i915 is the only driver using those fields in the drm_gem_object
structure, so they only waste memory for all other drivers.

Move the fields into drm_i915_gem_object instead and patch the i915 code
with the following sed commands:

sed -i "s/obj->base.read_domains/obj->read_domains/g" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.c drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*/*.c
sed -i "s/obj->base.write_domain/obj->write_domain/g" drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*.c drivers/gpu/drm/i915/*/*.c

Change is only compile tested.

v2: move fields around as suggested by Chris.
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180216124338.9087-1-christian.koenig@amd.comSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Register Address for CNL_PORT_DW5_LN0_D is 0x162E54, but current code is
defining it as 0x162ED4. Similarly for CNL_PORT_DW7_LN0_D register address
is defined 0x162EDC instead of 0x162E5C, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Fixes: 04416108 ("drm/i915/cnl: Add registers related to voltage swing sequences.")
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180215095643.3844-2-mahesh1.kumar@intel.com

The frame counter may have got reset between disabling and enabling vblank
interrupts due to DMC putting the hardware to DC5/6 states if PSR was
active. The frame counter could also have stalled if PSR was active in case
there was no DMC. The frame counter resetting has a user visible impact
of screen freezes.

Make use of drm_vblank_restore() to compute missed vblanks for the duration
in which vblank interrupts were disabled and update the vblank counter with
this value as diff. There's no need to check if PSR was actually active in
the interrupt disabled duration, so simplify the check to a feature check.

Enabling vblank interrupts wakes up the hardware from DC5/6 and prevents it
from going back again as long as the there are pending interrupts. So, we
don't have to explicity disallow DC5/6 after enabling vblank interrupts to
keep the counter running.

This change is not applicable to CHV, as enabling interrupts does not
prevent the hardware from activating PSR.

v2: Added comments(Rodrigo) and rewrote commit message.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-10-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

The HW frame counter can get reset if device enters a low power state after
vblank interrupts were disabled. This messes up any following vblank count
update as a negative diff (huge unsigned diff) is calculated from the HW
frame counter change. We cannot ignore negative diffs altogther as there
could be legitimate wrap arounds. So, allow drivers to update vblank->count
with missed vblanks for the time interrupts were disabled. This is similar
to _crtc_vblank_on() except that vblanks interrupts are not enabled at the
end as this function is expected to be called from the driver
_enable_vblank() vfunc.

v2: drm_crtc_vblank_restore should take crtc as arg. (Chris)
    Add docs and sprinkle some asserts.

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-9-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

Updating vblank counts requires register reads and these reads may not
return meaningful values if the device was in a low power state after
vblank interrupts were last disabled. So, update the count only if vblank
interrupts are enabled. Secondly, this means the registers should be read
before disabling vblank interrupts.

v2: Don't check vblank->enabled outside it's lock (Chris)

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-8-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

570e8696 ("drm: Widen vblank count to 64-bits [v3]") changed the
return type for drm_crtc_vblank_count() to u64.

The flip ioctl receives a 32-bit target sequence from user space and is
compared against the current sequence from drm_crtc_vblank_count(). So,
typecast return from drm_crtc_vblank_count() explicitly to add clarity.

__drm_crtcs_state.last_vblank_count however only ever stores the value from
drm_crtc_vblank_count() and can be upgraded to u64.

Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-7-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

570e8696 ("drm: Widen vblank count to 64-bits [v3]") changed the
return type for drm_crtc_vblank_count() to u64. This could cause
potential problems if the return value is used in arithmetic operations
with a 32-bit reference HW vblank count. Explicitly typecasting this
down to u32 either fixes a potential problem or serves to add clarity in
case the implicit typecasting was already correct.

Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Acked-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-6-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

570e8696 ("drm: Widen vblank count to 64-bits [v3]") changed the
return type for drm_crtc_vblank_count() to u64. This could cause
potential problems if the return value is used in arithmetic operations
with a 32-bit reference HW vblank count. Explicitly typecasting this down
to u32 either fixes a potential problem or serves to add clarity in case
the implicit typecasting was already correct.

Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-5-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

570e8696 ("drm: Widen vblank count to 64-bits [v3]") changed the
return type for drm_crtc_vblank_count() to u64. This could cause
potential problems if the return value is used in arithmetic operations
with a 32-bit reference HW vblank count. Explicitly typecasting this down
to u32 either fixes a potential problem or serves to add clarity in case
the typecasting was implicitly done.

Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Reviewed-by: NHarry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> for both this patch
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-4-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

570e8696 ("drm: Widen vblank count to 64-bits [v3]") changed the
return type for drm_crtc_vblank_count() to u64, store all the bits
without truncating. There is no need to type cast this value down to
32-bits.

Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-3-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

Core returns a u64 vblank count and intel_crtc_get_vblank_counter()
expects a 32-bit value. Make the typecast explicit to add clarity.

Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-2-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

drm_vblank_count() has an u32 type returning what is a 64-bit vblank count.
The effect of this is when drm_wait_vblank_ioctl() tries to widen the user
space requested vblank sequence using this clipped 32-bit count(when the
value is >= 2^32) as reference, the requested sequence remains a 32-bit
value and gets queued like that. However, the code that checks if the
requested sequence has passed compares this against the 64-bit vblank
count.

With drm_vblank_count() returning all bits of the vblank count, update
drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count() so that drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event() queues
the correct sequence. Otherwise, this leads to prolonged waits for a vblank
sequence when the current count is >=2^32.

Finally, fix drm_wait_one_vblank() too.

v2: Commit message fix (Keith)
    Squash commits (Rodrigo)

Fixes: 570e8696 ("drm: Widen vblank count to 64-bits [v3]")
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180203051302.9974-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com

Fix inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR in shrink_boom.
The proper pointer to use is _explode_ instead of _purge_.

This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.

Fixes: fe215c8b ("drm/i915/selftests: add missing gtt shrinker test")
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214211234.GA22341@embeddedgusReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Rather than deriving the platform_mask from the
intel_device_static_info->platform at runtime, pre-fill it in the static
data.

v2: Undefine macros at end of their scope
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180215081930.11477-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Be consistent and define the device's GEN as part of the GENx_FEATURE.
It will be overridden by the next gen upon inheriting, as per usual.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180215081930.11477-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Rather than deriving the gen_mask from the static intel_device_info->gen
at runtime, pre-fill it in the static data.

v2: Undefine local macros at end of their scope.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180215081930.11477-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we presume that we have sufficient coverage of CI for new machines
and new code paths, we do not need to have user impacting WARN_ON for
programming errors inside i915_gem_gtt.c, so convert those over to
GEM_BUG_ON. This leaves the memory debugging WARN_ON in place as they
are not so easy to exercise with CI.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180215110759.28603-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As befitting a file dedicated to the mistakes of the past,

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ioc32.c:2: warning: Cannot understand  * \file i915_ioc32.c
 on line 2 - I thought it was a doc line
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ioc32.c:82: warning: Function parameter or member 'filp' not described in 'i915_compat_ioctl'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ioc32.c:82: warning: Function parameter or member 'cmd' not described in 'i915_compat_ioctl'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ioc32.c:82: warning: Function parameter or member 'arg' not described in 'i915_compat_ioctl'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214160720.19673-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Turns out -1 >= ARRAY_SIZE() is always true. Move the bounds check where
we know pipe >= 0 and next to the array indexing where it makes most
sense.

Fixes: 9965db26 ("drm/i915: Check for fused or unused pipes")
Fixes: 0b7029b7 ("drm/i915: Check for fused or unused pipes")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Reviewed-by: NDhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214173840.25360-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

We now have a stable cnl on our CI and it seems mostly
green without big risks of blank screen or anything
blowing up on linux installations in the future.

As a reminder i915.alpha_support was created to protect
future linux installation's iso images that might contain a
kernel from the enabling time of the new platform. Without this
protection most of linux installation was recommending
nomodeset option during installation that was getting stick
there after installation.

Specifically, alpha support says nothing about the development
state of the hardware, and everything about the state of the
driver in a kernel release.

This is semantically no different from the old
preliminary_hw_support flag, but the old one was all too often
interpreted as (preliminary hw) support instead of the intended
(preliminary) hw support, and it was misleading for everyone.
Hence the rename.

v2: Fix the typos and include more history about the parameter
rename on commit message. (Jani)

Reference: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-cnl-y3.html
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Saarinen <jani.saarinen@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214204205.4446-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com

Add one missing PCI ID and sort them in a way
that gets easier to review and compare against spec's
table.

