of cifs_fid->fid)

Now mount with smb2 and cifsacl mount options will return EOPNOTSUP (instead
of timing out) and a future patch will add smb2 operations (e.g. get_smb2_acl)
to enable this.
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
      42eacf9e
  23. 10 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      fix O_SYNC|O_APPEND syncing the wrong range on write() · d311d79d
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      It actually goes back to 2004 ([PATCH] Concurrent O_SYNC write support)
when sync_page_range() had been introduced; generic_file_write{,v}() correctly
synced
	pos_after_write - written .. pos_after_write - 1
but generic_file_aio_write() synced
	pos_before_write .. pos_before_write + written - 1
instead.  Which is not the same thing with O_APPEND, obviously.
A couple of years later correct variant had been killed off when
everything switched to use of generic_file_aio_write().

All users of generic_file_aio_write() are affected, and the same bug
has been copied into other instances of ->aio_write().

The fix is trivial; the only subtle point is that generic_write_sync()
ought to be inlined to avoid calculations useless for the majority of
calls.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      d311d79d
  25. 08 2月, 2014 4 次提交
  27. 31 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  29. 27 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  31. 20 1月, 2014 12 次提交
  33. 28 12月, 2013 3 次提交
  35. 25 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • S
      [CIFS] Do not use btrfs refcopy ioctl for SMB2 copy offload · f19e84df
      由 Steve French 提交于 
      Change cifs.ko to using CIFS_IOCTL_COPYCHUNK instead
of BTRFS_IOC_CLONE to avoid confusion about whether
copy-on-write is required or optional for this operation.

SMB2/SMB3 copyoffload had used the BTRFS_IOC_CLONE ioctl since
they both speed up copy by offloading the copy rather than
passing many read and write requests back and forth and both have
identical syntax (passing file handles), but for SMB2/SMB3
CopyChunk the server is not required to use copy-on-write
to make a copy of the file (although some do), and Christoph
has commented that since CopyChunk does not require
copy-on-write we should not reuse BTRFS_IOC_CLONE.

This patch renames the ioctl to use a cifs specific IOCTL
CIFS_IOCTL_COPYCHUNK.  This ioctl is particularly important
for SMB2/SMB3 since large file copy over the network otherwise
can be very slow, and with this is often more than 100 times
faster putting less load on server and client.

Note that if a copy syscall is ever introduced, depending on
its requirements/format it could end up using one of the other
three methods that CIFS/SMB2/SMB3 can do for copy offload,
but this method is particularly useful for file copy
and broadly supported (not just by Samba server).
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
      f19e84df