When trying to sync libdrm and mesa id list with kernel
and spec I noticed something was wrong and we were missing
a pci id. So to make our lives easier when checking against
spec let's simplify and sort like spec does.

BSpec: 13621

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJames Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208073219.27860-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com

GENMASK_ULL wants the high bit of the mask first. The current value
cancels the in-fence when an out-fence is returned.

Fixes: fec0445c ("drm/i915: Support explicit fencing for execbuf")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_fence/keep-in-fence*
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214191827.8465-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12+

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:750: warning: Function parameter or member 'fifo_size' not described in 'intel_calculate_wm'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:5900: warning: Function parameter or member 'crtc' not described in 'intel_update_watermarks'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214140303.1561-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:569: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev_priv' not described in 'intel_PLL_is_valid'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:569: warning: Function parameter or member 'limit' not described in 'intel_PLL_is_valid'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:569: warning: Function parameter or member 'clock' not described in 'intel_PLL_is_valid'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:4769: warning: Function parameter or member 'crtc_state' not described in 'skl_update_scaler_plane'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:4769: warning: Excess function parameter 'state' description in 'skl_update_scaler_plane'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:4967: warning: Function parameter or member 'new_crtc_state' not described in 'intel_post_enable_primary'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:12650: warning: Function parameter or member 'new_state' not described in 'intel_prepare_plane_fb'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:12650: warning: Excess function parameter 'fb' description in 'intel_prepare_plane_fb'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:12763: warning: Function parameter or member 'old_state' not described in 'intel_cleanup_plane_fb'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:12763: warning: Excess function parameter 'fb' description in 'intel_cleanup_plane_fb'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214134922.28761-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c:198: warning: Function parameter or member 'state' not described in 'intel_crtc_destroy_state'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c:222: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_crtc' not described in 'intel_atomic_setup_scalers'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic.c:222: warning: Excess function parameter 'crtc' description in 'intel_atomic_setup_scalers'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214134922.28761-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Just a parameter name change that was lost to kerneldoc.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.c:209: warning: Function parameter or member 'xfer' not described in 'intel_uc_fw_upload'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc_fw.c:209: warning: Excess function parameter 'loader' description in 'intel_uc_fw_upload'

v2: Add the Returns:
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214105332.30230-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

During the recent upheaval to uc, the parameters to huc_ucode_xfer
were changed, but the kerneldoc left behind.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'huc_fw' not described in 'huc_ucode_xfer'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c:128: warning: Function parameter or member 'vma' not described in 'huc_ucode_xfer'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.c:128: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev_priv' description in 'huc_ucode_xfer'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214104040.4532-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Remove the kerneldoc markup applied to non-kerneldoc comments and
convert the multiline comments to the canonical style.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:313: warning: Function parameter or member 'encoder' not described in 'intel_enable_lvds'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:313: warning: Function parameter or member 'pipe_config' not described in 'intel_enable_lvds'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:313: warning: Function parameter or member 'conn_state' not described in 'intel_enable_lvds'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:453: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_lvds_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:453: warning: Function parameter or member 'force' not described in 'intel_lvds_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:471: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_lvds_get_modes'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:932: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev_priv' not described in 'intel_lvds_init'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c:932: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'intel_lvds_init'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Remove the kerneldoc markup applied to non-kerneldoc comments and
convert the multiline comments to the canonical style.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c:303: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_dvo_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c:303: warning: Function parameter or member 'force' not described in 'intel_dvo_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dvo.c:382: warning: Function parameter or member 'encoder' not described in 'intel_dvo_get_current_mode'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Regular comments where being marked up for kerneldoc, but were not
formatted properly. Remove the markup to remove the warnings.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ivch.c:192: warning: Function parameter or member 'dvo' not described in 'ivch_read'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ivch.c:192: warning: Function parameter or member 'addr' not described in 'ivch_read'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ivch.c:192: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'ivch_read'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The code describes what it is doing quite well; and that is now much
more complex than what the old comment would let you believe.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_crt.c:486: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_crt_detect_hotplug'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214092909.27040-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Split the 64b multiplication from the division so that it doesn't sprawl
across a couple of lines and use mul_u32_u32() instead of open-coding
the 64b conversion.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214091747.12753-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'source_min' not described in 'scale'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'source_max' not described in 'scale'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'target_min' not described in 'scale'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c:409: warning: Function parameter or member 'target_max' not described in 'scale'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214091747.12753-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214091747.12753-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Drop the kerneldoc markup from the non-kerneldoc comments and convert
the multi-line comments to the canonical format.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:223: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_sdvo' not described in 'intel_sdvo_write_sdvox'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:223: warning: Function parameter or member 'val' not described in 'intel_sdvo_write_sdvox'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:653: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_sdvo' not described in 'intel_sdvo_get_trained_inputs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:653: warning: Function parameter or member 'input_1' not described in 'intel_sdvo_get_trained_inputs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:653: warning: Function parameter or member 'input_2' not described in 'intel_sdvo_get_trained_inputs'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:2311: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev_priv' not described in 'intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c:2311: warning: Function parameter or member 'sdvo' not described in 'intel_sdvo_select_ddc_bus'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214090905.4747-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The ages old kerneldoc-esque comments still refer to the original stubs
and not the more complete functions. As they were only describing the
external entry points (or at least thought themselves to be, they had
drifted!), they don't provide any commentary for the code flow.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:379: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const struct tv_mode tv_modes[] = '
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1133: warning: bad line:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1140: warning: Function parameter or member 'intel_tv' not described in 'intel_tv_detect_type'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1140: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_tv_detect_type'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1272: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_tv_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1272: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctx' not described in 'intel_tv_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1272: warning: Function parameter or member 'force' not described in 'intel_tv_detect'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c:1351: warning: Function parameter or member 'connector' not described in 'intel_tv_get_modes'
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214085814.2565-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

So far models of the Dell Venue 8 Pro, with a panel with MIPI panel
index = 3, one of which has been kindly provided to me by Jan Brummer,
where not working with the i915 driver, giving a black screen on the
first modeset.

The problem with at least these Dells is that their VBT defines a MIPI
ASSERT sequence, but not a DEASSERT sequence. Instead they DEASSERT the
reset in their INIT_OTP sequence, but the deassert must be done before
calling intel_dsi_device_ready(), so that is too late.

Simply doing the INIT_OTP sequence earlier is not enough to fix this,
because the INIT_OTP sequence also sends various MIPI packets to the
panel, which can only happen after calling intel_dsi_device_ready().

This commit fixes this by splitting the INIT_OTP sequence into everything
before the first DSI packet and everything else, including the first DSI
packet. The first part (everything before the first DSI packet) is then
used as deassert sequence.

Changed in v2:
-Split the init OTP sequence into a deassert reset and the actual init
 OTP sequence, instead of calling it earlier and then having the first
 mipi_exec_send_packet() call call intel_dsi_device_ready().

Changes in v3:
-Move the whole shebang to intel_bios.c

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101205
Cc: Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
Reported-by: NJan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>
Tested-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214082151.25015-3-hdegoede@redhat.com

Make intel_bios_cleanup function free the DSI VBT data structures which
are memdup-ed by parse_mipi_config() and parse_mipi_sequence().
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214082151.25015-2-hdegoede@redhat.com

Add an intel_bios_cleanup() function to act as counterpart of
intel_bios_init() and move the cleanup of vbt related resources there,
putting it in the same file as the allocation.

Changed in v2:
-While touching the code anyways, remove the unnecessary:
 if (dev_priv->vbt.child_dev) done before kfree(dev_priv->vbt.child_dev)
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180214082151.25015-1-hdegoede@redhat.com

Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

We can implement limited RC6 counter wrap-around protection under the
assumption that clients will be reading this value more frequently than
the wrap period on a given platform.

With the typical wrap-around period being ~90 minutes, even with the
exception of Baytrail which wraps every 13 seconds, this sounds like a
reasonable assumption.

Implementation works by storing a 64-bit software copy of a hardware RC6
counter, along with the previous HW counter snapshot. This enables it to
detect wrap is polled frequently enough and keep the software copy
monotonically incrementing.

v2:
 * Missed GEN6_GT_GFX_RC6_LOCKED when considering slot sizing and
   indexing.
 * Fixed off-by-one in wrap-around handling. (Chris Wilson)

v3:
 * Simplify index checking by using unsigned int. (Chris Wilson)
 * Expand the comment to explain why indexing works.

v4:
 * Use __int128 if supported.

v5:
 * Use mul_u64_u32_div. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94852
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v3
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208160036.29919-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.comAcked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>